UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.DC 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.No    )

Filed by the Registrant  

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  

Check the appropriate box:

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

 

Definitive Additional Materials

 

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12under §240.14a-12

KLA Corporation

 

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Itsin its Charter)

 

      

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)all boxes that apply):

 

No fee required.

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which the transaction applies:

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which the transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of the transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of the transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

  Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.


LOGO

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.


LOGO

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

 

 

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

LOGO Notice of Annual Meeting of

    

(3)

Filing Party:

(4)

Date Filed:


LOGO

Stockholders

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERSNovember 2, 2022

November 5, 2019

To our stockholders:

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of KLA Corporation (“we”KLA,” “we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company”), a Delaware corporation, will be held on Tuesday,Wednesday, November 5, 20192, 2022, at 12:00 p.m., local time, PDT, in the Plus Building Three of our Milpitas facility,headquarters, located at ThreeOne Technology Drive, Milpitas, California 95035, for the following purposes:

 

1.

To elect the ten candidates nominated by our Board of Directors (the “Board”) to serve as directors for one yearone-year terms, each until his or her successor is duly elected.elected and qualified.

 

2.

To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2020.2023.

 

3.

To approve on anon-binding, advisory basis our named executive officer compensation.

 

4.4.

To consider a stockholder proposal requesting our Board to issue a report regarding net zero targets and climate transition planning, if properly presented at the meeting.

5.

To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof.

The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice.

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on September 9, 201912, 2022, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. A complete list of such stockholders will be open to the examination of any stockholder for a period of ten days prior to the Annual Meeting for a purpose germane to the Annual Meeting at the Company’s offices at One Technology Drive, Milpitas, California 95035.

Sincerely,For admission to the Annual Meeting, stockholders should come to the stockholder check-in table. Those who hold shares of our common stock in their own names should provide identification and have their ownership verified against the list of registered stockholders as of the close of business on the record date, September 12, 2022. Those who have beneficial ownership of stock through a broker, bank or other nominee must bring account statements or letters from the broker, bank or other nominee indicating that they owned our common stock as of the close of business on the record date, September 12, 2022. To vote at the meeting, those who have beneficial ownership of stock through a broker, bank or other nominee must bring a legal proxy, which can be obtained only from the broker, bank or other nominee.

 

 

LOGO
Sincerely,

LOGO

LOGO

Richard P. Wallace

President and Chief Executive Officer

Milpitas, California




This Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Proxy Statement and form of proxy are being made available electronically on or about September 20, 2019 and mailed on or about September 25, 2019.22, 2022.

 

All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting in person; however, regardless of whether you expect to attend the Annual Meeting in person, we encourage you to vote as soon as possible. You may vote by proxy over the Internet or by telephone, or, if you received paper copies of the proxy materials by mail, you can also vote by mail by following the instructions on the proxy card or voting instruction card. Voting over the Internet, by telephone or by written proxy or voting instruction card will ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting regardless of whether you attend in person.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION REGARDING MEETING ATTENDANCE

We are sensitive to the public health and travel concerns our stockholders may have regarding our in person Annual Meeting and recommendations that public health officials have issued and may issue in light of the continuing public health crisis caused by COVID-19. As a result, we will enforce appropriate protocols consistent with then applicable federal, state and local guidelines, mandates or recommendations or facility requirements. These requirements may include the use of face coverings, proof of vaccination and maintaining appropriate social distancing. We may also impose additional procedures or limitations on meeting attendees. We plan to announce any such updates on our website https://ir.kla.com/news-events, and we encourage you to vote as soon as possible. You may vote by proxy over the Internet or by telephone, or, if you received paper copies of the proxy materials by mail, you can also vote by mail by following the instructions on the proxy card or voting instruction card. Voting over the Internet, by telephone or by written proxy or voting instruction card will ensure your representation atcheck this website prior to the Annual Meeting regardless of whetherif you attend in person.plan to attend.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

 

TABLE OF CONTENTSi

 

LOGO Table of Contents

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

ii |Table of Contents

Helpful Resources

Annual Meeting

Proxy Statement & Annual Report

Board of Directors

Investor Relations

Environmental Social Governance (ESG)

Governance Documents

Corporate governance documents and policies, including:

    LOGO    Corporate Governance Standards

    LOGO    Committee Charters

    LOGO    Standards of Business Conduct

 

iLOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGOLOGO

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF

KLA CORPORATION

TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 5, 2019

PROXY STATEMENT 1

 

LOGO Proxy Summary

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS REGARDING PROXY MATERIALS

1.

WHY AM I RECEIVING COPIES OF THESE MATERIALS?

The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of KLA Corporation (“KLA,” the “Company” or “we”) is providing these proxy materials to you in connection with KLA’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Tuesday, November 5, 2019 at 12:00 p.m., local time (the “Annual Meeting”). As a stockholder, you are invited to attend the Annual Meeting, which will be held in Building Three of our Milpitas facility, located at Three Technology Drive, Milpitas, California 95035. The purposesThis summary does not contain all of the Annual Meeting are set forth ininformation you should consider when casting your vote. You should read the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and thiscomplete Proxy Statement.

These proxy solicitation materials, together with our Annual Report for fiscal year 2019, were first made available electronically on or about September 20, 2019 and mailed on or about September 25, 2019 to all stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Our principal executive offices are located at One Technology Drive, Milpitas, California 95035, and our telephone number is(408) 875-3000.Statement before voting.

 

 

2.

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

LOGO

HOW MAY I OBTAIN KLA’S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM10-K?Time and Date

12:00 p.m. PDT November 2, 2022                        

LOGO

Place

One Technology Drive, Milpitas,

California 95035

LOGO

Record Date

Close of business on September 12, 2022    

A copy of our Annual Report on Form10-K

STOCKHOLDER VOTING MATTERS for fiscal year 2019 is available free of charge on the Internet from the website of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) athttp://www.sec.gov,as well as on our website athttp://ir.KLA.com.

 

 

3.

WHY DID I RECEIVE A NOTICE IN THE MAIL REGARDING THE INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF THE PROXY MATERIALS INSTEAD OF A PAPER COPY OF THE PROXY MATERIALS?Proposal

We are again mailing to our stockholders a notice regarding the Internet availability of the proxy materials instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials. All stockholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials over the Internet and request to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request a paper copy may be found in the notice. In addition, the notice contains instructions on how you may request access to proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically on an ongoing basis.

4.

HOW CAN I ACCESS THE PROXY MATERIALS OVER THE INTERNET?

Your notice regarding the Internet availability of the proxy materials, proxy card or voting instruction card will contain instructions on how to:

uBoard’s Voting
Recommendation
 

Access and view our proxy materials for the Annual Meeting on the Internet; and

uPage
Reference
 

Instruct us to send our future proxy materials to you electronically bye-mail.

Our proxy materials are also available on our website at the following address:http://www.KLA.com/annualmeeting.

Your notice regarding the Internet availability of the proxy materials, proxy card or voting instruction card will contain instructions on how you may request access to proxy materials electronically on an ongoing basis. Choosing to access your future proxy materials electronically will help us conserve natural resources and reduce the costs of printing and distributing our proxy materials. If you choose to access future proxy materials electronically, you will receive ane-mail with instructions containing a link to the website where those materials are available and a link to the proxy voting website. Your election to access proxy materials bye-mail will remain in effect until you terminate it.

 

5.

HOW MAY I OBTAIN A PAPER COPY OF THE PROXY MATERIALS?LOGO

Stockholders receiving a notice regarding the Internet availability of the proxy materials will find instructions in that notice about how to obtain a paper copy of the proxy materials free of charge. Stockholders who have previously submitted a standing request to receive paper copies of our proxy materials will receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail.

6.

WHAT SHOULD I DO IF I RECEIVE MORE THAN ONE SET OF VOTING MATERIALS?

You may request delivery of a single copy of our future proxy statements and annual reports by writing to the address provided in the answer to Question 7 below or calling our Investor Relations department at the telephone number below. Stockholders may also request electronic delivery of future proxy statements by writing to the address below, by calling our Investor Relations department at(408) 875-3000 or via our website athttp://ir.KLA.com.

7.

I RECEIVED ONE COPY OF THESE MATERIALS. MAY I GET ADDITIONAL COPIES?

Certain stockholders who share an address are being delivered only one copy of this Proxy Statement. You may receive additional copies of this Proxy Statement without charge by sending a written request to KLA Corporation, Attention: Investor Relations, One Technology Drive, Milpitas, California 95035. Requests may also be made by calling our Investor Relations department at(408) 875-3000.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS REGARDING THE ANNUAL MEETING

8.

WHO MAY VOTE AT THE ANNUAL MEETING?

You may vote at the Annual Meeting if our records showed that you owned shares of KLA Common Stock as of the close of business on September 9, 2019 (the “Record Date”). At the close of business on that date, we had a total of 158,462,804 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding, which were held of record by approximately 379 stockholders. As of the Record Date, we had no shares of Preferred Stock outstanding. You are entitled to one vote for each share that you own.

The Annual Meeting will be held if a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote is represented at the Annual Meeting. If you have returned valid proxy instructions or attend the Annual Meeting in person, your shares of Common Stock will be counted for the purpose of determining whether there is a quorum, even if you wish to abstain from voting on some or all matters at the Annual Meeting.

9.

WHAT PROPOSALS ARE BEING VOTED ON AT THE ANNUAL MEETING?

In addition to such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof, the following three proposals will be presented at the Annual Meeting:

u  

Election of ten candidates nominated by our Board to serve as directors forone-year terms;10 Directors Named in this Proxy Statement


LOGO FOR

Each Nominee


 

4
u

LOGO

  

Ratification of the appointmentAppointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

LOGO FOR28

LOGO

Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation

LOGO FOR30 2020;

LOGO

Stockholder Proposal – Report on Net Zero Targets and Climate Transition Planning

LOGO  AGAINST71

 

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

2  |Proxy Summary

OUR DIRECTOR NOMINEES

Nominee and Principal
Occupation
     Director
Since
 

Current Other Public Company Boards

 LOGO  Committees* LOGO
 Independent     Age     AC CTC NGC

Robert Calderoni

Chairman and Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of Citrix Systems, Inc.

 Yes 62 2007 

LOGO  Citrix Systems, Inc.

LOGO  Ansys, Inc.

 Chair   

🌑

Jeneanne Hanley

Former Senior Vice President and President of E-Systems Division of Lear Corporation

 Yes 49 2019 

LOGO  QuantumScape Corporation

   🌑  

Emiko Higashi

Founder of Tohmon Capital Partners, LLC

 Yes 63 2010 

LOGO  Takeda Pharmaceutical Company

LOGO  Rambus, Inc.

LOGO  One Equity Partners Open Water I Corp.

   🌑  

Kevin Kennedy

Chief Executive Officer of Quanergy Systems, Inc.

 Yes 66 2007 

LOGO  Digital Realty Trust, Inc.

LOGO  Quanergy Systems, Inc.

 🌑   🌑

Gary Moore

Former Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ServiceSource International, Inc.

 Yes 73 2014 

LOGO  None

   Chair  

Marie Myers

Chief Transformation Officer and Chief Financial Officer of HP, Inc.

 Yes 54 2020 

LOGO  F5 Networks, Inc.

 

🌑

    

Kiran Patel

Former Executive Vice President and General Manager, Small Business Group of Intuit, Inc.

 Yes 74 2008 

LOGO  None

 🌑   🌑

Victor Peng

President, Adaptive and Embedded Computing Group of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

 Yes 62 2019 

LOGO  None

   🌑  

Robert Rango

President and Chief Executive Officer of Enevate Corporation

 Yes 64 2014 

LOGO  Keysight Technologies, Inc.

 🌑    

Richard Wallace

President and Chief Executive Officer of KLA Corporation

 No 62 2006 

LOGO  None

      

* As of September 12, 2022

AC = Audit Committee                 CTC = Compensation and Talent Committee                 NGC = Nominating and Governance Committee

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

3

GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

LOGO

Board and Governance Information*

Size of the Board

10Independent ChairYes

Number of Independent Directors

9Proxy AccessYes

Average Age of Directors

64Stockholder Action by Written ConsentNo

Average Tenure of Directors

9.6 yearsStockholder Ability to Call Special MeetingNo

Annual Election of Directors

YesPoison PillNo

Women

30%Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors and Executive OfficersYes

Ethnic/Racial Diversity

30%Anti-Hedging and Pledging PoliciesYes

Majority Voting in Director Elections

YesClawback PolicyYes

* The information in this table reflects only the directors nominated

LOGO Fiscal Year 2022

    Performance Highlights

(Dollars in thousands)

uTotal revenues

$9,211,883

LOGO 33.1% since FY21

  

Non-binding,Net income attributable to KLA advisory approval of our named executive officer compensation.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS REGARDING PROXY SOLICITATION AND VOTING

 

10.

HOW CAN I VOTE IF I OWN SHARES REGISTERED DIRECTLY IN MY NAME?

Most stockholders do not own shares registered directly in their name, but rather are “beneficial holders” of shares held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee (that is, shares held “in street name”). Those stockholders should refer to Question 11 below for instructions regarding how to vote their shares.

If, however, your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, you are considered, with respect to those shares, the stockholder of record, and these proxy materials are being sent directly to you. You may vote in the following ways:

u$3,321,807

By Telephone: Votes may be cast by telephone prior to 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on November 4, 2019. To vote by telephone, you will need the control number that appears on your notice of the availability of the proxy materials (whether you received that notice by mail ore-mail) or your proxy card or voting instruction card;

u

By Internet: Votes may be cast through the Internet voting site prior to 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on November 4, 2019. To vote through the Internet, please follow the instructions for Internet voting contained in your notice of the availability of the proxy materials (whether you received that notice by mail ore-mail) or your proxy card or voting instruction card;

u

By Mail: Stockholders who have received a paper copy of a proxy card or voting instruction card by mail may also vote by mail, as long as the proxy card or voting instruction card is timely delivered. To vote by mail, you must complete, sign and date your proxy card or voting instruction card and mail it in the accompanyingpre-addressed envelope, and it must be delivered prior to 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on November 4, 2019; or

u

In Person: Attend the Annual Meeting and vote your shares in person.

Whichever of these methods you select to transmit your instructions, the proxy holders will vote your shares in accordance with those instructions.

If you vote by telephone, Internet or mail without giving specific voting instructions, your shares will be voted FOR Proposal One (the election of the ten nominees listed herein for the Board), FOR Proposal Two (the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm), and FOR Proposal Three (thenon-binding, advisory approval of our named executive officer compensation).

When proxies are properly dated, executed and returned (whether by telephone, Internet or returned proxy card), the shares represented by such proxies will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions of the stockholder. However, if no specific instructions are given, the shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of our Board and as the proxy holders may determine in their discretion with respect to any other matters that properly come before the meeting.

 

 

11.

LOGO 59.8% since FY21

HOW MAY I VOTE IF MY SHARES ARE HELD IN A STOCK BROKERAGE ACCOUNT, OR BY A BANK OR OTHER NOMINEE?

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held “in street name,” and your broker or nominee is considered thestockholder of record with respect to those shares. Your broker or nominee should be forwarding these proxy materials to you. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker how to vote, and you are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting. However, since you are not the stockholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the Annual Meeting. If a broker, bank or other nominee holds your shares, you will receive instructions from them that you must follow to have your shares voted.

12.

CAN I CHANGE MY VOTE?

You may change your vote at any time prior to the vote at the Annual Meeting. To change your proxy instructions if you are a stockholder of record, you must:

u  

Advise our Corporate Secretary in writing at our principal executive offices, before the proxy holders vote your shares, that you wish to revoke your proxy instructions; orDividends and stock
repurchases

 

u$4,606,334

Deliver proxy instructions dated after your earlier proxy instructions, in any of the voting methods described in the response to Question 10 above.

If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, you should contact the broker, bank or other nominee that holds your shares for instructions regarding how to change your vote.

 

 

13.

WHO WILL BEAR THE COST OF THIS PROXY SOLICITATION?

KLA is making this proxy solicitation, and we will pay the entire cost of this solicitation, including preparing, assembling, printing, mailing and distributing the notices and these proxy materials and soliciting votes. We have retained the services of D.F. King & Co., Inc. to aid in the solicitation of proxies from brokers, bank nominees and other institutional owners. We estimate that we will pay D.F. King fees of approximately $6,000 (plus reimbursement ofout-of-pocket expenses) for this solicitation activity, forwarding solicitation material to beneficial and registered stockholders and processing the results. Certain of our Directors, officers and regular employees, without additional compensation, may solicit proxies personally or by telephone.

14.

CAN MY BROKER VOTE MY SHARES IF I DO NOT INSTRUCT HIM OR HER HOW I WOULD LIKE MY SHARES VOTED?

Yes, but only on limited types of proposals. If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the “beneficial” owner of shares held “in street name,” and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your broker or nominee (the “record holder”) along with a voting card. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your record holder how to vote your shares, and your record holder is required to vote your shares in accordance with your instructions. Record holders donot have discretion to vote your shares on Proposal One or Proposal Three, in each case in the absence of specific instructions from you (the beneficial owner). Therefore, if you do not give instructions to your record holder, the record holder will only be entitled to vote your shares in its discretion on Proposal Two.

15.

ARE ABSTENTIONS AND BROKERNON-VOTESLOGO 207.5% since FY21 COUNTED?

Shares that are voted “FOR,” “AGAINST,” or “ABSTAIN” are treated as being present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum and are also treated as shares entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting (“Votes Cast”).

For each proposal, you are able to vote your shares “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN.” Shares that are voted without giving specific voting instructions will be voted as described in the answers to Questions 10 and 14. Abstentions will have no effect on the outcome of Proposal One. Abstentions with respect to Proposal Two and Proposal Three will have the same effect as a vote against that proposal.

Proposals Two and Three arenon-binding advisory votes, for which our Board and its Committees will give careful consideration to the voting results.

For all proposals, shares that are subject to a brokernon-vote are counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists but not for purposes of determining whether a proposal has passed.

16.

HOW DOES THE BOARD RECOMMEND THAT I VOTE?

The Board recommends that stockholders vote as follows:

u

“FOR” the election of the ten candidates nominated by the Board to serve as directors: Edward Barnholt, Robert Calderoni, Jeneanne Hanley, Emiko Higashi, Kevin Kennedy, Gary Moore, Kiran Patel, Victor Peng, Robert Rango and Richard Wallace;

u

“FOR” the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2020; and

u

“FOR” the approval of our named executive officer compensation.

 

17.

WILL ANY OTHER BUSINESS BE TRANSACTED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING?

We are not aware of any matters to be presented other than those described in thisLOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement. In the unlikely event that any matters not described in this Proxy Statement are properly presented at the Annual Meeting, the proxy holders will use their own judgment to determine how to vote.

18.

WHAT HAPPENS IF THE ANNUAL MEETING IS ADJOURNED OR POSTPONED?

If the Annual Meeting is adjourned or postponed, the proxy holders can vote your shares on the new meeting date as well, unless you have properly revoked your proxy instructions.

19.

WHERE CAN I FIND THE VOTING RESULTS OF THE ANNUAL MEETING?

We intend to announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and publish final results in a Current Report on Form8-K to be filed with the SEC within four business days following the Annual Meeting.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS REGARDING STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS, DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS BY STOCKHOLDERS AND RELATED BYLAW PROVISIONS

20.

CAN I PRESENT OTHER BUSINESS TO BE TRANSACTED FROM THE FLOOR AT THE ANNUAL MEETING?

A stockholder may only present a matter from the floor of a meeting of stockholders for consideration at that meeting if certain procedures set forth in our bylaws are followed, including delivery of advance notice by such stockholder to us. We have not received any timely notice with respect to the Annual Meeting regarding the presentation by a stockholder of business from the floor of the meeting. Accordingly, we do not expect to acknowledge any business presented from the floor at the Annual Meeting.

21.

WHAT IS THE DEADLINE TO PROPOSE ACTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION AT NEXT YEAR’S ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS?

You may submit proposals for consideration at future stockholder meetings. For a stockholder proposal to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement for next year’s annual meeting of stockholders, our Corporate Secretary must receive the written proposal at our principal executive offices no later than May 31, 2020. Such proposals also must comply with SEC regulations underRule 14a-8 regarding the inclusion of stockholder proposals in company-sponsored proxy materials. Proposals should be addressed to:

Corporate Secretary

KLA Corporation

One Technology Drive

Milpitas, California 95035

Fax:(408) 875-4266

For a stockholder proposal that is not intended to be included in our proxy statement underRule 14a-8, the stockholder must provide the information required by our bylaws and give timely notice to our Corporate Secretary in accordance with our bylaws, which, in general, require that the notice be received by our Corporate Secretary:

u

No earlier than the close of business on July 10, 2020, and

u

No later than the close of business on August 9, 2020.

If the date of the stockholders’ meeting is moved more than 30 days before or 60 days after November 5, 2020, then notice of a stockholder proposal that is not intended to be included in our proxy statement underRule 14a-8 must be


received no earlier than the close of business 120 days prior to the meeting and no later than the close of business on the later of the following two dates:LOGO

u

90 days prior to the meeting; and

u

10 days after public announcement of the meeting date.

22.

HOW MAY I RECOMMEND OR NOMINATE INDIVIDUALS TO SERVE AS DIRECTORS?

You may propose Director candidates for consideration by the Board’s Nominating and Governance Committee. Any such recommendations should include the nominee’s name and qualifications for Board membership and should be directed to our Corporate Secretary at the address of our principal executive offices set forth in Question 21 above.

In addition, our bylaws permit stockholders to nominate directors for election at an annual meeting of stockholders. To nominate a director, the stockholder must deliver the information required by our bylaws and a statement by the nominee acknowledging that he or she will owe a fiduciary obligation to KLA and its stockholders.

23.

WHAT IS THE DEADLINE TO PROPOSE OR NOMINATE INDIVIDUALS TO SERVE AS DIRECTORS?

A stockholder may send a proposed Director candidate’s name and information to the Board at any time. Generally, such proposed candidates are considered at the first or second Nominating and Governance Committee meeting prior to the annual meeting of stockholders.

To nominate an individual for election at an annual meeting of stockholders, the stockholder must give timely notice to our Corporate Secretary in accordance with our bylaws, which, for next year’s annual meeting of stockholders, will generally require that the notice be received by our Corporate Secretary between the close of business on July 10, 2020 and the close of business on August 9, 2020, unless the annual meeting is moved by more than 30 days before or 60 days after November 5, 2020, in which case the deadline will be as described in the last paragraph of Question 21 above.

24.

HOW MAY I OBTAIN A COPY OF KLA’S BYLAWS?

For a free copy of our bylaws, please contact our Investor Relations department at(408) 875-3000. A copy of our bylaws is also available free of charge on the Internet on our website athttp://ir.KLA.com and on the SEC’s website athttp://www.sec.gov.

 

PROPOSAL ONE:4  |

ELECTION OF DIRECTORSProposal One: Election of Directors

 

NomineesLOGO Proposal One: Election of

    Directors

NOMINEES

Ten incumbent Directorsdirectors are nominated for election at the Annual Meeting. We would like to thank John Dickson and Ana Pinczuk, who are not being nominated for another term, for their service on the Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee, consisting solely of independent Directorsdirectors as determined under the rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market, recommended the nominees listed in this Proposal One. Based on that recommendation, the members of the Board resolved to nominate such individuals for election.

Information regarding the business experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of each nominee is provided below under the section entitled “Nominees for Election at the 20192022 Annual Meeting.”

There are no family relationships among our executive officers and directors.

The ten candidates nominated by the Board for election as Directorsdirectors by the stockholders are:

 

u    LOGO   Robert Calderoni; 

Edward Barnholt;

    LOGO   Marie Myers;

u    LOGO   Jeneanne Hanley; 

Robert Calderoni;

    LOGO   Kiran Patel;

u    LOGO   Emiko Higashi; 

Jeneanne Hanley;

    LOGO   Victor Peng;

u    LOGO   Kevin Kennedy; 

Emiko Higashi;

    LOGO   Robert Rango; and

u    LOGO   Gary Moore; 

Kevin Kennedy;

u

Gary Moore;

u

Kiran Patel;

u

Victor Peng;

u

Robert Rango; and

u

    LOGO   Richard Wallace.

If elected, each nominee will serve as a Directordirector for aone-year term expiring at our 20202023 annual meeting of stockholders. Each Directordirector will hold office until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified, or until his or her death, resignation or removal. If any nominee declines to serve or becomes unavailable for any reason, or a vacancy occurs before the election, the proxies may be voted for such substitute nominees as the Board may designate. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Board is not aware of any nominee who is unable or who will decline to serve as a Director.director.

VOTE REQUIRED AND RECOMMENDATION

Vote Required and Recommendation

Under our bylaws, in any uncontested election of Directorsdirectors (an election in which the number of nominees does not exceed the number of Directorsdirectors to be elected), any nominee who receives a greater number of votes cast “FOR” his or her election than votes cast “AGAINST” his or her election will be elected. In accordance with our bylaws, the Nominating and Governance Committee has established procedures under which any Directordirector who is not elected shall offer to tender his or her resignation to the Board following certification of the stockholder vote. The Nominating and Governance Committee, composed entirely of independent Directors,directors, will consider the offer of resignation and recommend to the Board the action to be taken. The Board will take action on the recommendation, and we will publicly disclose the Board’s decision and the rationale behind it, within 90 days following certification of the stockholder vote. In making their respective decisions, the Nominating and Governance Committee and Board will take into consideration all factors they deem relevant. The Directordirector who tenders his or her resignation will not participate in the decisions of the Nominating and Governance Committee or the Board regarding his or her resignation.

 

The Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” each of the Director nominees, with the Directors who are nominees abstaining with respect to their own nomination.

LOGOThe Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” each of the director nominees, with the Directors who are nominees abstaining with respect to their own nomination.

 

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

5

INFORMATION ABOUT LOGO Information About the

    Board of Directors and its

    Committees

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ITS COMMITTEES

The Board of Directors

Our Board held a total of sixfour meetings during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019.2022. All Directorsdirectors other than Mr. Wallace are independent within the meaning of the NASDAQ Stock Market director independence standards.

The Board has three standing committees: the Audit Committee;Committee, the Compensation Committee;and Talent Committee, and the Nominating and Governance Committee. Each Committeecommittee is comprised entirely of independent directors, meets regularly and has a written charter approved by the Board, all of which are available on our website athttp://ir.KLA.com, along with our Standards of Business Conduct, Corporate Governance Standards and other governance-related information. The Board and each Committeecommittee regularly review the Committeecommittee charters. In addition, at each quarterly Board meeting, a member of each Committeecommittee reports on any significant matters addressed by the Committee.committee.

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019,2022, each of the incumbent Directorsdirectors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings (a) of the Board held during the period for which such person served as a Directordirector and (b) held by all Board committees on which such Directordirector served (during the periods that such Directordirector served).

Although we do not have a formal policy mandating attendance by members of the Board at our annual meetings of stockholders, we do have a formal policy encouraging their attendance at such meetings. All of the Directorsdirectors serving on our Board at the time attended last year’s annual meeting of stockholders, with the exception of Mr. Calderoni.stockholders.

Board Leadership Structure

KLA currently separates the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. Since October 2006, Edward Barnholt,In August 2022, our Board nominated Robert Calderoni, one of our independent Directors, has serveddirectors, to serve as our Chairman of the Board.Board, effective at the Annual Meeting, in light of Edward Barnholt’s term ending on November 2, 2022. The responsibilities of the Chairman of the Board include: setting the agenda for each Board meeting, in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer; chairing the meetings of the Board; presiding at executive sessions; facilitating and conducting, with the Nominating and Governance Committee, the annual self-assessments by the Board and each standing Committeecommittee of the Board; and conducting, with the Compensation and Talent Committee, a formal evaluation of the Chief Executive Officer in the context of compensation reviews.

Separating the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board allows our Chief Executive Officer to focus on ourday-to-day business, while allowing the Chairman of the Board to lead the Board in its fundamental role of providing advice to and independent oversight of management. The Board believes that having an independent Directordirector serve as Chairman of the Board is the appropriate leadership structure for the CompanyKLA at this time.

However, our Corporate Governance Standards permit the roles of the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer to be filled by the same or different individuals. This provides the Board with flexibility to determine whether the two roles should be combined in the future based on our needs and the Board’s assessment of the Company’sour leadership from time to time. Our Corporate Governance Standards provide that, in the event that the Chairman of the Board is not an independent Director, the independent members of the Board will designate a “lead independent director.”

The Board’s Role in Oversight of Risk

Our Board, as a whole and through its Committees,committees, has responsibility for the oversight of risk management. In its oversight role, our Board has the responsibility to satisfy itself that the risk management processes designed and implemented by management are adequate and functioning as designed. The involvement of the Board in working with management to establish our business strategy at least annually is a key part of its oversight of risk management, its assessment of

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

6  |Information about the Board of Directors and its Committees

management’s appetite for risk and its determination of what constitutes an appropriate level of risk for KLA. In addition, the Board periodically conducts a comprehensive review of the Company’sour overall risk environment and its risk management efforts. The Board and its Committeescommittees also regularly receive updates from management (including representatives of our legal and internal audit teams) regarding certain risks that we face, including industry, business, macroeconomic, litigation, cybersecurity and other operating risks.

While our Board is ultimately responsible for risk oversight, our Board has delegated to the Audit Committee the primary responsibility for the active oversight of our enterprise risk management activities. Our Audit Committee is not only responsible for overseeing risk management of financial matters, the adequacy of our risk-related internal controls, financial reporting and internal investigations, and cybersecurity, but its charter also provides that the Audit Committee will discuss at least annually KLA’s risk assessment, enterprise risk management processes and major financial risk exposures, as well as the steps our management has taken to monitor and control those exposures. Our Audit Committee reports its findings and activities to the Board at each quarterly Board meeting.

In addition, our other Board committees each oversee certain aspects of risk management. Our Compensation and Talent Committee oversees risks related to our compensation and human capital policies and practices, and our Nominating and Governance Committee oversees governance-related risks, such as Board independence, environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) matters, conflicts of interest as well asand management and director succession planning. The Committees report their findings and activities to the Board.

While the Board is responsible for risk oversight, management is responsible for risk management. KLA maintains an effective internal controls environment and has processes to identify and manage risk, including an executive risk council comprised of representatives from our legal, human resources, finance, global operations, internal audit, procurement, and risk and compliance teams. This council reports to our Chief Executive Officer and has oversight of the various risk assessment, monitoring and controls processes across the Company.

As of June 30, 2019, theThe ten nominees servedcurrently serve on the Committeescommittees of the Board indicated in the following table:

 

Director

  Audit  

DirectorCompensation and

Talent

  

Audit

Compensation

Nominating and

Governance

Richard Wallace

Edward Barnholt

Chair

Robert Calderoni

  Chair    

Jeneanne Hanley

       

Emiko Higashi

       

Kevin Kennedy

Gary Moore

    Chair   

Marie Myers

 

Gary Moore

Kiran Patel

  

Victor Peng

     

Kiran PatelRobert Rango

Victor Peng

     
   

Robert Rango

Richard Wallace

     

   

Audit Committee

AUDIT COMMITTEE

Members During Fiscal Year 2019: 2022: Robert Calderoni (Chairman), John Dickson, Emiko Higashi,Kevin Kennedy, Marie Myers, Kiran Patel Ana Pinczuk and David Wang.Robert Rango.

Meetings Held During Fiscal Year 2019: 72022:

8

Primary Responsibilities:Responsibilities:

The Audit Committee is responsible for appointing and overseeing the work of our independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing cybersecurity initiatives, approving the services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm, and reviewing and evaluating our accounting principles and system of internal accounting controls. In addition, the head of our Internal Audit function, who is supervised by our Chief Financial Officer, formally reports intoto the Audit Committee and provides updates at each quarterly meeting.

Independence:Independence:

The Board has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee meets the independence requirements (including the heightened requirements for Audit Committee members) of NASDAQ and under the rules and regulations of

the SEC, and has no material relationship with KLA (including any relationship that, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment as a Director) outside of their service on the Board and its Committees. The Board has determined that each of Messrs. Calderoni and Mr. Patel is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC.

Compensation Committee

Members During Fiscal Year 2019: Edward Barnholt, Emiko Higashi, Kevin Kennedy (Chairman), Gary Moore, Victor Peng and Robert Rango.

Meetings Held During Fiscal Year 2019: 9

Primary Responsibilities:

The Compensation Committee reviews and either approves or recommends to the full Board (depending upon the compensation plan and the executive involved) our executive compensation policy and administers our employee equity award plans. The Compensation Committee also reviews and, except with respect to our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, has the authority to approve the cash and equity compensation for our executive officers and for members of the Board. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Compensation Committee Decision Making-Approval Procedures Overview and Market Data” for more information concerning the procedures and processes the Compensation Committee follows in setting such compensation and implementing the various cash and equity compensation programs in effect for such individuals, including the retention of an independent compensation consultant to provide relevant market data and advice.

Independence:

The Board has determined that each of the members of the Compensation Committee meets the independence requirements (including the heightened requirements for Compensation Committee members) of NASDAQ and under the rules and regulations of the SEC, and has no material relationship with KLA (including any relationship that, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment as a Director)director) outside of their service on the Board and its Committees.committees.

 

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

7

The Board has determined that each of Messrs. Calderoni, Kennedy and Patel and Ms. Myers is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC. Following the Annual Meeting, Ms. Myers will be the Audit Committee Chair.

COMPENSATION AND TALENT COMMITTEE

Members During Fiscal Year 2022: Edward Barnholt, Jeneanne Hanley, Emiko Higashi, Gary Moore (Chairman) and Victor Peng.

Meetings Held During Fiscal Year 2022: 6

Primary Responsibilities: The Compensation and Talent Committee reviews and either approves or recommends to the Board (depending upon the compensation plan and the executive involved) our executive compensation policies and programs and administers our employee equity award plans. The Compensation and Talent Committee also reviews and, except with respect to our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, has the authority to approve the cash and equity compensation for our executive officers and for members of the Board. The Compensation and Talent Committee also reviews our human capital initiatives. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation and Talent Committee Decision Making-Approval Procedures Overview and Market Data” for more information concerning the procedures and processes the Compensation and Talent Committee follows in setting such compensation and implementing the various cash and equity compensation programs in effect for such individuals, including the retention of an independent compensation consultant to provide relevant market data and advice.

Independence: The Board has determined that each of the members of the Compensation and Talent Committee meets the independence requirements (including the heightened requirements for Compensation and Talent Committee members) of NASDAQ and under the rules and regulations of the SEC, and has no material relationship with KLA (including any relationship that, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment as a director) outside of their service on the Board and its committees.

Following the Annual Meeting, Mr. Moore will remain the Compensation and Talent Committee Chair.

Risk Considerations in Our Compensation Programs

Our management conducted an extensive review and analysis of the design and operation of KLA’s compensation practices, policies and programs for all employees, including our NEOs (as that term is defined on page 34 ofelsewhere in this Proxy Statement), to assess the risks associated with those practices, policies and programs. Our Compensation and Talent Committee has reviewed the results of that analysis, including underlying plan data and a risk assessment of significant elements of our compensation program. Based on this review and assessment, we and our Compensation and Talent Committee do not believe our compensation program encourages excessive or inappropriate risk-taking for the following reasons:

 

u
    LOGO    

Our use of different types of compensation provides a balance of short-term and long-term incentives with fixed and variable components;

u
    LOGO    

Our equity awards (including awards of performance-based restricted stock unit awards,units (“PRSUs”), to the extent earned) typically vest over a four-year period, encouraging participants to look to long-term appreciation in equity values;

u
    LOGO    

The metrics used to determine the amount of a participant’s bonus under our incentive bonus plans and the number of shares earnable under performance share awards, or PRSUs focus on Company-wide measures such as Operating Margin Dollars and relative free cash flow margin, metrics that the Compensation and Talent Committee believes encourage the generation of profitable revenue and drive long-term stockholder value;

u
    LOGO    

Our bonus plans impose caps on bonus awards to limit windfalls;

u
    LOGO    

Our system of internal control over financial reporting, Standards of Business Conduct and whistleblower processes, among other things, are intended to reduce the likelihood of manipulation of our financial performance to enhance payments under our performance-based compensation plans; and

u
    LOGO    

Our insider trading policy provides that our employees may not enter into hedging transactions involving our common stock (“Common Stock,Stock”), in an effort to prevent employees who receive equity awards from insulating themselves from the effects of changes in our stock price.

 

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


Nominating and Governance Committee

LOGO

 

8  |Information about the Board of Directors and its Committees

NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

Members During Fiscal Year 2019: 2022: Edward Barnholt (Chairman), Robert Calderoni, John DicksonKevin Kennedy and Kiran Patel.

Meetings Held During Fiscal Year 2019: 42022:

4

Primary Responsibilities:Responsibilities:

The Nominating and Governance Committee is primarily responsible for identifying and evaluating the qualifications of all candidates for election to the Board, as well as reviewing corporate governance policies and procedures and assessing stockholder proposals related to governance matters. The Nominating and Governance Committee assesses the appropriate size and composition of the Board, the effectiveness of its leadership structure, and whether any vacancies on the Board are expected.

expected, and monitors our ESG initiatives.

Independence:

The Board has determined that each of the members of the Nominating and Governance Committee meets the independence requirements of NASDAQ, and has no material relationship with KLA (including any relationship that, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment as a Director)director) outside of their service on the Board and its Committees.committees.

Following the Annual Meeting, Mr. Calderoni will be the Nominating and Governance Committee Chair.

Evaluation of Director Candidates

In the event that vacancies are anticipated, or otherwise arise, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers potential candidates that may come to its attention through current members of the Board, professional search firms, management, stockholders or other persons. In evaluating properly submitted stockholder recommendations, the Nominating and Governance Committee uses the evaluation standards discussed in further detail below and seeks to achieve a balance of knowledge, background, diversity, experience and capability on the Board. In nominating Ms. Hanley and Mr. Peng to the Board, the Nominating and Governance Committee had the assistance of an executive search firm which provided a list of potential candidates having the skill set, background and qualifications for a director sought by the Board.

It is the Nominating and Governance Committee’s policy to consider candidates for the Board recommended by, among other persons, stockholders who have owned at least one percent of our outstanding shares for at least one year and who state that they have an intent to continue as a substantial stockholder for the long term. Stockholders wishing to nominate candidates for the Board must notify our Corporate Secretary in writing of their intent to do so and provide us with certain information set forth in Article II, Section tenEleven of our bylaws and all other information regarding nominees that is required to be provided pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), or as otherwise requested by the Nominating and Governance Committee.

Majority Vote Policy

We maintain a governance policy applicable to uncontested Directordirector elections (elections in which the number of nominees does not exceed the number of Directorsdirectors to be elected) requiring that Directorsdirectors receive majority support in such elections. Under our bylaws, in any uncontested Directordirector election, any nominee who receives a greater number of votes cast “FOR” his or her election than votes cast “AGAINST” his or her election will be elected. In accordance with our bylaws, the Nominating and Governance Committee has established procedures under which any Directordirector who is not elected shall offer to tender his or her resignation to the Board following certification of the stockholder vote. The Nominating and Governance Committee, composed entirely of independent Directors,directors, will consider the offer of resignation and recommend to the Board the action to be taken. The Board will take action on the recommendation, and we will publicly disclose the Board’s decision and the rationale behind it, within 90 days following certification of the stockholder vote. In making their respective decisions, the Nominating and Governance Committee and Board will take into consideration all

factors they deem relevant. The Directordirector who tenders his or her resignation will not participate in the decisions of the Nominating and Governance Committee or the Board regarding his or her resignation.

Director Qualifications and Diversity

The Board believes that the skill set, backgrounds and qualifications of our Directors,directors, considered as a group, should provide a significant composite mix of diversity in experience, knowledge and abilities that will allow the Board to fulfill its responsibilities. In addition, the Board believes that there are certain attributes that every Directordirector should possess, such as demonstrated business or academic achievements, the highest ethical standards and a strong sense of professionalism. Accordingly, the Board and the Nominating and Governance Committee consider the qualifications of Directorsdirectors and Directordirector candidates individually and in the broader context of the Board’s overall composition and KLA’s current and future needs.

In considering candidates for Directordirector nomination, including evaluating any recommendations from stockholders as set forth above, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers candidates who have demonstrated executive

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

9

experience or significant high levelhigh-level experience in accounting, finance or a technical field or industry applicable to KLA. As set forth in our Corporate Governance Standards, the Nominating and Governance Committee takes into account all factors it considers appropriate when evaluating Directordirector candidates, which include strength of character, mature judgment, career specialization and the extent to which the candidate would fill a present need on the Board. In addition, with every candidate search, the Board considers the value of diversity and inclusion, and actively seeks candidates who will enhance the diversity and inclusiveness of the Board. With respect to new Board members, it is the standard practice of the Nominating and Governance Committee to engage a third-party recruiting firm to identify a slate of individuals for consideration as Board candidates based on the above-mentioned criteria.

In addition, the Nominating and Governance Committee annually reviews with the Board the appropriate skills and characteristics required of Directorsdirectors in the context of the current composition of the Board. In seeking a diversity of backgrounds, the Nominating and Governance Committee seeks a variety of occupational and personal backgrounds on the Board in order to obtain a range of viewpoints and perspectives. This annual assessment enables the Board to update the skills and experience it seeks in the Board as a whole, and in individual Directors,directors, as KLA’s needs evolve and change over time.

In evaluating Directordirector candidates, including incumbent Directorsdirectors forre-nomination to the Board, the Nominating and Governance Committee has considered all of the criteria described above. When assessing an incumbent Director,director, the Nominating and Governance Committee also considers the Director’sdirector’s past performance on and contributions to the Board. Among other things, the Nominating and Governance Committee has determined that it is important to have individuals with the following skills and experiences on the Board:

 

u
    LOGO    

Current or former executives who demonstrate strong leadership qualities and possess significant operating experience that together enable them to contribute practical business advice to the Board and management, strategies regarding change and risk management, and valuable insight into developing, implementing and assessing our operating plan and business strategy;

u
    LOGO    

A deep understanding of the key issues relevant to technology companies, including specific knowledge regarding the semiconductor industry, which is vital in understanding and reviewing our business goals and challenges, as well as our product development and acquisition strategies;

u
    LOGO    

Substantial international experience, which is particularly important given our global presence and the international nature of our customer base;

u
    LOGO    

An understanding of finance and related reporting processes. In the case of members of our Audit Committee, we seek individuals with demonstrated financial expertise with which to evaluate our financial statements and capital structure; and

u
    LOGO    

Corporate governance experience obtained from service as Board members and/or executives for other publicly traded companies, which we believe results in a greater sense of accountability for management and the Board and enhanced protection of stockholder interests.

interests; and
    LOGO   A diverse background and viewpoint, including diversity with respect to race, ethnicity, gender, thought and areas of expertise.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

10  |Information about the Board of Directors and its Committees

Board Diversity Matrix

The Board Diversity Matrix below depicts the current gender and ethnic composition of our Board:

Board Diversity Matrix (As of June 30, 2022)

Total Number of Directors:

 11      
  

 

 Female Male Non-Binary Did Not Disclose Gender

Part I: Gender Identity

        

Directors

 3 8    

Part II: Demographic Background

        

African American or Black (not of Hispanic or Latinx origin)

        

Alaska Native or Native American

        

Asian

 1 2    

Hispanic or Latinx

        

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

        

White (not of Hispanic or Latinx origin)

 2 6    

LGBTQ+

        

Did Not Disclose Demographic Background

        

Our Board and its Nominating and Governance Committee believe that all of the Directorsdirectors and nominees listed below are highly qualified and have the skills and experience required for service on our Board. The following table sets forthBelow is certain

information with respect to our Directorsdirectors and nominees as of the date of this Proxy Statement, including, for each Directordirector and nominee, a biography and a summary of his or her significant experiences, qualifications and skills that are most pertinent to that individual’s service as a member of our Board.

 

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

 

Nominees for Election at the 2019 Annual Meeting   11

NOMINEES FOR ELECTION AT THE 2022 ANNUAL MEETING

Robert Calderoni

LOGO

Director Since: 2007

Age: 62

Board Committees:

Audit (Chair)

Nominating and
Governance

Background

Mr. Calderoni has more than 30 years of executive experience in the technology industry. He currently serves as Chairman and as Interim President and Chief Executive Officer at Citrix Systems, Inc. Mr. Calderoni was appointed Interim President and CEO at Citrix in October 2021. Mr. Calderoni was the Executive Chairman at Citrix from July 2015 to December 2018. From October 2015 to January 2016, Mr. Calderoni served as the interim Chief Executive Officer and President of Citrix. Prior to that, he was President of SAP AG’s cloud business following SAP’s October 2012 acquisition of Ariba, Inc., a leading provider of cloud software solutions where he served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Prior to the acquisition, Mr. Calderoni served as Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors of Ariba from October 2001 until the company was acquired, and he also served as Ariba’s Chairman of the Board of Directors from July 2003 until the acquisition date. Before becoming Chief Executive Officer of Ariba, Mr. Calderoni served as Ariba’s Chief Financial Officer from January 2001 to October 2001. Prior to joining Ariba, Mr. Calderoni was Chief Financial Officer at Avery Dennison Corporation, a global manufacturing company. He also held numerous senior financial executive positions at major technology companies, including Senior Vice President Finance at Apple Inc., and Vice President Finance at IBM.

As a senior executive officer of Citrix, and former senior executive officer of SAP and Ariba, Mr. Calderoni provides our Board with extensive and relevant leadership and international operations experience in the technology industry. In addition, Mr. Calderoni is well-qualified to serve as a Board member and as the Chairman of our Audit Committee as a result of his over 20 years of experience as a finance executive, including his past service as the Chief Financial Officer of two publicly traded technology companies. As a Board member of two other public companies, Mr. Calderoni also has familiarity with a range of corporate governance issues.

Other U.S. Public Company Boards:

Citrix Systems, Inc. (since 2014)

Ansys, Inc. (since 2020)

Juniper Networks, Inc. (2003 to 2019)

Logmein, Inc. (2017 to 2020)

 

 

Edward Barnholt

Director since: 1995LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

Age: 7612  |

Board Committees: Compensation, Nominating and Governance (Chair)

Other U.S. Public Company Boards: Adobe Systems Incorporated (2005 to 2019); eBay Inc. (2005 to 2018)

Mr. Barnholt has served as Chairman of the Board of KLA since October 2006. From March 1999 to March 2005, Mr. Barnholt was President and Chief Executive Officer of Agilent Technologies, Inc., and he was Chairman ofInformation about the Board of Directors of Agilent from November 2002 to March 2005. In March 2005, Mr. Barnholt retired as the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Agilent. Before being named Agilent’s Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Barnholt served as Executive Vice President and General Manager of Hewlett-Packard Company’s Measurement Organization from 1998 to 1999. From 1990 to 1998, he served as General Manager of Hewlett-Packard’s Test and Measurement Organization. He was elected Senior Vice President of Hewlett-Packard in 1993 and Executive Vice President in 1996. Mr. Barnholt also currently serves on the Board of Trustees of the Packard Foundation.its Committees

As the former President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Agilent, as well as a former senior executive with Hewlett-Packard, Mr. Barnholt possesses significant leadership experience, which includes matters particularly relevant to companies with complex technology and international issues. Mr. Barnholt’s experience as a Board member of KLA provides him with an extensive knowledge of our business and industry, while bringing to the Board strong corporate governance expertise.

Jeneanne Hanley

LOGO

Director Since: 2019

Age: 49

Board Committees:

Compensation and Talent

Background

Ms. Hanley has held various positions at Lear Corporation, a designer and manufacturer of automotive seating systems and electrical distribution systems and related components, from 1994 until January 2019, most recently serving as Senior Vice President and President of the E-Systems Division. Other positions at Lear Corporation she has held include Corporate Vice President, Global Surface Materials, Corporate Vice President, Americas Seating Business Unit and Vice President, Global Strategy and Business Development. Ms. Hanley earned her bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering in 1994 and her master’s degree in business administration in 2000 from the University of Michigan.

Ms. Hanley possesses significant operating and leadership skills, including extensive experience in electrical distribution systems and electronic modules used in the automotive industry. She offers significant experience pairing business strategy with organizational strategy in a complex global industry.

Other U.S. Public Company Boards:

QuantumScape Corporation (since 2021)

Emiko Higashi

LOGO

Director Since: 2010

Age: 63

Board Committees:

Compensation and Talent

Background

Ms. Higashi is a founder of Tohmon Capital Partners, LLC (formerly Tomon Partners, LLC), a strategy and M&A advisory firm based in San Francisco and primarily serving companies in technology- and healthcare-related fields since 2003. Ms. Higashi serves on the boards of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd, Rambus, Inc., and One Equity Partners Open Water I Corp. Prior to Tohmon Partners, she was a co-founder and Chief Executive Officer of Gilo Ventures, a technology-focused venture capital firm, from 2000 to 2002. Before that, Ms. Higashi spent 15 years in investment banking. After beginning her investment banking career at Lehman Brothers from 1985 to 1988, Ms. Higashi was a founding member of Wasserstein Parella and the head of that firm’s technology M&A business from 1988 to 1994, and subsequently served as a managing director in charge of Merrill Lynch’s global technology M&A practice from 1994 until 2000. Prior to her investment banking career, Ms. Higashi spent two years as a consultant at McKinsey & Co. in Tokyo, Japan.

As a result of her extensive career in technology-focused investment banking and finance, Ms. Higashi brings to the Board significant strategic, business development, mergers and acquisitions and financial experience related to the business and financial issues facing large global technology corporations, a comprehensive understanding of international business matters, particularly in Asia, and knowledge of the semiconductor industry. In addition, as a founder and partner of several consulting firms and a founding member of an investment banking firm, Ms. Higashi also possesses significant leadership and entrepreneurial experience.

Other U.S. Public Company Boards:

Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd.
(since 2016)

Rambus, Inc. (since 2017)

One Equity Partners Open Water I Corp. (since 2021)

InvenSense, Inc. (2014 to 2017)

 

 

Robert Calderoni

Director since: 2007LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

13

Age: 59

Kevin Kennedy

Board Committees: Audit (Chair), Nominating and Governance

Other U.S. Public Company Boards: Juniper Networks, Inc. (2003 to 2019); Citrix Systems, Inc. (since 2015); Logmein, Inc. (since 2017)

Mr. Calderoni

LOGO

Director Since: 2007

Age: 66

Board Committees:

Audit

Nominating and

Governance

Background

Mr. Kennedy has more than 30 years of executive experience in the technology industry. He currently serves as Chairman at Citrix Systems, Inc. and Logmein, Inc. Mr. Calderoni was the Executive Chairman at Citrix from July 2015 to December 2018. From October 2015 to January 2016, Mr. Calderoni served as the interim Chief Executive Officer and President of Citrix. Prior to that, he was President of SAP AG’s cloud business following SAP’s October 2012 acquisition of Ariba, Inc., a leading provider of cloud software solutions where he served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Prior to the acquisition, Mr. Calderoni served as Chief Executive Officer and member of the Board of Directors of Quanergy Systems, Inc., a leading provider of LiDAR sensors, since January 2020. From July 2018 through March 2020, Mr. Kennedy was a senior managing director at Blue Ridge Partners, a consulting firm that advises companies on accelerating profitable revenue growth. Prior to that, Mr. Kennedy most recently served as President, Chief Executive Officer and member of the Board of Directors of Avaya Inc., a leading global provider of business communications applications, systems and services, positions he held from January 2009 to October 2017. In January 2017, Avaya Inc. filed a Chapter 11 restructuring plan with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. Prior to joining Avaya, Mr. Kennedy was Chief Executive Officer of JDS Uniphase Corporation, a provider of optical products and test and measurement solutions for the communications industry, from September 2003 to December 2008, also serving as JDS Uniphase’s President from March 2004 to December 2008. From 2001 to 2003, he served as Chief Operating Officer of Openwave Systems, Inc., a provider of software solutions for the communication and media industries. Previously, Mr. Kennedy spent nearly eight years at Cisco Systems, Inc. and 17 years at Bell Laboratories. In 1987, Mr. Kennedy was a Congressional Fellow to the U.S. House of Representatives on Science, Space and Technology. In January 2012, Mr. Kennedy was appointed to the President’s National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee by former President Barack Obama.

As the Chief Executive Officer of Quanergy and a former senior executive at Avaya, JDS Uniphase and Openwave, Mr. Kennedy possesses a vast amount of leadership and operational experience with companies in high technology industries. Also, as the holder of a Ph.D. degree in engineering from Rutgers University, a member of President Obama’s National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee, a former Congressional Fellow to the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Science, Space and Technology, and the author of more than 30 papers on computational methods, data networking and technology management, Mr. Kennedy offers relevant expertise in a broad range of technology matters. Specifically, Mr. Kennedy has been associated with over 150 M&A transactions as part of building large and growing organizations. In addition, as a result of his experience on the Boards of Directors of several public companies, Mr. Kennedy offers our Board a deep understanding of corporate governance matters.

Other U.S. Public Company Boards:

Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (since 2013)

Quanergy Systems, Inc. (since 2020)

Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. (2020 to 2022)

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

14  |Information about the Board of Directors of Ariba from October 2001 until the company was acquired, and he also served as Ariba’sits Committees

Gary Moore

LOGO

Director Since: 2014

Age: 73

Board Committees:

Compensation and Talent

(Chair)

Background

Mr. Moore retired in July 2022 from his position as the Chief Executive Officer of ServiceSource International, Inc., a global leader in outsourced, performance-based customer success and revenue growth solutions, a position he had held since December 2018. He also held the position of the Executive Chairman of ServiceSource International, Inc. since November 2018. Mr. Moore previously retired in July 2015 from his positions as President and Chief Operating Officer of Cisco Systems, Inc., a leading global provider of networking and other products and services related to the communications and information technology industry, positions he had held from October 2012 to July 2015. Mr. Moore first joined Cisco in October 2001 as Senior Vice President, Advanced Services, and, in August 2007, he also assumed responsibility as co-lead of Cisco Services. From May 2010 to February 2011, he served as Executive Vice President, Cisco Services, and he was Cisco’s Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from February 2011 until October 2012 when he was named President and Chief Operation Officer. Immediately before joining Cisco, Mr. Moore served for approximately two years as Chief Executive Officer of Netigy Corporation, a network consulting company. Prior to that, he was employed for 26 years by Electronic Data Systems (“EDS”), where he held a number of senior executive positions, including as the President and Chief Executive Officer of joint venture Hitachi Data Systems from 1989 to 1992.

As the former Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ServiceSource and a former senior executive with Cisco and other global companies (including roles as Cisco’s President and Chief Operating Officer, the head of Cisco Services, the creator and manager of EDS’s e-solutions global business unit and the President and Chief Executive Officer of the EDS joint venture Hitachi Data Systems), Mr. Moore brings to the Board extensive leadership experience, as well as expertise in matters relating to international operations in the technology industry. Mr. Moore’s experience managing large-scale operations and growing businesses enables him to provide the Board and the Company with valuable advice and guidance regarding operational and strategic issues faced by global technology companies.

Other U.S. Public Company Boards:

Finjan Holdings, Inc. (2015 to 2020)

ServiceSource International, Inc. (2016 to 2022)

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

  15

Marie Myers

LOGO

Director Since: 2020

Age: 54

Board Committees:

Audit

Background

Since June 2020, Ms. Myers has served as the Chief Transformation Officer and since October 2020 as the Chief Financial Officer at HP Inc. and prior to that, from March 2020 to June 2020, served as its Chief Digital Officer. Ms. Myers served as the Chief Financial Officer of UiPath Inc. from December 2018 to December 2019. Prior to UiPath, Ms. Myers held various positions at HP Inc. and the Hewlett-Packard Company from 2001 to 2018, most recently serving as Global Controller. Other positions at Hewlett-Packard included Senior Finance Executive; Vice President for Finance Strategy, Sales and hp.com, Printing and Personal Systems Division; Head of Audit; Chief Financial Officer, Personal Systems Group; Vice President and Americas Controller; and Vice President and Chief Audit Officer. Ms. Myers held finance, audit and business operations positions at Compaq from 1997 until its acquisition by the Hewlett-Packard Company in 2001.

Ms. Myers’ extensive experience as a finance executive for a multinational technology company and experience managing the Internal Audit and financial operations functions brings an important and valuable perspective to our Board. Her experiences also provide valuable insight into challenges faced by a technology company with an international presence.

Other U.S. Public Company Boards:

F5 Networks, Inc. (since 2019)

Kiran Patel

LOGO

Director Since: 2008

Age: 74

Board Committees:

Audit

Nominating and Governance

Background

Mr. Patel retired in September 2013 from his position as Executive Vice President and General Manager, Small Business Group of Intuit Inc., a provider of personal finance and small business software, a position he had held since December 2008. Mr. Patel previously served as Intuit’s Senior Vice President and General Manager, Consumer Tax Group and as its Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Before joining Intuit in September 2005, he was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Solectron Corporation from August 2001 to September 2005. He previously worked for Cummins Inc. for 27 years in a variety of finance and business positions, most recently as Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President. Mr. Patel currently serves as a Trustee of the Charles Schwab Funds.

As a former senior officer of Intuit, Solectron and Cummins, Mr. Patel possesses significant international operating and leadership skills, including extensive experience in global sourcing, sales and other business management aspects within manufacturing and technology industries, often involving living and managing businesses overseas. In addition, as a result of his past service as the Chief Financial Officer of several global organizations, Mr. Patel offers a vast understanding of critical finance matters, which enables him to make significant contributions as a member of our Board and its Audit Committee.

Other U.S. Public Company Boards:

None

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

16  |Information about the Board of Directors from July 2003 until the acquisition date. Before becoming Chief Executive Officer of Ariba, Mr. Calderoni served as Ariba’s Chief Financial Officer from January 2001 to October 2001. Prior to joining Ariba, Mr. Calderoni was Chief Financial Officer at Avery Dennison Corporation, a global manufacturing company. He also held numerous senior financial executive positions at major technology companies, including Senior Vice President Finance at Apple Inc., and Vice President Finance at IBM.its Committees

As a senior executive officer of Citrix and former senior executive with SAP and Ariba, Mr. Calderoni provides our Board with extensive and relevant leadership and international operations experience in the technology industry. In addition, Mr. Calderoni is well-qualified to serve as a Board member and as the Chairman of our Audit Committee as a result of his over 20 years of experience as a finance executive, including his past service as the Chief Financial Officer of two publicly traded technology companies. As a Board member of two other public companies, Mr. Calderoni also has familiarity with a range of corporate governance issues.

Victor Peng

LOGO

Director Since: 2019

Age: 62

Board Committees:

Compensation and Talent

Background

Mr. Peng joined Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (“AMD”), a developer of leadership high-performance and adaptive processor technologies, combining CPUs, GPUs, FPGAs, Adaptive SoCs and deep software expertise to enable leadership computing platforms for cloud, edge and end devices, in February 2022 as its President, Adaptive and Embedded Computing Group, after AMD completed its acquisition of Xilinx, Inc. From January 2018 to February 2022, Mr. Peng served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Xilinx. He served on the Xilinx Board of Directors from October 2017 to February 2022. From April 2017 to January 2018, Mr. Peng served as Xilinx’s Chief Operating Officer. From July 2014 to April 2017, he served as Executive Vice President and General Manager of Products. Prior to joining Xilinx, Mr. Peng served as Corporate Vice President, Graphics Products Group at AMD from November 2005 to April 2008. Prior to joining AMD, Mr. Peng served in a variety of executive engineering positions at companies in the semiconductor and processor industries.

As the current President, Adaptive and Embedded Computing Group, of AMD, the former Chief Executive Officer of Xilinx and former member of its Board of Directors, and with his over 30 years of experience in the semiconductor industry, Mr. Peng provides our Board with extensive and relevant leadership and international operations experience.

Other U.S. Public Company Boards:

Xilinx, Inc. (2017 to 2022)

 

Jeneanne Hanley

Robert Rango

Director since: 2019

Age: 47

Board Committees: Compensation

Other U.S. Public Company Boards: None

Ms. Hanley has held various positions at Lear Corporation, a designer and manufacturer of automotive seating systems and electrical distribution systems and related components, from 1994 until January 2019, most recently serving as Senior Vice President and President of theE-Systems Division. Other positions at Lear Corporation she has held include Corporate Vice President, Global Surface Materials, Corporate Vice President, Americas Seating Business Unit and Vice President, Global Strategy and Business Development. Ms. Hanley earned her bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering in 1994 and her master’s degree in business administration in 2000 from the University of Michigan.

Ms. Hanley possesses significant operating and leadership skills, including extensive experience in electrical distribution systems and electronic modules used in the automotive industry. As a result of her past service as an operational executive of significant business units and divisions serving the global automotive industry, we expect Ms. Hanley will

LOGO

Director Since: 2014

Age: 64

Board Committees:

Audit

Background

Since May 2016, Mr. Rango has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Enevate Corporation, a company working on the development of next generation Lithium Ion (Li-ion) battery technology. Prior to that, Mr. Rango served for over 12 years, from March 2002 to July 2014, as an executive at Broadcom Corporation, a leading fabless semiconductor company. He most recently served as Executive Vice President and General Manager of Broadcom’s Mobile and Wireless Group, a role he had held since February 2011. During his tenure with Broadcom, Mr. Rango held a number of senior management positions in the company’s Network Infrastructure Business Unit, Mobile and Wireless Group and Wireless Connectivity Group, including as Senior Vice President and General Manager, Wireless Connectivity Group from January 2006 to February 2010 and as Executive Vice President and General Manager, Wireless Connectivity Group from February 2010 to February 2011. From 1995 to 2002, Mr. Rango held several Vice President and General Manager positions at Lucent Microelectronics, a networking communications company, and Agere Systems, a leader in semiconductors and software solutions for storage, mobility and networking markets, in its Optical Access, New Business Initiatives and Modem/Multimedia Divisions.

Mr. Rango possesses significant operating and leadership skills, including extensive experience in global semiconductor product marketing, development and sales. As a result of his past service as an operational executive and general manager of several large global organizations, Mr. Rango offers a vast understanding of mobile, wireless, semiconductor, optical, software and technology management, which enables him to make significant contributions as a member of our Board.

Other U.S. Public Company Boards:

Integrated Device Technology, Inc. (2015 to 2019)

Keysight Technologies, Inc. (since 2015)

 

 

Emiko Higashi

Director since: 2010LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement

Age: 60

Board Committees: Compensation

Other U.S. Public Company Boards: Rambus, Inc. (since 2017); InvenSense, Inc. (2014 to 2017); Takeda Pharmaceutical Company (since 2016)

Ms. Higashi is a founder of Tohmon Capital Partners, LLC (formerly Tomon Partners, LLC), a strategy and M&A advisory firm based in San Francisco and primarily serving companies in technology- and healthcare-related fields since 2003. Ms. Higashi also serves on the boards of MetLife Insurance K.K., a subsidiary of MetLife, Inc. (NYSE), Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. (TSE), and Rambus, Inc. (Nasdaq). Ms. Higashi also serves as a senior advisor to several private consulting firms. Prior to Tohmon Partners, she was aco-founder and Chief Executive Officer of Gilo Ventures, a technology-focused venture capital firm, from 2000 to 2002. Before that, Ms. Higashi spent 15 years in investment banking. After beginning her investment banking career at Lehman Brothers from 1985 to 1988, Ms. Higashi was a founding member of Wasserstein Parella and the head of that firm’s technology M&A business from 1988 to 1994, and subsequently served as a managing director in charge of Merrill Lynch’s global technology M&A practice from 1994 until 2000. Prior to her investment banking career, Ms. Higashi spent two years as a consultant at McKinsey & Co. in Tokyo, Japan.

As a result of her extensive career in technology-focused investment banking and finance, Ms. Higashi brings to the Board significant strategic, business development, mergers and acquisitions and financial experience related to the business and financial issues facing large global technology corporations, a comprehensive understanding of international business matters, particularly in Asia, and knowledge of the semiconductor industry. In addition, as a founder and partner of several consulting firms and a founding member of an investment banking firm, Ms. Higashi also possesses significant leadership and entrepreneurial experience.


LOGO

 

Kevin Kennedy 17

Richard Wallace

LOGO

Director Since: 2006

Age: 62

Board Committees:

None

Background

Mr. Wallace currently serves as our President and Chief Executive Officer. He has been our Chief Executive Officer since January 2006 and has also served as our President since November 2008. He began at KLA Instruments in 1988 as an applications engineer and has held various general management positions throughout his 34 years with us, including positions as President and Chief Operating Officer from July 2005 to December 2005, Executive Vice President of the Customer Group from May 2004 to July 2005, and Executive Vice President of the Wafer Inspection Group from July 2000 to May 2004. Earlier in his career, he held positions with Ultratech Stepper and Cypress Semiconductor. Mr. Wallace previously served as a member of the Board of Directors of SEMI (Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International), a prominent industry association, including as SEMI’s Chairman of the Board. He earned his bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from the University of Michigan and his master’s degree in engineering management from Santa Clara University, where he also taught strategic marketing and global competitiveness courses after his graduation.

As our President and Chief Executive Officer and a KLA employee for 34 years, Mr. Wallace brings to the Board extensive leadership and semiconductor industry experience, including a deep knowledge and understanding of our business, operations and employees, the opportunities and risks faced by KLA, and management’s strategy and plans for accomplishing our goals. In addition, Mr. Wallace’s current service as a member of our Board, and his prior service as a member of the Boards of Directors of NetApp and Proofpoint give him a strong understanding of his role as a Director and a broad perspective on key industry issues and corporate governance matters.

Other U.S. Public Company Boards:

NetApp, Inc. (2011 to 2019)

Proofpoint, Inc. (2017 to 2021)

Director since: 2007LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

Age: 6318  |

Board Committees: Compensation (Chair)

Other U.S. Public Company Boards: Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (since 2013)

In July 2018, Mr. Kennedy joined Blue Ridge Partners, a consulting firm that advises companies on accelerating profitable revenue growth, as a senior managing director. Prior to that, Mr. Kennedy most recently served as President, Chief Executive Officer and member ofInformation about the Board of Directors of Avaya Inc., a leading global provider of business communications applications, systems and services, positions he held from January 2009 to October 2017. In January 2017, Avaya Inc. filed a Chapter 11 restructuring plan with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. Prior to joining Avaya, Mr. Kennedy was Chief Executive Officer of JDS Uniphase Corporation, a provider of optical products and test and measurement solutions for the communications industry, from September 2003 to December 2008, also serving as JDS Uniphase’s President from March 2004 to December 2008. From 2001 to 2003, he served as Chief Operating Officer of Openwave Systems, Inc., a provider of software solutions for the communication and media industries. Previously, Mr. Kennedy spent nearly eight years at Cisco Systems, Inc. and 17 years at Bell Laboratories. In 1987, Mr. Kennedy was a Congressional Fellow to the U.S. House of Representatives on Science, Space and Technology. In January 2011, Mr. Kennedy was appointed to the President’s National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee by former President Barack Obama.

As the former President and Chief Executive Officer of Avaya and a former senior executive at JDS Uniphase and Openwave, Mr. Kennedy possesses a vast amount of leadership and operational experience with companies in high technology industries. Also as the holder of a Ph.D. degree in engineering from Rutgers University, a member of President Obama’s National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee, a former Congressional Fellow to the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Science, Space and Technology, and the author of more than 30 papers on computational methods, data networking and technology management, Mr. Kennedy offers relevant expertise in a broad range of technology matters. In addition, as a result of his experience on the Boards of Directors of several public companies, Mr. Kennedy offers our Board a deep understanding of corporate governance matters.its Committees

 

Gary Moore

Director since: 2014DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Age: 70

Board Committees: Compensation

Other U.S. Public Company Boards: Finjan Holdings, Inc. (since 2015); ServiceSource International, Inc. (since 2016)

Mr. Moore has served as the Chief Executive Officer of ServiceSource International, Inc., a global leader in outsourced, performance-based customer success and revenue growth solutions, since December 2018 and as its Executive Chairman since November 2018. Mr. Moore retired in July 2015 from his positions as President and Chief Operating Officer of Cisco Systems, Inc., a leading global provider of networking and other products and services related to the communications and information technology industry, positions he had held from October 2012 to July 2015. Mr. Moore first joined Cisco in October 2001 as Senior Vice President, Advanced Services, and, in August 2007, he also assumed responsibility asco-lead of Cisco Services. From May 2010 to February 2011, he served as Executive Vice President, Cisco Services, and he was Cisco’s Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from February 2011 until October 2012. Immediately before joining Cisco, Mr. Moore served for approximately two years as Chief Executive Officer of Netigy Corporation, a network consulting company. Prior to that, he was employed for 26 years by Electronic Data Systems (“EDS”), where he held a number of senior executive positions, including as the President and Chief Executive Officer of joint venture Hitachi Data Systems from 1989 to 1992.

As the Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ServiceSource and a former senior executive with Cisco and other global companies (including roles as Cisco’s President and Chief Operating Officer, the head of Cisco Services, the creator and manager of EDS’se-solutions global business unit and the President and Chief Executive Officer of the EDS joint venture Hitachi Data Systems), Mr. Moore brings to the Board extensive leadership experience, as well as expertise in matters relating to international operations in the technology industry. Mr. Moore’s experience managing large-scale operations and growing businesses enables him to provide the Board and the Company with valuable advice and guidance regarding operational and strategic issues faced by global technology companies.

Kiran Patel

Director since: 2008

Age: 71

Board Committees: Audit, Nominating and Governance

Other U.S. Public Company Boards: None

Mr. Patel retired in September 2013 from his position as Executive Vice President and General Manager, Small Business Group of Intuit Inc., a provider of personal finance and small business software, a position he had held since December 2008. Mr. Patel previously served as Intuit’s Senior Vice President and General Manager, Consumer Tax Group and as its Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Before joining Intuit in September 2005, he was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Solectron Corporation from August 2001 to September 2005. He previously worked for Cummins Inc. for 27 years in a variety of finance and business positions, most recently as Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President. Mr. Patel currently serves as a Trustee of the Charles Schwab Funds.

As a former senior officer of Intuit, Solectron and Cummins, Mr. Patel possesses significant international operating and leadership skills, including extensive experience in global sourcing, sales and other business management aspects within manufacturing and technology industries, often involving living and managing businesses overseas. In addition, as a result of his past service as the Chief Financial Officer of several global organizations, Mr. Patel offers a vast understanding of critical finance matters, which enables him to make significant contributions as a member of our Board and its Audit Committee.

Victor Peng

Director since: 2019

Age: 59

Board Committees: Compensation

Other U.S. Public Company Boards: Xilinx, Inc. (since 2017)

Mr. Peng joined Xilinx, Inc., a developer of highly flexible and adaptive processing platforms that enable rapid innovation across a variety of technologies, in 2008 and currently serves as its President and Chief Executive Officer, which he has held since January 2018. He joined the Xilinx board in October 2017. From April 2017 to January 2018, Mr. Peng served as Xilinx’s Chief Operating Officer. From July 2014 to April 2017, he served as Executive Vice President and General Manager of Products. From May 2013 through July 2014, Mr. Peng served as Senior Vice President and General Manager of the Programmable Platforms Group. From May 2012 through April 2013, he served as Senior Vice President of the Programmable Platforms Group. From November 2008 through April 2012, he served as Senior Vice President of the Programmable Platforms Development Group. Prior to joining Xilinx, Mr. Peng served as Corporate Vice President, Graphics Products Group at Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), a provider of processing solutions, from November 2005 to April 2008. Prior to joining AMD, Mr. Peng served in a variety of executive engineering positions at companies in the semiconductor and processor industries.

As the President and Chief Executive Officer of Xilinx and a member of its board of directors, and with his over 30 years of experience in the semiconductor industry, Mr. Peng provides our Board with extensive and relevant leadership and international operations experience.

Robert Rango

Director since: 2014

Age: 61

Board Committees: Compensation

Other U.S. Public Company Boards: Integrated Device Technology, Inc. (2015 to 2019); Keysight Technologies, Inc. (since 2015)

Since May 2016 Mr. Rango has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Enevate Corporation, a company working on the development of next generation Lithium Ion(Li-ion) battery technology. Prior to that, Mr. Rango served for over 12 years, from March 2002 to July 2014, as an executive at Broadcom Corporation, a leading fabless semiconductor company. He most recently served as Executive Vice President and General Manager of Broadcom’s Mobile and Wireless Group, a role he had held since February 2011. During his tenure with Broadcom, Mr. Rango held a number of senior management positions in the company’s Network Infrastructure Business Unit, Mobile and Wireless Group and Wireless Connectivity Group, including as Senior Vice President and General Manager, Wireless Connectivity Group from January 2006 to February 2010 and as Executive Vice President and General Manager, Wireless Connectivity Group from February 2010 to February 2011. From 1995 to 2002, Mr. Rango held several Vice President and General Manager positions at Lucent Microelectronics, a networking communications company, and Agere Systems, a leader in semiconductors and software solutions for storage, mobility and networking markets, in its Optical Access, New Business Initiatives and Modem/Multimedia Divisions.

Mr. Rango possesses significant operating and leadership skills, including extensive experience in global semiconductor product marketing, development and sales. As a result of his past service as an operational executive and general manager of several large global organizations, Mr. Rango offers a vast understanding of mobile, wireless, semiconductor, optical, software and technology management, which enables him to make significant contributions as a member of our Board.

Richard Wallace

Director since: 2006

Age: 59

Board Committees: None

Other U.S. Public Company Boards: NetApp, Inc. (2011 to 2019); Proofpoint, Inc. (since 2017)

Mr. Wallace currently serves as our President and Chief Executive Officer. He has been our Chief Executive Officer since January 2006 and has also served as our President since November 2008. He began at KLA Instruments in 1988 as an applications engineer and has held various general management positions throughout his 31 years with us, including positions as President and Chief Operating Officer from July 2005 to December 2005, Executive Vice President of the Customer Group from May 2004 to July 2005, and Executive Vice President of the Wafer Inspection Group from July 2000 to May 2004. Earlier in his career, he held positions with Ultratech Stepper and Cypress Semiconductor. Mr. Wallace previously served as a member of the Board of Directors of SEMI (Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International), a prominent industry association, including as SEMI’s Chairman of the Board. He earned his bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from the University of Michigan and his master’s degree in engineering management from Santa Clara University, where he also taught strategic marketing and global competitiveness courses after his graduation.

As our President and Chief Executive Officer and a KLA employee for 31 years, Mr. Wallace brings to the Board extensive leadership and semiconductor industry experience, including a deep knowledge and understanding of our business, operations and employees, the opportunities and risks faced by KLA, and management’s strategy and plans for accomplishing our goals. In addition, Mr. Wallace’s current service as a member of the Boards of Directors of KLA and Proofpoint give him a strong understanding of his role as a Director and a broad perspective on key industry issues and corporate governance matters.

Director Compensation

Our Fiscal Year 20192022 Director Compensation Program

Non-employee members of the Board (“Outside Directors”) receive a combination of equity and cash compensation as approved by the Compensation and Talent Committee (or, in the case of the compensation of the Chairman of the Board, as recommended by the Compensation and Talent Committee and approved by the Board). Equity compensation to Outside Directors is provided under our 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, which has been approved by our stockholders. Retainers and committee fees are paid in quarterly cash installments (unless the applicable director elects to defer such cash payments, as described below). The following table presents the key features of our fiscal year 20192022 Outside Director compensation program:

 

COMPENSATION ELEMENT

 

  

FISCAL YEAR 20192022 PROGRAM

 

Cash Compensation

  Standard annual cash retainer$90,000
 

 

Cash Compensation

Standard annual cash retainer

$90,000, paid quarterly

Committee member additional annual cash retainers

  (including Committee Chair)

 

  

$15,000 for Audit Committee

$12,500 for Compensation and Talent Committee

$7,500 for Nominating and Governance Committee

 

Committee Chair additional annual cash retainers

  

$30,000 for Audit Committee

$20,000 for Compensation and Talent Committee

$10,000 for Nominating and Governance Committee

 

Annual cash retainer fornon-executive Chairman
(in

  (in lieu of standard retainer)

 

  

$130,000

 

Reimbursement for reasonable meeting attendance

  expenses

  

Included

Equity Compensation

 

Equity Compensation

 

Market value of standard RSUrestricted stock unit (“RSU”) award

  granted at annual meeting

  

$200,000220,000 (to be granted at the Annual Meeting); dividend equivalents payable upon vesting

 

Market value ofnon-executive Chairman RSU award

  granted at annual meeting in lieu of standard RSUs award

  

$270,000290,000 (to be granted at the Annual Meeting); dividend equivalents payable upon vesting

 

Vesting period of Outside Director RSUs

  

Awards vest annually; shares immediately issued upon vesting

In August 2021, the Board approved revisions to the fiscal year 2022 Outside Director compensation program, effective November 3, 2021, which included:

 

    LOGO   an increase to the market value of the standard RSU award granted to our Outside Directors from $200,000 to $220,000; and
    LOGO   an increase to the market value of the Chairman RSU award from $270,000 to $290,000.

Members of the Board who are employees of the Company do not receive any additional compensation for their services as Directors.directors. The Board will separately determine the compensation payable to Outside Directors for service on special purpose committees of the Board, if such committees are created.

If a new Outside Director joins the Board after the date of an annual meeting of stockholders, his or her first restricted stock unit award (“RSU”) award will be granted at the time or promptly after he or she joins the Board and will be prorated to take into account the period of time from the last annual meeting of stockholders to the date the new Outside Director joined the Board.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

19

Under the Outside Director compensation program, the RSU awards granted to our Outside Directors are issued with “dividend equivalent” rights pursuant to our 2004 Equity Incentive Plan. The plan administrator may issue dividend equivalent rights with respect to RSUs, performance-based restricted stock units, performance units and deferred stock units. These dividendDividend equivalent rights entitle the recipient to receive credits, payable in cash, or additional shares of our Common Stock, equal to the cash dividends that would have been received on the shares of our Common Stock had the shares subject to the RSUs been issued and outstanding on the dividend record date. The dividend equivalents wouldare only be paidpayable to the recipient upon vesting orand settlement of the underlying award.

We have had in effect since 2008 a policy of providing prorated vesting acceleration of RSUs held by Outside Directors who are in good standing, whose service on the Board terminates before their RSUs are vested and who, at the time of termination, have served on the Board for six years.

Deferred Compensation

Each Outside Director is entitled to defer all or a portion of his or her cash retainer, pursuant to our Executive Deferred Savings Plan (“EDSP”), a nonqualified deferred compensation plan. Amounts credited to the EDSP may be allocated by the participant among a variety of investment funds. For further information regarding our EDSP, including the list of investment funds available under the EDSP during fiscal year 2019,2022, please refer to the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Nonqualified“Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Nonqualified Deferred Compensation.” Of the current Outside Directors, only Ms. Myers and Messrs. Barnholt and Patel and Ms. Pinczuk participated in the EDSP during fiscal year 2019,2022, though only Ms. PinczukMyers made new contributions during the fiscal year.

Matching Program

Since August 2014, Outside Directors have been able to participate in a gift matching program, under which the KLA Foundation will generally match,dollar-for-dollar, gifts by Outside Directors to qualifyingtax-exempt educational institutions up to $10,000 per calendar year.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

We have adopted a policy, pursuant to which each Outside Director is expected to own a specified minimum number of shares of our Common Stock. Under our current policy, each Outside Director, once he or she has served as an Outside Director for at least four years, is expected to own shares of our Common Stock with a market value of at least four (4)five (5) times the standard annual cash retainer paid to the Outside Directors. Shares of Common Stock underlying outstanding RSUs held by the Directorsdirectors count toward this ownership requirement. As

The table below sets forth as of September 12, 2022, the Record Date, eachcompliance with our stock ownership guidelines by the seven Outside Directors who have served for at least four years. Value is based on the closing price of our currentCommon Stock on June 30, 2022 ($319.08). Ratio is equal to value divided by annual cash retainer.

Name

  Total
Shares
(#)(1)
   Value ($)   Ratio 

Edward Barnholt

   39,172    12,499,002    96.1x 

Robert Calderoni

   12,994    4,146,126    46.1x 

Emiko Higashi

   13,478    4,300,560    47.8x 

Kevin Kennedy

   6,285    2,005,418    22.3x 

Gary Moore

   13,481    4,301,517    47.8x 

Kiran Patel

   12,452    3,973,184    44.1x 

Robert Rango

   13,415    4,280,458    47.6x 

(1) Consists of: (i) shares owned, including shares indirectly owned by the Outside Directors was in compliance with the stock ownership requirement.through living trusts, and (ii) RSUs.

 

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

20  |Information about the Board of Directors and its Committees

Director Compensation Table

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the compensation earned by or awarded to each Outside Director during fiscal year 2019 who served on our Board2022:

Name

  Fees
Earned
or Paid
in Cash
($)(1)
   Stock
Awards
($)(2)
   Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)(3)
   All Other
Compensation
($)(4)
   Total
($)
 

Edward Barnholt

   160,000    289,741    -    4,590    454,331 

Robert Calderoni

   142,500    219,668    -    3,398    365,566 

Jeneanne Hanley

   102,500    219,668    -    3,398    325,566 

Emiko Higashi

   102,500    219,668    -    3,398    325,566 

Kevin Kennedy

   112,500    219,668    -    3,398    335,566 

Gary Moore

   122,500    219,668    -    3,398    345,566 

Marie Myers

   105,000    219,668    -    3,398    328,066 

Kiran Patel

   112,500    219,668    -    3,398    335,566 

Victor Peng

   102,500    219,668    -    3,398    325,566 

Robert Rango

   105,000    219,668    -    3,398    328,066 

(1) The amounts set forth in this column represent cash fees earned by each Outside Director during fiscal year 2022, regardless of whether the fees were actually paid during the fiscal year:year.

(2) The amounts shown represent the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs awarded to each Outside Director during fiscal year 2022, computed in accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, referred to in this Proxy Statement as ASC 718 (except that the fair values set forth above have not been reduced by the Company’s estimated forfeiture rate). The ASC 718 grant date fair value of each RSU award was calculated based on the fair market value of our Common Stock on the award date. For further discussion regarding the assumptions used in calculating the grant date fair value for RSUs, please refer to Note 1 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, filed with the SEC on August 5, 2022.

On November 3, 2021, each Outside Director then in office was granted an RSU award for 558 shares of our Common Stock (other than Mr. Barnholt who, as Chairman of the Board, received an RSU award for 736 shares, as described above under the heading “Our Fiscal Year 2022 Director Compensation Program”). The following table shows, for each Outside Director, the aggregate number of unvested shares of our Common Stock underlying all outstanding RSUs held by that Outside Director then in office as of June 30, 2022:

 

Name

    Fees
Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)  (1)
    Stock
Awards ($) (2)
    Change in Pension
Value and Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation
Earnings ($) (3)
    All Other
Compensation
($) (4)
    Total ($)   
  

Edward Barnholt

 

  160,000  269,938  -      6,880  436,818  
  

Robert Calderoni

 

  142,500  199,969  -      5,097  347,566  
  

John Dickson

 

  112,500  199,969  -      5,097  317,566  
  

Jeneanne Hanley

 

    22,500    82,145              -  104,645  
  

Emiko Higashi

 

  105,000  199,969  -      5,097  310,066  
  

Kevin Kennedy

 

  122,500  199,969  -      5,097  327,566  
  

Gary Moore

 

  102,500  199,969  -      5,097  307,566  
  

Kiran Patel

 

  112,500  199,969  -      5,097  317,566  
  

Victor Peng

 

    51,250  153,354  -            -  204,604  
  

Ana Pinczuk

 

  112,500  250,271  -         323  363,094  
  

Robert Rango

 

  102,500  199,969  -      5,097  307,566  
  

David Wang

 

     26,250             -   -       5,097     31,347  

(1)

The amounts set forth in this column represent fees earned by each Outside Director during fiscal year 2019, regardless of whether the fees were actually paid during the fiscal year.

(2)

The amounts shown represent the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs awarded to each Outside Director during fiscal year 2019, computed in accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, referred to in this Proxy Statement as ASC 718 (except that the fair values set forth above have not been reduced by the Company’s estimated forfeiture rate). The ASC 718 grant date fair value of each RSU award was calculated based on the fair market value of our Common Stock on the award

date. For further discussion regarding the assumptions used in calculating the grant date fair value for RSUs, please refer to Note 1 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, filed with the SEC on August 16, 2019. On November 7, 2018, each Outside Director then in office was granted an RSU award for 2,072 shares of our Common Stock (other than Mr. Barnholt who, as Chairman of the Board, received an RSU award for 2,797 shares, as described above under the heading “Our Fiscal year 2019 Director Compensation Program”). The following table shows, for each Outside Director, the aggregate number of unvested shares of our Common Stock underlying all outstanding RSUs held by that Outside Director then in office as of June 30, 2019:

Name

  Aggregate Number of
Unvested

Shares of
Common Stock

Underlying Director
RSU

Awards as of
June 30, 2019 (#)2022
 

Edward Barnholt

   2,797736 

Robert Calderoni

   2,072558 

  John Dickson

Jeneanne Hanley

   2,072558 

  Jeneanne Hanley

Emiko Higashi

   724558 

  Emiko Higashi

Kevin Kennedy

   2,072558 

  Kevin Kennedy

Gary Moore

   2,072558 

  Gary Moore

Marie Myers

   2,072558 

Kiran Patel

   2,072558 

Victor Peng

   1,439558 

  Ana Pinczuk

Robert Rango

   2,072

  Robert Rango

2,072558 

(3)

As noted above, of the current Outside Directors, only Messrs. Barnholt and Patel and Ms. Pinczuk participated in our EDSP during fiscal year 2019. We have concluded that, because the EDSP earnings correspond to the actual market earnings on a select group of investment funds available under the EDSP, no portion of the Outside Directors’ earnings under the EDSP is “above market” or “preferential.” Accordingly, we do not report any portion of the Outside Directors’ earnings under the EDSP in the Director Compensation Table. The investment earnings (loss) under the EDSP during fiscal year 2019 for the Outside Directors who participated in the EDSP were as follows: (a) Mr. Barnholt: $108,931; (b) Mr. Patel: $16,328; and (c) Ms. Pinczuk: $343.

(4)

Represents dividend equivalents paid upon the vesting of RSUs during fiscal year 2019.

(3) As noted above, of the current Outside Directors, only Ms. Myers and Messrs. Barnholt and Patel participated in our EDSP during fiscal year 2022. We have concluded that, because the EDSP earnings correspond to the actual market earnings on a select group of investment funds available under the EDSP, no portion of the Outside Directors’ earnings under the EDSP is “above market” or “preferential.” Accordingly, we do not report any portion of the Outside Directors’ earnings under the EDSP in the Director Compensation Table. The investment earnings (loss) under the EDSP during fiscal year 2022 for the Outside Directors who participated in the EDSP were as follows: (a) Ms. Myers: ($61,539); (b) Mr. Barnholt: ($637,627); and (c) Mr. Patel: ($70,920).

(4) Represents dividend equivalents paid upon the vesting of RSUs during fiscal year 2022.

 

OUR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICESLOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

21

LOGO Our Corporate Governance

    Practices

At KLA, we believe that strong and effective corporate governance procedures and practices are an extremely important part of our corporate culture. In that spirit, we have summarized several of our corporate governance practices below.

ADOPTING AND MAINTAINING GOVERNANCE STANDARDS

Adopting and Maintaining Governance Standards

The Board has adopted, and regularly reviews and updates as necessary, a set of Corporate Governance Standards to establish a framework within which it will conduct its business and to guide management in its running of the Company. The governance standards, portions of which are summarized below, can be found on our website athttp://ir.KLA.comir.KLA.com.. We have posted information regarding our corporate governance procedures to help ensure the transparency of our practices.

MONITORING BOARD EFFECTIVENESS

Monitoring Board Effectiveness

It is important that our Board and its Committees are performing effectively and in the best interests of KLA and our stockholders. The Board is responsible for annually assessing its effectiveness and the effectiveness of each of its Committees in fulfilling their respective obligations, and each Committee is responsible for reviewing the Board’s assessment of that Committee’s effectiveness. In addition, our Nominating and Governance Committee is charged with overseeing an annual review of the Board and its membership. The standard practice of the Board is that Outside Directors will not stand forre-election after reaching the age 75. However, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee, the Board may nominate director candidates who have reached the age of 75, unless asked to doif it determines that doing so to help ensure an appropriate transition, and whileis in the best interest of the Company. Board members are elected for one (1) yearone-year terms, and there is currently no limitation on the number of terms a Directordirector may serve.

CONDUCTING FORMAL INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR SESSIONS

Conducting Formal Independent Director Sessions

At the conclusion of each regularly scheduled Board meeting, the independent Directorsdirectors meet in executive session without KLA management or anynon-independent Directors.directors.

HIRING OUTSIDE ADVISORS

Hiring Outside Advisors

The Board and each of its Committeescommittees may retain outside advisors and consultants of their choosing at our expense, without management’s consent.

AVOIDING CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Avoiding Conflicts of Interest

We expect our Directors, executivesdirectors, executive officers and employees to conduct themselves with the highest degree of integrity, ethics and honesty. Our credibility and reputation depend upon the good judgment, ethical standards and personal integrity of each Director,director, executive officer and employee. In order to provide assurances internally and to our stockholders, we have implemented Standards of Business Conduct that provide clear conflict of interest guidelines to our employees, as well as an explanation of reporting and investigatory procedures.

COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD

Communications with the Board

Stockholders may communicate with the Board by writing to us at KLA Corporation, Attention: Investor Relations, One Technology Drive, Milpitas, California 95035.

Stockholders who would like their submission directed to a member of the Board may so specify, and the communication will be forwarded, as appropriate.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

 

Standards of Business Conduct; Whistleblower Hotline and Website22  |Our Corporate Governance Practices

STANDARDS OF BUSINESS CONDUCT; WHISTLEBLOWER HOTLINE AND WEBSITE

The Board has adopted Standards of Business Conduct for all of our employees and Directors,directors, including our principal executive and senior financial officers, and we have prepared and made available versions of our Standards of Business Conduct translated into Chinese (Simplified and Traditional), Dutch, French, German, Hebrew, Italian, Japanese and Korean in an effort to maximize the accessibility and understandability of these important guidelines to our employees. You can obtain a copy of our Standards of Business Conduct via our website athttp://ir.KLA.com, or by making a written request to us at KLA Corporation, Attention: Investor Relations, One Technology Drive, Milpitas, California 95035. We will disclosemake any amendmentrequired disclosures regarding amendments to, or waivers from, the Standards of Business Conduct or waiver of a provision thereof, on our website at the same address.

In addition, we have established a hotline and website for use by employees, as well as third parties such as vendors and customers, to report actual or suspected wrongdoing and to answer questions about business conduct. The hotline and website are both operated by an independent third party, which provides tools to enable individuals to submit reports in a number of different languages and, where permitted by law, on an anonymous basis.

ENSURING AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE

Ensuring Auditor Independence

We have taken a number of steps to ensure the continued independence of our outside auditors. Our independent registered public accounting firm reports directly to the Audit Committee, which also has the ability topre-approve or reject anynon-audit services proposed to be conducted by the firm.

COMPENSATION AND TALENT COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The Compensation Committee currently consistsDuring all or a portion of fiscal year 2022, Messrs. Kennedy (Chair), Barnholt, Moore Peng and RangoPeng and Mses. Hanley and Higashi.Higashi served on the Compensation and Talent Committee. None of these individuals was an officer or employee of KLA at any time during fiscal year 20192022 or at any other time. During fiscal year 2019,2022, there was no instance in which an executive officer of KLA served as a member of the Boardboard of directors or compensation committee of any entity and an executive officer of that same entity served on our Board or Compensation and Talent Committee.

STOCKHOLDER NOMINATIONS TO THE BOARD

Stockholder Nominations to the Board

Please see “INFORMATION ABOUT THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ITS COMMITTEES—Nominating and Governance Committee.”

MAJORITY VOTE POLICY

Majority Vote Policy

Please see “INFORMATION ABOUT THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ITS COMMITTEES—Nominating and Governance Committee—Majority Vote Policy.”

STOCKHOLDER OUTREACH

During the year, we engage with our stockholders to better understand their views on matters they consider important, which varies by stockholder, but usually includes topics such as: agenda items for the annual meeting of stockholders; Board composition; business performance and strategy; corporate governance; and environmental, social and human capital management. We typically commence our outreach activities following the filing of our proxy statement. Stockholder outreach is led by our investor relations team, but often includes members of management, our legal and compliance team and occasionally one or more members of our Board. Stockholder concerns expressed in this outreach are summarized and communicated to the Board or one of its committees. Similar to previous years, during outreach sessions, certain stockholders generally expressed a desire to see more disclosure on our website regarding ESG matters. In 2022, we published our second global impact report covering our ESG strategy and the foundation of that strategy.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

23

 

PROPOSAL TWO:Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)

KLA technologies address complex global challenges with the goal of making a meaningful impact on our world. While responding to unprecedented demand for our products in fiscal year 2022, we remained steadfast in our commitment to fulfill our mission of being positive stewards and living our values. While KLA’s core approach to business has long included a focus on continuous innovation for the greater good, in 2020, we centralized our ESG activities under the leadership of an enterprise-wide ESG Steering Committee. This committee comprises leaders from across the business who create and drive strategies, cross-functional programs, and initiatives to achieve our ESG goals. To promote dialogue between management and the Board for engagement and prioritization of ESG issues, the ESG Steering Committee receives oversight from the Nominating and Governance Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for monitoring KLA’s policies, programs and results related to environmental stewardship, corporate citizenship, human rights, and other social and public matters of significance to KLA and regularly receives updates from and engages with management. ESG oversight was added to the Committee’s charter in 2021, in response to input from our stakeholders.

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDINGADVANCING STEWARDSHIP

KLA is focused on responding to the climate challenges facing our world. In addition to the new climate goals we have announced for our global operations, we are working to make the microprocessor manufacturing process more efficient (and thus sustainable) through our core business, creating new products and services that can help companies reduce waste, conserve natural resources and reduce their environmental footprint.

We have made important strides in updating and improving our greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory baseline and achieving limited third-party verification of our inventory and renewable energy use. We have also announced new targets for reducing our emissions, as discussed in greater detail below, and are continuing to challenge ourselves to find new ways to fulfill our mission of being positive stewards and living our values.

We understand that there is currently significant pressure on companies to make climate-related commitments, and that this pressure can result in commitments being made before there is a path forward to achieve those commitments. At KLA, we strive to be methodical in our approach to target-setting, so that when we make a commitment, our stakeholders know we see a path forward for achieving it. That is why we are currently conducting various reviews of our Scope 3 emissions to inform our path forward. It is our aim to be in a position to provide further details on our progress toward the development of Scope 3 emissions reduction goals by the end of 2023.

JUNE 30, 2020Climate and energy:

We are taking action through our Science Based Target Initiatives (SBTi) informed climate goals—reducing Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 50% by 2030 (from 2021 baseline) and achieving net zero Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 2050—building on our previously announced goal of using 100% renewable energy by 2030.

Highlights:

 

    LOGO   Since 2018, we have continued to increase our procurement of electricity from carbon-free sources across our global operations year-over-year. In 2021, 52% of our electricity was sourced from renewable energy sources.

    LOGO   In 2021, KLA conducted our first in-depth climate risk and opportunity assessment following the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD).

    LOGO   We also developed a new and improved greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory baseline.

    LOGO   Completed first third-party verification of GHG inventory: limited assurance of Scope 1 and 2, Scope 3 business travel, and our renewable energy progress.

    LOGO   In 2021, KLA announced the grand opening of our second North American headquarters campus in Ann Arbor, Michigan. The sustainable design features of the new campus include underground parking to minimize the building footprint as well as a green roof, which insulates the building, helping reduce energy demands.

    LOGO   Regarding Scope 3 emissions, we are currently evaluating product energy efficiency opportunities and exploring a potential strategy to engage with our top suppliers around setting GHG emissions reduction goals.

    LOGO   As we look ahead to further reduce our climate impact, it is our aim to be in a position to provide further details on our progress toward the development of Scope 3 emissions reduction goals by the end of 2023.

 

Audit Committee RecommendationLOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

24  |Our Corporate Governance Practices

Materials and waste:

We are committed to continuously improving our use of materials and reducing waste across our sites. Millions of pounds of recyclable materials have been diverted away from local landfills as a result of these efforts. Each KLA site has programs in place to achieve these objectives, from waste diversion processes in manufacturing to encouraging recycling and composting in our dining areas and breakrooms.

Highlights:

    LOGO   From 2020 to 2021, KLA increased the amount of waste recycled by 43% and decreased the amount of waste sent to landfills by 20%.

    LOGO   In Milpitas, we achieved a 94% rate of waste diverted away from landfills.

    LOGO   In Singapore, we achieved a 71% diversion rate.

Water management:

Water is an increasingly critical resource around the world. KLA is taking innovative approaches across its sites to reduce water demand and reliance on fresh water sources.

Highlights:

    LOGO   We reduced our total water withdrawal by 1.1% from 2020 to 2021 while experiencing significant business growth.

    LOGO   Singapore maintained 75% usage of domestic wastewater (NEWater) cleaned through reverse osmosis which can be used for industrial purposes such as cooling towers and landscaping.

    LOGO   KLA Israel achieved a 15.7% reduction in water consumption per employee over 2020.

ADVANCING OPPORTUNITY

We believe our impact is powered by our people. That is why we embrace our responsibility to lead through exceptional training programs and professional development and making sure our employees feel included, safe, healthy and empowered to bring their full selves to work.

Inclusion and diversity:

At KLA, Inclusion & Diversity (I&D) is a shared aspiration, commitment and responsibility—and a direct expression of our core values. We celebrate the diversity of our employees, customers and partners, and we are committed to fostering a culture of conscious inclusion.

Highlights:

    LOGO   In 2021, we improved our I&D efforts in several ways. We continued to offer over 35 trainings to multiple teams globally in 2021 to expand awareness and understanding on I&D topics. Our Values in Action training was expanded last year to include a focus on I&D, reaching close to 1,200 leaders across the company.

    LOGO   To strengthen our culture of inclusion, we continue to increase the number of employee resource groups at our sites. These are voluntary groups of employees who have a common interest in helping KLA achieve its inclusion and diversity goals.

    LOGO   Demonstrating our commitment to creating a more diverse workforce, KLA signed the CEO Action for Diversity & Inclusion pledge and joined the Alliance for Global Inclusion in 2022.

    LOGO   We made I&D a key element of the KLA Foundation, focusing on our mission to advance humanity by investing in our communities to help create a more equitable, inclusive and accessible world. We aligned our strategic pillars of education, wellness and community enrichment with six of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, including 4-Quality Education, 5-Gender Equality and 10-Reduced Inequities.

    LOGO   At KLA, we value I&D throughout our organization and supply chain. We are working to grow an inclusive and diverse global supply chain, that drives innovation and partners with us in advancing humanity through KLA technologies and services.

Talent development:

Our competitive advantage is our people and the technology they develop, so we invest in KLA’s future by fully supporting their personal and professional growth. Our talent development programs focus on developing the unique attributes of our employees through comprehensive training offerings, employee engagement programs, and health and wellness activities.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

25

Highlights:

    LOGO   KLA has been included in Training Magazine’s Top 10 Hall of Fame for the past 15 years.

    LOGO   We support continued learning through tuition reimbursement. Through our partnerships with San Jose State University and the University of Michigan, employees can pursue advanced degrees in engineering that are customized for KLA and the skills/competencies required to support our customers.

    LOGO   Our Corporate Learning Center offers extensive training programs that are among the best in the technology industry.

    LOGO   In 2021, we achieved record attendance at 499 unique learning events across the globe.

    LOGO   In 2021, 211 leaders completed our Enterprise Leadership Program, a comprehensive, two-year management training program that provides robust succession planning to prepare KLA employees to fill future leadership roles.

Health and safety:

Our employees are the lifeblood of our business. That is why their health and safety are always our priority.

Highlights:

    LOGO   In 2021, our Environmental Health & Safety (EHS) team focused on building its organization to increase global coordination and consistency with strong local connections that support customers and employees within each region and site.

    LOGO   In response to the continuing demands of COVID-19, strong EHS collaboration across the regions resulted in the continued refinement of best practices for each of our sites, improving business resiliency and the health and safety of our employees worldwide.

    LOGO   In 2021, we had a Total Recordable Incident Rate of 0.22 incidents for every 200,000 hours worked across the U.S.

    LOGO   In 2021, we implemented a global standard for tracking and reporting our incidents to ensure consistency across our regions, and continually outperformed industry averages for injury rates.

Community engagement:

We value equity as much as empathy. We listen to local needs and find meaningful ways to help. We came together as an organization to address pressing needs that matter most to our employees and their communities. The KLA Foundation and KLA employees around the world supported the communities where we live and work through financial support, volunteerism and program facilitation focusing on our three strategic pillars: Education, Wellness and Community Support.

Highlights:

    LOGO   In 2021, the KLA Foundation made $3.9 million in direct grants and $1.6 million in employee match funding grants for a total of $5.5 million in community giving.

    LOGO   When India was hit with a resurgence of COVID-19 in 2021, the KLA Foundation expanded its efforts in the region with a $550,000 donation.

    LOGO   KLA employees worldwide volunteered to serve their local communities. For example, KLA Singapore employees planted trees together, delivered food packages to 3,000 senior citizens and continued their 20-year commitment to the Metta School for children with autism and special needs.

    LOGO   Through the KLA Social Equity Fund established in 2020 in partnership with the American Heart Association, we made $530,000 in grants to five nonprofits in the South Bay/Silicon Valley and Metro Detroit areas.

    LOGO   In 2021, the KLA Foundation made a $750,000 grant donation to the Milpitas Unified School District to support the development of the Innovation Campus—an educational initiative that will offer real-world educational experiences in high technology and other industries for students of all ages and learning levels.

Supply Chain Stewardship

Our commitment to advancing opportunity extends to our supply chain. We seek out suppliers who share our strong values, treat their employees with dignity, respect and fairness, and meet the strict requirements in our Standards of Business Conduct to promote a supply chain free from any human trafficking and labor violations.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

26  |Our Corporate Governance Practices

Highlights:

    LOGO   We refined our Supplier I&D initiative by expanding education efforts, increasing guidelines and identifying goals and metrics.

    LOGO   We strengthened our Supplier Diversity program by publishing our Supplier I&D Expectations document outlining our expectations and requesting our suppliers to use reasonable efforts to align with these expectations and implement internal practices and similar policies to partner with KLA in supporting supplier I&D.

    LOGO   We contractually require our suppliers to adhere to our Supply Chain Human Rights Policy and Standards of Business Conduct.

    LOGO   We continued to achieve our goal to get 85% of our targeted suppliers to participate in the annual Responsible Business Alliance (“RBA”) Facility Supplier Assessment Questionnaire, which assesses the supplier’s compliance to the RBA Code of Conduct.

    LOGO   We are actively exploring a potential engagement strategy with our top suppliers around setting GHG emissions reduction goals to help reduce upstream Scope 3 emissions in our value chain.

ADVANCING INNOVATION

We tackle our customers’ most complex problems through significant investment in research and development (“R&D”), collaborative teams and a passion for excellence.

Product innovation and sustainability:

The nature of KLA’s business and involvement in technological advancements requires us to continue to innovate and heavily invest in R&D to deliver for our customers. Our customers are constantly challenged to increase their production yield, reduce waste and meet their own profitability and sustainability goals. KLA solutions make this possible by allowing manufacturers to innovate and produce chips faster, more sustainably and at a lower cost.

Highlights:

    LOGO   In fiscal year 2022, our R&D spending was 12% of total revenue.

    LOGO   Reducing our Scope 3 emissions in a sustainable, impactful way is a priority. We are actively evaluating product energy efficiency opportunities to inform the feasibility of setting a target to establish a pathway toward reducing our downstream Scope 3 emissions.

    LOGO   In 2021, KLA unveiled four new products to ensure high yield, reliability and performance of the chips that power the most advanced automotive electronics.

    LOGO   KLA has been delivering solutions and support to the silicon carbide (SiC) and gallium nitride (GaN) power device market that enables advances in electric vehicles and other green technologies.

Protecting intellectual property:

At KLA, we have been a part of the most significant technological breakthroughs in our industry. Protecting the intellectual assets that we create and manage every day enables the innovations that advance humanity tomorrow.

Highlights:

    LOGO   We aim to ensure that the technologies we use to secure our digital environment are operational and running more than 99% of the time in any calendar month.

    LOGO   We have developed need-to-know and data classification systems to help employees recognize and protect intellectual property. The need-to-know campaign aims to get employees to think more about how and with whom they share information, while the data classification system is a visual way to identify and protect information.

Protecting against cybersecurity threats:

Recent years have brought unique challenges that highlight the importance of keeping our data safe. Around the globe, the switch to remote work and virtual schooling led to a huge influx of phishing emails, malware and ransomware at companies across every industry. At KLA, we responded aggressively to these challenges.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

27

Highlights:

    LOGO   Our KLA Security Operations Center monitors our digital environment 24/7 to help protect our data.

    LOGO   We have introduced key technologies that give us more visibility holistically across our environment—significantly reducing the time needed to detect and contain incidents.

    LOGO   We have a culture of open reporting. We want people to feel like they can come to us, ask questions and report concerns.

ADVANCING LEADERSHIP

Our solutions move industries forward, but our people make it happen. We empower today’s leaders—and tomorrow’s—by infusing our foundational values into everything we do. At the heart of this is strong business ethics, corporate governance, and corporate culture.

Business ethics and compliance:

Working ethically and complying with our legal obligations are central to the way we conduct business. At KLA, we continuously strive to create and maintain an ethical and legally compliant culture where everyone is aligned around our value systems, policies and procedures. That means regularly assessing our risk and adjusting our approach as needed.

Highlights:

    LOGO   KLA’s Chief Compliance Officer updates the Board’s Audit Committee and the CEO’s staff on a quarterly basis on current and emerging issues.

    LOGO   We initiated a first-ever Annual Compliance Disclosure process in which approximately 2,400 employees were asked to certify that they have complied with specific aspects of KLA’s Standards of Business Conduct and/or disclose any noncompliance.

    LOGO   Our Values in Action program is an innovative training program on our Standards of Business Conduct that incorporates internal and external instructors, interactive exercises, discussions and polling questions and involves about 10 hours of in-depth training. Values in Action covers subject areas such as the importance of speaking up, anti-bribery and corruption, trade compliance, privacy, and inclusion and diversity. The new program launched globally in 2021.

Corporate governance:

Governance and Ethics at KLA is more than policymaking or having the right systems in place to establish the rights of our people and the responsibilities of our leadership. We view Governance and Ethics as an opportunity to continuously embrace our core values, build trust and live up to our stakeholders’ expectations.

Highlights:

    LOGO   ESG oversight was added to the Nominating and Governance Committee’s charter in 2021.

    LOGO   The Board approved changes to the Compensation and Talent Committee charter to include oversight of human capital policies and practices, including I&D, and the Audit Committee now reviews cybersecurity initiatives quarterly.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

28  |Proposal Two: Ratification of Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Our Independent Registered Public Accounting

Firm for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023

LOGO Proposal Two: Ratification of

    Appointment of

    PricewaterhouseCoopers

    LLP as Our Independent

    Registered Public

    Accounting Firm for the

    Fiscal Year Ending June 30,

    2023

AUDIT COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Audit Committee has the sole authority to retain or dismiss our independent auditors. The Audit Committee has selectedappointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, to audit our consolidated financial statements for our fiscal year ending June 30, 2020.2023. Before making its determination, the Audit Committee carefully considered that firm’s qualifications as independent auditors.

The Board, following the Audit Committee’s determination, unanimously recommends that the stockholders vote for ratification of such appointment.

Although ratification by stockholders is not required by law, the Board has determined that it is desirable to request approval of this selectionappointment by the stockholders. If the stockholders do not ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Audit Committee may reconsider its selection.such appointment.

ATTENDANCE AT THE ANNUAL MEETING

Attendance at the Annual Meeting

A representative of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting with the opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so, and is expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

 

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

 

Fees 29

FEES

The aggregate fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, KLA’s independent registered public accounting firm, in fiscal years 20192022 and 20182021 were as follows:

 

Services Rendered/Fees

 2019 ($) 2018 ($)   2022 ($)     2021 ($) 
 

Audit Fees(1)

         7,028,730          3,941,771    6,280,316      5,260,369 
 

Audit-Related Fees(2)

 15,000  387,865    41,552      24,194 
 

 

  

 

 
 

Total Audit and Audit-Related Fees

 7,043,730  4,329,636    6,321,868      5,284,563 
 

Tax Compliance

 613,133  437,884    1,130,875      1,511,896 
 

Tax Planning and Consulting

 117,428  179,578    209,413      247,751 
 

 

  

 

 
 

Total Tax Fees(3)

 730,561  617,462    1,340,288      1,759,647 
 

All Other Fees(4)

  

 

42,041

 

 

 

  

 

31,300

 

 

 

   5,400      900 

(1)

Represents professional services rendered for the audits of annual financial statements set forth in our Annual Reports on Form10-K for fiscal years 2019 and 2018, the review of quarterly financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form10-Q for fiscal years 2019 and 2018, and fees for services related to statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. Fiscal year 2019 includes fees for assurance and related services rendered in connection with acquisition activities, audit services pertaining to bond offering, and adoption of ASC606 Revenue Standards. Fiscal year 2018 includes fees forS-3 andS-4 registration statement filings.

(2)

Fiscal year 2019 and 2018 represents accounting consultations and due diligence services, respectively, in connection with the proposed acquisition of Orbotech Ltd.

(3)

Represents tax services for U.S. and foreign tax compliance, planning and consulting.

(4)

For fiscal year 2019, represents software license fees, subscription for tax legislation fees and consulting services associated with user interface of certain products. For fiscal year 2018, represents software license fees and subscription for tax legislation fees.

(1) Represents professional services rendered for the audits of annual financial statements set forth in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K for fiscal years 2022 and 2021, the review of quarterly financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed during fiscal years 2022 and 2021, services related to statutory and regulatory filings or engagements, and audits of new systems/processes. Fiscal year 2022 also includes fees for audit services pertaining to bond offerings and accelerated share repurchase agreements. Fiscal year 2021 also includes fees for the adoption of new credit losses guidance.

(2) Represents audits of employee benefit plans and audits of government-sponsored research and development program grant spending.

(3) Represents tax services for U.S. and foreign tax compliance, planning and consulting.

(4) Represents license fees related to accounting research software.

Pre-ApprovalPRE-APPROVAL Policies and ProceduresPOLICIES AND PROCEDURES

The Audit Committee has adopted a policy regardingnon-audit services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. First, the policy ensures the independence of our auditors by expressly naming all services that the auditors may not perform and reinforcing the principle of independence regardless of the type of service. Second, certainnon-audit services, such astax-related services and acquisition advisory services, are permitted but limited in proportion to the audit fees paid. Third, the Audit Committeepre-approvesnon-auditpre-approves non-audit services not specifically permitted under this policy (or subsequently approves such services in circumstances where a subsequent approval is necessary and permissible), and the Audit Committee reviews the annual plan and any subsequent engagements. Allnon-audit fees were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to itspre-approval policies and procedures.

On a quarterly basis, management provides written updates to the Audit Committee with regard to audit andnon-auditINDEPENDENCE ASSESSMENT BY AUDIT COMMITTEE services, the amount of audit andnon-audit service fees incurred to date, and the estimated cost to complete such services.

Independence Assessment by Audit Committee

Our Audit Committee considered and determined that the provision of the services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as set forth herein is compatible with maintaining PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s independence and approved allnon-audit related fees and services.

VOTE REQUIRED AND RECOMMENDATION

Vote Required and Recommendation

If a quorum is present, and voting, the affirmative vote of the majority of Votes Castvotes cast is needed to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, to audit our consolidated financial statements for our fiscal year ending June 30, 2020.2023.

 

LOGO

The Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023.

The Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2020.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

 

30  |Proposal Three: Approval of our Named Executive Officer Compensation

PROPOSAL THREE:LOGO Proposal Three: Approval of

    Our Named Executive

    Officer Compensation

BACKGROUND

APPROVAL OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

Background

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, or the Dodd-Frank Act, enables KLA’s stockholders to vote to approve, on anon-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our NEOs (as that term is defined on page 34 of this Proxy Statement) as disclosed in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section, the Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and disclosures in this Proxy Statement. This vote is required pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act. The Board has determined, consistent with the feedback from our stockholders, that we will hold this vote every year.

As described in greater detail under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” we seek to closely align the interests of our NEOs with the interests of our stockholders by focusing on a philosophy of“pay-for-performance.” Our compensation programs are designed to support our business goals and to promote both short-term and long-term financial and strategic achievement.

We urge stockholders to read the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement, which describes in more detail how our executive compensation policies and procedures operate and are designed to achieve our compensation objectives, and the Summary Compensation Table and other related compensation tables and disclosure in this Proxy Statement, which provide detailed information on the compensation of our NEOs. The Compensation and Talent Committee and the Board believe that the policies and procedures articulated in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” are effective in achieving our goals and that the compensation of our NEOs as reported in this Proxy Statement has supported and contributed to our recent and long-term success.

NATURE OF VOTE; RECOMMENDATION

Nature of Vote; Recommendation

This vote is advisory and therefore not binding on KLA, our Board or the Compensation and Talent Committee. The vote on this resolution is not intended to address any specific element of compensation, but rather relates to the overall compensation of our NEOs, as described in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC.

Accordingly, we ask our stockholders to approve the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:

RESOLVED,that KLA Corporation’s stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the NEOs, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of RegulationS-K in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 20192022 annual meeting of stockholders, pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and disclosure.”

While this advisory vote on executive compensation isnon-binding, the Board and the Compensation and Talent Committee value the opinion of KLA’s stockholders and will carefully assess the voting results and consider the impact of such voting results on our compensation policies and decisions, as described in greater detail in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement.

VOTE REQUIRED

Vote Required

If a quorum is present, and voting, the affirmative vote of the majority of Votes Castvotes cast is required for advisory approval of this proposal.

 

The Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the approval of the compensation of our NEOs, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement.

LOGOThe Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the approval of the compensation of our NEOs, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement.

 

INFORMATION ABOUT EXECUTIVE OFFICERSLOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

31

LOGO Information About Executive

    Officers

Set forth below are the names, ages and positions of the executive officers of KLA as of the date of this Proxy Statement.Record Date.

 

Name

PositionAge

Name

Richard Wallace

LOGO

 

Position

    Age    

Richard Wallace

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

59    

62

Please see INFORMATION“INFORMATION ABOUT THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ITS COMMITTEESCOMMITTEES—Nominees for Election at the 20192022 Annual Meeting.”

 

Name

PositionAge

NameBren Higgins

LOGO

 

Position

    Age    

Bren Higgins

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

49    

52

Bren Higgins has served as KLA’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since August 2013. In this role, Mr. Higgins oversees and manages the Company’s finance operations and control processes, global manufacturing operations corporate procurement, and investor relations functions. Prior to his promotion to Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Higgins oversaw the Company’s treasury and investor relations functions and supported its business development efforts in his role as Vice President of Corporate Finance from January 2012 to August 2014,2013, and as Senior Director of Corporate Finance from August 2011 to January 2012. Before that, he served as the Company’s Senior Director of Financial Planning and Analysis from August 2008 to August 2011. Mr. Higgins has also held various financial and investor relations positions since he began his tenure at the Company in 1999, including multiple product division controller assignments and serving as Group Controller of the Company’s Wafer Inspection Group from 2006 to 2008. Mr. Higgins received his bachelor’s degree from the University of California at Santa Barbara and his master’s degree in business administration with a concentration in finance from the University of California at Davis.

 

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

32  |Information About Executive Officers

Name

 PositionAge

PositionAhmad Khan

LOGO

     Age    

Ahmad Khan

President, Semiconductor Process Control

 

45    

48

Ahmad Khan has served as KLA’s President, Semiconductor Process Control since August 2019 where he is responsible for overseeing and managing our Semiconductor Process Control segment, and was Executive Vice President, Global Products Group from December 2016 to August 2019, where he was responsible for the Company’s wafer inspection and patterning divisions. From August 2015 to December 2016, he served as Executive Vice President, Patterning Division. In this role, he was responsible for the development and execution of technology roadmaps and customer collaboration strategies for all of KLA’s patterning products. Mr. Khan joined KLA’s Films & Surface Technology Division in 2003 as Senior Director of Business Development, and has since held numerous strategic management positions throughout his14-year17-year tenure with the Company. In 2007, Mr. Khan served as Vice President and General Manager of KLA’s Optical Films Metrology Division. From 2008 to his current position, his executive management responsibilities expanded to include the Resistivity, Optical CD, Implant, Thermawave, Overlay and SensArray Divisions, all ultimately comprising KLA’s Metrology Division. Prior to joining KLA, Mr. Khan spent nine years at Applied Materials, holding various product engineering, support, operations and senior management positions. Mr. Khan earned his bachelor’s degree in electronics engineering technology from DeVry University.

 

Name

PositionAge

NameOreste Donzella

LOGO

 

Position

    Age    

Brian Trafas

Executive Vice President, Global Customer Organization

Electronics, Packaging and Components
 

56

Brian TrafasOreste Donzella has servedheld various positions with KLA since he joined us in 1999. He currently serves as KLA’sthe Company’s Executive Vice President Global Customer Organizationof Electronics, Packaging and Components since November 2017 and prior to that as Senior Vice President, Global Customer Organization from April 2015. In thisMarch 2020, in which role Mr. Trafashe is responsible for all field-based salesrunning our specialty semiconductors, advanced packaging, printed circuit board and field-based service teams,flat panel display businesses. Prior to his current role, Mr. Donzella served as our Executive Vice President and works in close collaboration with customers to address their needs with leading edge technology and services, while growing KLA’s business. Mr. Trafas served most recently as Chief Marketing Officer from JanuarySeptember 2016 to February 2020 and had responsibilities for market analytics, external communication and company-wide collaborations with the broader electronics industry. From July 2015 to July 2018, he was also responsible for the customer engagement organization at KLA, leading the world-wide field application engineering teams. In his long tenure at KLA, Mr. Donzella also served as general manager of the macro wafer inspection and the unpatterned wafer inspection divisions from August 2007 to AprilJune 2015 where he was responsible for overseeingand held various leadership management positions in product marketing initiatives, product development, marketing communications, market research, and application engineering across the development of marketing talent. Priorcompany prior to that, from June 2000 to January 2007, he was Vice President and General Manager of the Critical Dimension (“CD”) Metrology Division and Group Vice President of Marketing for the Wafer Inspection Group. During his tenure with KLA,that. Mr. Trafas has led the Company’s introduction of Laser Scattering Patterned Wafer Inspection products, Scatterometry-based CD products, and developed a company-wide program of marketing best practices and talent forums. Having two

decadesDonzella brings more than 27 years of experience in the semiconductor capital equipment industry, with an emphasisindustry. Prior to joining KLA, he spent more than six years at Texas Instruments and Micron Technology, holding engineering and management positions in the process integration and yield enhancement departments. Mr. Donzella currently serves on process control, he has written extensively about CD process control, advanced patterned wafer inspection methodologies and the application of scanning probe microscopes. A former chairman of the SEMI North America Advisory Board,Board. Mr. Trafas continues to serve as a board member, and is also a member of the SEMI ISS committee. Mr. Trafas holds a bachelor’sDonzella earned his master’s degree in physics from St. John’s University and a doctorate in materials scienceelectrical engineering from the University of Minnesota. Mr. Trafas announced his intent to retire from KLA at the end of 2019.La Sapienza in Rome, Italy.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

33

 

Name

 

Position

 Age

Virendra Kirloskar

Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

55    

Virendra Kirloskar has served as the Company’s Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer since March 2008. Mr. Kirloskar rejoined the Company as Vice President and Corporate Controller in May 2003 and served in that role until March 2008, other than the period from August 2006 to August 2007, during which time he held management responsibilities within KLA India. Prior to that, from June 2002 to April 2003, Mr. Kirloskar served as Corporate Controller of Atmel Corporation, a designer and manufacturer of semiconductor integrated circuits. Mr. Kirloskar also held various finance positions within KLA from 1993 to 1999. Mr. Kirloskar received his bachelor’s degree in commerce from the University of Pune, India and his master’s degree in business administration from the University of Massachusetts Amherst.

NameMary Beth Wilkinson

LOGO

 

Position

    Age    

Teri Little

Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary

 

55    

50

Teri LittleMary Beth Wilkinson has served as the Company’s Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary since August 2017September 2020. Ms. Wilkinson has more than two decades of legal experience including extensive executive and operating experience in industrials and manufacturing. Before joining KLA, she served as Senior Vice President, Generalsenior vice president, general counsel and corporate secretary of O-I Glass, Inc. and as a partner at Hogan Lovells, an international law firm. Ms. Wilkinson was named to Women Inc.’s 2019 Top Corporate Counsel and Corporate Secretary from October 2015 until August 2017.list. Ms. Little served as the Company’s interim General Counsel from September 2015 to October 2015. Prior to that, from 2007 until September 2015, Ms. Little served as an Associate General Counsel for the Company, leading the Commercial legal team in connection with various customer and supplier-related matters, including the negotiation of the Company’s worldwide commercial sales, procurement, and technology development agreements, working with the Company’s largest and most strategic customers and suppliers. In 2014, she assumed responsibility for the Corporate legal function, managing the legal requirements associated with the Company’s corporate securities, mergers and acquisitions, strategic alliances, corporate governance and Sarbanes-Oxley compliance. Ms. Little joined the Company in 2002 as Senior Counsel. Prior to joining the Company, she was a senior associate at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C. Ms. Little received her J.D. from Stanford University andWilkinson earned her bachelor’s degree from Saint Mary’s College, Notre Dame, Indiana, with a double major in financeeconomics and English writing. She holds a Juris Doctor degree from San Jose State University.Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law and is a graduate of Stanford University’s Executive Program.

 

Name

PositionAge

NameBrian Lorig

LOGO

 

Position

    Age    

Brian Lorig

Executive Vice President, Global Support and Services

 

45    

48

Brian Lorig has served as Executive Vice President, since August 2019, and Senior Vice President and general manager of the Company’s Global Support and Services organization since March 2016. The Global Support and Services organization includes the Company’s services group, which enables customers in all business sectors to maintain high performance and productivity of their purchased products through a flexible portfolio of services. Global Support and Services also includes KT Pro Systems, which offers certified fully refurbished and tested systems, as well as remanufactured legacy systems, and KT Pro Enhancements, which include enhancements and upgrades for previous-generation KLA tools. Mr. Lorig joined the Company in 1998 and has held a number of leadership positions in Manufacturing Operations and Service, including vice president of U.S. Manufacturing and Operations Group from January 2013 through February 2014, and vice president of Global Support and Services Field Operations from February 2014 through March 2016. Mr. Lorig earned his bachelor of science in supply chain management from Arizona State University and his MBA from Santa Clara University.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

34  |Information About Executive Officers

Name

 

Position

 Age

Amichai SteimbergVirendra Kirloskar

 

 

Senior Vice President and Chief ExecutiveAccounting Officer of Orbotech Ltd.

 

57    

58

Amichai SteimbergVirendra Kirloskar has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Orbotech Ltd., one of our subsidiaries, since March 2019. Prior to that, Mr. Steimberg was the President and Chief Operating Officer of Orbotech from January 2013 to March 2019, and served as Chief Operating Officer from June 2010 to December 2012, and as Deputy Chief Executive Officer – Global Finance and Operations from July 2009 to May 2010. From May 2006 to June 2009, he served as ExecutiveCompany’s Senior Vice President and Chief FinancialAccounting Officer prior to which he had,since March 2008. Mr. Kirloskar rejoined the Company as Vice President and Corporate Controller in May 2003 and served in that role until March 2008, other than the period from August 20002006 to May 2006,August 2007, during which time he held management responsibilities within KLA India. Prior to that, from June 2002 to April 2003, Mr. Kirloskar served as Corporate Vice President for FinanceController of Atmel Corporation, a designer and Chief Financial Officer. From January 1997manufacturer of semiconductor integrated circuits. Mr. Kirloskar also held various finance positions within KLA from 1993 to July 2000, he served as the Executive Vice President of Orbotech, Inc., and from 1995 to January 1997, he served as that company’s Vice President Finance and Operations. Prior to joining Orbotech,1999. Mr. Steimberg was Chief Financial Officer of Orbot Instruments Ltd. Mr. Steimberg obtainedKirloskar received his bachelor’s degree in agricultural economicscommerce from the University of Pune, India and his master’s degree in business administration from the Hebrew University. He is a graduateUniversity of the advanced management program at Harvard Business School.Massachusetts Amherst.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

 

35

LOGO Security Ownership of

    Certain Beneficial Owners

    and Management

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENTPRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

Principal Stockholders

As of September 9, 2019,12, 2022, based solely on our review of filings made with the SEC, we are aware of the following entities being beneficial owners of more than 5% of our Common Stock:

 

Name and Address

 Number of
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
  Percent of
Shares
Beneficially
Owned (1)
 
  

The Vanguard Group, Inc. (2)

  18,154,377   11.5 

100 Vanguard Boulevard

Malvern, PA 19355

   
  

PRIMECAP Management Company(3)

  12,244,761   7.7 

117 E. Colorado Blvd., 11th Floor

Pasadena, CA 91105

   
  

BlackRock, Inc.(4)

  11,236,759   7.1 

40 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10022

   
  

Wellington Management Group LLP(5)

  8,661,923   5.5 

280 Congress Street

Boston, MA 02210

        

Name and Address

  Number of Shares
Beneficially Owned
   Percent of Shares
Beneficially Owned(1)
 

The Vanguard Group, Inc.(2)

100 Vanguard Boulevard

Malvern, PA 19355

   13,509,990    9.5% 

BlackRock, Inc.(3)

40 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10022

   11,324,684    8.0% 

Capital International Investors(4)

333 S. Hope Street, 55th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90071

   7,934,340    5.6% 

(1) Based on 141,807,816 outstanding shares of our Common Stock as of September 12, 2022.

(2) All information regarding The Vanguard Group (“Vanguard”) is based solely on information disclosed in an Amendment to Schedule 13G filed by Vanguard with the SEC on February 10, 2022. According to the Schedule 13G/A filing, of the 13,509,990 shares of our Common Stock reported as beneficially owned by Vanguard as of December 31, 2021, Vanguard had shared voting power with respect to 257,704 shares, had sole dispositive power with respect to 12,878,859 shares, and had shared dispositive power with respect to 631,131 shares.

(3) All information regarding BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) is based solely on information disclosed in an Amendment to Schedule 13G filed by BlackRock with the SEC on February 1, 2022. According to the Schedule 13G/A filing, of the 11,324,684 shares of our Common Stock reported as beneficially owned by BlackRock as of December 31, 2021, BlackRock had sole voting power with respect to 10,029,929 shares and had sole dispositive power with respect to all 11,324,684 shares.

(4) All information regarding Capital International Investors (“Capital”) is based solely on information disclosed in an Amendment to Schedule 13G filed by Capital on February 11, 2022. According to the Schedule 13G/A filing, of the 7,934,340 shares of our Common Stock reported as beneficially owned by Capital as of December 31, 2021, Capital had sole voting power with respect to 7,929,794 shares and had sole dispositive power with respect to all 7,934,340 shares.

 

(1)

Based on 158,462,804 outstanding shares of our Common Stock as of September 9, 2019.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement

(2)

All information regarding The Vanguard Group, Inc. (“Vanguard”) is based solely on information disclosed in an Amendment to Schedule 13G filed by Vanguard with the SEC on February 11, 2019. According to the Schedule 13G/A filing, of the 18,154,377 shares of our Common Stock reported as beneficially owned by Vanguard as of December 31, 2018, Vanguard had sole voting power with respect to 190,525 shares, had shared voting power with respect to 33,403 shares, had sole dispositive power with respect to 17,935,797 shares, and had shared dispositive power with respect to 218,580 shares of our Common Stock reported as beneficially owned by Vanguard as of that date.

(3)

All information regarding PRIMECAP Management Company (“PRIMECAP”) is based solely on information disclosed in an Amendment to Schedule 13G filed by PRIMECAP with the SEC on February 8, 2019. According to the Schedule 13G/A filing, of the 12,244,761 shares of our Common Stock reported as beneficially owned by PRIMECAP as of December 31, 2018, PRIMECAP had sole voting power with respect to 3,018,750 shares, did not have shared voting or dispositive power with respect to any other shares, and had sole dispositive power with respect to all 12,244,761 shares of our Common Stock reported as beneficially owned by PRIMECAP as of that date.

(4)

All information regarding BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) is based solely on information disclosed in an Amendment to Schedule 13G filed by BlackRock with the SEC on February 6, 2019. According to the Schedule 13G/A filing, of the 11,236,759 shares of our Common Stock reported as beneficially owned by BlackRock as of December 31, 2018, BlackRock had sole voting power with respect to 9,963,457 shares, did not have shared voting or dispositive power with respect to any other shares, and had sole dispositive power with respect to all 11,236,759 shares of our Common Stock reported as beneficially owned by BlackRock as of that date.

(5)

All information regarding Wellington Management Group LLP (“Wellington”) is based solely on information disclosed in an Amendment to Schedule 13G filed by Wellington with the SEC on February 12, 2019. According to the Schedule 13G/A filing, of the 8,661,923 shares of our Common Stock reported as beneficially owned by Wellington as of December 31, 2018, Wellington had sole voting and dispositive power with respect to none of the shares, had shared voting power with respect to 4,181,895 shares and had shared dispositive power with respect to 8,661,923 shares of our Common Stock reported as beneficially owned by Wellington as of that date.


LOGO

 

Directors, Nominees36  |Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock as of September 9, 201912, 2022, by all current Directors,directors, each of the NEOs (as defined on page 41 of this Proxy Statement) set forth in the Summary Compensation Table, and all current Directorsdirectors and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each person is c/o KLA Corporation, One Technology Drive, Milpitas, California 95035. Except for shares held in brokerage accounts which may, from time to time, together with other securities held in those accounts, serve as collateral for margin loans made from those accounts, none of the shares reported as beneficially owned are currently pledged as security for any outstanding loan or indebtedness. Shares that, as of September 9, 2019,12, 2022, have not yet been issued under outstanding RSUs due to applicable performance or service-vesting requirements that have not yet been satisfied are not included in the table below:

 

Name

  Number of
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
   Percent of
Shares
Beneficially
Owned(1)
 

Richard Wallace(2)

   98,930200,930    * 

Edward Barnholt(3)

   41,29039,172    * 

Robert Calderoni(4)

   10,40812,994    * 

John DicksonJeneanne Hanley(5)

   32,3093,350    * 

Jeneanne HanleyEmiko Higashi(6)(5)

   72413,478    * 

Emiko HigashiKevin Kennedy(4)(6)

   10,8526,285    * 

Kevin KennedyGary Moore (7)(5)

   21,15913,481    * 

Gary MooreMarie Myers(4)(5)

   10,4782,333    * 

Kiran M. Patel(8)(7)

   18,82612,452    * 

Victor Peng(9)(5)

   1,4394,065    * 

Ana PinczukRobert Rango(4)(5)

   2,50313,415    * 

Robert Rango (4)Oreste Donzella

   10,7899,709    * 

Bren Higgins

   8,44310,935    * 

Ahmad Khan(10)

   9,59112,637    * 

Asher Levy(11)Virendra Kirloskar

   41,805297    * 

Amichai Steimberg(12)Brian Lorig

   13,6747,148    * 

Brian TrafasMary Beth Wilkinson(10)(8)

   1,7575,522    * 

All current Directorsdirectors and executive officers as a group (20(17 persons) (13)(9)

   

300,969

219,068
   

*

 *

Less than 1%.

* Less than 1%.

(1)

Based on 158,462,804 outstanding shares of our Common Stock as of September 9, 2019. In addition, shares of our Common Stock subject to RSUs that will vest and become deliverable within 60 days after September 9, 2019

(1) Based on 141,807,816 outstanding shares of our Common Stock as of September 12, 2022. In addition, shares of our Common Stock subject to RSUs that will vest and become deliverable within 60 days after September 12, 2022, are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of the applicable person or entity in this table, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person or entity.

(2) Includes 9,182 outstanding shares of our Common Stock that are held by the Wallace Living Trust u/a/d dated 3/27/01, as amended, of which Mr. Wallace is a trustee and beneficiary.

(3) Includes (a) 736 shares subject to RSUs that will vest and become deliverable within 60 days after September 12, 2022, and (b) 25,431 outstanding shares of our Common Stock that are held by The Barnholt Family Trust dated January 8, 1987, of which Mr. Barnholt is a trustee and beneficiary.

(4) Includes (a) 558 shares subject to RSUs that will vest and become deliverable within 60 days after September 12, 2022, and (b) 11,529.527 outstanding shares of our Common Stock that are held by The 2019 Calderoni Family Trust.

(5) Includes 558 shares subject to RSUs that will vest and become deliverable within 60 days after September 12, 2022.

(6) Includes (a) 558 shares subject to RSUs that will vest and become deliverable within 60 days after September 12, 2022, and (b) 4,821 outstanding shares of our Common Stock that are held by the Kennedy Family Trust u/a/d 11/19/98, of which Mr. Kennedy is a trustee and beneficiary.

(7) Includes (a) 558 shares subject to RSUs that will vest and become deliverable within 60 days after September 12, 2022, and (b) 11,894 outstanding shares of our Common Stock that are held by The Kiran Patel Trust dated August 28, 2018, of which Mr. Patel is a trustee and beneficiary.

(8) Includes 5,522 shares subject to RSUs that will vest and become deliverable within 60 days after September 12, 2022.

(9) Includes 5,758 shares subject to RSUs held by Outside Directors and 5,522 shares subject to RSUs held by executive officers that will vest and become deliverable within 60 days after September 12, 2022, together with the other shares set forth in footnotes (2) through (7).

 

(2)

Includes 9,182 outstanding shares of our Common Stock that are held by the Wallace Living Trust u/a/d dated 3/27/01, as amended, of which Mr. Wallace is a trustee and beneficiary.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement

(3)

Includes (a) 2,797 shares subject to RSUs that will vest and become deliverable within 60 days after September 9, 2019, and (b) 28,281 outstanding shares of our Common Stock that are held by The Barnholt Family Trust dated January 8, 1987, of which Mr. Barnholt is a trustee and beneficiary.

(4)

Includes 2,072 shares subject to RSUs that will vest and become deliverable within 60 days after September 9, 2019.

(5)

Includes (a) 2,072 shares subject to RSUs that will vest and become deliverable within 60 days after September 9, 2019, and (b) 30,237 outstanding shares of our Common Stock that are held under The Dickson Family Trust Agreement dated October 24, 2006, of which Mr. Dickson is a trustee and beneficiary.


(6)

Includes 724 shares subject to RSUs that will vest and become deliverable within 60 days after September 9, 2019.

LOGO

(7)

Includes (a) 2,072 shares subject to RSUs that will vest and become deliverable within 60 days after September 9, 2019, and (b) 17,185 outstanding shares of our Common Stock that are held by the Kennedy Family Trust U/A/D 11/19/98, of which Mr. Kennedy is a trustee and beneficiary.

(8)

Includes (a) 2,072 shares subject to RSUs that will vest and become deliverable within 60 days after September 9, 2019, and (b) 14,852 outstanding shares of our Common Stock that are held by The Kiran Patel Trust dated August 28, 2018, of which Mr. Patel is a trustee and beneficiary.

(9)

Includes 1,439 shares subject to RSUs that will vest and become deliverable within 60 days after September 9, 2019.

(10)

Includes 1,757 shares subject to RSUs that will vest and become deliverable within 60 days after September 9, 2019.

(11)

Includes 5,702 shares subject to RSUs that will vest and become deliverable within 60 days after September 9, 2019.

(12)

Includes 1,669 shares subject to RSUs that will vest and become deliverable within 60 days after September 9, 2019.

(13)

Includes 21,536 shares subject to RSUs held by Outside Directors and 5,926 shares subject to RSUs held by executive officers that will vest and become deliverable within 60 days after September 9, 2019 together with the other shares set forth in footnotes (2) through (8).

 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance 37

DELINQUENT SECTION 16(A) REPORTS

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers, Board members and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC, and such persons are also required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by us, we believe that during fiscal year 20192022 all of our executive officers, Board members and greater than ten percent stockholders complied with all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements, except that the following persons filed late Forms 4, each for one Form 4s: Teri Little (one form4 and one transaction).two transactions: Oreste Donzella, Bren Higgins, Ahmad Khan, Virendra Kirloskar, Brian Lorig and Richard Wallace.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

 

38  |Executive Compensation and Other Matters

LOGO Executive Compensation

    and Other Matters

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER MATTERSSUMMARY

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis section discusses the compensation policies and programs for our “Named Executive Officers” as determined under the rules of the SEC, for fiscal year 2022.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The objective of our executive compensation program is to attract, retain and motivate experienced and talented executives who can help KLA to achieve its business objectives and maximize stockholder value. We believe that a significant portion of the compensation paid to our executive officers should be closely aligned with our performance on both a short-term and long-term basis.

Executive Summary

Fiscal year 2019 was another very good year for KLA. We delivered strong topgrowth and bottom line performance, driven by the ongoing execution of our strategic objectives despite a weaker semiconductor market demand environment. The principal differences between executive compensationprofitability in fiscal 2019 comparedyear 2022. Customer demand across our major product groups remained strong in fiscal year 2022 as long-term secular trends drove broad-based diversified growth across a range of markets. As semiconductors have become more pervasive in our home and work lives, they have also become critical to global economic growth. As a result, despite evolving macro-economic and supply chain related headwinds, demand for semiconductors has remained resilient. Against this dynamic backdrop, we have remained focused on responding to evolving customer needs and navigating through supply chain challenges in our industry. We are operating with purpose and precision as we stay focused on creating value for our customers, partners, and stockholders.

Revenue grew 33.1% to $9.2 billion in fiscal 2018 are:

u

In fiscal 2019 we granted to certain NEOs PRSUs that are tied to achieving total stockholder return objectives (“TSR Awards”) to further incent execution of our growth initiatives and increase stockholder value. We do not expect to make additional TSR Awards in the near term;

u

We acquired Orbotech in February 2019, which led to us entering into new employment agreements with two of our NEOs who joined us from that acquisition; and

u

Beginning in calendar 2018, the maximum bonus achievable by executives under our short-term incentive plan was reduced from 300% of target in calendar 2017 to 200% of target.

year 2022, marking the seventh consecutive year of growth. GAAP diluted net income per share attributable to KLA grew 63.9% in fiscal year 2022 to $21.92 per share, setting a new record for KLA. Delivering on our commitment to provide healthy capital returns to stockholders, we returned $4.61 billion to our stockholders in fiscal year 2022, including $638.5 million in quarterly dividends and total stock repurchases of $3.97 billion.

Fiscal Year 2019 HighlightsFISCAL YEAR 2022 HIGHLIGHTS

KLA delivered strong performance in fiscal year 2022 including double-digit total revenue and service revenue growth. Below are some of the highlights for fiscal year 20192022 and the percentage change from fiscal 2018. Net income attributable to KLA and diluted EPS attributable to KLAyear 2021 (dollars in fiscal 2018 were negatively impacted by the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in December 2017. Fiscal 2019 amounts include the contribution of Orbotech and its subsidiaries for the period from February 20, 2019 through June 30, 2019 or as of June 30, 2019.thousands, except per share data).

 

Total
revenues
  Net income
attributable

to KLA
  Diluted EPS
attributable to

KLA
  Net cash
provided by
operating

activities
  Cash, cash
equivalents

and
marketable
securities
  Dividends and
stock
repurchases ($)
  Service
revenues ($)
 

 

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

 
 $          4,568,904   $          1,175,617   $                   7.49   $      1,152,632   $      1,739,385   $      1,567,465   $      1,176,661 

 

Change from Fiscal Year 2018

 

 
 

 

13.2

 

 

  

 

46.5

 

 

  

 

46.9

 

 

  

 

(6.2)

 

 

  

 

(39.6)

 

 

  

 

159.0

 

 

  

 

34.3

 

 

Total revenues

 

$9,211,883

LOGO 33.1% since FY21

Net income attributable to KLA

$3,321,807

LOGO 59.8% since FY21

Diluted EPS attributable to KLA

$21.92

LOGO 63.9% since FY21

Net cash provided by

operating activities

$3,312,702

LOGO 51.6% since FY21

Cash, cash equivalents and

marketable securities

$2,708,008

LOGO 8.6% since FY21

Dividends and stock
repurchases

$4,606,334

LOGO 207.5% since FY21

Service revenues

$1,910,455

LOGO 13.8% since FY21

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

 

Multi-Year Growth 39

MULTI-YEAR GROWTH

We have experienced tremendous growth over the last five years, with total revenues increasing 128.2% to $9.2 billion in fiscal year 2022 from $4.0 billion in fiscal year 2018 and net income attributable to KLA increasing 314.1% to $3.3 billion in fiscal year 2022 from $802.3 million in fiscal year 2018, and we intend to continue to deliver profitable growth in the future as we execute against our strategic objective to grow both inside and outside our core semiconductor process control segment, the first major example of which was our acquisition of Orbotech in February 2019.objectives.

The charts below show total stockholder return (stock price appreciation plus cash dividends per share) to a hypothetical investor who purchased a share of our Common Stock on each ofJuly 3, 2017 and July 1, 2014 and 20162019 and the associated compound annual growth rate (CAGR)(“CAGR”). As demonstrated by the charts below, our total stockholder return has outpaced the S&P 500 on both a five- and three-year basis.

 

 

LOGO

Appreciation in Share Price and Cumulative Cash Dividends

As demonstrated by the charts below, we have experienced double digit annualized revenue and net income per share growth over the five-year period endedDistributed Per Share Since June 30, 2019:2017

 

 

LOGOLOGO

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

40  |Executive Compensation and Other Matters

Appreciation in Share Price and Cumulative Cash Dividends

Distributed Per Share Since June 30, 2019

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

41

KLA’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM AT A GLANCE

Introduction

This “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section describes KLA’s fiscal year 2022 executive compensation program, including the decisions made by the Board and its Compensation and Talent Committee during the year, the processes and tools that they used to reach those decisions, and a discussion of the compensation earned by KLA’s “Named Executive Officers” (i.e., the CEO, the CFO and the three other most highly-compensated executive officers in fiscal year 2022) as presented in the section entitled “Executive Compensation Tables” below.

Named Executive Officers

Our “Named Executive Officers” (or “NEOs”) and their positions for fiscal year 2022 were:

 

LOGO

Richard Wallace

President and Chief Executive Officer

LOGO

Bren Higgins

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

LOGO

Ahmad Khan

President, Semiconductor Process Control

LOGO

Oreste Donzella

Executive Vice President, Electronics, Packaging and Components

LOGO

Mary Beth Wilkinson

Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary

 

KLA ’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM AT A GLANCEPHILOSOPHY AND DESIGN PRINCIPLES

 

Introduction

Named Executive Officers

This “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section describes KLA’s fiscal year 2019 executive compensation program, including the decisions made by the Board and its Compensation Committee during the year, the processes and tools that they used to reach those decisions, and a discussion of the compensation earned by KLA’s “Named Executive Officers” (the CEO, the CFO and the three other most highly-compensated executive officers in fiscal year 2019 together with a former executive officer), as presented in the section entitled “Executive Compensation Tables” below.

Our “Named Executive Officers” (or “NEOs”) for fiscal year 2019 were:

u  Richard Wallace,President and CEO

u  Bren Higgins,Executive Vice President and CFO

u  Ahmad Khan,President, Semiconductor Process Control

u  Brian Trafas,Executive Vice President, Global Customer Organization

u  Amichai Steimberg,CEO of Orbotech

u  Asher Levy,Former CEO of Orbotech

Compensation Philosophy and Design Principles

Compensation Philosophy

Design Principles

Executive compensation should be designed to:

LOGO

 

Attract, retain and reward executives
who contribute to our overall success
by offering compensation packages
that are competitive with those offered
by other employers with which we
compete for talent.

LOGO

Achieve a balance and alignment between
(i) performance-based compensation that rewards
corporate and individual achievement and
stockholder value creation, and (ii) compensation
that supports our long-term retention efforts.

This philosophy is reflected in the following design principles:

u  Attract, retain and reward executives who contribute to our overall success by offering compensation packages that are competitive with those offered by other employers with which we compete for talent.LOGO

 

u

In addition to a competitive base
salary, a substantial portion of the
executives’ potential cash
compensation is tied to a short-term
incentive bonus plan that rewards
corporate and individual achievement
of challenging performance goals.

u  Achieve a balance and alignment between (i) performance-based compensation that rewards corporate and individual achievement and stockholder value creation, and (ii) compensation that supports our long-term employee retention efforts.LOGO

 

u

The program typicallyalso provides two types of long-term
compensation: (i) performance-based restricted
stock unit awards (PRSUs)covering shares of our Common
Stock (“PRSUs”), which provide additional
compensation as a reward for achievement of
corporate performance goals and which, if earned,
include service-vesting requirements, and
(ii) service-based restricted stock unit awards (RSUs)
covering shares of our Common Stock (“RSUs”) with
vesting conditioned only upon continued service.

Compensation and Talent Committee Decision Making – Approval Procedures Overview and Market Data

The Compensation and Talent Committee takes a broad-based approach in evaluating and making decisions with respect to executive compensation. The charter of the Compensation and Talent Committee gives the Compensation and Talent Committee full authority for determining the compensation of our executive officers (including our NEOs), other than the Chief Executive Officer, for whom the Compensation and Talent Committee makes recommendations to the Outside Directors for approval.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

42  |Executive Compensation and Other Matters

Advisor to the Compensation and Talent Committee

The Compensation and Talent Committee retains Semler Brossy Consulting Group, LLC (“Semler Brossy”), an independent compensation consultant, to provide the Compensation and Talent Committee with independent, objective analysis and advice on executive officer and director compensation matters. Semler Brossy reports directly to the Chair of the Compensation and Talent Committee and, aside from its support of the Compensation and Talent Committee, performed no other work for the Company during fiscal year 2022.

Semler Brossy generally attends all meetings of the Compensation and Talent Committee in which evaluations of the effectiveness of overall executive compensation programs are conducted or in which compensation for executive officers is analyzed or approved. During fiscal year 2022, Semler Brossy’s duties included providing the Compensation and Talent Committee with relevant market and industry data and analysis, as well as preparing and reviewing materials for the Compensation and Talent Committee’s meetings. In fulfilling these duties, Semler Brossy met, as needed and at the direction of the Compensation and Talent Committee, with our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Human Resources Officer and other executive officers and members of our Human Resources department.

The Compensation and Talent Committee, in conducting its annual assessment in fiscal year 2022, determined that Semler Brossy was independent and did not have any conflicts of interest.

Approval Procedures

During multiple meetings (both with and without management present) and with the assistance of Semler Brossy, the Compensation and Talent Committee engaged in extensive deliberation in developing the fiscal year 2022 executive compensation program, seeking to establish compensation packages and target performance levels aimed at rewarding strong financial performance and long-term success of the Company. The Compensation and Talent Committee’s deliberations for all executive officers looked at a broad range of market data (described below), individual performance reviews and total compensation reports for each officer, the historically cyclical nature of our business, internally appropriate levels and targets relative to the officer’s role, and initial package recommendations from Semler Brossy and management. With regard to our 2021 Executive Incentive Plan (“2021 Bonus Plan”) and the fiscal year 2022 PRSUs granted to our NEOs, the proposed financial metrics and payout percentage recommendations were developed by management and approved by the Compensation and Talent Committee, with review and guidance from Semler Brossy.

With respect to the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer (Mr. Wallace), the Compensation and Talent Committee considered recommendations prepared by Semler Brossy. Following extensive deliberation, the Compensation and Talent Committee recommended Mr. Wallace’s proposed fiscal year 2022 target compensation opportunities and RSU and PRSU grants for approval by the Outside Directors. The Outside Directors then discussed and, in August 2021, approved Mr. Wallace’s fiscal year 2022 target compensation opportunities and PRSU and RSU grants as recommended. Mr. Wallace was not present and did not participate in the discussions regarding his own compensation.

For the other NEOs, the Compensation and Talent Committee, after considering the performance reviews and recommendations of Mr. Wallace, as well as extensive comparative compensation data provided by Semler Brossy, approved the fiscal year 2022 target compensation opportunities and PRSU and RSU grants for the other NEOs in August 2021.

In each case, when establishing each element of compensation and the overall target compensation opportunities for the NEOs, the Compensation and Talent Committee and the Outside Directors exercised their judgment based upon the data provided, and no specific formula was applied to determine the weight of each data point.

Market Data

Our ability to continue to attract and retain outstanding contributors, including our core executive team, is essential to our continuing success. Therefore, the Compensation and Talent Committee reviews several different data sources (including our industry peer group and broader market data) to assess whether we are offering compensation opportunities that are competitive with those offered by other employers seeking to attract the same talented individuals.

The industry peer group is comprised of U.S. publicly traded companies primarily in the semiconductor and semiconductor equipment industries that had at least 0.33x the Company’s trailing four-quarter revenues and at least 0.2x the Company’s 200-day average market capitalization value. Additionally, the peer group is reviewed to remove companies that we feel are too large to provide meaningful comparison.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

43

Below is the list of industry peer group companies used in developing our fiscal year 2022 program:

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Keysight Technologies, Inc.Micron Technology, Inc.Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
Analog Devices, Inc.Lam Research CorporationMKS Instruments, Inc.Teradyne, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc.Marvell Technology Group Ltd.NVIDIA CorporationTexas Instruments Incorporated
Broadcom, Inc.Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.*ON Semiconductor Corp.Xilinx, Inc.**
Corning IncorporatedMicrochip Technology, Inc.Qorvo, Inc.

* Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. was acquired by Analog Devices, Inc. on August 26, 2021.

** Xilinx, Inc. was acquired by Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. on February 14, 2022.

The Compensation and Talent Committee, in consultation with Semler Brossy, periodically reviews and, as appropriate, may approve changes to the list. The peer group reflected the following changes from our fiscal year 2021 peer group: the removal of Cypress Semiconductor Corp. due to its acquisition by Infineon Technologies AG.

When assessing our fiscal year 2022 executive compensation program, the Compensation and Talent Committee reviewed information developed by Semler Brossy regarding the compensation levels, programs and practices of our industry peer group to obtain comparative data and identify compensation trends and practices.

Though the Compensation and Talent Committee referred to percentile data in its analysis, as well as allocations between annual and long-term compensation, the Compensation and Talent Committee did not employ specific equations for determining compensation amounts based on such data. Rather, the Compensation and Talent Committee’s emphasis was on establishing compensation packages for the executive officers that would be competitive with those offered by other employers in our industry, appropriately reflect each executive officer’s skill set and experience, drive performance and encourage retention of top performers.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

44  |Executive Compensation and Other Matters

KEY PAY PRACTICES IN OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM AND LAST YEAR’S “SAY ON PAY” VOTE

Investor feedback is an important input to us in the design of our executive compensation program. We hold an annual “Say on Pay” advisory vote, with approximately 93% of the votes cast at our 2021 Annual Meeting voting “FOR” approval of our NEO compensation, which the Compensation and Talent Committee believes demonstrated strong stockholder support for our executive compensation policies and practices. We expect to ask our stockholders to vote, at our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders, in a non-binding, advisory vote regarding the frequency of our Say-on-Pay Votes.

We strive to follow good governance practices and align compensation with the stockholder experience. Our executive compensation program is designed to incorporate the following key pay practices and inputs:

What We Do

Elements

What We Don’t Do
  LOGOPay for performance: We have a pay for performance focus with a majority of Compensation

our NEOs’ cumulative annual target compensation in the form of performance-based annual cash bonuses and PRSUs, tied to challenging metrics that reflect and are key to the growth and profitability of the Company’s business and promote alignment between executive and stockholder economic interests.
LOGONo automatic salary increases: We do not guarantee automatic salary increases for our executive officers.

Element  LOGO

 

 Different metrics in short- and long-term incentive plans: The metrics used for our annual cash bonus program (i.e., Operating Margin Dollar achievement and corporate balanced scorecard assessment) are different from those used for our PRSUs (i.e., Relative Free Cash Flow Margin (as defined below)).

Variability

LOGO

No hedging and pledging: We prohibit officers, directors and employees from hedging against our stock or pledging our stock.

  LOGO

 

 Long-term incentive alignment: Equity awards vest typically over a four-year period, other than new hire RSU awards which vest over a three-year period, and our PRSUs are tied to a three-year performance period with 50% vesting in year three and 50% vesting in year four.

Objective

LOGO

 

How Established

No single-trigger change in control: We only offer “double trigger” change of control benefits.

  LOGO

 

 

 

Stock ownership guidelines: We impose stock ownership guidelines on all executive officers and Outside Directors.

LOGO

FY19 Terms/Outcomes
for NEOsNo gross-ups:
We do not provide tax gross-up provisions on any change in control, severance or other payments related to executive terminations.

  LOGO

 

Clawbacks: We maintain a “clawback” policy that enables us to recover performance-based compensation in the event of a significant restatement of our financial results.

LOGO

No excessive perquisites: It is our policy to strictly limit the use and value of perquisites.

  LOGO

Compensation consultant: The Compensation and Talent Committee retains and regularly consults with an independent compensation consultant to advise on our executive compensation program and practices.

LOGO

No dividends prior to vesting: We do not pay dividends on RSUs or PRSUs until the awards vest and then only on the portion that vests.

 

Base salary  LOGO

(Page 38)

 Fixed

Independence: Executive compensation decisions for Mr. Wallace, our CEO, are made by the Outside Directors on our Board, and for all other executive officers by the Compensation and Talent Committee, which is comprised exclusively of Outside Directors.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

45

ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION

Element

VariabilityObjectiveHow EstablishedFY22 Terms/ Outcomes
for NEOs

LOGO

Base salary

(Page 46)

FIXED 

 

Provide a competitive fixed component of compensation that, as part of a total compensation package, enables us to attract and retain top talent.

 

Reviewed against the executive officer’s skill, experience and responsibilities, and for competitiveness against our compensation peer group.

 

 

Only Mr. HigginsAll of our NEOs received a salary increase during fiscal year 2019.2022.

LOGO

 

Short-term executive incentive plan (cash

(cash bonus)

(Pages 3846 to 42)50)

 

PERFORMANCE -

Performance-
basedBASED

 

 

Offer a variable cash compensation opportunity based upon the level of achievement of challenging corporate goals, with adjustments based on individual performance.bonus achievement percentage.

 

 

Target payouts set by measuring total cash compensation against our compensation peer group. Corporate performance targets based on challenging operational goals.

 

 

Bonus funding from balancedBalanced scorecard and Operating Margin Dollar (as defined below) achievement versus goal for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 was 142%2021, in addition to individual performance, resulted in a 2021 bonus payout equal to 200% of target. Individual performancetarget for each NEO. Bonus achievement percentage multipliers ranged from 119% to 120%were all set at 100% for participatingthe NEOs.

LOGO

 

PRSUs including TSR Awards

(Pages 42 50 to 45)52)

 

PERFORMANCE - BASED

Performance-
based and
value tied to
stock price

 

 

Align long-term management and stockholder interests and strengthen retention with longer vesting provisions. PRSUs provide compensation and ownership opportunity based upon the level of achievement of challenging corporate goals. RSUs offer some certainty and create long-term retention.

 

 

Target totalTotal target value of annual awards set using market data (reviewed against our compensation peer group for competitiveness) and the executive officer’s responsibilities, contributions and criticality to ongoing success. Additional

Our fiscal year 2022 PRSUs are tied to three-year Relative Free Cash Flow Margin (as defined below). Earned shares vest 50% at three years and 50% at four years after grant date, subject to continued service through each vesting date.

LOGO

RSUs

(Page 52)

VALUE TIED TO STOCK PRICERSUs promote long-term retention and alignment with stockholder interests.

RSU awards may be granted when necessary to remain competitive with the marketplace.

 

Our fiscal year 2019 PRSUs are tied to three-year Relative Free Cash Flow Margin. Earned shares vest 50% at three years and 50% at four years after grant date. Our TSR Awards are tied to total stockholder return objectives and can vest in part no earlier than the third anniversary of the grant date.

RSUs (Pages 43 to 44)

Value tied to
stock price

Fiscal year 20192022 RSUs vest 25% per year over four years.

years, subject to continued service through each vesting date.

Other compensation

(Page 45)Pages 52 to 54)

 

PRIMARILY

Primarily

fixedFIXED

 

 

Provide competitive employee benefits. We do not view this as a significant component of our executive compensation program.

 

 

Reviewed for competitiveness against our compensation peer group.

 

No significant changes to fiscal year 2018 program, other than2022 Program, with the continuationexception of historical compensation arrangementsMr. Donzella who received an expatriate package for relocating to two NEOs joining us from our acquisition of Orbotech in February 2019.

the United Kingdom.

 

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

46  |Executive Compensation and Other Matters

CEO Compensation atCOMPENSATION AT A GLANCE

Our CEO’s fiscal year 2022 compensation is consistent with our pay for performance philosophy, with a Glance

focus on variable and “at-risk” compensation that is closely aligned with our operational and stock price performance. The chartschart below show for fiscal 2019 the elementshighlights that 95% of our CEO’s compensation as a percentage of total compensation andfor fiscal year 2022 (excluding “all other compensation,” consisting principally of dividend equivalents paid on the allocation between riskier performance-basedvesting of awards granted in prior years) is at risk, with 63% of such compensation andtied to the achievement of challenging performance objectives:

non-performance-basedFISCAL YEAR 2022 CEO compensation:

COMPENSATION ALLOCATION

 

 

LOGO

Key Pay Practices in Our Executive Compensation Program and Last Year’s “Say on Pay” Vote

Investor feedback is an important input to us in the design of our executive compensation program. We hold an annual “Say on Pay” advisory vote, with approximately 95% of the votes cast at our 2018 Annual Meeting voting “FOR” approval of our NEO compensation, which the Compensation Committee believed demonstrated strong stockholder support for our executive compensation policies and practices.

We strive to follow good governance practices and align compensation with the shareholder experience. Our executive compensation program is designed to incorporate the following key pay practices and inputs:

LOGO

What We DoDESCRIPTION OF INDIVIDUAL ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION

A significant percentage of our NEOs’ cumulative annual target compensation is in the form of performance-based annual bonuses and, in most years, performance share awards, or PRSUs, tied to challenging metrics that reflect or are key to the growth and profitability of the Company’s business and promote alignment between executive and stockholder economic interests:

u

Different metrics in short- and long-term incentive plans: We use different metrics for our cash bonus program (Operating Margin Dollar achievement1 and corporate balanced scorecard assessment), our PRSUs (free cash flow margin relative to an industry peer group) and TSR Awards (growth in total stockholder return)

u

Long-term incentive alignment: Equity awards vest typically over a four-year period; PRSUs are tied to a three-year performance period with 50% vesting in year three and 50% vesting in year four; and the 2019 TSR Awards vest over a five-year period beginning three years from the grant date

u

Stock ownership guidelines: We impose stock ownership guidelines on all executive officers and directors

u

Clawbacks: We maintain a “clawback” policy that enables us to recover performance-based compensation in the event of a significant restatement of our financial results

u

Compensation consultant: The Compensation Committee retains and regularly consults with an independent compensation consultant to advise on our executive compensation program and practices

u

Independence: Executive compensation decisions for Mr. Wallace are made by Outside Directors and for all other executive officers by the Compensation Committee, which is comprised of Outside Directors

What We Don’t Do

u

Hedging and pledging: We prohibit officers, directors and employees from hedging against our stock, and prohibit executive officers and directors from pledging our stock

u

Single-trigger change in control: We only offer “double trigger” change of control benefits

u

Gross-ups: We completely eliminated taxgross-up provisions in our severance plans in 2016

u

Perquisites: It is our policy to strictly limit the use and value of perquisites; provided that we continued the use of the perquisites enjoyed by two of our NEOs who joined us in connection with the acquisition of Orbotech

1 For our calendar year 2018 short-term incentive bonus plan, “Operating Margin Dollar achievement” represents our total revenues less total costs of revenues, research and development expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses, but excluding expenses related to acquisitions, severance and merger-related items.

Orbotech Employment Agreements

Two of our NEOs (Amichai Steimberg and Asher Levy) for fiscal 2019 joined us in connection with the acquisition of Orbotech in February 2019. Upon the acquisition of Orbotech, Messrs. Steimberg and Levy entered into employment agreements with us, modeled in large part upon their existing employment agreements with Orbotech prior to the acquisition, a summary of the key elements of which are provided in the table below. Compensation data for Messrs. Steimberg and Levy are for the period from the acquisition date (February 20, 2019) to the end of the fiscal year. Mr. Levy transitioned to senior advisor status in March 2019.

Compensation Element

Amichai Steimberg

Asher Levy

Annual Base Salary

$529,5792, provided that at such time as he transitions to senior advisor status his annual salary will be reduced to $180,000.

Initially $595,4282, provided that upon his transition to senior advisor status in March 2019 his annual salary decreased to $180,000.

Acquisition Closing Bonus

$1,783,333, which has already been paid.

$2,283,333, which has already been paid.

Annual Bonus

Target bonus equal to 100% of annualized salary based on achievement of bonus objectives based on Operating Margin Dollar achievement for Orbotech and a “balanced scorecard” rating awarded by the Compensation Committee for calendar 2019, which is designed to measure Orbotech’s progress based on talent management and development of a plan to achieve acquisition-related synergies. The maximum annual bonus payment is 180% of annualized salary.

Target bonus equal to 100% of annualized salary based on achievement of bonus objectives based on Operating Margin Dollar achievement for Orbotech and a “balanced scorecard” rating awarded by the Compensation Committee for calendar 2019, which is designed to measure Orbotech’s progress based on talent management and development of a plan to achieve acquisition-related synergies. The maximum annual bonus payment is 180% of annualized salary.

PRSUs

Received a PRSU for a target number of shares equal to 30,388 subject to the achievement of Operating Margin Dollar targets and a “balanced scorecard” rating award by the Compensation Committee, which is designed to measure Orbotech’s progress based on talent management and development of a plan to achieve acquisition-related synergies. The maximum payout is 200% of the target shares. If the performance objectives are achieved, the PRSUs vest 50% on December 31, 2019 and 50% on December 31, 2020 subject to continued service on those dates. If Mr. Steimberg is terminated without cause prior to December 31, 2019, then in lieu of the PRSUs that haven’t vested he will receive a cash payment equal to $3,430,000 or if terminated after December 31, 2019 but prior to December 31, 2020, then a cash payment equal to $1,715,000.3

Received a PRSU for a target number of shares equal to 25,073 subject to the achievement of Operating Margin Dollar and a “balanced scorecard” rating award by the Compensation Committee, which is designed to measure Orbotech’s progress based on talent management and development of a plan to achieve acquisition-related synergies. The maximum payout is 200% of the target shares. If the performance objectives are achieved, the PRSUs vest 100% on December 31, 2019 subject to continued service on that date. If Mr. Levy is terminated without cause prior to December 31, 2019, then in lieu of the PRSUs that haven’t vested he will receive a cash payment equal to $2,830,000.

RSUs

Received an RSU for 20,259 shares vesting 50% on December 31, 2019 and 50% on December 31, 2020, subject to continued service on those dates. If Mr. Steimberg is terminated without cause prior to December 31, 2019, then in lieu of the RSUs that haven’t vested, he will receive a cash payment equal to $2,886,667, or if terminated after December 31, 2019 but prior to December 31, 2020, then a cash payment equal to $1,443,334.

Received an RSU for 16,715 shares vesting 50% on July 1, 2019 and 50% on December 31, 2019, subject to continued service on those dates. If Mr. Levy is terminated without cause prior to December 31, 2019, then in lieu of the RSUs that haven’t vested, he will receive a cash payment equal to $943,333.

Termination benefits

For a summary of the termination of employment benefits for Mr. Steimberg, see “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control – Orbotech Arrangements.”

For a summary of the termination of employment benefits for Mr. Steimberg, see “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control – Orbotech Arrangements.”

Other benefits

Pension plan participation (contribution by Orbotech of not less than 5% of salary), disability insurance contributions by Orbotech (not to exceed 2.5% of salary), annual recreation allowance (not less than $2,042 per year), educational fund contribution by Orbotech (7.5% of salary), and use of a company car.

Pension plan participation (contribution by Orbotech of not less than 5% of salary), disability insurance contributions by Orbotech (not to exceed 2.5% of salary), annual recreation allowance (not less than $2,042 per year), educational fund contribution by Orbotech (7.5% of salary), and use of a company car.

2 Based on foreign currency exchange rates in effect on June 28, 2019 (the last business day of the fiscal year).

3 The parties are discussing revisions to thenon-GAAP Operating Margin Dollar targets associated with his annual bonus opportunity and PRSU achievement thresholds provided for in his employment agreement due to shifts in management responsibilities following execution of his employment agreement, which revisions are not expected to change the aggregate bonus opportunity or the maximum number of shares available to him under his PRSU. We expect to finalize these revisions prior to the end of 2019.

Base Salary

The Compensation and Talent Committee annually reviews the base salaries of the executive officersNEOs as part of its overall compensation review and considers the competitive market analysis of the Company’s industry peer group each year in determining whether to make an adjustment to the base salary for each NEO. TheWe increased the annual base salaries of all of our NEOs who were NEOs in fiscal year 2018 were unchanged from fiscal year 2018,2022 to better align their salaries with the exception of a 5% increase for Mr. Higgins to improve his overall competitive positioning.benchmarks. These changes resulted in competitive positioning that is consistent with our pay philosophy. For fiscal year 2019,2022, the Compensation and Talent Committee (or, the independent members of the Board, in the case of Mr. Wallace, the CEO)Outside Directors) approved the base salaries set forth in the table below.

 

Name

Annual Base
Salary Rate
Approved During
Fiscal Year

2019 ($)
Richard Wallace900,000
Bren Higgins525,000
Ahmad Khan525,000
Brian Trafas500,000
Amichai Steimberg535,884(1)
Asher Levy (before transition to senior advisor role)595,428(1)

Asher Levy (after transition to senior advisor role)

180,000

Name

  Annual Base Salary Rate Approved
During Fiscal Year 2022  ($)
   

    % Increase from Fiscal Year 2021

Annual Base Salary Rate

 

Richard Wallace

   1,000,000    2.6% 

Bren Higgins

   600,000    9.1% 

Ahmad Khan

   650,000    13.0% 

Oreste Donzella

   460,000    4.5% 

Mary Beth Wilkinson

   525,000    5.0% 

Short-Term Executive Incentive Bonus Plan

(1)

Based on foreign currency exchange rates in effect on June 28, 2019.

Our annual Executive Incentive Plan (our “Bonus Plan”) is intended to motivate our senior executives, including our NEOs, to achieve short-term corporate objectives by providing a competitive cash bonus which is earned based upon the achievement of pre-determined Company performance goals, relating to Operating Margin Dollar (as defined below), the Company’s “balanced scorecard” objectives (as described below) and individual performance.

Under our Bonus Plan, which operates on a calendar-year basis, participating executives are eligible to earn up to 200% of the applicable executive’s target bonus opportunity based on the level of attainment of the relevant performance goals during the relevant calendar year. During our fiscal year 2022, our NEOs participated in our 2021 Bonus Plan through December 31, 2021 and in our 2022 Bonus Plan from January 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022. The 2022 Bonus Plan is substantially identical to the 2021 Bonus Plan, other than with respect to Operating Margin Dollar target levels of performance and the related payout percentages.

 

Short-Term Incentive Bonus PlanLOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

 

47

 

Plan Design and Performance Metrics

We useused Operating Margin Dollar achievement as a key performance metric in our calendar year 2018 bonus plan (the “Bonus Plan”)2021 Bonus Plan because we believe that it reflects several important competitive and business elements such as product acceptance, market share and cost discipline, and is therefore a very good barometer of our overall performance. PayoutsFor our calendar year 2021 Bonus Plan, “Operating Margin Dollar” represents our total revenues less total costs of revenues, research and development expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses, but excluding expenses related to acquisitions, goodwill impairment, severance and merger-related items.

In addition to Operating Margin Dollar achievement, payouts under the 2021 Bonus Plan are also determined in part by a “balanced scorecard” rating awarded by the Compensation and Talent Committee, which is designed to measure our progress based on financial andnon-financial metrics related to operational excellence, customer focus, growth and talent management, as well as individual performance multipliers assigned to each executive based on his or her contributions.management. The use of the balanced scorecard is designed to ensure that the quality of our operating results is high and that those results support the sustainability of our business model. We believe that the balanced scorecard’s use of broad measures of financial and strategic success closely aligns with the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders. The balanced scorecard is tracked throughout the year by the Compensation and Talent Committee, and then formally reviewed by the Compensation and Talent Committee and the Board following the conclusion of the applicable calendar year for assessment of the Company’s success in achieving its annual strategic goals.

For calendar year 2018,2021, the corporate goals and objectives were set at levels that the Compensation and Talent Committee believed would be challenging to achieve based on our historical and anticipated performance and the then-prevailing macroeconomic conditions. While the Operating Margin Dollar and many of the “balanced scorecard” metrics are quantitative in nature, some are qualitative and, therefore, introduce a degree of judgment into the bonus determination process. We believe that the balanced scorecard’s use of broad measures of financial and strategic success closely aligns the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders. This structure of using both Operating Margin Dollar achievement and the balanced scorecard is intended to ensure that bonus payouts not only reflect the Company’s achievement of specific levels of Operating Margin Dollars, but also the level of management performance necessary to continue to achieve those results over the long term.4

4 For ourThe 2021 Bonus Plan also contains an element of an individual assessment. The Compensation and Talent Committee retains the discretion to increase or decrease each executive officer’s bonus amount (to the extent earned) based on a subjective assessment of the executive’s individual performance by applying a “bonus achievement percentage” multiplier. Bonus achievement multipliers for individual performance range from 80% to 120%. Following the completion of calendar year 2018 short-term incentive bonus plan, “Operating Margin Dollar achievement” represents our total revenues less total costs2021, the Compensation and Talent Committee conducted a performance assessment of revenues, researcheach executive officer (including each NEO), with input from Mr. Wallace (except with respect to his own performance), and development expensesthe Outside Directors conducted a similar assessment for Mr. Wallace, in each case based on the executive officer’s leadership skills, experience and selling, generalperformance, including how each executive led his or her organization as demonstrated against the key balanced scorecard objectives and administrative expenses, but excluding expenses related to acquisitions, severance and merger-related items.goals for the executive’s respective organization.

The payout formula under the Bonus Plan was structured as follows:

 

 

LOGO

LOGO

 

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

48  |Executive Compensation and Other Matters

 

Plan Design and Payout Percentages

Our 2021 Bonus Plan was structured to pay out 100% of each participating executive’s target bonus amount if we successfully achieved our target level of Operating Margin Dollar performance.performance (subject to the applicable executive’s bonus achievement percentage multiplier). Under the 2021 Bonus Plan, we were required to achieve a threshold level of Operating Margin Dollar achievement in order for the Bonus Plan to be funded.5funded; to the extent Operating Margin Dollar was achieved below the threshold value, the applicable payout percentage would be equal to 0%. Upon achievement of that threshold level, a participant’s actual bonus amount iswas then determined based upon a bonus payout grid, with Operating Margin Dollar achievementgoals as the variable along one axis and, on the other axis, the “balanced scorecard” rating (which is a score awarded to the Company by the Compensation CommitteeBoard based uponon its assessment of our performance against the Company’s performance“balanced scorecard” metrics), as measured against a defined “balanced scorecard.”adjusted by the participant’s bonus achievement percentage multiplier.

The Compensation and Talent Committee sets performance targets for the Bonus Plan in consideration of internal budgets, broader market forecasts, and prior year achievement. In consideration of these factors, with respect to our 2021 Bonus Plan, the Compensation and Talent Committee set the target Operating Margin Dollar achievement at $1.593$2.637 billion for the calendar year ended December 31, 2018,2021, which exceededwas approximately 34% higher than the comparable target for calendar year 2020 ($1.97 billion) and approximately 19% higher than the actual achievement level for calendar year 2020, reflecting its focus on setting goals that it believed were challenging to achieve.

In addition, the maximum Operating Margin Dollar achievement was set at $3.428 billion for the calendar year ended December 31, 2017 ($1.2 billion), and at a level that it believed was challenging to achieve based on market expectations for calendar 2018.

5 The satisfaction of thispre-determined threshold level of2021, which (if attained) would have surpassed the Operating Margin Dollar achievement would trigger full funding of the Bonus Plan, and each participant’s maximum potential bonus opportunity.

any calendar year in our history.

With respect to the balanced scorecard assessment, the Compensation Committee reviewed our achievement of strategic objectives of Operational Excellence, Customer Focus, Growth, and Talent Management – which were assessed as follows:

Objectives

Assessment

Factors Considered

Operational

Excellence            

The Compensation Committee considered the Company’s performance against its operational plan of record, management of fixed costs, business model performance, management of assets and key product distribution metrics. In doing so, the Compensation Committee reviewed order levels, new product introductions, expense fluctuations across different operations, inventory levels, cycle times andon-time delivery.

u Fourth quarter record bookings and revenue

u Calendar year records across the income statement

u Met the adjusted calendar 2018 plan

Customer

Focus

The Compensation Committee assessed the Company’s success in terms of market share, customer satisfaction, product differentiation and customer collaboration. This process included a review of the Company’s market position across divisions, competitive environment, feedback and recognition from customers, and next generation product and technology collaboration efforts.

u Relative performance against wafer fabrication equipment (WFE) market overall

u Continued to maintain market share with high gross margins

u Strengthening R&D and fabless semiconductor collaborations

u Received “Best in Value” award from Samsung

Growth

The Compensation Committee reviewed the Company’s absolute and relative growth, its rate of product adoption, and its positioning for future growth.

u Growth in revenue year to year outperforming WFE growth

u Orbotech acquisition announcement plus several smaller acquisitions

u Bookings growth in several platforms plus the introduction of new systems

Talent Management

The Compensation Committee assessed the Company’s success in acquiring, inspiring, developing and retaining top talent, as well as demonstrating solid employee engagement. This assessment included a review of the Company’s turnover and early career hiring.

u Commenced new diversity and inclusion initiatives

u Top talent turnover fell to its lowest levels in four years

u Launched new wellness and management tools

u Commenced plan for a second U.S. headquarters in Ann Arbor, Michigan

They then evaluated performance on a scale of 1 to 5, with “1” corresponding to “opportunity for improvement,” and “5” corresponding to “exceptional.” The Compensation Committee awarded the Company a balanced scorecard rating of “4+” (“outstanding”), based on its assessment of our overall performance against our strategic goals during the calendar year. That combination, together with Operating Margin Dollar achievement of $1.669 billion in calendar 2018 (approximately 4.8% above target), resulted in a funding, before individual multipliers, of 142% of target bonuses under the Bonus Plan.

The2021 Bonus Plan was structured so that, for each level of Operating Margin Dollar performance, the maximum payout would be reasonable relative to our financial results. The following examples highlight the possible funding levels for our 2021 Bonus Plan at different levels of our performance, before applying individual multipliers.

 

Level of Operating

Margin Dollars

  

Funding Level Details

Less than $398$791 million

  

uLOGO    No payouts would be made under the 2021 Bonus Plan if the Company achieved Operating Margin Dollars of less than $398$791 million

$398791 million (threshold)

  

LOGO    Set at 30% of target

u MaximumLOGO    Highest bonus funding level equal to 38% of the executive officers’ target bonuses, only achievable if the Compensation CommitteeBoard awarded the Company a balanced scorecard scorerating of 5 (“exceptional”)

$1.5932.637 billion (target)

  

uLOGO    Target level of Operating Margin Dollars of $1.593$2.637 billion exceededwas approximately 19% higher than our Operating Margin Dollar performance for the prior calendar year ($2.213 billion)

u MaximumLOGO    Highest bonus funding level equal to 150% of the executive officers’ target bonuses, only achievable if the Compensation CommitteeBoard awarded the Company a balanced scorecard scorerating of 5 (“exceptional”)

u The Bonus Plan would have funded atLOGO    Target bonus funding level equal to 100% of the executive officers’ target bonuses, if the Compensation CommitteeBoard awarded the Company a balanced scorecard scorerating of 3+ (“primarily meets expectations”)

$1.8443.428 billion (maximum)

  

LOGO    Set at 30% higher than target

uLOGO    Operating Margin Dollars of $1.844$3.428 billion would have surpassed any12-month period calendar year in our history

u MaximumLOGO    Highest bonus funding level equal to 200% of the executive officers’ target bonuses, if the Compensation CommitteeBoard awarded the Company a balanced scorecard scorerating of 3+ (“primarily meets expectations”)

uLOGO    Minimum bonus funding level equal to 100% of the executive officers’ target bonuses, if the Compensation CommitteeBoard awarded the Company a balanced scorecard scorerating of 1 (“opportunity for improvement”)

 

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

 

Individual Multiplier 49

With respect to the balanced scorecard assessment, the Compensation and Talent Committee and the Board considered macro-economic and market dynamic factors when making the balanced scorecard assessment, including projected GDP increases despite headwinds caused by slowing growth in China, worldwide supply chain constraints, inflation, new COVID-19 variants and slowing vaccination rates, and increased spending in foundry/logic and DRAM and NAND flash memory segments. The Compensation and Talent Committee and the Board reviewed the following categories to determine the balanced scorecard rating for our 2021 Bonus Plan:

Balanced Scorecard
  Objectives

Assessment

KLA Revenue

Calendar year 2021 revenue finished at $8.166 billion which was up 34% from calendar year 2020.

Market Leadership

The Board considered market share as a leading indicator of market leadership and noted an expected 0.3% to 0.5% improvement in market share led by strong broadband plasma and optical metrology performance.

Product Differentiation

The Board assessed gross margin as a leading indicator of product differentiation versus competitors, noting that overall non-GAAP gross margin finished at 62.8% for calendar year 2021 and was 1.4 percentage points higher than calendar year 2020, aided by average selling price premiums across semiconductor process control products.

Productivity

The Board considered operating margin as a leading indicator of productivity, noting that non-GAAP operating margin finished at 41.7% for calendar year 2021 and was 5.3 percentage points higher than calendar year 2020.

Human Capital

The Board considered employee engagement and employee retention as leading indicators of human capital performance noting low turnover rates for both the employee base as a whole and for top talent, the successful onboarding of 3,000 employees in calendar year 2021, an increase in the percentage of women in the workforce and in global leadership positions and strong employee productivity and engagement despite the impact of COVID-19.

The Board then evaluated the Company’s performance with respect to the objectives described above on a scale of 1 to 5, with:

    LOGO   “1” corresponding to “opportunity for improvement,”
    LOGO“3” corresponding to “primarily meets expectations,” and
    LOGO“5” corresponding to “exceptional.”

The Board awarded the Company a balanced scorecard rating of “4+”, based on its assessment of our overall performance against our strategic objectives during calendar year 2021. That combined with Operating Margin Dollar achievement of $3.401 billion in calendar year 2021 (approximately 29% above target), resulted in a funding, before applying bonus achievement percentage multipliers, of 200% of target bonuses under the 2021 Bonus Plan also contains an element of individual performance assessment. The Compensation Committee retains the discretion to increase or decrease each executive officer’s bonus amountPlan.

In addition, based on the officer’s individual performance by applying an “individual performance multiplier” of between 80%Compensation and 120%. FollowingTalent Committee’s (or, with respect to Mr. Wallace, the completion of calendar year 2018, the Compensation Committee conducted a performanceOutside Directors’) assessment of each executive officer, with input from Mr. Wallace (except with respect to his own compensation), based on the executive officer’s leadership skills, experience and performance, and established theNEO’s individual performance multipliers for the participating NEOs set forth in the table below.calendar year 2021, each NEO was awarded a bonus achievement percentage multiplier of 100%.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

50  |Executive Compensation and Other Matters

2021 Payouts

The following table presents each participating NEO’s target bonus (as a percentage of base salary and in dollars, based on actual salary paid during the year)calendar year 2021 (rather than fiscal year 2022)), as well as the bonus payout multiplepercentage generated by the 2021 Bonus Plan’s payout grid, based on our performance, the individual performancebonus achievement percentage multiplier assigned to the NEO and the actual bonus amount paid to the officer.    NEO.

 

Name

 Officer’s
Target Bonus
Award Under
Bonus Plan (as a
Percentage
of Base Salary) (1)
 Officer’s
Target Bonus
Award Under
Bonus Plan ($)
 Payout Multiple
Based on
Company
Performance
(Operating
Margin Dollars
and Balanced
Scorecard)
 Individual
Performance
Multiplier Assigned
by Compensation
Committee
 Actual Bonus
Payout Under
Bonus Plan ($) (2)
 Actual Bonus
Payout as a
Percentage of
Target Bonus
   NEO’s FY
2021 Target
Bonus Award
Under Bonus
Plan (as a
Percentage of
Base Salary)(1)
   NEO’s Target
Bonus Award
Under Bonus
Plan ($)
   Payout
Multiple
Based on
Company
Performance
(Operating
Margin
Dollars and
Balanced
Scorecard)
   Bonus
Achievement
Percentage
Assigned by
Compensation
and Talent
Committee
   Actual
Bonus
Payout
Under 2021
Bonus  Plan
($)(2)
   Actual Bonus
Payout
Under 202
Bonus
Plan as a
Percentage
of Target
Bonus
 
 
Richard Wallace 150 1,350,000  142 120 2,305,260  170.8   150%    1,476,923    200%    100%    2,953,846    200% 
 
Bren Higgins 95 484,808  142 119 824,201  170.0   100%    569,231    200%    100%    1,138,462    200% 
 
Ahmad Khan 95 498,750  142 119 847,875  170.0   100%    603,846    200%    100%    1,207,692    200% 
 

Brian Trafas

  

 

80

 

 

  

 

400,000

 

 

 

  

 

142

 

 

  

 

119

 

 

  

 

680,023

 

 

 

  

 

170.0

 

 

Oreste Donzella

   80%    358,154    200%    100%    716,308    200% 

Mary Beth Wilkinson

   80%    403,077    200%    100%    806,154    200% 

(1)

The amounts in this column represent the applicable NEO’s target bonus (stated as a percentage of the officer’s base salary). Under the Bonus Plan, this percentage, when multiplied by (a) the payout percentage determined

(1) The amounts in this column represent the applicable NEO’s bonus (stated as a percentage of the executive officer’s base salary). Under the 2021 Bonus Plan, the actual salary paid during the calendar year multiplied by (a) the payout percentage determined by the 2021 Bonus Plan’s bonus payout grid based on the Company’s performance, and (b) the NEO’s bonus achievement percentage multiplier assigned by the Compensation and Talent Committee or, in the case of Mr. Wallace, the Outside Directors, generated the executive officer’s actual bonus payment amount.

by the Bonus Plan’s bonus payout grid based on the Company’s performance, and (b) the NEO’s individual performance multiplier assigned by the Compensation Committee based on the officer’s performance, generated the officer’s actual bonus payment amount.

(2)

Actual bonus payouts are based on the actual salary paid to the NEO during calendar 2018.

(2) Actual bonus payouts are based on the actual salary paid to the NEO during calendar year 2021 rather than fiscal year 2022.

Our NEO’s target bonus opportunities are determined by our Compensation and Talent Committee (or, in the case of Mr. Wallace, by our Outside Directors) by considering each NEO’s performance, role and responsibilities at our Company. The target bonus as a percentage of base salary for each of our NEOs for calendar year 2022 was not changed from calendar year 2021.

Long-Term Incentives

Annual PRSU Awards

During fiscal year 2022, we granted each of our NEOs an annual award of PRSUs, which vests based on the attainment of specified Company performance goals and service-vesting requirements. The NEOs’ (other than Messrs. Levy and Steimberg) fiscal 2019year 2022 PRSUs are tied toearned based on the Company’s free cash flow margin relative to its industry peer group companies for the three years ending June 30, 2021. Our free cash flow margin for that period will be calculated as the Company’sRelative Free Cash Flow Margin (as defined below). “Relative Free Cash Flow Margin” means our cumulative free cash flow (cash flow provided by operations, less capital expenditures), divided by cumulative revenues, (“Relative Free Cash Flow Margin”), and that number will be compared against each company inrelative to the Company’scumulative free cash flow for our industry peer group companies for the three years ending June 30, 2021.2024. A determination will be made after June 30, 2021,2024, based on the Company’s percentile performance againstrelative to its industry peer group, regarding the percentage of the fiscal year 20192022 PRSUs that will have been earned.

We believe that the Relative Free Cash Flow Margin metric is a key measure of our long-term performance and stockholder value creation. Our ability to generate cash from operations is essential to fund the expansive research and development efforts that are instrumental to our long-term success, as well as our efforts to return cash to stockholders. The relative nature of the metric ensures that the Company’sour performance must compare favorably to our industry peer group companies (listed below) for sharesPRSUs to be earned. To the extent that we and/or one of our industry peer group companies completes a significant acquisition, the results of operations of the significant acquisition will be subtracted from our results and/or the results of our industry peer group company that completed the acquisition beginning in the first full quarter immediately following such acquisition, based on the results of the acquired company for the last four quarters of operations for which financial data is publicly available. The NEOs’

Any fiscal year 20192022 PRSUs earned PRSUs vestsby an NEO will vest 50% after three years and 50% after four years from the date of grant.grant, in each case, subject to continued service on each vesting date. Fiscal year 2022 PRSUs are granted with dividend equivalent rights which entitle the recipient to receive credits, payable in cash or additional shares of our Common Stock, equal to the cash dividends that would have been received on the shares of our Common Stock had the shares been issued and outstanding on the dividend record date. Dividend equivalents are only paid to the recipient upon vesting or settlement of the underlying award.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

51

The following exampletable highlights the possible payouts under the participating NEO’s fiscal year 2019 PRSU grants2022 PRSUs at different levels of Company performance:

 

Level of

Relative Free Cash Flow

Flow Margin Performance

  

PRSU Payout Details

Less than 30th percentile

  

uLOGO    No shares underlying the 2022 PRSU awards will bebecome eligible to vest under the fiscal year 2019 PRSUs if we achieve aour Relative Free Cash Flow Margin is below the 30th percentile

30th percentile

(Threshold)

  

uLOGO    25% of the target number of shares achievable under this awardunderlying the 2022 PRSU awards will become eligible to vest if we achieve aour Relative Free Cash Flow Margin is equal to the 30th percentile

55th percentile

(Target)

  

uLOGO    Target performance level will require strong performance relative to our industry peer group and is therefore considered challenging

 

uLOGO    100% of the target number of shares achievable underunderlying the award2022 PRSU awards will become eligible to vest if we achieve aour Relative Free Cash Flow Margin is equal to the 55th percentile

75th percentile or above (Maximum)

  

uLOGO    Maximum performance level will require significant performance relative to the Company’s industry peer group and is therefore considered very challenging

 

uLOGO    150% of the target number of shares achievable under this awardunderlying the 2022 PRSU awards will become eligible to vest if we achieve aour Relative Free Cash Flow Margin is equal to or greater than the 75th percentile or above

Payout will be linearly interpolated if actual results fall between two of the defined percentilethreshold and target, or the target and maximum measurement points above.

The following table sets forth the minimum,threshold, target and maximum shares achievable by our participating NEOs with respect to the PRSU awards forming a part of their annual RSU awards for fiscal year 2019:

Name

  

Type of Grant

  Minimum Shares   Target Shares   Maximum Shares 
Richard Wallace  Annual Grant (PRSU)   0    41,383    62,074 
Bren Higgins  Annual Grant (PRSU)   0    11,495    17,242 
Ahmad Khan  Annual Grant (PRSU)   0    12,645    18,967 

Brian Trafas

 

  

Annual Grant (PRSU)

 

   

 

0

 

 

 

   

 

9,196

 

 

 

   

 

13,794

 

 

 

For Messrs. Levy and Steimberg, their fiscal 2019 PRSUs are tied to Operating Margin Dollar achievement for Orbotech and performance against a “balanced scorecard” grading talent management and the design of a plan to achieve cost synergy targets associated with the Orbotech acquisition.

The Compensation Committee set the target Operating Margin Dollar achievement for Orbotech at $240 million for the year ending December 31, 2019, which it believed was challenging to achieve based on market expectations for calendar 2019.

With respect to the balanced scorecard assessment, the Compensation Committee considered the following strategic objectives:

Category

Objectives

Talent Management        Retention of a list of Orbotech employees
Synergy Plan

Development of a plan to achieve cost synergy targets of $50 million over thetwo-year period following the Orbotech acquisition

The “balanced scorecard” evaluates performance on a scale of 1 to 5, with “1” corresponding to “far below expectations,” and “5” corresponding to “far above expectations.” Achievement of the Operating Margin Dollar targets and the corresponding “balanced scorecard” grade will be determined by the Compensation Committee following the end of calendar 2019.

The following table sets forth the minimum, target and maximum shares achievable by Messrs. Steimberg and Levy with respect to the PRSU awards forming a part of their PRSU awards for fiscal year 201962022 (rounded down to the nearest whole PRSU):

 

Name

  

Type of Grant

  Minimum Shares   Target Shares   Maximum Shares 
Amichai Steimberg  Special Grant (PRSU)   0    30,388    60,776 

Asher Levy

 

  

Special Grant (PRSU)

 

   

 

0

 

 

 

   

 

25,073

 

 

 

   

 

50,146

 

 

 

Name

  Type of Grant   Target Value ($)(1)   Threshold Shares (#)   Target Shares (#)   Maximum Shares (#) 

Richard Wallace

   Annual PRSU    8,100,000    6,486    25,947    38,920 

Bren Higgins

   Annual PRSU    1,900,000    1,521    6,086    9,129 

Ahmad Khan

   Annual PRSU    2,100,000    1,681    6,727    10,090 

Oreste Donzella

   Annual PRSU    750,000    600    2,403    3,604 

Mary Beth Wilkinson

   Annual PRSU    800,000    640    2,563    3,844 

Annual RSU Awards

Each NEO received an annual RSU grant in fiscal 2019.(1) The Compensation Committee typically approves annual grants to NEOs consisting of an RSU that vests 25% each year over four years and a PRSU with the same target number of shares asunderlying our fiscal year 2022 PRSUs was determined by dividing a dollar target by the RSUs that vests 50%90-day average of our closing stock price ending on the third anniversaryFriday prior to approval of the awards. In fiscal year 2022, the 90-day average price was 13% lower than the price on the date of grant, and 50% onwhich is the fourth anniversaryprice used to determine the value of the date of grant. However,award in the “Summary Compensation Table.”

Fiscal Year 2019 PRSUs – Performance Criteria Satisfaction Determination

The fiscal year 2019 PRSUs were earned based on our Relative Free Cash Flow Margin attained over the three-year period ended June 30, 2021. In August 2021, the Compensation and Talent Committee and, in the case of Mr. Wallace, the CEO,Outside Directors, determined the independent membersextent to which the fiscal year 2019 PRSUs had been earned: a 134% payout at the 66th percentile of our industry peer group. The terms of the Board approved an annual grant weighted 60% forfiscal year 2019 PRSUs, including the target performance and 40% for RSUs.

6 The partiespayout level, actual results and vesting schedule, are discussing revisions tosummarized in thenon-GAAP operating margin dollar targets associated with Mr. Steimberg’s annual bonus opportunity and PRSU achievement thresholds provided for in his employment agreement due to shifts in management responsibilities following execution of his employment agreement, which revisions are not expected to change the aggregate bonus opportunity or the maximum number of shares available to him under his PRSU. We expect to finalize these revisions prior to the end of 2019.

For Messrs. Levy and Steimberg, the PRSUs were weighted more heavily than the RSU grants they received, with the PRSUs weighted at 60% and the RSUs weighted at 40%. For Mr. Levy, his RSUs vested 50% on July 1, 2019 and will vest as to the remaining 50% on December 31, 2019, subject to continued service on that date. For Mr. Steimberg, his RSU will vest 50% on December 31, 2019 and 50% on December 31, 2020, subject to continued service. The following table sets forth the annual RSU grants for each NEO in fiscal 2019:table:

 

NameTerms of Fiscal Year 2019 PRSUs

  Shares
Richard WallaceThreshold  27,589
Bren HigginsTarget Level  11,495
Ahmad Khan

Actual Results

  12,645

Maximum Level

Brian Trafas9,196
Amichai Steimberg20,259
Asher Levy16,715

Non-Recurring Awards—TSR Awards

Consistent with our pay for performance philosophy and our preference to weight NEO compensation more towards equity incentives to further align NEO compensation with the interests of our stockholders, in addition to the annual long-term incentive awards granted to our NEOs, in fiscal 2019 we granted TSR Awards to certain of our NEOs. We do not anticipate granting any additional TSR Awards in the near term. The TSR Awards were designed to further incentivize certain of our NEOs to execute on our strategy to expand our product offerings beyond our core competencies in semiconductor process control and into adjacent markets, which we believe will increase returns to stockholders. The value of the TSR awards were designed to be approximately equal to the fair value of our annual RSU and PRSU awards at target. The TSR Awards will vest only if significant total stockholder return targets are achieved during a five-year performance period. The TSR Awards are heavily long-term oriented, with a meaningful five-year vesting period, consistent with our philosophy to drive long-term stockholder value. The TSR Awards vest if total stockholder return milestones are met during the period from March 20, 2019 to March 20, 2024 (the “Performance Period”). Total stockholder return is measured by an increase in the market price of our Common Stock plus cash dividends paid to stockholders on a per share basis as compared to the base price of $116.391 (the “Base Price”), which represents the average closing price of our Common Stock during the20-trading day period ending on March 20, 2019.

Vesting Tier 1: The TSR Award will not vest unless the average closing price of our Common Stock for twenty consecutive trading days plus cash dividends distributed per share at any point during the Performance Period exceeds 150% of the Base Price, or $174.5865 (“Tier 1 TSR Hurdle”). If the Tier 1 TSR Hurdle is achieved during the Performance Period, 50% of the target number of shares subject to the TSR Award will vest on the later of (i) March 20, 2022 and (ii) the last trading day of the month in which the first Tier 1 TSR Hurdle is achieved, subject to continued service on such date.

Vesting Tier 2: If the average closing price of our Common Stock for twenty consecutive trading days plus cash dividends distributed per share at any point during the Performance Period exceeds 175% of the Base Price, or $203.6843 (“Tier 2 TSR Hurdle”), then an additional 50% of the target shares subject to the TSR Award will vest on the later of (i) March 20, 2023 and (ii) the last trading day of the month in which the first Tier 2 TSR Hurdle is achieved, subject to continued service on such date.

Vesting Tier 3: If the average closing price of our Common Stock for twenty consecutive trading days plus cash dividends distributed per share at any point during the Performance Period exceeds 200% of the Base Price, or $232.782 (“Tier 3 TSR Hurdle”), then an additional 50% of the target shares subject to the TSR Award will vest on March 20, 2024, subject to continued service on such date.

The maximum number of shares any recipient can receive for a TSR Award is 150% of the target number of shares subject to the award. The table below sets forth the target number of shares subject to the TSR Award granted to participating NEOs.

NameRelative Free Cash Flow
Margin performance

  Target Shares
Subject to TSR
Award (#)30th percentile
  

Richard Wallace55th

percentile

  

82,882

Bren Higgins66th

percentile

  

75th

27,626

percentile

Ahmad Khan

Payout level as a percentage
of target shares

  

30,390

LOGO

Brian Trafas

Vesting schedule

  

22,100

With respect to the earned fiscal year 2019 PRSUs, 50% vested in August 2021 and the remaining 50% vested in August 2022

 

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

52  |Executive Compensation and Other Matters

The following table sets forth the threshold, target and maximum shares achievable by the NEOs, as well as the actual number of shares earned by them, with respect to the fiscal year 2019 PRSUs (rounded down to the nearest whole PRSU):

Name

  Type of Grant   Threshold Shares (#)   Target Shares (#)   Maximum Shares (#)   Actual Shares Earned (#) 

Richard Wallace

   Annual PRSU    10,345    41,383    62,074    55,453 

Bren Higgins

   Annual PRSU    2,873    11,495    17,242    15,403 

Ahmad Khan

   Annual PRSU    3,161    12,645    18,967    16,944 

Oreste Donzella

   Annual PRSU    1,437    5,748    8,622    7,702 

Annual RSU Awards

The Compensation and Talent Committee also approved annual 2022 RSU grants to each of our NEOs. Each RSU award vests over four years, with 25% of the RSUs underlying the award vesting on each of the first four anniversaries of the applicable vesting commencement date, subject to continued service through the applicable vesting date. The size of the RSU and PRSU awards to NEOs are typically weighted equally, except in the case of Mr. Wallace, whose grants are weighted 60% PRSUs (at target levels) and 40% RSUs. Fiscal year RSUs are granted with dividend equivalent rights which entitle the recipient to receive credits, payable in cash or additional shares of our Common Stock, equal to the cash dividends that would have been received on the shares of our Common Stock had the shares been issued and outstanding on the dividend record date. Dividend equivalents are only paid to the recipient upon vesting or settlement of the underlying award.

The following table sets forth the RSU grants for each NEO in fiscal year 2022:

Name

  Target Value ($)(1)   Shares (#) 

Richard Wallace

   5,400,000    17,298 

Bren Higgins

   1,900,000    6,086 

Ahmad Khan

   2,100,000    6,727 

Oreste Donzella

   750,000    2,402 

Mary Beth Wilkinson

   1,800,000    5,765 

(1) The number of shares underlying our fiscal year 2022 RSUs was determined by dividing a dollar target by the 90-day average of our closing stock price ending on the Friday prior to approval of the awards. In fiscal year 2022, the 90-day average price was 13% lower than the price on the date of grant, which is the price used to determine the value of the award in the “Summary Compensation Table.”

In addition to their annual LTI grants, NEOs received one-time special PRSUs tied to absolute EPS achievement, with full vesting based on performance and continued service through June 30, 2026. See the Form 8-K filed on August 5, 2022 for more information.

Employee Benefits and Perquisites

Perquisites and Other Compensation

We make only nominal use of perquisites in compensating our domestic executive officers.officers, including our NEOs, except in the case of Mr. Donzella who received an expatriate package upon agreeing to relocate from the United States to the United Kingdom to run our Electronics, Packaging and Components business. Mr. Donzella also received a bonus for the issuance of a patent for which he was an inventor. All of our domestic executive officers, including our NEOs, are entitled to receive Company-provided professional financial services. These services include tax planning, preparation and filing, as well as financial and estate planning services, up to a maximum cost of $20,000 per calendar year, and are provided in order to allow our executive officers to devote their fullest attention to our business and to help ensure that their tax returns comply with IRS requirements.

In addition, our domestic executive officers, including our NEOs, are eligible to participate in our 401(k) plan (including a Company matching contribution on employee 401(k) plan contributions), employee stock purchase plan and the other employee benefit plans (including the Executive Retiree Medical Benefits (as defined and described below)) sponsored by us on the same terms and conditions that are generally available to other eligible employees.

The employment agreementsOther than these standard benefits (and, for Messrs. Levy and Steimberg were based in part on their existing employment agreements with Orbotech priorMr. Donzella, the expatriate package), we do not provide any other perquisites to the acquisition. These employment agreements provide for other customary perquisites for similarly situated executives domiciled in Israel. These perquisites include pension plan participation (contribution by Orbotech of not less than 5% of salary), disability insurance contributions by Orbotech (not to exceed 2.5% of salary), an annual recreation allowance (not less than $2,042 per year), educational fund contributions by Orbotech (7.5% of salary), and the use of a leased company car.

our NEOs.

 

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

53

Severance BenefitsApproval Procedures

During multiple meetings (both with and Changewithout management present) and with the assistance of Control AgreementsSemler Brossy, the Compensation and Talent Committee engaged in extensive deliberation in developing the fiscal year 2022 executive compensation program, seeking to establish compensation packages and target performance levels aimed at rewarding strong financial performance and long-term success of the Company. The Compensation and Talent Committee’s deliberations for all executive officers looked at a broad range of market data (described below), individual performance reviews and total compensation reports for each officer, the historically cyclical nature of our business, internally appropriate levels and targets relative to the officer’s role, and initial package recommendations from Semler Brossy and management. With regard to our 2021 Executive Incentive Plan (“2021 Bonus Plan”) and the fiscal year 2022 PRSUs granted to our NEOs, the proposed financial metrics and payout percentage recommendations were developed by management and approved by the Compensation and Talent Committee, with review and guidance from Semler Brossy.

With respect to the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer (Mr. Wallace), the Compensation and Talent Committee considered recommendations prepared by Semler Brossy. Following extensive deliberation, the Compensation and Talent Committee recommended Mr. Wallace’s proposed fiscal year 2022 target compensation opportunities and RSU and PRSU grants for approval by the Outside Directors. The Outside Directors then discussed and, in August 2021, approved Mr. Wallace’s fiscal year 2022 target compensation opportunities and PRSU and RSU grants as recommended. Mr. Wallace was not present and did not participate in the discussions regarding his own compensation.

For the other NEOs, the Compensation and Talent Committee, after considering the performance reviews and recommendations of Mr. Wallace, as well as extensive comparative compensation data provided by Semler Brossy, approved the fiscal year 2022 target compensation opportunities and PRSU and RSU grants for the other NEOs in August 2021.

In each case, when establishing each element of compensation and the overall target compensation opportunities for the NEOs, the Compensation and Talent Committee and the Outside Directors exercised their judgment based upon the data provided, and no specific formula was applied to determine the weight of each data point.

Market Data

Our ability to continue to attract and retain outstanding contributors, including our core executive team, is essential to our continuing success. Therefore, the Compensation and Talent Committee reviews several different data sources (including our industry peer group and broader market data) to assess whether we are offering compensation opportunities that are competitive with those offered by other employers seeking to attract the same talented individuals.

The industry peer group is comprised of U.S. publicly traded companies primarily in the semiconductor and semiconductor equipment industries that had at least 0.33x the Company’s trailing four-quarter revenues and at least 0.2x the Company’s 200-day average market capitalization value. Additionally, the peer group is reviewed to remove companies that we feel are too large to provide meaningful comparison.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

43

Below is the list of industry peer group companies used in developing our fiscal year 2022 program:

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Keysight Technologies, Inc.Micron Technology, Inc.Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
Analog Devices, Inc.Lam Research CorporationMKS Instruments, Inc.Teradyne, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc.Marvell Technology Group Ltd.NVIDIA CorporationTexas Instruments Incorporated
Broadcom, Inc.Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.*ON Semiconductor Corp.Xilinx, Inc.**
Corning IncorporatedMicrochip Technology, Inc.Qorvo, Inc.

* Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. was acquired by Analog Devices, Inc. on August 26, 2021.

** Xilinx, Inc. was acquired by Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. on February 14, 2022.

The Compensation and Talent Committee, in consultation with Semler Brossy, periodically reviews and, as appropriate, may approve changes to the list. The peer group reflected the following changes from our fiscal year 2021 peer group: the removal of Cypress Semiconductor Corp. due to its acquisition by Infineon Technologies AG.

When assessing our fiscal year 2022 executive compensation program, the Compensation and Talent Committee reviewed information developed by Semler Brossy regarding the compensation levels, programs and practices of our industry peer group to obtain comparative data and identify compensation trends and practices.

Though the Compensation and Talent Committee referred to percentile data in its analysis, as well as allocations between annual and long-term compensation, the Compensation and Talent Committee did not employ specific equations for determining compensation amounts based on such data. Rather, the Compensation and Talent Committee’s emphasis was on establishing compensation packages for the executive officers that would be competitive with those offered by other employers in our industry, appropriately reflect each executive officer’s skill set and experience, drive performance and encourage retention of top performers.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

44  |Executive Compensation and Other Matters

KEY PAY PRACTICES IN OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM AND LAST YEAR’S “SAY ON PAY” VOTE

Investor feedback is an important input to us in the design of our executive compensation program. We hold an annual “Say on Pay” advisory vote, with approximately 93% of the votes cast at our 2021 Annual Meeting voting “FOR” approval of our NEO compensation, which the Compensation and Talent Committee believes demonstrated strong stockholder support for our executive compensation policies and practices. We expect to ask our stockholders to vote, at our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders, in a non-binding, advisory vote regarding the frequency of our Say-on-Pay Votes.

We strive to follow good governance practices and align compensation with the stockholder experience. Our executive compensation program is designed to incorporate the following key pay practices and inputs:

What We Do

What We Don’t Do
  LOGOPay for performance: We have a pay for performance focus with a majority of our NEOs’ cumulative annual target compensation in the form of performance-based annual cash bonuses and PRSUs, tied to challenging metrics that reflect and are key to the growth and profitability of the Company’s business and promote alignment between executive and stockholder economic interests.LOGONo automatic salary increases: We do not guarantee automatic salary increases for our executive officers.

  LOGO

Different metrics in short- and long-term incentive plans: The metrics used for our annual cash bonus program (i.e., Operating Margin Dollar achievement and corporate balanced scorecard assessment) are different from those used for our PRSUs (i.e., Relative Free Cash Flow Margin (as defined below)).

LOGO

No hedging and pledging: We prohibit officers, directors and employees from hedging against our stock or pledging our stock.

  LOGO

Long-term incentive alignment: Equity awards vest typically over a four-year period, other than new hire RSU awards which vest over a three-year period, and our PRSUs are tied to a three-year performance period with 50% vesting in year three and 50% vesting in year four.

LOGO

No single-trigger change in control: We only offer “double trigger” change of control benefits.

  LOGO

Stock ownership guidelines: We impose stock ownership guidelines on all executive officers and Outside Directors.

LOGO

No gross-ups: We do not provide tax gross-up provisions on any change in control, severance or other payments related to executive terminations.

  LOGO

Clawbacks: We maintain a “clawback” policy that enables us to recover performance-based compensation in the event of a significant restatement of our financial results.

LOGO

No excessive perquisites: It is our policy to strictly limit the use and value of perquisites.

  LOGO

Compensation consultant: The Compensation and Talent Committee retains and regularly consults with an independent compensation consultant to advise on our executive compensation program and practices.

LOGO

No dividends prior to vesting: We do not pay dividends on RSUs or PRSUs until the awards vest and then only on the portion that vests.

  LOGO

Independence: Executive compensation decisions for Mr. Wallace, our CEO, are made by the Outside Directors on our Board, and for all other executive officers by the Compensation and Talent Committee, which is comprised exclusively of Outside Directors.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

45

ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION

Element

VariabilityObjectiveHow EstablishedFY22 Terms/ Outcomes
for NEOs

LOGO

Base salary

(Page 46)

FIXED

Provide a competitive fixed component of compensation that, as part of a total compensation package, enables us to attract and retain top talent.

Reviewed against the executive officer’s skill, experience and responsibilities, and for competitiveness against our compensation peer group.

All of our NEOs received a salary increase during fiscal year 2022.

LOGO

Short-term executive incentive plan

(cash bonus)

(Pages 46 to 50)

PERFORMANCE -

BASED

Offer a variable cash compensation opportunity based upon the level of achievement of challenging corporate goals, with adjustments based on bonus achievement percentage.

Target payouts set by measuring total cash compensation against our compensation peer group. Corporate performance targets based on challenging operational goals.

Balanced scorecard and Operating Margin Dollar (as defined below) achievement versus goal for the twelve months ended December 31, 2021, in addition to individual performance, resulted in a 2021 bonus payout equal to 200% of target for each NEO. Bonus achievement percentage multipliers were all set at 100% for the NEOs.

LOGO

PRSUs

(Pages 50 to 52)

PERFORMANCE - BASED

and value tied to stock price

Align long-term management and stockholder interests and strengthen retention with longer vesting provisions. PRSUs provide compensation and ownership opportunity based upon the level of achievement of challenging corporate goals.

Total target value of annual awards set using market data (reviewed against our compensation peer group for competitiveness) and the executive officer’s responsibilities, contributions and criticality to ongoing success.

Our fiscal year 2022 PRSUs are tied to three-year Relative Free Cash Flow Margin (as defined below). Earned shares vest 50% at three years and 50% at four years after grant date, subject to continued service through each vesting date.

LOGO

RSUs

(Page 52)

VALUE TIED TO STOCK PRICERSUs promote long-term retention and alignment with stockholder interests.

RSU awards may be granted when necessary to remain competitive with the marketplace.

Fiscal year 2022 RSUs vest 25% per year over four years, subject to continued service through each vesting date.

Other compensation

(Pages 52 to 54)

PRIMARILY

FIXED

Provide competitive employee benefits. We do not view this as a significant component of our executive compensation program.

Reviewed for competitiveness against our compensation peer group.

No significant changes to fiscal year 2022 Program, with the exception of Mr. Donzella who received an expatriate package for relocating to the United Kingdom.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

46  |Executive Compensation and Other Matters

CEO COMPENSATION AT A GLANCE

Our CEO’s fiscal year 2022 compensation is consistent with our pay for performance philosophy, with a focus on variable and “at-risk” compensation that is closely aligned with our operational and stock price performance. The chart below highlights that 95% of our CEO’s total compensation for fiscal year 2022 (excluding “all other compensation,” consisting principally of dividend equivalents paid on the vesting of awards granted in prior years) is at risk, with 63% of such compensation tied to the achievement of challenging performance objectives:

FISCAL YEAR 2022 CEO

COMPENSATION ALLOCATION

LOGO

DESCRIPTION OF INDIVIDUAL ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION

Base Salary

The Compensation and Talent Committee annually reviews the base salaries of the NEOs as part of its overall compensation review and considers the competitive market analysis of the Company’s industry peer group each year in determining whether to make an adjustment to the base salary for each NEO. We increased the annual base salaries of all of our NEOs in fiscal year 2022 to better align their salaries with competitive benchmarks. These changes resulted in competitive positioning that is consistent with our pay philosophy. For fiscal year 2022, the Compensation and Talent Committee (or, in the case of Mr. Wallace, the Outside Directors) approved the base salaries set forth in the table below.

Name

  Annual Base Salary Rate Approved
During Fiscal Year 2022  ($)
   

    % Increase from Fiscal Year 2021

Annual Base Salary Rate

 

Richard Wallace

   1,000,000    2.6% 

Bren Higgins

   600,000    9.1% 

Ahmad Khan

   650,000    13.0% 

Oreste Donzella

   460,000    4.5% 

Mary Beth Wilkinson

   525,000    5.0% 

Short-Term Executive Incentive Bonus Plan

Our annual Executive Incentive Plan (our “Bonus Plan”) is intended to motivate our senior executives, including our NEOs, to achieve short-term corporate objectives by providing a competitive cash bonus which is earned based upon the achievement of pre-determined Company performance goals, relating to Operating Margin Dollar (as defined below), the Company’s “balanced scorecard” objectives (as described below) and individual performance.

Under our Bonus Plan, which operates on a calendar-year basis, participating executives are eligible to earn up to 200% of the applicable executive’s target bonus opportunity based on the level of attainment of the relevant performance goals during the relevant calendar year. During our fiscal year 2022, our NEOs participated in our 2021 Bonus Plan through December 31, 2021 and in our 2022 Bonus Plan from January 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022. The 2022 Bonus Plan is substantially identical to the 2021 Bonus Plan, other than with respect to Operating Margin Dollar target levels of performance and the related payout percentages.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

47

Plan Design and Performance Metrics

We currently have two plansused Operating Margin Dollar achievement as a key performance metric in our calendar year 2021 Bonus Plan because we believe that provide certain compensationit reflects several important competitive and benefits ifbusiness elements such as product acceptance, market share and cost discipline, and is therefore a participant’s employment with the Company terminates under certain defined circumstances:very good barometer of our Executive Severanceoverall performance. For our calendar year 2021 Bonus Plan, adopted in 2006 (the “Original Severance Plan”),“Operating Margin Dollar” represents our total revenues less total costs of revenues, research and our 2010 Executive Severance Plan (the “2010 Severance Plan”). During fiscal year 2019, Mr. Wallace was a participantdevelopment expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses, but excluding expenses related to acquisitions, goodwill impairment, severance and merger-related items.

In addition to Operating Margin Dollar achievement, payouts under the Original Severance Plan, and Messrs. Higgins, Khan and Trafas were participants under the 2010 Severance Plan.

We believe the Original Severance Plan and the 2010 Severance2021 Bonus Plan are important foralso determined in part by a “balanced scorecard” rating awarded by the long-term retentionCompensation and Talent Committee, which is designed to measure our progress based on financial and non-financial metrics related to operational excellence, customer focus, growth and talent management. The use of the balanced scorecard is designed to ensure that the quality of our senior executivesoperating results is high and enhance their commitment tothat those results support the attainmentsustainability of our strategic objectives. The benefits provided under our severance plans will allow the participating executives to continue to focus their attention on our business operations and strategic plans without undue concern over their own financial situation during periods when substantial disruptions and distractions might otherwise prevail.model. We believe that the benefits provided underbalanced scorecard’s use of broad measures of financial and strategic success closely aligns with the interests of our severance plansexecutive officers with those of our stockholders. The balanced scorecard is tracked throughout the year by the Compensation and Talent Committee, and then formally reviewed by the Compensation and Talent Committee and the Board following the conclusion of the applicable calendar year for assessment of the Company’s success in achieving its annual strategic goals.

For calendar year 2021, the corporate goals and objectives were set at levels that the Compensation and Talent Committee believed would be challenging to achieve based on our historical and anticipated performance and the then-prevailing macroeconomic conditions. While the Operating Margin Dollar and many of the “balanced scorecard” metrics are fairquantitative in nature, some are qualitative and, reasonable in lighttherefore, introduce a degree of judgment into the bonus determination process. This structure of using both Operating Margin Dollar achievement and the balanced scorecard is intended to ensure that bonus payouts not only reflect the Company’s achievement of specific levels of Operating Margin Dollars, but also the level of dedicationmanagement performance necessary to continue to achieve those results over the long term.

The 2021 Bonus Plan also contains an element of an individual assessment. The Compensation and commitmentTalent Committee retains the participatingdiscretion to increase or decrease each executive officers have renderedofficer’s bonus amount (to the Company,extent earned) based on a subjective assessment of the contribution they have madeexecutive’s individual performance by applying a “bonus achievement percentage” multiplier. Bonus achievement multipliers for individual performance range from 80% to our growth120%. Following the completion of calendar year 2021, the Compensation and financial success,Talent Committee conducted a performance assessment of each executive officer (including each NEO), with input from Mr. Wallace (except with respect to his own performance), and the value we expect to receive from retaining their services,Outside Directors conducted a similar assessment for Mr. Wallace, in each case based on the executive officer’s leadership skills, experience and performance, including during challenging transition periods in connection with a change of control.how each executive led his or her organization as demonstrated against the key balanced scorecard objectives and goals for the executive’s respective organization.

The severance protection for Messrs. Levy and Steimberg are contained in their respective employment agreements. Underpayout formula under the terms of their employment agreements upon a termination of employment, Messrs. Steimberg and Levy receive:

u

acceleration of any unvested equity awards granted by Orbotech and assumed by us in the acquisition of Orbotech;

u

a lump sum payment equal to the difference between 200% of monthly salary prior to transitioning to senior advisor status multiplied by 29 (in the case of Mr. Levy) or 27 (in the case of Mr. Steimberg, less contributions made by Orbotech to the manager’s insurance policy or pension fund maintained by Orbotech from the period from November 1, 1990 (in the case of Mr. Levy) or November 1, 1992 (in the case of Mr. Steimberg;

u

a lump sum payment equal to the difference between 200% of monthly salary prior to transitioning to senior advisor status multiplied by the years of service or partial years of service with Orbotech following the closing of the Orbotech acquisition, less contributions made by Orbotech to the manager’s insurance policy or pension fund maintained by Orbotech following the closing of the Orbotech acquisition;

u

a lump sum payment equal to six months salary based on the monthly salary in effect prior to transitioning to senior advisor status;

u

if terminated without Cause and less than six months’ advanced notice is provided, a lump sum payment equal the monthly salary in effect prior to transitioning to senior advisor status plus the value of all othernon-equity andnon-bonus compensation multiplied by the number of months short of six months in which notice of termination is provided; and

u

if terminated without Cause, in lieu of acceleration of outstanding RSUs and PRSUs awards that were not assumed awards in the acquisition of Orbotech, employee will receive a cash payment equal to the unvested portion of the award. If none of the awards had vested in part, the cash value for Mr. Steimberg and Levy of these awards would be $5,716,667 and $4,716,667, respectively.

Deferred Compensation

We maintain an Executive Deferred SavingsBonus Plan a nonqualified deferred compensation plan, which enables eligible employees to defer all or a portion of certain components of their compensation, with no Company match. For further information, please see the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation.” We do not provide any defined benefit pension benefits or any other retirement benefits to domestic NEOs, other than the 401(k) plan generally available to employees and the executive retiree medical program described below. The employment agreements for Messrs. Steimberg and Levy provide for Orbotech contributions to Israeli pension plans on their behalf.was structured as follows:

 

 

LOGO

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

48  |Executive Compensation and Other Matters

Executive Retiree Medical ProgramPayout Percentages

We have established a retiree medical programOur 2021 Bonus Plan was structured to offer continued health benefits to certain current domestic senior executive officers. To be eligible, an executive must be at least 55 years old with ten yearspay out 100% of service with the Company and must be in good standing with us at the timeeach participating executive’s target bonus amount if we successfully achieved our target level of retirement. Eligible executives are entitled to participate until age 65 and must pay the full cost of the premium. Participation in this program is limitedOperating Margin Dollar performance (subject to the Company’s Section 16 executive officers asapplicable executive’s bonus achievement percentage multiplier). Under the 2021 Bonus Plan, we were required to achieve a threshold level of February 2011. The benefits described above shallOperating Margin Dollar achievement in order for the Bonus Plan to be referred to herein as the “Executive Retiree Medical Benefits.” As of June 30, 2019, the only NEO potentially eligible to participate in this program was Mr. Wallace. No future participants (other than the current participant,funded; to the extent he eventually becomes eligibleOperating Margin Dollar was achieved below the threshold value, the applicable payout percentage would be equal to participate0%. Upon achievement of that threshold level, a participant’s actual bonus amount was then determined based upon a bonus payout grid, with Operating Margin Dollar goals as the variable along one axis and, on the other axis, the “balanced scorecard” rating (which is a score awarded to the Company by the Board based on its assessment of our performance against the “balanced scorecard” metrics), as adjusted by the participant’s bonus achievement percentage multiplier.

The Compensation and Talent Committee sets performance targets for the Bonus Plan in consideration of internal budgets, broader market forecasts, and prior year achievement. In consideration of these factors, with respect to our 2021 Bonus Plan, the program) are allowed intoCompensation and Talent Committee set the program.

Stock Ownership Guidelines; Policy Regarding Hedgingtarget Operating Margin Dollar achievement at $2.637 billion for the calendar year ended December 31, 2021, which was approximately 34% higher than the comparable target for calendar year 2020 ($1.97 billion) and approximately 19% higher than the actual achievement level for calendar year 2020, reflecting its focus on setting goals that it believed were challenging to achieve.

In November 2008,addition, the maximum Operating Margin Dollar achievement was set at $3.428 billion for the calendar year ended December 31, 2021, which (if attained) would have surpassed the Operating Margin Dollar any calendar year in our Board adopted revised stock ownership guidelines applicablehistory.

The 2021 Bonus Plan was structured so that, for each level of Operating Margin Dollar performance, the maximum payout would be reasonable relative to our executive officers. Under that policy,financial results. The following examples highlight the possible funding levels for our executives are expected to own KLA Common Stock having a minimum value, denominated as a multiple2021 Bonus Plan at different levels of their annual base salaries, as follows:our performance, before applying individual multipliers.

 

TitleLevel of Operating Margin Dollars

Funding Level Details

Less than $791 million

  

SharesLOGO    No payouts would be made under the 2021 Bonus Plan if the Company achieved Operating Margin Dollars of less than $791 million

Chief Executive Officer

$791 million (threshold)

  

ValueLOGO    Set at 30% of at least four times annual base salarytarget

 

LOGO    Highest bonus funding level equal to 38% of the executive officers’ target bonuses, if the Board awarded the Company a balanced scorecard rating of 5 (“exceptional”)

Executive Vice President / Senior Vice President

$2.637 billion (target)

  

ValueLOGO    Target level of Operating Margin Dollars of $2.637 billion was approximately 19% higher than our Operating Margin Dollar performance for the prior calendar year ($2.213 billion)

LOGO    Highest bonus funding level equal to 150% of the executive officers’ target bonuses, if the Board awarded the Company a balanced scorecard rating of 5 (“exceptional”)

LOGO    Target bonus funding level equal to 100% of the executive officers’ target bonuses, if the Board awarded the Company a balanced scorecard rating of 3+ (“primarily meets expectations”)

$3.428 billion (maximum)

LOGO    Set at least two times annual base salary30% higher than target

 

LOGO    Operating Margin Dollars of $3.428 billion would have surpassed any calendar year in our history

LOGO    Highest bonus funding level equal to 200% of the executive officers’ target bonuses, if the Board awarded the Company a balanced scorecard rating of 3+ (“primarily meets expectations”)

LOGO    Minimum bonus funding level equal to 100% of the executive officers’ target bonuses, if the Board awarded the Company a balanced scorecard rating of 1 (“opportunity for improvement”)

Unearned PRSUs do not count for purposes of measuring compliance with the ownership guidelines. The value of outstanding RSUs and PRSUs for which the performance-based vesting criteria have been achieved but for which the service-based vesting criteria have not yet been satisfied is included in measuring compliance. Each executive officer, once he or she has served in a position listed above for at least four years, is expected to comply with these guidelines.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

49

With respect to our CEO,the balanced scorecard assessment, the Compensation and Talent Committee conducts an annual reviewand the Board considered macro-economic and market dynamic factors when making the balanced scorecard assessment, including projected GDP increases despite headwinds caused by slowing growth in China, worldwide supply chain constraints, inflation, new COVID-19 variants and slowing vaccination rates, and increased spending in foundry/logic and DRAM and NAND flash memory segments. The Compensation and Talent Committee and the Board reviewed the following categories to assess compliancedetermine the balanced scorecard rating for our 2021 Bonus Plan:

Balanced Scorecard
  Objectives

Assessment

KLA Revenue

Calendar year 2021 revenue finished at $8.166 billion which was up 34% from calendar year 2020.

Market Leadership

The Board considered market share as a leading indicator of market leadership and noted an expected 0.3% to 0.5% improvement in market share led by strong broadband plasma and optical metrology performance.

Product Differentiation

The Board assessed gross margin as a leading indicator of product differentiation versus competitors, noting that overall non-GAAP gross margin finished at 62.8% for calendar year 2021 and was 1.4 percentage points higher than calendar year 2020, aided by average selling price premiums across semiconductor process control products.

Productivity

The Board considered operating margin as a leading indicator of productivity, noting that non-GAAP operating margin finished at 41.7% for calendar year 2021 and was 5.3 percentage points higher than calendar year 2020.

Human Capital

The Board considered employee engagement and employee retention as leading indicators of human capital performance noting low turnover rates for both the employee base as a whole and for top talent, the successful onboarding of 3,000 employees in calendar year 2021, an increase in the percentage of women in the workforce and in global leadership positions and strong employee productivity and engagement despite the impact of COVID-19.

The Board then evaluated the Company’s performance with respect to the guidelines. Vice Presidents’ compliance is evaluatedobjectives described above on a scale of 1 to 5, with:

    LOGO   “1” corresponding to “opportunity for improvement,”
    LOGO“3” corresponding to “primarily meets expectations,” and
    LOGO“5” corresponding to “exceptional.”

The Board awarded the Company a balanced scorecard rating of “4+”, based on its assessment of our overall performance against our strategic objectives during calendar year 2021. That combined with Operating Margin Dollar achievement of $3.401 billion in calendar year 2021 (approximately 29% above target), resulted in a funding, before applying bonus achievement percentage multipliers, of 200% of target bonuses under the 2021 Bonus Plan.

In addition, based on the Compensation and Talent Committee’s (or, with respect to Mr. Wallace, the Outside Directors’) assessment of each NEO’s individual performance for calendar year 2021, each NEO was awarded a bonus achievement percentage multiplier of 100%.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

50  |Executive Compensation and Other Matters

2021 Payouts

The following table presents each NEO’s target bonus (as a percentage of base salary and in dollars, based on actual salary paid during the calendar year 2021 (rather than fiscal year 2022)), as well as the bonus payout percentage generated by the CEO. As2021 Bonus Plan’s payout grid, based on our performance, the bonus achievement percentage multiplier assigned to the NEO and the actual bonus amount paid to the NEO.

Name

  NEO’s FY
2021 Target
Bonus Award
Under Bonus
Plan (as a
Percentage of
Base Salary)(1)
   NEO’s Target
Bonus Award
Under Bonus
Plan ($)
   Payout
Multiple
Based on
Company
Performance
(Operating
Margin
Dollars and
Balanced
Scorecard)
   Bonus
Achievement
Percentage
Assigned by
Compensation
and Talent
Committee
   Actual
Bonus
Payout
Under 2021
Bonus  Plan
($)(2)
   Actual Bonus
Payout
Under 202
Bonus
Plan as a
Percentage
of Target
Bonus
 

Richard Wallace

   150%    1,476,923    200%    100%    2,953,846    200% 

Bren Higgins

   100%    569,231    200%    100%    1,138,462    200% 

Ahmad Khan

   100%    603,846    200%    100%    1,207,692    200% 

Oreste Donzella

   80%    358,154    200%    100%    716,308    200% 

Mary Beth Wilkinson

   80%    403,077    200%    100%    806,154    200% 

(1) The amounts in this column represent the applicable NEO’s bonus (stated as a percentage of the Record Date,executive officer’s base salary). Under the 2021 Bonus Plan, the actual salary paid during the calendar year multiplied by (a) the payout percentage determined by the 2021 Bonus Plan’s bonus payout grid based on the Company’s performance, and (b) the NEO’s bonus achievement percentage multiplier assigned by the Compensation and Talent Committee or, in the case of Mr. Wallace, the Outside Directors, generated the executive officer’s actual bonus payment amount.

(2) Actual bonus payouts are based on the actual salary paid to the NEO during calendar year 2021 rather than fiscal year 2022.

Our NEO’s target bonus opportunities are determined by our Compensation and Talent Committee (or, in the case of Mr. Wallace, by our Outside Directors) by considering each NEO’s performance, role and responsibilities at our Company. The target bonus as a percentage of base salary for each of our NEOs for calendar year 2022 was in compliance with this stock ownership requirement.not changed from calendar year 2021.

Under our Policy on Insider Trading and Unauthorized Disclosures, our directors and employees (including our NEOs) are not permitted to engage in short salesLong-Term Incentives

Annual PRSU Awards

During fiscal year 2022, we granted each of our securities or any hedging or derivative securities transactions relatingNEOs an annual award of PRSUs, which vests based on the attainment of specified Company performance goals and service-vesting requirements. The NEOs’ fiscal year 2022 PRSUs are earned based on the Company’s Relative Free Cash Flow Margin (as defined below). “Relative Free Cash Flow Margin” means our cumulative free cash flow (cash flow provided by operations, less capital expenditures), divided by cumulative revenues, relative to the cumulative free cash flow for our industry peer group companies for the three years ending June 30, 2024. A determination will be made after June 30, 2024, based on the Company’s percentile performance relative to its industry peer group, regarding the percentage of the fiscal year 2022 PRSUs that have been earned.

We believe that the Relative Free Cash Flow Margin metric is a key measure of our long-term performance and stockholder value creation. Our ability to generate cash from operations is essential to fund the expansive research and development efforts that are instrumental to our securities.long-term success, as well as our efforts to return cash to stockholders. The relative nature of the metric ensures that our performance must compare favorably to our industry peer group companies for PRSUs to be earned. To the extent that we and/or one of our industry peer group companies completes a significant acquisition, the results of operations of the significant acquisition will be subtracted from our results and/or the results of our industry peer group company that completed the acquisition beginning in the first full quarter immediately following such acquisition, based on the results of the acquired company for the last four quarters of operations for which financial data is publicly available.

Any fiscal year 2022 PRSUs earned by an NEO will vest 50% after three years and 50% after four years from the date of grant, in each case, subject to continued service on each vesting date. Fiscal year 2022 PRSUs are granted with dividend equivalent rights which entitle the recipient to receive credits, payable in cash or additional shares of our Common Stock, equal to the cash dividends that would have been received on the shares of our Common Stock had the shares been issued and outstanding on the dividend record date. Dividend equivalents are only paid to the recipient upon vesting or settlement of the underlying award.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

 

Compensation Committee Decision Making – Approval Procedures Overview and Market Data 51

The Compensation Committee takes a broad-based approach in evaluatingfollowing table highlights the possible payouts under the participating NEO’s fiscal year 2022 PRSUs at different levels of Company performance:

Level of Relative Free Cash

Flow Margin Performance

PRSU Payout Details

Less than 30th percentile

LOGO    No shares underlying the 2022 PRSU awards will become eligible to vest if our Relative Free Cash Flow Margin is below the 30th percentile

30th percentile (Threshold)

LOGO    25% of the target number of shares underlying the 2022 PRSU awards will become eligible to vest if our Relative Free Cash Flow Margin is equal to the 30th percentile

55th percentile (Target)

LOGO    Target performance level will require strong performance relative to our industry peer group and is therefore considered challenging

LOGO    100% of the target number of shares underlying the 2022 PRSU awards will become eligible to vest if our Relative Free Cash Flow Margin is equal to the 55th percentile

75th percentile or above (Maximum)

LOGO    Maximum performance level will require significant performance relative to the Company’s industry peer group and is therefore considered very challenging

LOGO    150% of the target number of shares underlying the 2022 PRSU awards will become eligible to vest if our Relative Free Cash Flow Margin is equal to or greater than the 75th percentile

Payout will be linearly interpolated if actual results fall between the threshold and making decisionstarget, or the target and maximum measurement points above.

The following table sets forth the threshold, target and maximum shares achievable by our NEOs with respect to executive compensation.their annual PRSU awards for fiscal year 2022 (rounded down to the nearest whole PRSU):

Name

  Type of Grant   Target Value ($)(1)   Threshold Shares (#)   Target Shares (#)   Maximum Shares (#) 

Richard Wallace

   Annual PRSU    8,100,000    6,486    25,947    38,920 

Bren Higgins

   Annual PRSU    1,900,000    1,521    6,086    9,129 

Ahmad Khan

   Annual PRSU    2,100,000    1,681    6,727    10,090 

Oreste Donzella

   Annual PRSU    750,000    600    2,403    3,604 

Mary Beth Wilkinson

   Annual PRSU    800,000    640    2,563    3,844 

(1) The charternumber of shares underlying our fiscal year 2022 PRSUs was determined by dividing a dollar target by the 90-day average of our closing stock price ending on the Friday prior to approval of the awards. In fiscal year 2022, the 90-day average price was 13% lower than the price on the date of grant, which is the price used to determine the value of the award in the “Summary Compensation Committee givesTable.”

Fiscal Year 2019 PRSUs – Performance Criteria Satisfaction Determination

The fiscal year 2019 PRSUs were earned based on our Relative Free Cash Flow Margin attained over the three-year period ended June 30, 2021. In August 2021, the Compensation and Talent Committee full authority for determiningand, in the compensationcase of our executive officers, other than the Chief Executive Officer, for whom the Compensation Committee makes recommendations toMr. Wallace, the Outside Directors, for approval.determined the extent to which the fiscal year 2019 PRSUs had been earned: a 134% payout at the 66th percentile of our industry peer group. The terms of the fiscal year 2019 PRSUs, including the target performance and payout level, actual results and vesting schedule, are summarized in the following table:

 

Terms of Fiscal Year 2019 PRSUs

ThresholdTarget Level

Actual Results

Maximum Level

Relative Free Cash Flow
Margin performance

30th percentile

55th

percentile

66th

percentile

75th

percentile

Payout level as a percentage
of target shares

LOGO

Vesting schedule

With respect to the earned fiscal year 2019 PRSUs, 50% vested in August 2021 and the remaining 50% vested in August 2022

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

 

Advisor52  |Executive Compensation and Other Matters

The following table sets forth the threshold, target and maximum shares achievable by the NEOs, as well as the actual number of shares earned by them, with respect to the Compensation Committeefiscal year 2019 PRSUs (rounded down to the nearest whole PRSU):

Name

  Type of Grant   Threshold Shares (#)   Target Shares (#)   Maximum Shares (#)   Actual Shares Earned (#) 

Richard Wallace

   Annual PRSU    10,345    41,383    62,074    55,453 

Bren Higgins

   Annual PRSU    2,873    11,495    17,242    15,403 

Ahmad Khan

   Annual PRSU    3,161    12,645    18,967    16,944 

Oreste Donzella

   Annual PRSU    1,437    5,748    8,622    7,702 

Annual RSU Awards

The Compensation and Talent Committee retains Semler Brossy Consulting Group, LLC (“Semler Brossy”), an independent compensation consultant,also approved annual 2022 RSU grants to provideeach of our NEOs. Each RSU award vests over four years, with 25% of the Compensation CommitteeRSUs underlying the award vesting on each of the first four anniversaries of the applicable vesting commencement date, subject to continued service through the applicable vesting date. The size of the RSU and PRSU awards to NEOs are typically weighted equally, except in the case of Mr. Wallace, whose grants are weighted 60% PRSUs (at target levels) and 40% RSUs. Fiscal year RSUs are granted with independent, objective analysis and advice on executive and director compensation matters. Semler Brossy reports directlydividend equivalent rights which entitle the recipient to receive credits, payable in cash or additional shares of our Common Stock, equal to the Chaircash dividends that would have been received on the shares of our Common Stock had the shares been issued and outstanding on the dividend record date. Dividend equivalents are only paid to the recipient upon vesting or settlement of the Compensation Committee and, aside from its supportunderlying award.

The following table sets forth the RSU grants for each NEO in fiscal year 2022:

Name

  Target Value ($)(1)   Shares (#) 

Richard Wallace

   5,400,000    17,298 

Bren Higgins

   1,900,000    6,086 

Ahmad Khan

   2,100,000    6,727 

Oreste Donzella

   750,000    2,402 

Mary Beth Wilkinson

   1,800,000    5,765 

(1) The number of shares underlying our fiscal year 2022 RSUs was determined by dividing a dollar target by the 90-day average of our closing stock price ending on the Friday prior to approval of the awards. In fiscal year 2022, the 90-day average price was 13% lower than the price on the date of grant, which is the price used to determine the value of the award in the “Summary Compensation Committee, performs no other workTable.”

In addition to their annual LTI grants, NEOs received one-time special PRSUs tied to absolute EPS achievement, with full vesting based on performance and continued service through June 30, 2026. See the Form 8-K filed on August 5, 2022 for more information.

Employee Benefits and Perquisites

Perquisites and Other Compensation

We make only nominal use of perquisites in compensating our domestic executive officers, including our NEOs, except in the case of Mr. Donzella who received an expatriate package upon agreeing to relocate from the United States to the United Kingdom to run our Electronics, Packaging and Components business. Mr. Donzella also received a bonus for the Company.

Semler Brossy generally attends all meetingsissuance of the Compensation Committee ina patent for which evaluationshe was an inventor. All of the effectiveness of overall executive compensation programs are conducted or in which compensation forour domestic executive officers, is analyzed or approved. During fiscal year 2019, Semler Brossy’s duties included providing the Compensation Committee with relevant marketincluding our NEOs, are entitled to receive Company-provided professional financial services. These services include tax planning, preparation and industry data and analysis,filing, as well as preparingfinancial and reviewing materials for the Compensation Committee’s meetings. In fulfilling these duties, Semler Brossy met, as neededestate planning services, up to a maximum cost of $20,000 per calendar year, and at the direction of the Compensation Committee, withare provided in order to allow our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Human Resources Officer and other executive officers to devote their fullest attention to our business and members ofto help ensure that their tax returns comply with IRS requirements.

In addition, our Human Resources department.domestic executive officers, including our NEOs, are eligible to participate in our 401(k) plan (including a Company matching contribution on employee 401(k) plan contributions), employee stock purchase plan and the other employee benefit plans (including the Executive Retiree Medical Benefits (as defined and described below)) sponsored by us on the same terms and conditions that are generally available to other eligible employees.

The Compensation Committee, in conducting its annual assessment in fiscal 2019 determined that Semler Brossy was independent and didOther than these standard benefits (and, for Mr. Donzella, the expatriate package), we do not haveprovide any conflicts of interest.

other perquisites to our NEOs.

 

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

53

Approval Procedures

During multiple meetings (both with and without Company management present) and with the assistance of Semler Brossy, the Compensation and Talent Committee engaged in extensive deliberation in developing the fiscal year 20192022 executive compensation program, seeking to establish compensation packages and target performance levels aimed at rewarding strong financial performance and long-term success of the Company. The Compensation and Talent Committee’s deliberations for all executive officers looked at a broad range of market data (described below), individual performance reviews and total compensation reports for each officer, the historically cyclical nature of our business, internally appropriate levels and targets relative to the officer’s role, and initial package recommendations from Semler Brossy and management. With regard to our 2021 Executive Incentive Plan (“2021 Bonus PlanPlan”) and the fiscal year 2022 PRSUs granted to our NEOs, the proposed financial metrics and payout percentage recommendations were developed by management and approved by the Compensation and Talent Committee, with review and guidance from Semler Brossy.

With respect to the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation,Officer (Mr. Wallace), the Compensation and Talent Committee considered recommendations prepared by Semler Brossy. Following extensive deliberation, the Compensation and Talent Committee recommended Mr. Wallace’s proposed fiscal year 20192022 target compensation opportunities and RSU and PRSU grants tofor approval by the Outside Directors. The Outside Directors then discussed and, in August 2018,2021, approved Mr. Wallace’s fiscal year 20192022 target compensation opportunities and PRSU and RSU grants as recommended. Mr. Wallace’s TSR Award was approved by the Outside Directors in April 2019. Mr. Wallace was not present and did not participate in the discussions regarding his own compensation.

For the other NEOs, the Compensation and Talent Committee, after considering the performance reviews and recommendations of Mr. Wallace, as well as extensive comparative compensation data provided by Semler Brossy, approved the fiscal year 2022 target compensation opportunities and PRSU and RSU grants for the other NEOs in August 2018 and the TSR Awards in March 2019.2021.

In each case, when establishing each element of compensation and the overall target compensation opportunities for the NEOs, the Compensation and Talent Committee and the Outside Directors exercised their judgment based upon the data provided, and no specific formula was applied to determine the weight of each data point.

Market Data

Our ability to continue to attract and retain outstanding contributors, including our core executive team, is essential to our continuing success. Therefore, the Compensation and Talent Committee reviews several different data sources (including the

Company’sour industry peer group and broader market data) to assess whether we are offering compensation opportunities that are competitive with those offered by other employers seeking to attract the same talented individuals.

The industry peer group is comprised of U.S. publicly traded companies primarily in the semiconductor and semiconductor equipment industries that had at least 0.33x the Company’s trailing four-quarter revenues and at least 0.2x the Company’s200-day average market capitalization value. Additionally, the peer group is reviewed to remove companies that we feel are too large to provide meaningful comparison.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

43

Below is the list of industry peer group companies used in developing our fiscal year 20192022 program:

 

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. First Solar,Keysight Technologies, Inc. Microsemi CorporationMicron Technology, Inc. Teradyne,Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
Analog Devices, Inc. Lam Research Corporation MKS Instruments, Inc. Texas Instruments IncorporatedTeradyne, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. Marvell Technology Group Ltd. NVIDIA Corporation Xilinx, Inc.Texas Instruments Incorporated
Broadcom, Ltd.Inc. Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.* ON Semiconductor Corp. Xilinx, Inc.**
Cree, Inc.Corning Incorporated Microchip Technology, Inc. Qorvo, Inc. 
Cypress Semiconductor Corp.Micron Technology, Inc.Skyworks Solutions, Inc.

* Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. was acquired by Analog Devices, Inc. on August 26, 2021.

** Xilinx, Inc. was acquired by Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. on February 14, 2022.

The Compensation and Talent Committee, in consultation with Semler Brossy, periodically reviews and, as appropriate, may approve changes to the list. ForThe peer group reflected the following changes from our fiscal year 2019,2021 peer group: the Compensation Committee decidedremoval of Cypress Semiconductor Corp. due to add MKS Instruments to the list of peer group companies following its acquisition of Newport.    by Infineon Technologies AG.

When assessing our fiscal year 20192022 executive compensation program, the Compensation and Talent Committee reviewed information developed by Semler Brossy regarding the compensation levels, programs and practices of our industry peer group to obtain comparative data and identify compensation trends and practices.

Though the Compensation and Talent Committee referred to percentile data in its analysis, as well as allocations between annual and long-term compensation, the Compensation and Talent Committee did not employ specific equations for determining compensation amounts based on such data. Rather, the Compensation and Talent Committee’s emphasis was on establishing compensation packages for the executive officers that would be competitive with those offered by other employers in our industry, appropriately reflect each executive officer’s skill set and experience, drive performance and encourage retention of top performers.

 

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

44  |Executive Compensation and Other Matters

KEY PAY PRACTICES IN OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM AND LAST YEAR’S “SAY ON PAY” VOTE

Investor feedback is an important input to us in the design of our executive compensation program. We hold an annual “Say on Pay” advisory vote, with approximately 93% of the votes cast at our 2021 Annual Meeting voting “FOR” approval of our NEO compensation, which the Compensation and Talent Committee believes demonstrated strong stockholder support for our executive compensation policies and practices. We expect to ask our stockholders to vote, at our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders, in a non-binding, advisory vote regarding the frequency of our Say-on-Pay Votes.

We strive to follow good governance practices and align compensation with the stockholder experience. Our executive compensation program is designed to incorporate the following key pay practices and inputs:

What We Do

What We Don’t Do
  LOGOPay for performance: We have a pay for performance focus with a majority of our NEOs’ cumulative annual target compensation in the form of performance-based annual cash bonuses and PRSUs, tied to challenging metrics that reflect and are key to the growth and profitability of the Company’s business and promote alignment between executive and stockholder economic interests.LOGONo automatic salary increases: We do not guarantee automatic salary increases for our executive officers.

  LOGO

Different metrics in short- and long-term incentive plans: The metrics used for our annual cash bonus program (i.e., Operating Margin Dollar achievement and corporate balanced scorecard assessment) are different from those used for our PRSUs (i.e., Relative Free Cash Flow Margin (as defined below)).

LOGO

No hedging and pledging: We prohibit officers, directors and employees from hedging against our stock or pledging our stock.

  LOGO

Long-term incentive alignment: Equity awards vest typically over a four-year period, other than new hire RSU awards which vest over a three-year period, and our PRSUs are tied to a three-year performance period with 50% vesting in year three and 50% vesting in year four.

LOGO

No single-trigger change in control: We only offer “double trigger” change of control benefits.

  LOGO

Stock ownership guidelines: We impose stock ownership guidelines on all executive officers and Outside Directors.

LOGO

No gross-ups: We do not provide tax gross-up provisions on any change in control, severance or other payments related to executive terminations.

  LOGO

Clawbacks: We maintain a “clawback” policy that enables us to recover performance-based compensation in the event of a significant restatement of our financial results.

LOGO

No excessive perquisites: It is our policy to strictly limit the use and value of perquisites.

  LOGO

Compensation consultant: The Compensation and Talent Committee retains and regularly consults with an independent compensation consultant to advise on our executive compensation program and practices.

LOGO

No dividends prior to vesting: We do not pay dividends on RSUs or PRSUs until the awards vest and then only on the portion that vests.

  LOGO

Independence: Executive compensation decisions for Mr. Wallace, our CEO, are made by the Outside Directors on our Board, and for all other executive officers by the Compensation and Talent Committee, which is comprised exclusively of Outside Directors.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

45

ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION

Element

VariabilityObjectiveHow EstablishedFY22 Terms/ Outcomes
for NEOs

LOGO

Base salary

(Page 46)

FIXED

Provide a competitive fixed component of compensation that, as part of a total compensation package, enables us to attract and retain top talent.

Reviewed against the executive officer’s skill, experience and responsibilities, and for competitiveness against our compensation peer group.

All of our NEOs received a salary increase during fiscal year 2022.

LOGO

Short-term executive incentive plan

(cash bonus)

(Pages 46 to 50)

PERFORMANCE -

BASED

Offer a variable cash compensation opportunity based upon the level of achievement of challenging corporate goals, with adjustments based on bonus achievement percentage.

Target payouts set by measuring total cash compensation against our compensation peer group. Corporate performance targets based on challenging operational goals.

Balanced scorecard and Operating Margin Dollar (as defined below) achievement versus goal for the twelve months ended December 31, 2021, in addition to individual performance, resulted in a 2021 bonus payout equal to 200% of target for each NEO. Bonus achievement percentage multipliers were all set at 100% for the NEOs.

LOGO

PRSUs

(Pages 50 to 52)

PERFORMANCE - BASED

and value tied to stock price

Align long-term management and stockholder interests and strengthen retention with longer vesting provisions. PRSUs provide compensation and ownership opportunity based upon the level of achievement of challenging corporate goals.

Total target value of annual awards set using market data (reviewed against our compensation peer group for competitiveness) and the executive officer’s responsibilities, contributions and criticality to ongoing success.

Our fiscal year 2022 PRSUs are tied to three-year Relative Free Cash Flow Margin (as defined below). Earned shares vest 50% at three years and 50% at four years after grant date, subject to continued service through each vesting date.

LOGO

RSUs

(Page 52)

VALUE TIED TO STOCK PRICERSUs promote long-term retention and alignment with stockholder interests.

RSU awards may be granted when necessary to remain competitive with the marketplace.

Fiscal year 2022 RSUs vest 25% per year over four years, subject to continued service through each vesting date.

Other compensation

(Pages 52 to 54)

PRIMARILY

FIXED

Provide competitive employee benefits. We do not view this as a significant component of our executive compensation program.

Reviewed for competitiveness against our compensation peer group.

No significant changes to fiscal year 2022 Program, with the exception of Mr. Donzella who received an expatriate package for relocating to the United Kingdom.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

46  |Executive Compensation and Other Matters

CEO COMPENSATION AT A GLANCE

Our CEO’s fiscal year 2022 compensation is consistent with our pay for performance philosophy, with a focus on variable and “at-risk” compensation that is closely aligned with our operational and stock price performance. The chart below highlights that 95% of our CEO’s total compensation for fiscal year 2022 (excluding “all other compensation,” consisting principally of dividend equivalents paid on the vesting of awards granted in prior years) is at risk, with 63% of such compensation tied to the achievement of challenging performance objectives:

FISCAL YEAR 2022 CEO

COMPENSATION ALLOCATION

LOGO

DESCRIPTION OF INDIVIDUAL ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION

Base Salary

The Compensation and Talent Committee annually reviews the base salaries of the NEOs as part of its overall compensation review and considers the competitive market analysis of the Company’s industry peer group each year in determining whether to make an adjustment to the base salary for each NEO. We increased the annual base salaries of all of our NEOs in fiscal year 2022 to better align their salaries with competitive benchmarks. These changes resulted in competitive positioning that is consistent with our pay philosophy. For fiscal year 2022, the Compensation and Talent Committee (or, in the case of Mr. Wallace, the Outside Directors) approved the base salaries set forth in the table below.

Name

  Annual Base Salary Rate Approved
During Fiscal Year 2022  ($)
   

    % Increase from Fiscal Year 2021

Annual Base Salary Rate

 

Richard Wallace

   1,000,000    2.6% 

Bren Higgins

   600,000    9.1% 

Ahmad Khan

   650,000    13.0% 

Oreste Donzella

   460,000    4.5% 

Mary Beth Wilkinson

   525,000    5.0% 

Short-Term Executive Incentive Bonus Plan

Our annual Executive Incentive Plan (our “Bonus Plan”) is intended to motivate our senior executives, including our NEOs, to achieve short-term corporate objectives by providing a competitive cash bonus which is earned based upon the achievement of pre-determined Company performance goals, relating to Operating Margin Dollar (as defined below), the Company’s “balanced scorecard” objectives (as described below) and individual performance.

Under our Bonus Plan, which operates on a calendar-year basis, participating executives are eligible to earn up to 200% of the applicable executive’s target bonus opportunity based on the level of attainment of the relevant performance goals during the relevant calendar year. During our fiscal year 2022, our NEOs participated in our 2021 Bonus Plan through December 31, 2021 and in our 2022 Bonus Plan from January 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022. The 2022 Bonus Plan is substantially identical to the 2021 Bonus Plan, other than with respect to Operating Margin Dollar target levels of performance and the related payout percentages.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

47

Plan Design and Performance Metrics

We used Operating Margin Dollar achievement as a key performance metric in our calendar year 2021 Bonus Plan because we believe that it reflects several important competitive and business elements such as product acceptance, market share and cost discipline, and is therefore a very good barometer of our overall performance. For our calendar year 2021 Bonus Plan, “Operating Margin Dollar” represents our total revenues less total costs of revenues, research and development expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses, but excluding expenses related to acquisitions, goodwill impairment, severance and merger-related items.

In addition to Operating Margin Dollar achievement, payouts under the 2021 Bonus Plan are also determined in part by a “balanced scorecard” rating awarded by the Compensation and Talent Committee, which is designed to measure our progress based on financial and non-financial metrics related to operational excellence, customer focus, growth and talent management. The use of the balanced scorecard is designed to ensure that the quality of our operating results is high and that those results support the sustainability of our business model. We believe that the balanced scorecard’s use of broad measures of financial and strategic success closely aligns with the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders. The balanced scorecard is tracked throughout the year by the Compensation and Talent Committee, and then formally reviewed by the Compensation and Talent Committee and the Board following the conclusion of the applicable calendar year for assessment of the Company’s success in achieving its annual strategic goals.

For calendar year 2021, the corporate goals and objectives were set at levels that the Compensation and Talent Committee believed would be challenging to achieve based on our historical and anticipated performance and the then-prevailing macroeconomic conditions. While the Operating Margin Dollar and many of the “balanced scorecard” metrics are quantitative in nature, some are qualitative and, therefore, introduce a degree of judgment into the bonus determination process. This structure of using both Operating Margin Dollar achievement and the balanced scorecard is intended to ensure that bonus payouts not only reflect the Company’s achievement of specific levels of Operating Margin Dollars, but also the level of management performance necessary to continue to achieve those results over the long term.

The 2021 Bonus Plan also contains an element of an individual assessment. The Compensation and Talent Committee retains the discretion to increase or decrease each executive officer’s bonus amount (to the extent earned) based on a subjective assessment of the executive’s individual performance by applying a “bonus achievement percentage” multiplier. Bonus achievement multipliers for individual performance range from 80% to 120%. Following the completion of calendar year 2021, the Compensation and Talent Committee conducted a performance assessment of each executive officer (including each NEO), with input from Mr. Wallace (except with respect to his own performance), and the Outside Directors conducted a similar assessment for Mr. Wallace, in each case based on the executive officer’s leadership skills, experience and performance, including how each executive led his or her organization as demonstrated against the key balanced scorecard objectives and goals for the executive’s respective organization.

The payout formula under the Bonus Plan was structured as follows:

LOGO

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

48  |Executive Compensation and Other Matters

Payout Percentages

Our 2021 Bonus Plan was structured to pay out 100% of each participating executive’s target bonus amount if we successfully achieved our target level of Operating Margin Dollar performance (subject to the applicable executive’s bonus achievement percentage multiplier). Under the 2021 Bonus Plan, we were required to achieve a threshold level of Operating Margin Dollar achievement in order for the Bonus Plan to be funded; to the extent Operating Margin Dollar was achieved below the threshold value, the applicable payout percentage would be equal to 0%. Upon achievement of that threshold level, a participant’s actual bonus amount was then determined based upon a bonus payout grid, with Operating Margin Dollar goals as the variable along one axis and, on the other axis, the “balanced scorecard” rating (which is a score awarded to the Company by the Board based on its assessment of our performance against the “balanced scorecard” metrics), as adjusted by the participant’s bonus achievement percentage multiplier.

The Compensation and Talent Committee sets performance targets for the Bonus Plan in consideration of internal budgets, broader market forecasts, and prior year achievement. In consideration of these factors, with respect to our 2021 Bonus Plan, the Compensation and Talent Committee set the target Operating Margin Dollar achievement at $2.637 billion for the calendar year ended December 31, 2021, which was approximately 34% higher than the comparable target for calendar year 2020 ($1.97 billion) and approximately 19% higher than the actual achievement level for calendar year 2020, reflecting its focus on setting goals that it believed were challenging to achieve.

In addition, the maximum Operating Margin Dollar achievement was set at $3.428 billion for the calendar year ended December 31, 2021, which (if attained) would have surpassed the Operating Margin Dollar any calendar year in our history.

The 2021 Bonus Plan was structured so that, for each level of Operating Margin Dollar performance, the maximum payout would be reasonable relative to our financial results. The following examples highlight the possible funding levels for our 2021 Bonus Plan at different levels of our performance, before applying individual multipliers.

Level of Operating Margin Dollars

Funding Level Details

Less than $791 million

LOGO    No payouts would be made under the 2021 Bonus Plan if the Company achieved Operating Margin Dollars of less than $791 million

$791 million (threshold)

LOGO    Set at 30% of target

LOGO    Highest bonus funding level equal to 38% of the executive officers’ target bonuses, if the Board awarded the Company a balanced scorecard rating of 5 (“exceptional”)

$2.637 billion (target)

LOGO    Target level of Operating Margin Dollars of $2.637 billion was approximately 19% higher than our Operating Margin Dollar performance for the prior calendar year ($2.213 billion)

LOGO    Highest bonus funding level equal to 150% of the executive officers’ target bonuses, if the Board awarded the Company a balanced scorecard rating of 5 (“exceptional”)

LOGO    Target bonus funding level equal to 100% of the executive officers’ target bonuses, if the Board awarded the Company a balanced scorecard rating of 3+ (“primarily meets expectations”)

$3.428 billion (maximum)

LOGO    Set at 30% higher than target

LOGO    Operating Margin Dollars of $3.428 billion would have surpassed any calendar year in our history

LOGO    Highest bonus funding level equal to 200% of the executive officers’ target bonuses, if the Board awarded the Company a balanced scorecard rating of 3+ (“primarily meets expectations”)

LOGO    Minimum bonus funding level equal to 100% of the executive officers’ target bonuses, if the Board awarded the Company a balanced scorecard rating of 1 (“opportunity for improvement”)

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

49

With respect to the balanced scorecard assessment, the Compensation and Talent Committee and the Board considered macro-economic and market dynamic factors when making the balanced scorecard assessment, including projected GDP increases despite headwinds caused by slowing growth in China, worldwide supply chain constraints, inflation, new COVID-19 variants and slowing vaccination rates, and increased spending in foundry/logic and DRAM and NAND flash memory segments. The Compensation and Talent Committee and the Board reviewed the following categories to determine the balanced scorecard rating for our 2021 Bonus Plan:

Balanced Scorecard
  Objectives

Assessment

KLA Revenue

Calendar year 2021 revenue finished at $8.166 billion which was up 34% from calendar year 2020.

Market Leadership

The Board considered market share as a leading indicator of market leadership and noted an expected 0.3% to 0.5% improvement in market share led by strong broadband plasma and optical metrology performance.

Product Differentiation

The Board assessed gross margin as a leading indicator of product differentiation versus competitors, noting that overall non-GAAP gross margin finished at 62.8% for calendar year 2021 and was 1.4 percentage points higher than calendar year 2020, aided by average selling price premiums across semiconductor process control products.

Productivity

The Board considered operating margin as a leading indicator of productivity, noting that non-GAAP operating margin finished at 41.7% for calendar year 2021 and was 5.3 percentage points higher than calendar year 2020.

Human Capital

The Board considered employee engagement and employee retention as leading indicators of human capital performance noting low turnover rates for both the employee base as a whole and for top talent, the successful onboarding of 3,000 employees in calendar year 2021, an increase in the percentage of women in the workforce and in global leadership positions and strong employee productivity and engagement despite the impact of COVID-19.

The Board then evaluated the Company’s performance with respect to the objectives described above on a scale of 1 to 5, with:

    LOGO   “1” corresponding to “opportunity for improvement,”
    LOGO“3” corresponding to “primarily meets expectations,” and
    LOGO“5” corresponding to “exceptional.”

The Board awarded the Company a balanced scorecard rating of “4+”, based on its assessment of our overall performance against our strategic objectives during calendar year 2021. That combined with Operating Margin Dollar achievement of $3.401 billion in calendar year 2021 (approximately 29% above target), resulted in a funding, before applying bonus achievement percentage multipliers, of 200% of target bonuses under the 2021 Bonus Plan.

In addition, based on the Compensation and Talent Committee’s (or, with respect to Mr. Wallace, the Outside Directors’) assessment of each NEO’s individual performance for calendar year 2021, each NEO was awarded a bonus achievement percentage multiplier of 100%.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

50  |Executive Compensation and Other Matters

2021 Payouts

The following table presents each NEO’s target bonus (as a percentage of base salary and in dollars, based on actual salary paid during the calendar year 2021 (rather than fiscal year 2022)), as well as the bonus payout percentage generated by the 2021 Bonus Plan’s payout grid, based on our performance, the bonus achievement percentage multiplier assigned to the NEO and the actual bonus amount paid to the NEO.

Name

  NEO’s FY
2021 Target
Bonus Award
Under Bonus
Plan (as a
Percentage of
Base Salary)(1)
   NEO’s Target
Bonus Award
Under Bonus
Plan ($)
   Payout
Multiple
Based on
Company
Performance
(Operating
Margin
Dollars and
Balanced
Scorecard)
   Bonus
Achievement
Percentage
Assigned by
Compensation
and Talent
Committee
   Actual
Bonus
Payout
Under 2021
Bonus  Plan
($)(2)
   Actual Bonus
Payout
Under 202
Bonus
Plan as a
Percentage
of Target
Bonus
 

Richard Wallace

   150%    1,476,923    200%    100%    2,953,846    200% 

Bren Higgins

   100%    569,231    200%    100%    1,138,462    200% 

Ahmad Khan

   100%    603,846    200%    100%    1,207,692    200% 

Oreste Donzella

   80%    358,154    200%    100%    716,308    200% 

Mary Beth Wilkinson

   80%    403,077    200%    100%    806,154    200% 

(1) The amounts in this column represent the applicable NEO’s bonus (stated as a percentage of the executive officer’s base salary). Under the 2021 Bonus Plan, the actual salary paid during the calendar year multiplied by (a) the payout percentage determined by the 2021 Bonus Plan’s bonus payout grid based on the Company’s performance, and (b) the NEO’s bonus achievement percentage multiplier assigned by the Compensation and Talent Committee or, in the case of Mr. Wallace, the Outside Directors, generated the executive officer’s actual bonus payment amount.

(2) Actual bonus payouts are based on the actual salary paid to the NEO during calendar year 2021 rather than fiscal year 2022.

Our NEO’s target bonus opportunities are determined by our Compensation and Talent Committee (or, in the case of Mr. Wallace, by our Outside Directors) by considering each NEO’s performance, role and responsibilities at our Company. The target bonus as a percentage of base salary for each of our NEOs for calendar year 2022 was not changed from calendar year 2021.

Long-Term Incentives

Annual PRSU Awards

During fiscal year 2022, we granted each of our NEOs an annual award of PRSUs, which vests based on the attainment of specified Company performance goals and service-vesting requirements. The NEOs’ fiscal year 2022 PRSUs are earned based on the Company’s Relative Free Cash Flow Margin (as defined below). “Relative Free Cash Flow Margin” means our cumulative free cash flow (cash flow provided by operations, less capital expenditures), divided by cumulative revenues, relative to the cumulative free cash flow for our industry peer group companies for the three years ending June 30, 2024. A determination will be made after June 30, 2024, based on the Company’s percentile performance relative to its industry peer group, regarding the percentage of the fiscal year 2022 PRSUs that have been earned.

We believe that the Relative Free Cash Flow Margin metric is a key measure of our long-term performance and stockholder value creation. Our ability to generate cash from operations is essential to fund the expansive research and development efforts that are instrumental to our long-term success, as well as our efforts to return cash to stockholders. The relative nature of the metric ensures that our performance must compare favorably to our industry peer group companies for PRSUs to be earned. To the extent that we and/or one of our industry peer group companies completes a significant acquisition, the results of operations of the significant acquisition will be subtracted from our results and/or the results of our industry peer group company that completed the acquisition beginning in the first full quarter immediately following such acquisition, based on the results of the acquired company for the last four quarters of operations for which financial data is publicly available.

Any fiscal year 2022 PRSUs earned by an NEO will vest 50% after three years and 50% after four years from the date of grant, in each case, subject to continued service on each vesting date. Fiscal year 2022 PRSUs are granted with dividend equivalent rights which entitle the recipient to receive credits, payable in cash or additional shares of our Common Stock, equal to the cash dividends that would have been received on the shares of our Common Stock had the shares been issued and outstanding on the dividend record date. Dividend equivalents are only paid to the recipient upon vesting or settlement of the underlying award.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

51

The following table highlights the possible payouts under the participating NEO’s fiscal year 2022 PRSUs at different levels of Company performance:

Level of Relative Free Cash

Flow Margin Performance

PRSU Payout Details

Less than 30th percentile

LOGO    No shares underlying the 2022 PRSU awards will become eligible to vest if our Relative Free Cash Flow Margin is below the 30th percentile

30th percentile (Threshold)

LOGO    25% of the target number of shares underlying the 2022 PRSU awards will become eligible to vest if our Relative Free Cash Flow Margin is equal to the 30th percentile

55th percentile (Target)

LOGO    Target performance level will require strong performance relative to our industry peer group and is therefore considered challenging

LOGO    100% of the target number of shares underlying the 2022 PRSU awards will become eligible to vest if our Relative Free Cash Flow Margin is equal to the 55th percentile

75th percentile or above (Maximum)

LOGO    Maximum performance level will require significant performance relative to the Company’s industry peer group and is therefore considered very challenging

LOGO    150% of the target number of shares underlying the 2022 PRSU awards will become eligible to vest if our Relative Free Cash Flow Margin is equal to or greater than the 75th percentile

Payout will be linearly interpolated if actual results fall between the threshold and target, or the target and maximum measurement points above.

The following table sets forth the threshold, target and maximum shares achievable by our NEOs with respect to their annual PRSU awards for fiscal year 2022 (rounded down to the nearest whole PRSU):

Name

  Type of Grant   Target Value ($)(1)   Threshold Shares (#)   Target Shares (#)   Maximum Shares (#) 

Richard Wallace

   Annual PRSU    8,100,000    6,486    25,947    38,920 

Bren Higgins

   Annual PRSU    1,900,000    1,521    6,086    9,129 

Ahmad Khan

   Annual PRSU    2,100,000    1,681    6,727    10,090 

Oreste Donzella

   Annual PRSU    750,000    600    2,403    3,604 

Mary Beth Wilkinson

   Annual PRSU    800,000    640    2,563    3,844 

(1) The number of shares underlying our fiscal year 2022 PRSUs was determined by dividing a dollar target by the 90-day average of our closing stock price ending on the Friday prior to approval of the awards. In fiscal year 2022, the 90-day average price was 13% lower than the price on the date of grant, which is the price used to determine the value of the award in the “Summary Compensation Table.”

Fiscal Year 2019 PRSUs – Performance Criteria Satisfaction Determination

The fiscal year 2019 PRSUs were earned based on our Relative Free Cash Flow Margin attained over the three-year period ended June 30, 2021. In August 2021, the Compensation and Talent Committee and, in the case of Mr. Wallace, the Outside Directors, determined the extent to which the fiscal year 2019 PRSUs had been earned: a 134% payout at the 66th percentile of our industry peer group. The terms of the fiscal year 2019 PRSUs, including the target performance and payout level, actual results and vesting schedule, are summarized in the following table:

Terms of Fiscal Year 2019 PRSUs

ThresholdTarget Level

Actual Results

Maximum Level

Relative Free Cash Flow
Margin performance

30th percentile

55th

percentile

66th

percentile

75th

percentile

Payout level as a percentage
of target shares

LOGO

Vesting schedule

With respect to the earned fiscal year 2019 PRSUs, 50% vested in August 2021 and the remaining 50% vested in August 2022

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

52  |Executive Compensation and Other Matters

The following table sets forth the threshold, target and maximum shares achievable by the NEOs, as well as the actual number of shares earned by them, with respect to the fiscal year 2019 PRSUs (rounded down to the nearest whole PRSU):

Name

  Type of Grant   Threshold Shares (#)   Target Shares (#)   Maximum Shares (#)   Actual Shares Earned (#) 

Richard Wallace

   Annual PRSU    10,345    41,383    62,074    55,453 

Bren Higgins

   Annual PRSU    2,873    11,495    17,242    15,403 

Ahmad Khan

   Annual PRSU    3,161    12,645    18,967    16,944 

Oreste Donzella

   Annual PRSU    1,437    5,748    8,622    7,702 

Annual RSU Awards

The Compensation and Talent Committee also approved annual 2022 RSU grants to each of our NEOs. Each RSU award vests over four years, with 25% of the RSUs underlying the award vesting on each of the first four anniversaries of the applicable vesting commencement date, subject to continued service through the applicable vesting date. The size of the RSU and PRSU awards to NEOs are typically weighted equally, except in the case of Mr. Wallace, whose grants are weighted 60% PRSUs (at target levels) and 40% RSUs. Fiscal year RSUs are granted with dividend equivalent rights which entitle the recipient to receive credits, payable in cash or additional shares of our Common Stock, equal to the cash dividends that would have been received on the shares of our Common Stock had the shares been issued and outstanding on the dividend record date. Dividend equivalents are only paid to the recipient upon vesting or settlement of the underlying award.

The following table sets forth the RSU grants for each NEO in fiscal year 2022:

Name

  Target Value ($)(1)   Shares (#) 

Richard Wallace

   5,400,000    17,298 

Bren Higgins

   1,900,000    6,086 

Ahmad Khan

   2,100,000    6,727 

Oreste Donzella

   750,000    2,402 

Mary Beth Wilkinson

   1,800,000    5,765 

(1) The number of shares underlying our fiscal year 2022 RSUs was determined by dividing a dollar target by the 90-day average of our closing stock price ending on the Friday prior to approval of the awards. In fiscal year 2022, the 90-day average price was 13% lower than the price on the date of grant, which is the price used to determine the value of the award in the “Summary Compensation Table.”

In addition to their annual LTI grants, NEOs received one-time special PRSUs tied to absolute EPS achievement, with full vesting based on performance and continued service through June 30, 2026. See the Form 8-K filed on August 5, 2022 for more information.

Employee Benefits and Perquisites

Perquisites and Other Compensation

We make only nominal use of perquisites in compensating our domestic executive officers, including our NEOs, except in the case of Mr. Donzella who received an expatriate package upon agreeing to relocate from the United States to the United Kingdom to run our Electronics, Packaging and Components business. Mr. Donzella also received a bonus for the issuance of a patent for which he was an inventor. All of our domestic executive officers, including our NEOs, are entitled to receive Company-provided professional financial services. These services include tax planning, preparation and filing, as well as financial and estate planning services, up to a maximum cost of $20,000 per calendar year, and are provided in order to allow our executive officers to devote their fullest attention to our business and to help ensure that their tax returns comply with IRS requirements.

In addition, our domestic executive officers, including our NEOs, are eligible to participate in our 401(k) plan (including a Company matching contribution on employee 401(k) plan contributions), employee stock purchase plan and the other employee benefit plans (including the Executive Retiree Medical Benefits (as defined and described below)) sponsored by us on the same terms and conditions that are generally available to other eligible employees.

Other than these standard benefits (and, for Mr. Donzella, the expatriate package), we do not provide any other perquisites to our NEOs.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

53

Severance Benefits and Change of Control Agreements

We currently maintain two executive severance plans that provide certain compensation and benefits to our employees, including certain of our NEOs, if a participant’s employment with the Company terminates under certain specified circumstances: (i) our Amended and Restated Executive Severance Plan, adopted in 2006 (the “Original Severance Plan”), and (ii) our Amended and Restated 2010 Executive Severance Plan (the “2010 Severance Plan” and, together with the Original Severance Plan, the “Severance Plans”).

During fiscal year 2022, Mr. Wallace was a participant under the Original Severance Plan, and Messrs. Higgins, Khan and Donzella and Ms. Wilkinson were participants under the 2010 Severance Plan.

These severance benefits and arrangements are described below in more detail under the title “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.”

We believe the Original Severance Plan and the 2010 Severance Plan are important for the long-term retention of our senior executives and enhance their commitment to the attainment of our strategic objectives. These severance benefits allow the participating executives to continue to focus their attention on our business operations and strategic plans without undue concern over their own financial situation during periods when substantial disruptions and distractions might otherwise prevail. We believe that these severance benefits are fair and reasonable in light of the level of dedication and commitment the participating executive officers have rendered the Company, the contribution they have made to our growth and financial success, and the value we expect to receive from retaining their services, including during challenging transition periods in connection with a change of control.

Deferred Compensation

We maintain an Executive Deferred Savings Plan, a nonqualified deferred compensation plan, which enables eligible employees, including our NEOs, and directors to defer all or a portion of certain components of their compensation, with no Company match. For further information, please see the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation.” We do not provide any pension benefits or any other retirement benefits to our NEOs, other than the 401(k) plan generally available to employees and the Executive Retiree Medical Benefits, described below.

Executive Retiree Medical Program

We have established a retiree medical program to offer continued health benefits to certain current domestic senior executive officers (including certain of our NEOs). To be eligible, an executive must be at least 55 years old with 10 years of service with the Company and must be in good standing with us at the time of retirement. Eligible executives are entitled to participate until age 65 and must pay the full cost of the premium. Participation in this program is limited to the Company’s Section 16 executive officers as of February 2011. The benefits described above shall be referred to herein as the “Executive Retiree Medical Benefits.” As of June 30, 2022, the only NEO eligible to participate in this program was Mr. Wallace.

Stock Ownership Guidelines; Policy Regarding Hedging

In November 2008, our Board adopted revised stock ownership guidelines applicable to our executive officers (including our NEOs) and Outside Directors. Under that policy, our executives are expected to own KLA Common Stock having a minimum value, denominated as a multiple of their annual base salaries, as follows:

Title

Shares

Chief Executive Officer

Value of at least four times annual base salary

Executive Vice President/Senior Vice President

Value of at least two times annual base salary

Unearned PRSUs do not count for purposes of measuring compliance with the ownership guidelines. The value of outstanding RSUs and PRSUs for which the performance-based vesting criteria (if any) have been achieved but for which the service-based vesting criteria have not yet been satisfied is included in measuring compliance. Each executive officer, once he or she has served in a position listed above for at least four years, is expected to comply with these guidelines. With respect to our NEOs, the Compensation and Talent Committee conducts an annual review to assess compliance with the guidelines.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

54  |Executive Compensation and Other Matters

The table below sets forth as of June 30, 2022 our NEOs’ compliance with our stock ownership guidelines. Value is based on the closing price of our common stock on June 30, 2022 ($319.08) and the ratio is based on the annual salary rate approved during fiscal year 2022.

Name

  Total Shares (#)(1)   Value ($)   Ratio 

Richard Wallace

   231,149    73,755,023    73.8x 

Bren Higgins

   64,257    20,503,124    34.2x 

Ahmad Khan

   72,052    22,990,352    35.4x 

Oreste Donzella

   35,481    11,321,278    24.6x 

Mary Beth Wilkinson

   22,330    7,125,056    13.6x 

(1) Consists of: (i) shares owned, including for Mr. Wallace, shares held by the Wallace Living Trust u/a/d dated 3/27/01, as amended; (ii) RSUs; and (iii) PRSUs for which the performance conditions have been satisfied.

Under our Policy on Insider Trading and Unauthorized Disclosures, our directors and employees (including our NEOs) are not permitted to engage in short sales of our securities or any hedging or derivative securities transactions relating to our securities.

Tax Considerations

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 162(m)”) disallows an income tax deduction to publicly-traded companies for compensation paid to the CEO and the three other highest paid executive officers“covered employees,” which generally includes NEOs, for compensation that exceeds $1.0 million per officer in any taxable year.

The Compensation and Talent Committee believes that the potential deductibility of the compensation payable under our executive compensation program should be only one of the relevant factors taken into consideration when establishing the program, and not the sole or primary factor. We expect that the vast majority of the compensation we provide to NEOs will not be deductible under Section 162(m).

Clawback Policy

We maintain a clawback policy, which is set forth in the Compensation and Talent Committee’s charter. This policy provides that in the event of a significant restatement of financial results resulting from fraud, misconduct, materialnon-compliance or material errors, the Compensation and Talent Committee may direct that the Company recover all or a portion of performance-based compensation, including bonuses and long-term incentive awards, made to executive officers during the restatement period. This direction may be made by the Compensation and Talent Committee in its sole discretion, as long as the Compensation and Talent Committee is acting in good faith and in compliance with applicable laws. The policy states that the amount to be recovered from an executive officer will be the amount by which the performance-based compensation exceeded the amount that would have been payable to the executive officer had the financial statements been initially filed as restated. However, the Compensation and Talent Committee has the discretion to direct the Company to recover any different amount (including the entire award) that the Compensation and Talent Committee may determine. In addition, the Compensation and Talent Committee may, in its discretion, recover different amounts from different executive officers on any basis as the Compensation and Talent Committee deems appropriate and, to the extent it determines to seek any such recovery, has full discretion regarding the form of such recovery. More information regarding this policy is contained in the Compensation and Talent Committee’s charter, which is available on our Investor Relations website athttp://ir.KLA.com.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT 55

LOGO  

Compensation and Talent

Committee Report

The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” with the SEC or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that KLA specifically incorporates it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

The Compensation and Talent Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Based on that review and its discussions, the Compensation and Talent Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

MEMBERS OF THE COMPENSATION AND TALENT COMMITTEE

Kevin Kennedy,Gary Moore, Chairman

Edward Barnholt

Jeneanne Hanley

Emiko Higashi

Gary Moore

Victor Peng

Robert Rango

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES56  |Executive Compensation Tables

 

SummaryLOGO Executive Compensation     TableTables

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table sets forth certain summary information concerning the compensation earned for services rendered in all capacities to the Company and its subsidiaries for the following fiscal years by our NEOs for the fiscal year ended 2022.

Name and

Principal Position

  Year     Salary
($)(1)
     Bonus
($)
   Stock
Awards
($)(2)
   Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(1)(3)
     All Other
Compensation
($)(4)
   Total ($) 

(a)

  (b)     (c)     (d)   (e)   (f)     (g)   (h) 

Richard Wallace

President & Chief
Executive Officer

   2022      997,115          15,296,189(5)    2,953,846      1,321,475    20,568,625 
   2021      975,000          9,338,877(6)    2,895,750      500,761    13,710,388 
   2020      966,923          8,796,499(7)    2,609,820      951,133    13,324,375 

Bren Higgins

Executive Vice President &

Chief Financial Officer

   2022      594,231          4,305,358(5)    1,138,462      432,587    6,470,638 
   2021      550,000          3,295,919(6)    1,089,000      227,149    5,075,228 
   2020      543,077          3,518,545(7)    1,001,160      221,678    5,284,460 

Ahmad Khan

President, Semiconductor

Process Control

   2022      641,346          4,758,814(5)    1,207,692      458,034    7,065,886 
   2021      575,000          3,845,408(6)    1,138,500      199,056    5,757,964 
   2020      569,615          4,105,015(7)    1,019,520      209,052    5,903,202 

Oreste Donzella

Executive Vice President,

Electronics, Packaging &
Components

   2022      457,692      4,942(8)    1,699,577(5)    716,308      782,595    3,661,114 
   2021      435,385          1,538,123(6)    603,139      103,405    2,680,052 
   2020      400,000          1,466,174(7)    480,480      103,911    2,450,565 

Mary Beth Wilkinson

Executive Vice President,

Chief Legal Officer &
Corporate Secretary

   2022      518,077          2,945,697(5)    806,154      55,607    4,325,535 
   2021      369,231      350,000(8)    2,999,922(6)    165,000      14,058    3,898,211 
                                         

(1) Includes amounts deferred, including under our 401(k) plan, a tax-qualified deferred compensation plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, and under our EDSP, a nonqualified deferred compensation program available to the executive officers and certain other employees.

(2) The amounts shown in column (d) for fiscal year 2022 represent the aggregate grant date fair value of all RSUs and PRSUs awarded to the particular executive officer. For further discussion regarding the assumptions used in calculating the grant date fair value for equity awards, please refer to Note 1 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, 20182022, filed with the SEC on August 5, 2022.

With respect to RSUs (i.e., awards issued with only service-based vesting criteria and 2017 byno performance-based vesting criteria), the grant date fair value of each such RSU has been computed in accordance with the provisions of FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, referred to in this Proxy Statement as ASC 718. The ASC 718 grant date fair value of each RSU award was calculated based on the closing fair market value of our Chief Executive Officer,Common Stock on the applicable grant date.

With respect to PRSUs (i.e., awards issued with both service-based and performance-based vesting criteria), the grant date fair value of each such award has been computed in accordance with ASC 718 based on the probable outcome (determined as of the grant date) of the performance-based conditions applicable to the awards, which is target level performance, and the closing fair market value of our Chief Financial Officer,Common Stock on the three other most highly compensated executive officersgrant date.

(3) The amounts shown in column (f) for fiscal year 2019 who2022 reflect the payments earned by each NEO under our 2021 Bonus Plan which amounts were serving as executive officers aspaid in 2022. The 2021 Bonus Plan covered, and the payments set forth in this column were earned during, calendar year 2021. The NEOs currently participate in our 2022 Bonus Plan, under which they are eligible to earn cash incentive compensation with respect to calendar year 2022. Amounts payable under our 2022 Bonus Plan will not be determinable until the conclusion of calendar year 2022 and, accordingly, will be disclosed in our Proxy Statement for fiscal year 2023.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

57

(4) The amounts presented in column (g) consist of the following for fiscal year ended June 30, 20192022:

Name

  Company
Matching
Contribution
to 401(k)
Plan ($)
   Company-Paid
Financial Plan-
ning and Tax
Preparation
Costs ($)
   Term Life
Insurance
Premium
($)
   Dividend
Equivalents
Paid in Fiscal
Year 2022  ($)(a)
   Expatriate
Package ($)
   Total ($) 

Richard Wallace

   9,065    16,910    1,567    1,293,933        1,321,475 

Bren Higgins

   9,063    16,910    930    405,684        432,587 

Ahmad Khan

   8,704    16,910    1,004    431,416        458,034 

Oreste Donzella

   8,798    16,910        195,441    561,446    782,595 

Mary Beth Wilkinson

   11,012    23,072    816    20,707        55,607 

(a) Represents dividend equivalent rights paid in respect of PRSUs and one former executive officer whoRSUs during fiscal year 2022. These dividend equivalent rights entitle the recipient to receive credits, payable in cash or additional shares of our Common Stock, equal to the cash dividends that would have been onereceived on the shares of our Common Stock underlying the PRSUs and RSUs, had the shares been issued and outstanding on the dividend record date. Dividend equivalents are only paid to the recipient upon vesting or settlement of the three most highly compensated executive officers during fiscal 2019 had he been an executive officerunderlying award (including satisfaction of any performance-vesting criteria associated with PRSUs).

(5) A portion of this amount reflects the estimated fair value of PRSUs based on the probable outcome (determined as of the grant date) of the performance-based conditions applicable to the awards and the closing fair market value of our Common Stock on the grant date. The number of shares issuable under the fiscal year 2022 PRSUs will be determined by the Company’s Relative Free Cash Flow Margin over the three-year period ending June 30, 2019.2024, relative to our industry peer group. The individuals namedfiscal year 2022 PRSUs are structured so that 100% of the target number of shares underlying the award will be earned upon achievement by KLA of a target Relative Free Cash Flow Margin performance among this peer group (the 55th percentile), and up to 150% of that target number of shares could be earned for performance at or above the 75th percentile. Because the Company’s relative performance over the three-year performance period was undeterminable as of the grant date of the PRSUs, the probable outcome of the performance-based conditions applicable to the awards as of the grant date, for purposes of the calculations set forth in this table, has been determined to be equal to 100% of the target number of shares underlying the applicable award. Accordingly, the amounts included in the table belowabove attributable to PRSUs granted during fiscal year 2022 are referredas follows: (a) for Mr. Wallace, $9,177,713; (b) for Mr. Higgins, $2,152,679; (c) for Mr. Khan, $2,379,407; (d) for Mr. Donzella, $849,965; and (e) for Ms. Wilkinson, $906,559. The grant date fair value of the fiscal year 2022 PRSUs, if earned at their maximum, would be as follows: (a) for Mr. Wallace, $13,766,393; (b) for Mr. Higgins, $3,229,019; (c) for Mr. Khan, $3,568,934; (d) for Mr. Donzella, $1,274,771; and (e) for Ms. Wilkinson, $1,359,661. The Company’s achievement of the performance-based conditions applicable to the fiscal year 2022 PRSUs (and therefore the number of shares issuable under the fiscal year 2022 PRSUs) will be determined by the Compensation and Talent Committee (and, with respect to Mr. Wallace, the Outside Directors) following the completion of fiscal year 2024.

(6) A portion of this amount reflects the estimated fair value of PRSUs based on the probable outcome (determined as of the grant date) of the performance-based conditions applicable to the awards and the closing fair market value of our “Named Executive Officers”Common Stock on the grant date. The number of shares issuable under the fiscal year 2021 PRSUs will be determined by the Company’s Relative Free Cash Flow Margin over the three-year period ending June 30, 2023, relative to our industry peer group. The fiscal year 2021 PRSUs are structured so that 100% of the target number of shares underlying the award will be earned upon achievement by KLA of a target Relative Free Cash Flow Margin performance among this peer group (the 55th percentile), and up to 150% of that target number of shares could be earned for performance at or “NEOs.” The amounts below for Messrs. Steimberg and Levy are fromabove the 75th percentile. Because the Company’s relative performance over the three-year performance period was undeterminable as of the grant date of the Orbotech acquisitionPRSUs, the probable outcome of the performance-based conditions applicable to the awards as of the grant date, for purposes of the calculations set forth in February 2019.this table, has been determined to be equal to 100% of the target number of shares underlying the applicable award. Accordingly, the amounts included in the table above attributable to PRSUs granted during fiscal year 2021 are as follows: (a) for Mr. Wallace, $5,603,408; (b) for Mr. Higgins, $1,648,061; (c) for Mr. Khan, $1,922,704; (d) for Mr. Donzella, $769,163; and (e) for Ms. Wilkinson, $0. The grant date fair value of the fiscal year 2021 PRSUs, if earned at their maximum, would be as follows: (a) for Mr. Wallace, $8,405,111; (b) for Mr. Higgins, $3,295,919; (c) for Mr. Khan, $3,845,408; (d) for Mr. Donzella, $1,153,745; and (e) for Ms. Wilkinson, $0. The Company’s achievement of the performance-based conditions applicable to the fiscal year 2021 PRSUs (and therefore the number of shares issuable under the fiscal year 2021 PRSUs) will be determined by the Compensation and Talent Committee (and, with respect to Mr. Wallace, the Outside Directors) following the completion of fiscal year 2023.

(7) A portion of this amount reflects the estimated fair value of PRSUs based on the probable outcome (determined as of the grant date) of the performance-based conditions applicable to the awards and the closing fair value of our Common Stock on the grant date. The number of shares issuable under the fiscal year 2020 PRSUs will be determined by the Company’s Relative Free Cash Flow Margin over the three-year period ending June 30, 2022 relative to our industry peer group. The fiscal year 2020 PRSUs are structured so that 100% of the target number of shares underlying the award will be earned upon achievement by KLA of a target Relative Free Cash Flow Margin performance among this peer group (the 55th percentile), and up to 150% of that target number of shares could be earned at or above the 75th percentile. Because the Company’s relative performance over the three-year performance period was undeterminable as of the grant date of the PRSUs, the probable outcome of the performance-based conditions applicable to the awards as of the grant date, for purposes of the calculations set forth in this table, has been determined to be equal to 100% of the target number of shares underlying the applicable award. Accordingly, the amounts included in the table above attributable to PRSUs granted during fiscal year 2020 are as follows: (a) for Mr. Wallace, $5,277,954; (b) for Mr. Higgins, $1,759,273; (c) for Mr. Khan, $2,052,507; and (d) for Mr. Donzella, $733,087. The grant date fair value of the fiscal year 2020 PRSUs, if earned at their maximum, would be as follows: (a) for Mr. Wallace, $7,916,931; (b) for Mr. Higgins, $2,638,909; (c) for Mr. Khan, $3,078,761; and (d) for Mr. Donzella, $1,099,631. The Company’s achievement of the performance-based conditions applicable to the fiscal year 2020 PRSUs (and therefore the number of shares issuable under the fiscal year 2020 PRSUs) were determined by the Compensation and Talent Committee (and, with respect to Mr. Wallace, the Outside Directors) following the completion of fiscal year 2022.

(8) Amount reflects (i) for Mr. Donzella, a patent award bonus paid to Mr. Donzella during fiscal year 2022 and (ii) for Ms. Wilkinson, a one-time cash hiring bonus paid to Ms. Wilkinson during fiscal year 2021 in connection with the commencement of her employment with us.

 

Name and Principal Position

     Year          Salary ($)    
(1)
  Stock
    Awards ($)    
(2)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
  Compensation  
($)(1)(3)
  All Other
  Compensation  
($)(4)
  Total ($) 

(a)

 (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)  (g)  (h) 
  
Richard Wallace  2019   900,000   15,983,570(5)   2,305,260   1,323,537     20,512,367 
  
  President & Chief  2018   900,000   6,675,558(6)   3,224,500   1,591,242   12,391,300 
  
  Executive Officer  2017   900,000     10,975,987(7)   1,100,790   1,602,473   14,579,250 
  
Bren Higgins  2019   522,308   5,223,502(5)   824,201   340,117   6,910,128 
  
  Executive Vice President &  2018   500,000   2,002,668(6)   1,100,000   416,498   4,019,166 
  
  Chief Financial Officer  2017   482,308   3,755,594   340,963   253,227   4,832,092 
  
Ahmad Khan  2019   525,000   5,746,097(5)   847,875   327,967   7,446,939 
  
  President, Semiconductor  2018   507,308   2,296,789(6)   1,040,000   327,931   4,172,028 
  
  Process Control  2017   475,000   2,998,278   348,583   411,995   4,233,856 
  
Brian Trafas  2019   500,000   4,178,729(5)   680,023   239,372   5,598,124 
  
  Executive Vice President,  2018   464,615   1,629,233(6)   800,000   266,987   3,160,835 
  
  Global Customer Organization  2017   400,000   2,003,867   239,184   308,666   2,951,717 
  
Amichai Steimberg  2019   171,641   5,716,527(5)      1,877,787   7,765,955 
  
  CEO of Orbotech       
  
Asher Levy  2019   110,603   4,716,612(5)      2,364,603   7,191,818 
  
  Former CEO of Orbotech  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement

(1)

Includes amounts deferred, including under our 401(k) plan, atax-qualified deferred compensation plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, and our EDSP, a nonqualified deferred compensation program available to the executive officers and certain other employees. For Messrs. Steimberg and Levy, amounts are translated from Israeli Shekels based on the foreign currency exchange rate in effect on June 28, 2019.

(2)

The amounts shown in column (d) represent the aggregate grant date fair value of all RSUs, PRSUs and TSR Awards awarded to the particular executive officer during the applicable fiscal year. For further discussion regarding the assumptions used in calculating the grant date fair value for RSUs, PRSUs and TSR Awards, please refer to Note 1 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, filed with the SEC on August 16, 2019.

RSUs, PRSUs and TSR Awards were issued with dividend equivalent rights. These dividend equivalent rights entitle the recipient to receive credits, payable in cash or additional shares of our Common Stock, equal to the cash dividends that would have been received on the shares of our Common Stock had the shares been issued and outstanding on the dividend record date. The dividend equivalents would only be paid to the recipient upon vesting or settlement of the underlying award (including satisfaction of any performance-vesting criteria associated with any PRSUs).

With respect to RSUs (i.e., awards issued with only service-based vesting criteria and no performance-based vesting criteria), the grant date fair value of each such RSU has been computed in accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, referred to in this Proxy Statement as ASC 718. The ASC 718 grant date fair value of each RSU award was calculated based on the closing fair market value of our Common Stock on the grant date.


With respect to PRSUs (i.e., awards issued with both service-based and performance-based vesting criteria), the grant date fair value of each such award has been computed in accordance with ASC 718 based on the probable outcome (determined as of the grant date) of the performance-based conditions applicable to the awards and the closing fair market value of our Common Stock on the grant date. The grant date fair value of the TSR Awards are based on a Monte Carlo simulation under ASC 718. For more information regarding specific awards, please refer to footnotes (5), (6) and (7) to this Summary Compensation Table.

LOGO

 

We did not grant any stock options to any of the NEOs during fiscal years 2019, 2018 or 2017. However, certain stock options held by Mr. Levy prior to the acquisition of Orbotech were assumed by us in the merger and converted into an option for KLA Common Stock.

58  |Executive Compensation Tables

 

(3)

The amounts shown in column (e) for fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017 reflect the payments earned by each NEO under our short-term cash incentive plan for the applicable fiscal year.

(4)

For Messrs. Steimberg and Levy, amounts are translated from Israeli Shekels based on the foreign currency exchange rate in effect on June 28, 2019. The amounts presented in column (g) consist of the following:

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 for Messrs. Wallace, Higgins, Khan and Trafas:

Name

 Company
Matching
Contribution
  to 401(k) Plan  
($)
  Company-Paid
Financial
Planning and
  Tax  Preparation  
Costs ($)
  Term Life
Insurance
  Premium ($)  
  Dividend
  Equivalents Paid  
in Fiscal Year
2019 ($)
          Total ($)         
  
Richard Wallace  7,337   16,500   2,088   1,297,612   1,323,537 
  
Bren Higgins  7,986   16,500   1,207   314,424   340,117 
  
Ahmad Khan  4,957   16,500   1,218   305,292   327,967 
  
Brian Trafas  8,253      1,160   229,959   239,372 

The PRSUs and certain of the RSUs granted in fiscal year 2019 (excluding awards assumed in connection with the Orbotech acquisition) were granted with dividend equivalent rights. These dividend equivalent rights entitle the recipient to receive credits, payable in cash or additional shares of our Common Stock, equal to the cash dividends that would have been received on the shares of our Common Stock had the shares been issued and outstanding on the dividend record date. The dividend equivalents would only be paid to the recipient upon vesting or settlement of the underlying award (including satisfaction of any performance-vesting criteria associated with PRSUs). In November 2014, our Board declared a special cash dividend of $16.50 per share on our outstanding Common Stock, which was substantially paid in December 2014. In connection with the special cash dividend, our Board and Compensation Committee approved an equitable and proportionate adjustment to the then-outstanding equity awards (RSUs and PRSUs) under the 2004 Equity Plan, as required by the 2004 Equity Plan that will be paid subject to the vesting requirements of the underlying awards. During fiscal year 2019, we paid dividend equivalents, including the amounts associated with the special cash dividend described above, in cash only.

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 for Messrs. Steimberg and Levy (dollar amounts based on foreign currency exchange rates in effect as of June 28, 2019):

Benefit description

          Amichai Steimberg ($)                    Asher Levy ($)         
  
Orbotech acquisition closing bonus   1,805,796    2,312,094 
  
Severance fund contributions   35,786    20,353 
  
Pension fund contributions   11,538    6,637 
  
Advanced education fund contributions   1,427    1,427 
  
Social security contributions   3,738    3,738 
  
Workman’s compensation contributions   1,068    1,060 
  
Leased automobile   18,094    18,942 
Other   340    352 

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018:

Name

 Company
Matching
Contribution
  to 401(k) Plan  
($)
  Company-Paid
Financial
Planning and
  Tax  Preparation  
Costs ($)
  Term Life
Insurance
  Premium ($)  
  Dividend
  Equivalents Paid  
in Fiscal Year
2018 ($)
          Total ($)         
  
Richard Wallace  4,000   18,121   2,376   1,566,745   1,591,242 
  
Bren Higgins  4,000   18,121   1,320   393,057   416,498 
  
Ahmad Khan  4,000   18,121   1,342   304,468   327,931 
  
Brian Trafas  4,000      1,562   261,425   266,987 

The PRSUs and RSUs granted in fiscal year 2019 were granted with dividend equivalent rights. These dividend equivalent rights entitle the recipient to receive credits, payable in cash or additional shares of our Common Stock, equal to the cash dividends that would have been received on the shares of our Common Stock had the shares been issued and outstanding on the dividend record date. The dividend equivalents would only be paid to the recipient upon vesting or settlement of the underlying award (including satisfaction of any performance-vesting criteria associated with PRSUs). In November 2014, our Board declared a special cash dividend of $16.50 per share on our outstanding Common Stock, which was substantially paid in December 2014. In connection with the special cash dividend, our Board and Compensation Committee approved an equitable and proportionate adjustment to the then-outstanding equity awards (RSUs and PRSUs) under the 2004 Equity Plan, as required by the 2004 Equity Plan that will be paid subject to the vesting requirements of the underlying awards. During fiscal year 2017, we paid dividend equivalents, including the amounts associated with the special cash dividend described above, in cash only.

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017:

Name

 Company
Matching
Contribution
  to 401(k) Plan  
($)
  Company-Paid
Financial
Planning and
  Tax Preparation  
Costs ($)
  Term Life
Insurance
  Premium ($)  
  Dividend
  Equivalents Paid  
in Fiscal Year
2017 ($)
          Total ($)         
  
Richard Wallace  4,000   19,715   2,376   1,576,382   1,602,473 
  
Bren Higgins  4,000   19,538   1,265   228,424   253,227 
  
Ahmad Khan  4,000   19,715   1,254   387,026   411,995 
  
Brian Trafas  4,000      1,056   303,610   308,666 

The PRSUs and certain of the RSUs granted in fiscal year 2017 were granted with dividend equivalent rights. These dividend equivalent rights entitle the recipient to receive credits, payable in cash or additional shares of our Common Stock, equal to the cash dividends that would have been received on the shares of our Common Stock had the shares been issued and outstanding on the dividend record date. The dividend equivalents would only be paid to the recipient upon vesting or settlement of the underlying award (including satisfaction of any performance-vesting criteria associated with PRSUs). In November 2014, our Board declared a special cash dividend of $16.50 per share on our outstanding Common Stock, which was substantially paid in December 2014. In connection with the special cash dividend, our Board and Compensation Committee approved an equitable and proportionate adjustment to the then-outstanding equity awards (RSUs and PRSUs) under the 2004 Equity Plan, as required by the 2004 Equity Plan that will be paid subject to the vesting requirements of the underlying awards. During fiscal year 2017, we paid dividend equivalents, including the amounts associated with the special cash dividend described above, in cash only.

(5)

A portion of this amount reflects the estimated fair value of PRSUs and, for Messrs. Wallace, Higgins, Khan and Trafas TSR Awards, based on the probable outcome (determined as of the grant date) of the performance-based conditions applicable to the awards and the fair value of our Common Stock on the grant date.

The number of shares issuable under the fiscal year 2019 PRSUs for Messrs. Wallace, Higgins, Khan and Trafas will be determined by the Company’s Relative Free Cash Flow Margin over the three-year period ending June 30,

2021 relative to our industry peer group. The fiscal year 2019 PRSUs are structured so that 100% of the target number of shares underlying the award will be earned upon achievement by KLA of a target Relative Free Cash Flow Margin performance among this peer group (the 55th percentile), and up to 150% of that target number of shares could be earned for performance at or above the 75th percentile. Because the Company’s relative performance over the three-year performance period was undeterminable as of the grant date of the PRSUs, the probable outcome of the performance-based conditions applicable to the awards as of the grant date, for purposes of the calculations set forth in this table, has been determined to be equal to 100% of the target number of shares underlying the applicable award. Accordingly, the amounts included in the table above attributable to PRSUs granted during fiscal year 2019 are as follows: (a) for Mr. Wallace, $4,902,644; (b) for Mr. Higgins, $1,361,813; (c) for Mr. Khan, $1,498,053; and (d) for Mr. Trafas, $1,089,450. The grant date fair value of the fiscal year 2019 PRSUs, if earned at their maximum, would be as follows: (a) for Mr. Wallace, $7,353,907; (b) for Mr. Higgins, $2,042,660; (c) for Mr. Khan, $2,247,020; and (e) for Mr. Trafas, $1,634,175. The Company’s achievement of the performance-based conditions applicable to the fiscal year 2019 PRSUs (and therefore the number of shares issuable under the fiscal year 2019 PRSUs) will be determined by the Compensation Committee (and, with respect to Mr. Wallace, the Outside Directors) following the completion of fiscal year 2021.

The number of shares issuable to Messrs. Wallace, Higgins, Khan and Trafas under the TSR Awards will be determined based on total stockholder return against a base price of $116.391. The TSR Awards are structured so that 100% of the target number shares underlying the awards will be earned if the average closing price of our Common Stock over 20 consecutive trading days in the five-year period ending March 20, 2024 plus cash dividends per share distributed during that period exceed $203.684. Because achievement of the total stockholder return threshold was undeterminable as of the grant date of the TSR Awards, for purposes of the calculations set forth in this table, it has been determined to be equal to 100% of the target number of shares underlying the TSR Award. Accordingly, the amounts included in the table above attributable to the TSR Awards granted during fiscal year 2019 are as follows: (a) for Mr. Wallace, $7,812,457; (b) for Mr. Higgins, $2,499,877; (c) for Mr. Khan, $2,749,991; and (d) for Mr. Trafas, $1,999,829. The grant date fair value of the fiscal year 2019 TSR Awards, if earned at their maximum, would be as follows: (a) for Mr. Wallace, $11,718,686; (b) for Mr. Higgins, $3,749,815; (c) for Mr. Khan, $4,124,987 and (d) for Mr. Trafas, $2,999,744.

The number of shares issuable under the fiscal year 2019 PRSUs for Messrs. Levy and Steimberg will be determined based on Orbotech’s calendar 2019 Operating Margin Dollars, as determined by the Compensation Committee against a target of $240 million and performance against a “balanced scorecard” based on talent retention and the development of a plan to achieve cost synergies from the Orbotech acquisition of $50 million over the two year period following the closing of the acquisition. Because the probable outcome of the performance-based conditions applicable to the awards as of the date of grant was undeterminable, for purposes of the calculations set forth in this table, the fair value of the awards has been determined to be 100% of the target number of shares underlying the PRSUs granted to Messrs. Levy and Steimberg, $2,829,990 and $3,429,894, respectively. The grant date fair value of the fiscal 2019 PRSUs granted to Messrs. Levy and Steimberg, if earned at their maximum would be $5,659,979 and $6,859,787, respectively.

(6)

A portion of this amount reflects the estimated fair value of PRSUs based on the probable outcome (determined as of the grant date) of the performance-based conditions applicable to the awards and the closing fair market value of our Common Stock on the grant date. The number of shares issuable under the fiscal year 2018 PRSUs will be determined by the Company’s Relative Free Cash Flow Margin over the three-year period ending June 30, 2020 relative to our industry peer group. The fiscal year 2018 PRSUs are structured so that 100% of the target number of shares underlying the award will be earned upon achievement by KLA of a target Relative Free Cash Flow Margin performance among this peer group (the 55th percentile), and up to 150% of that target number of shares could be earned for performance at or above the 75th percentile. Because the Company’s relative performance over the three-year performance period was undeterminable as of the grant date of the PRSUs, the probable outcome of the performance-based conditions applicable to the awards as of the grant date, for purposes of the calculations set forth in this table, has been determined to be equal to 100% of the target number of shares underlying the applicable award. Accordingly, the amounts included in the table above attributable to PRSUs granted during fiscal year 2018 are as follows: (a) for Mr. Wallace, $4,005,335; (b) for Mr. Higgins, $1,001,334; (c) for Mr. Khan, $778,845; and (d) for Mr. Trafas, $445,067. The grant date fair value

of the fiscal year 2019 PRSUs, if earned at their maximum, would be as follows: (a) for Mr. Wallace, $6,008,003; (b) for Mr. Higgins, $1,502,001; (c) for Mr. Khan, $1,168,223; and (d) for Mr. Trafas, $667,556. The Company’s achievement of the performance-based conditions applicable to the fiscal year 2019 PRSUs (and therefore the number of shares issuable under the fiscal year 2019 PRSUs) will be determined by the Compensation Committee (and, with respect to Mr. Wallace, the Outside Directors) following the completion of fiscal year 2020.

(7)

A portion of this amount reflects the estimated fair value of PRSUs based on the probable outcome (determined as of the grant date) of the performance-based conditions applicable to the awards and the closing fair market value of our Common Stock on the grant date. The number of shares issuable under the fiscal year 2017 PRSUs will be determined by the Company’s Relative Free Cash Flow Margin over the three-year period ending September 30, 2019 relative to our industry peer group. The fiscal year 2017 PRSUs are structured so that 100% of the target number of shares underlying the award will be earned upon achievement by KLA of a target Relative Free Cash Flow Margin performance among this peer group (the 55th percentile), and up to 125% of that target number of shares could be earned for performance at or above the 75th percentile. Because the Company’s relative performance over the three-year performance period was undeterminable as of the grant date of the PRSUs, the probable outcome of the performance-based conditions applicable to the awards as of the grant date, for purposes of the calculations set forth in this table, has been determined to be equal to 100% of the target number of shares underlying the applicable award. Accordingly, the amounts included in the table above attributable to PRSUs granted during fiscal year 2017 are $2,524,439. The Company’s achievement of the performance-based conditions applicable to the fiscal year 2017 PRSUs (and therefore the number of shares issuable under the fiscal year 2017 PRSUs) will be determined by the independent members of the Board following September 30, 2019.

Of the NEOs, Messrs. Wallace, Higgins, Khan and TrafasDonzella participated in our EDSP during fiscal years 2019, 20182022, 2021 or 2017.2020. No portion of the applicable NEO’s investment earnings (or losses, as applicable) during fiscal years 2019, 20182022, 2021 or 20172020 on his nonqualified deferred compensation account under the EDSP was “above market” or “preferential.” Each participating NEO’s earnings (or losses, as applicable) corresponded to the actual market earnings (or losses, as applicable) on a select group of investment funds utilized to track the notional investment return on the officer’s account balance for the applicable fiscal year. The investment earnings (or losses, as applicable) under the EDSP for the NEOs who participated in such plan during the fiscal years 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020 were as follows:

 

Name

  

    Year    

  

Earnings on NEO’s EDSP Account ($)

  
Richard Wallace  2019  102,061
   2018  264,045
   

2017

 

  

268,196

 

  
Ahmad Khan  2019  92,684
   2018  74,650
   

2017

 

  

144,717

 

  
Brian Trafas  2019  110,549
   2018  123,931
   

2017

 

  

130,999

 

Name

  Year   Earnings on NEO’s EDSP Account ($) 

Richard Wallace

   2022    (830,958
   2021    1,033,844 
    2020    188,365 

Bren Higgins

   2022    (51,988
   2021     
    2020     

Ahmad Khan

   2022    (27,702
   2021    21,647 
    2020    39,724 

Oreste Donzella

   2022    (269,295
   2021     
    2020     

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table provides certain summary information concerning each grant of an awardplan-based awards made to a NEO during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 under a compensation plan.2022. No stock options or stock appreciation rights were granted to any of the NEOs during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019. This table excludes any Orbotech awards assumed in connection with the acquisition of Orbotech.2022.

 

       

 

Potential Payouts Under

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)

  

 

Potential Future Payouts Under

Equity Incentive Plan Awards

     

Name and Principal Position

 

   Grant Date  

 

    Threshold  
($)(2)

 

    Target  
($)(3)

 

    Maximum  
($)(4)

 

    Threshold  
(#)(5)

 

    Target  
(#)(6)

 

  Maximum
(#)(7)

 

  

 

Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Equity
Awards

($)(8)

 

 

(a)

 (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)  (f)  (g)  (h)  (i) 

 

Richard Wallace

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

175,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,350,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,700,000

 

 

     
  President & Chief  8/2/18(9)      27,589   27,589   27,589   3,268,469 
  Executive Officer  8/2/18(10)      10,345   41,383   62,074   4,902,644 
   4/11/19(11)      41,441   82,882   124,323   7,812,457 
Bren Higgins     61,425   472,500   945,000      
  Executive Vice President &  8/2/18(9)      11,495   11,495   11,495   1,361,813 
  Chief Financial Officer  8/2/18(10)      2,873   11,495   17,242   1,361,813 
   3/20/19(11)      13,813  27,626   41,439  2,499,877
Ahmad Khan     61,425   472,500   945,000      
  President, Semiconductor  8/2/18(9)      12,645   12,645   12,645   1,498,053 
  Process Control  8/2/18(10)      3,161   12,645   18,967   1,498,053 
   3/20/19(11)      15,195   30,390   45,585   2,749,991 
Brian Trafas     52,000   400,000   800,000      
  Executive Vice President,  8/2/18(9)      9,196   9,196   9,196   1,089,450 
  Global Customer Organization  8/2/18(10)      2,299   9,196   13,794   1,089,450 
   3/20/19(11)      11,050   22,100   33,150   1,999,829 
Amichai Steimberg     42,871   535,884   964,591      
  CEO of Orbotech  2/20/19(12)      20,259   20,259   20,259   2,286,633 
   2/20/19(13)      1,519   30,388   60,776   3,429,894 
Asher Levy     47,634   595,428   1,071,770      
  Former CEO of Orbotech  2/20/19(14)      16,715   16,715   16,715   1,886,622 
 

 

  2/20/19(13)   

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  1,253   25,073   50,146   2,829,990 
     Potential Payouts Under
Non-Equity Plan Awards(1)
  Potential Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
       

Name and Principal

Position

 Grant
Date
  

Threshold
($)

 

  

Target

($)

 

  

Maximum
($)

 

  

Threshold
(#)(2)

 

  

Target
(#)(3)

 

  

Maximum
(#)(4)

 

  

All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock
(#)

 

  

Grant
Date
Fair
Value of
Equity
Awards

($)(5)

 

 

(a)

 (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)  (f)  (g)  (h)  (i)  (j) 

Richard Wallace

President &

Chief Executive Officer

     192,562   1,481,250   2,962,500                
  8/5/2021(6)                     17,298   6,118,476 
  8/5/2021(7)            6,486   25,947   38,920      9,177,713 

Bren Higgins

Executive Vice President &

Chief Financial Officer

     74,750   575,000   1,150,000                
  8/5/2021(6)                     6,086   2,152,679 
  8/5/2021(7)            1,521   6,086   9,129      2,152,679 

Ahmad Khan

President, Semiconductor

Process Control

     79,500   612,500   1,225,000                
  8/5/2021(6)                     6,727   2,379,407 
  8/5/2021(7)            1,681   6,727   10,090      2,379,407 

Oreste Donzella

Executive Vice President,

Electronics, Packaging &

Components

     45,200   350,154   700,308                
  8/5/2021(6)                     2,402   849,611 
  8/5/2021(7)            600   2,403   3,604      849,965 

Mary Beth Wilkinson

Executive Vice President,

Chief Legal Officer &

Corporate Secretary

     33,800   260,000   520,000                
  8/5/2021(6)                     5,765   2,039,138 
  8/5/2021(7)            640   2,563   3,844      906,559 

(1) The amounts set forth in the table as “Potential Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards” reflect the potential cash payouts (threshold, target and maximum) that could be earned under our calendar year 2021 and 2022 Bonus Plans. Because the NEOs participated in the calendar year 2021 Bonus Plan during

 

(1)

The amounts set forth in the table as “Potential Payouts UnderNon-Equity

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement Incentive Plan Awards” reflect the potential cash payouts (threshold, target and maximum) that could be earned under our calendar year 2019 Executive Incentive Plan (the “Calendar Bonus Plan”) based on the Company’s performance for calendar year 2019, or in the case of Messrs. Steimberg and Levy, their respective employment agreements.

(2)

The threshold amount is calculated as the minimum amount that could be payable under the Calendar Bonus Plan to the participating NEO assuming satisfaction of the initial performance threshold required to fund the particular plan (disregarding, for purposes of this calculation, potential adjustments of an executive’s bonus payout based on that executive’s individual performance multiplier). Under the structure of the Calendar Bonus Plan, the actual percentage of the executive’s target bonus payable was or will be determined by a combination of (a) the Company’s achieved level of Operating Margin Dollars, and (b) an assessment by the Compensation Committee (or the independent members of the Board, as applicable) of the extent to which the Company’s balanced scorecard goals for the applicable period had been achieved. If the Company had achieved exactly the threshold level of Operating Margin Dollars required to fund the Calendar Bonus Plan (and no higher), the Compensation Committee and the independent members of the Board would have been able to set such percentage as low as 13% of the executives’ target bonus amounts based on their assessment of the Company’s balanced scorecard achievement.


In the case of Messrs. Levy and Steimberg, the threshold is calculated as the minimum amount that could be payable under the terms of their employment agreements, based on the achievement of Operating Margin Dollars and balanced scorecard results, as determined by the Compensation Committee. If Orbotech achieves exactly the level of Operating Margin Dollars required to fund the annual bonus (and no higher), the Compensation Committee would be able to set such percentage as low as 8% of their target bonus amounts based on their assessment of balanced scorecard achievement.

LOGO

 

(3)

The amount in column (d) reflects the amount that could be payable under the Calendar Bonus Plan to the participating NEO assuming payment of the officer’s full target bonus (disregarding, for purposes of this calculation, potential adjustments of an executive’s bonus payout based on that executive’s individual performance multiplier). Under the structure of the Calendar Bonus Plan, a payout of 100% of a participant’s target bonus will be payable upon Company achievement of its target level of operating results (in terms of both the Company’s Operating Margin Dollar achievement and the Company’s achievement of its balanced scorecard goals).

59

 

In the case of Messrs. Levy and Steimberg, the amount in column (d) reflects the amount that could be payable under their respective employment agreements assuming payment of full of their target bonus. Under the structure of their employment agreements, a payout of 100% of their target bonus will be payable upon Orbotech’s achievement of its Operating Margin Dollar target in calendar 2019 and achievement of balanced scorecard goals.

the first half of fiscal year 2022 and the 2022 Bonus Plan during the second half of fiscal year 2022, the amounts under “Potential Payouts under Non-Equity Plan Awards” is apportioned 50% to the potential payouts under the calendar year 2021 Bonus Plan and 50% to the potential payouts under the calendar year 2022 Bonus Plan.

(2) With respect to the fiscal year 2022 PRSUs, the number of shares reported in column (f) reflects the threshold number of shares that can potentially be earned under those awards. With respect to the fiscal year 2022 PRSUs, under the structure of such awards, the actual number of shares that will be potentially issuable under such award will be determined by the Company’s Relative Free Cash Flow Margin over the three-year period ending June 30, 2024. The number of shares reported in column (f) reflects the number of shares that would be earned by the participating NEO if the Company were to achieve, for the three-year performance period covered by those awards, exactly the threshold level of Relative Free Cash Flow Margin performance (the 30th percentile) necessary to earn any shares under the fiscal year 2022 PRSU award. If the Company were to achieve exactly the threshold level of Relative Free Cash Flow Margin performance for such period (and no higher), then 25% of the target number of shares subject to such awards would be able to be earned, subject to such officer’s satisfaction of the service-based vesting criteria applicable to such award.

(3) With respect to the fiscal year 2022 PRSUs, the number of shares reported in column (g) reflects the number of shares that would be earned if the Company were to achieve exactly its target level of three-year Relative Free Cash Flow Margin performance (the 55th percentile) for the three-year performance period covered by the award. If the Company were to achieve that target level of Relative Free Cash Flow Margin performance, then one hundred percent (100%) of the target number of shares subject to the fiscal year 2022 PRSUs would be able to be earned, subject to such officer’s satisfaction of the service-based vesting criteria applicable to such awards.

(4) With respect to the fiscal year 2022 PRSUs, the number of shares reported in column (h) reflects the maximum number of shares that can potentially be earned under those awards. Under the terms of the fiscal year 2022 PRSUs, the participating NEO can potentially earn up to 150% of the target number of shares subject to those awards if the Company’s three-year Relative Free Cash Flow Margin performance for the three-year period ending June 30, 2024, equals or exceeds the 75th percentile, subject to such officer’s satisfaction of the service-based vesting criteria applicable to such awards.

(5) The dollar value reported in column (j) represents the grant date fair value of the applicable RSU or PRSU. With respect to RSUs, the grant date fair value of each such RSU has been computed in accordance with ASC 718. The ASC 718 grant date fair value of each RSU award was calculated based on the closing sale price of our Common Stock on the grant date. With respect to PRSUs, the grant date fair value of the award has been computed in accordance with ASC 718 based on the probable outcome (determined as of the grant date) of the performance-based conditions applicable to the award and the closing sale price of our Common Stock on the grant date. Because the PRSUs granted during fiscal year 2022 were structured so that they would be fully earned upon achievement by KLA of its target level of three-year Relative Free Cash Flow Margin performance over the three-year period ending June 30, 2024 (a target that was considered difficult to achieve at the time of grant), the probable outcome of the performance-based conditions applicable to the awards as of the grant date, for purposes of the calculations set forth in this table, has been determined to be equal to the target number of shares potentially issuable under the applicable award.

(6) Reflects an award of RSUs that only has a service-vesting component tied to continued service beyond fiscal year 2022. Twenty-five percent (25%) of the shares will vest on the one-year anniversary of the grant date, and an additional twenty-five percent (25%) will vest on each of the second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date, provided the NEO continues in our service through the applicable vesting date. The underlying shares may also vest on an accelerated basis in the event the NEO’s employment terminates under certain circumstances, as described in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”

(7) Reflects an award of PRSUs that have both a performance-vesting component tied to the Company’s three-year Relative Free Cash Flow Margin over the three-year period ending June 30, 2024, and a service-vesting component tied to continued service. The achievement of the performance-vesting component of PRSUs (i.e., the number of shares that will be issuable to the NEO under his or her PRSU, if he or she satisfies the applicable service-vesting requirements) will be determined following June 30, 2024. Fifty percent (50%) of the earned shares will vest on the three-year anniversary of the grant date (or on the date that such shares are determined to have been earned, if that date is later than the three-year anniversary of the grant date) and the remaining fifty percent (50%) will vest on the fourth anniversary of the date of grant, provided the NEO continues in our service through the applicable vesting date. The underlying shares may also vest on an accelerated basis in the event the NEO’s employment terminates under certain circumstances, as described in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”

 

(4)

The amount in column (e) reflects the maximum amount that was or is potentially payable under the Calendar Bonus Plan to the applicable NEO (disregarding, for purposes of this calculation, potential adjustments of an executive’s bonus payout based on that executive’s individual performance multiplier). Under the structure of the Calendar Bonus Plan, each NEO could potentially have earned up to 200% of his or her target bonus, based on the Company’s Operating Margin Dollar achievement and the Compensation Committee’s assessment of the Company’s achievement of its balanced scorecard goals and the officer’s individual performance multiplier.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement

In the case of Messrs. Steimberg and Levy, the amount in column (e) reflects the maximum amount that is potentially payable to them under their employment agreement for the annual bonus. Under the structure of their employment agreements, they could potentially earn up to 180% of their target bonus based on Orbotech’s Operating Margin Dollar achievement in calendar 2019 and achievement of balanced scorecard goals.

(5)

The threshold amount is calculated as the minimum number of shares that would be able to be earned under the fiscal year 2019 RSUs (i.e., awards issued with only service-based vesting criteria and no performance-based vesting criteria), PRSUs (i.e., awards issued with both service-based and performance-based vesting criteria) and TSR Awards (i.e., awards issued with both service-based and performance-based vesting criteria tied to delivery of total stockholder return) granted to the participating NEO assuming satisfaction of the initial performance threshold, if any, required to earn any shares under the applicable award.

With respect to the fiscal year 2019 PRSUs, under the structure of such awards, the actual number of shares that will be potentially issuable under such award will be determined by the Company’s Relative Free Cash Flow Margin over the three-year period ending June 30, 2021, or in the case of Messrs. Steimberg and Levy, Orbotech’s Operating Margin Dollar achievement for 2019 and balanced scorecard grade. The number of shares reported in column (f) reflects the number of shares that would be earned by the participating NEO if the Company were to achieve, for the three-year performance period covered by those awards, exactly the threshold level of Relative Free Cash Flow Margin performance (the 30th percentile) necessary to earn any shares under the fiscal year 2019 PRSU award, or in the case of Messrs. Steimberg and Levy, Orbotech’s achievement of $50 million in Operating Margin Dollars and a balanced scorecard grade of “1” (far below expectations). If the Company were to achieve exactly the threshold level of Relative Free Cash Flow Margin performance for such period (and no higher), then 25% of the target number of shares subject to such awards would be able to be earned, subject to such officer’s satisfaction of the service-based vesting criteria applicable to such award, or in the case of Messrs. Steimberg and Levy, if Orbotech were to achieve the threshold Operating Margin Dollars ($50 million) and no higher and received a balanced scorecard grade of “1” (far below expectations), then 8% of the target number of shares subject to such awards would be able to be earned, subject to such officer’s satisfaction of the service-based vesting criteria.


(6)

The target amount is calculated as the number of shares that would be able to be earned under the fiscal year 2019 RSUs and PRSUs granted to the applicable NEO assuming Company or Orbotech, as applicable, performance at target.

LOGO

With respect to the fiscal year 2019 RSUs, they contain no performance-based vesting criteria, so the total number of shares subject to such RSU is reported in column (g).

With respect to the fiscal year 2019 PRSUs, the number of shares reported in column (g) reflects the number of shares that would be earned if the Company were to achieve exactly its target level of three-year Relative Free Cash Flow Margin performance (the 55th percentile) for the three-year performance period covered by the award, or in the case of Messrs. Steimberg and Levy, if Orbotech achieves $240 million Operating Margin Dollars and a balanced scorecard grade of “3” (primarily meets expectations). If the Company were to achieve that target level of Relative Free Cash Flow Margin performance or if Orbotech achieves $240 million Operating Margin Dollars and a balanced scorecard grade of “3”, then one hundred percent (100%) of the target number of shares subject to the fiscal year 2019 PRSUs would be able to be earned, subject to such officer’s satisfaction of the service-based vesting criteria applicable to such awards.

(7)

The maximum amount reflects the maximum number of shares potentially earnable under the applicable award.

With respect to the fiscal year 2019 RSUs, they contain no performance-based vesting criteria, so the total number of shares subject to such RSU is reported in column (h).

With respect to the fiscal year 2019 PRSUs, the number of shares reported in column (h) reflects the maximum number of shares that can potentially be earned under those awards. Under the terms of the fiscal year 2019 PRSUs, the participating NEO can potentially earn up to 150% of the target number of shares subject to those awards if the Company’s three-year Relative Free Cash Flow Margin performance for the three-year period ending June 30, 2020 equals or exceeds the 75th percentile, subject to such officer’s satisfaction of the service-based vesting criteria applicable to such awards.

In the case of Messrs. Steimberg and Levy, the number of shares reported in column (h) reflects the maximum number of shares that can potentially be earned under those awards, or 200% of the target shares if Orbotech achieves $300 million in Operating Margin Dollars in 2019 and they receive a balanced scorecard grade of “5” (far exceeds expectations).

(8)

The dollar value reported in column (i) represents the grant date fair value of the applicable RSU, PRSU or TSR Award calculated in accordance with the SEC’s applicable requirements.

With respect to RSUs, the grant date fair value of each such RSU has been computed in accordance with ASC 718. The ASC 718 grant date fair value of each RSU award was calculated based on the closing fair market value of our Common Stock on the grant date, or in the case of TSR Awards, the value obtained from a Monte Carlo simulation.

With respect to PRSUs, the grant date fair value of the award has been computed in accordance with ASC 718 based on the probable outcome (determined as of the grant date) of the performance-based conditions applicable to the award and the closing fair market value of our Common Stock on the grant date. Because the PRSUs granted during fiscal year 2019 were structured so that they would be fully earned upon achievement by KLA of its target level of three-year Relative Free Cash Flow Margin performance over the three-year period ending June 30, 2021, or, in the case of Messrs. Steimberg and Levy, Orbotech achieving Operating Margin Dollars of $240 million in 2019 (both targets that were considered difficult to achieve at the time of grant), the probable outcome of the performance-based conditions applicable to the awards as of the grant date, for purposes of the calculations set forth in this table, has been determined to be equal to the target number of shares potentially issuable under the applicable award.

(9)

Reflects an award of RSUs that only has a service-vesting component tied to continued service beyond fiscal year 2019. Twenty-five percent (25%) of the shares will vest on theone-year anniversary of the grant date, and an additional twenty-five percent (25%) will vest on each of the second, third and fourth yearly anniversaries of the

grant date, provided the NEO continues in our service through the applicable vesting date. The underlying shares may also vest on an accelerated basis in the event the NEO’s employment terminates under certain circumstances, as described in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”

(10)

Reflects an award of PRSUs (equal to 50% of the executive officer’s total equity awards on the grant date, or 60% in the case of the CEO) that have both a performance-vesting component tied to the Company’s three-year Relative Free Cash Flow Margin over three-year period ending June 30, 2021 and a service-vesting component tied to continued service. The achievement of the performance-vesting component of PRSUs (i.e., the number of shares that will be issuable to the NEO under his or her PRSU, if he or she satisfies the applicable service-vesting requirements) will be determined following June 30, 2021. Fifty percent (50%) of the earned shares will vest on the three-year anniversary of the grant date (or on the date that such shares are determined to have been earned, if that date is later than the three-year anniversary of the grant date) and the remaining fifty percent (50%) will vest on the fourth anniversary of the date of grant, provided the NEO continues in our service through the applicable vesting date. The underlying shares may also vest on an accelerated basis in the event the NEO’s employment terminates under certain circumstances, as described in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”

(11)

Reflects a TSR Award that have both a performance-vesting component tied to the achievement of a minimum total stockholder return threshold and a service-based component tied to continued service. The achievement of the performance-vesting component of the TSR Awards (i.e., the number of shares that will be issuable to the NEO under his or her PRSU, if he or she satisfies the applicable service-vesting requirements) will be determined over the five-year period ending March 20, 2024.One-third of the target number of shares can vest no earlier than March 20, 2022. The remainingone-third andone-third of the target number of shares can vest no earlier than March 20, 2023 and 2024, respectively, subject to continued service on those dates. The underlying shares may also vest on an accelerated basis in the event the NEO’s employment terminates under certain circumstances, as described in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”

(12)

Reflects an award of RSUs that only has a service-vesting component tied to continued service. Fifty percent (50%) of the shares will vest on the December 31, 2019 and the remaining 50% will vest on December 31, 2020, provided the NEO continues in our service through the applicable vesting date. The underlying shares may also vest on an accelerated basis in the event the NEO’s employment terminates under certain circumstances, as described in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”

(13)

Reflects an award of PRSUs that have both a performance-vesting component tied to achievement by Orbotech of Operating Margin Dollars and balanced scorecard grade for 2019 and a service-vesting component tied to continued service. The achievement of the performance-vesting component of PRSUs (i.e., the number of shares that will be issuable to the NEO under his or her PRSU, if he or she satisfies the applicable service-vesting requirements) will be determined following December 31, 2019. In the case of Mr. Steimberg, 50% of the earned shares will vest on December 31, 2019 and the remaining 50% will vest on December 31, 2020, provided the NEO continues in our service through the applicable vesting date. In the case of Mr. Levy, 100% of the earned shares will vest on December 31, 2019. The underlying shares may also vest on an accelerated basis in the event the NEO’s employment terminates under certain circumstances, as described in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”

(14)

Reflects an award of RSUs that only has a service-vesting component tied to continued service. One hundred percent (100%) of the shares will vest on the December 31, 2019, provided the NEO continues in our service through the applicable vesting date. The underlying shares may also vest on an accelerated basis in the event the NEO’s employment terminates under certain circumstances, as described in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End60  |Executive Compensation Tables

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END

The following table provides certain summary information concerning outstanding equity awards held by the NEOs as of June 30, 2019.2022.

 

    Option awards   Stock awards 

Name and principal position

  Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options (#)
exercisable
   Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options (#)
unexercisable
   Option
exercise
price
($)
   Option
expiration
date
   Equity
incentive
plan
awards:
number of
unearned
shares,
units or
other
rights that
have not
vested (#)
  Equity
incentive
plan
awards:
market or
payout
value of
unearned
shares,
units or
other
rights that
have not
vested ($)(1)
 

Richard Wallace

           41,817(2)   4,942,769 

  President & CEO

           32,829(3)   3,880,388 
            67,536(4)   7,982,755 
            62,074(5)   7,337,147 
            124,323(6)   14,694,979 
            121,414(7)   14,351,135 

Bren Higgins

           8,215(3)   971,013 

  Executive Vice President & Chief

           16,884(4)   1,995,689 

  Financial Officer

           17,242(5)   2,038,004 
            41,439(6)   4,898,090 
            48,653(7)   5,750,785 

Ahmad Khan

           8,215(3)   971,013 

  President, Semiconductor

           13,132(4)   1,552,202 

   Process Control

           18,967(5)   2,241,899 
            45,585(6)   5,388,147 
            48,180(7)   5,694,876 

Brian Trafas

           5,456(3)   644,899 

  Executive Vice President

           7,504(4)   886,973 

  Global Customer Organization

           13,794(5)   1,630,451 
            33,150(6)   3,918,330 
            33,545(7)   3,965,019 

Amichai Steimberg

           60,776(8)   7,183,723 

  CEO of Orbotech

           31,683(7)   3,744,931 

Asher Levy

           50,146(8)   5,927,257 

  Former CEO of Orbotech

           40,172(7)   4,748,330 
        2,576    103.05    6/20/2025     
    2,450    2,451    53.81    6/28/2024     
 

 

       3,174    44.94    9/11/2023    

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

       

Stock Awards

Name and Principal Position

  Grant
Date
   Number of
Shares of
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested (#)
  Market Value
of Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested ($)(1)
   Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
unearned
shares, units or
other rights
that have not
vested (#)
  Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
market or
payout value of
unearned
shares, units or
other rights
that have not
vested ($)(1)
 

Richard Wallace

President & Chief Executive Officer

  

 

8/2/2018

 

  

 

34,623

(2) 

 

 

11,047,507

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

4/11/2019

 

  

 

75,517

(3) 

 

 

24,095,964

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

8/1/2019

 

  

 

12,862

(2) 

 

 

4,104,007

 

  

 

57,885

(4) 

 

 

18,469,946

 

  

 

8/6/2020

 

  

 

13,761

(2) 

 

 

4,390,860

 

  

 

41,284

(5) 

 

 

13,172,899

 

  

 

8/5/2021

 

  

 

17,298

(2) 

 

 

5,519,446

 

  

 

38,920

(6) 

 

 

12,418,594

 

Bren Higgins

Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

  

 

8/2/2018

 

  

 

10,574

(2) 

 

 

3,373,952

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

3/20/2019

 

  

 

27,626

(3) 

 

 

8,814,904

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

8/1/2019

 

  

 

6,431

(2) 

 

 

2,052,003

 

  

 

19,294

(4) 

 

 

6,156,330

 

  

 

8/6/2020

 

  

 

6,070

(2) 

 

 

1,936,816

 

  

 

12,142

(5) 

 

 

3,874,269

 

  

 

8/5/2021

 

  

 

6,086

(2) 

 

 

1,941,921

 

  

 

9,129

(6) 

 

 

2,912,881

 

Ahmad Khan

President, Semiconductor Process Control

  

 

8/2/2018

 

  

 

11,633

(2) 

 

 

3,711,858

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

3/20/2019

 

  

 

30,390

(3) 

 

 

9,696,841

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

8/1/2019

 

  

 

7,503

(2) 

 

 

2,394,057

 

  

 

22,510

(4) 

 

 

7,182,491

 

  

 

8/6/2020

 

  

 

7,083

(2) 

 

 

2,260,044

 

  

 

14,166

(5) 

 

 

4,520,087

 

  

 

8/5/2021

 

  

 

6,727

(2) 

 

 

2,146,451

 

  

 

10,090

(6) 

 

 

3,219,517

 

Oreste Donzella

Executive Vice President Electronics, Packaging & Components

  

 

8/2/2018

 

  

 

5,288

(2) 

 

 

1,687,295

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

3/20/2019

 

  

 

13,812

(3) 

 

 

4,407,133

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

8/1/2019

 

  

 

2,680

(2) 

 

 

855,134

 

  

 

8,040

(4) 

 

 

2,565,403

 

  

 

8/6/2020

 

  

 

2,832

(2) 

 

 

903,635

 

  

 

5,667

(5) 

 

 

1,808,226

 

  

 

8/5/2021

 

  

 

2,402

(2) 

 

 

766,430

 

  

 

3,604

(6) 

 

 

1,149,964

 

Mary Beth Wilkinson

Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer & Corporate Secretary

  

 

9/21/2020

 

  

 

11,043

(7) 

 

 

3,523,600

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

8/5/2021

 

  

 

5,765

(2) 

 

 

1,839,496

 

  

 

3,844

(6) 

 

 

1,226,544

 

                       

(1) Calculated based on the $319.08 closing price per share of our Common Stock on June 30, 2022.

(2) Reflects an award of RSUs that only has a service-vesting component tied to continued service beyond fiscal year 2022. One-fourth (1/4) of the original grant vests on each anniversary of the date of grant, provided that the NEO continues in our service through the applicable vesting date. The underlying shares may also vest on an accelerated basis in the event the NEO’s employment terminates under certain circumstances as described in the section of the Proxy Statement entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination of Change of Control.”

(3) Represents the number of unvested awards of our Common Stock that could be earned under TSR Awards that were granted to the applicable executive officer in 2019. The performance conditions under the TSR Awards have been satisfied in full. The remaining shares will vest no earlier than March 20, 2023 and 2024, respectively, provided the NEO continues in our employ through the applicable vesting date; provided that the underlying shares may also vest on an accelerated basis in the event the NEO’s employment terminates under certain circumstances, as described in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”

(4) Represents the maximum number of shares of our Common Stock that could be earned under PRSUs that were granted to the applicable executive officer in August 2019. The achievement of the performance-vesting component of these PRSUs will be determined following the completion of fiscal year 2022 based on the Company’s three-year Relative Free Cash Flow Margin over fiscal years 2020, 2021 and 2022 relative to our industry peer group. Fifty percent (50%) of the earned shares will vest on the three-year anniversary of the grant date, and the remaining fifty percent (50%) will vest on the four-year anniversary of the grant date, provided the NEO continues in our employ through the applicable vesting date. The underlying shares may also vest on an accelerated basis in the event the NEO’s employment terminates under certain circumstances, as described in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”

(5) Represents the maximum number of shares of our Common Stock that could be earned under PRSUs that were granted to the applicable executive officer in August 2020. The achievement of the performance-vesting component of these PRSUs will be determined following the completion of fiscal year 2023 based on the Company’s three-year Relative Free Cash Flow Margin over fiscal years 2021, 2022 and 2023 relative to our industry peer group. Fifty percent (50%) of the

 

(1)

Calculated based on the $118.20 closing price per share of our Common Stock on June 28, 2019, the last trading day in fiscal 2019.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement

(2)

This grant represents the maximum number of shares of our Common Stock that could be earned under PRSUs that were granted to the applicable executive officer in November 2016. The achievement of the performance-


vesting component of these PRSUs (i.e., the number of shares that will be issuable to the NEO under his or her PRSU, if he or she satisfies the applicable service-vesting requirements) will be determined following September 30, 2019 based on the Company’s three-year Relative Free Cash Flow Margin over the three-year period ending September 30, 2019. One hundred percent (100%) of the earned shares will vest on the three-year anniversary of the grant date (or on the date that such shares are determined to have been earned, if that date is later than the three-year anniversary of the grant date), provided the NEO continues in our employ through the vesting date. The underlying shares may also vest on an accelerated basis in the event the NEO’s employment terminates under certain circumstances, as described in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”

LOGO

(3)

These grants represent 124% of the target number of shares of our Common Stock under PRSUs that were granted to the applicable NEO in August 2015. The achievement of the performance-vesting component of these PRSUs was determined to be at the 71st percentile following the completion of fiscal year 2019 based on the Company’s three-year Relative Free Cash Flow Margin over fiscal years 2016, 2017 and 2018. Fifty percent (50%) of the earned shares vested on the three-year anniversary of the grant date, and the remaining fifty percent (50%) will vest on the four-year anniversary of the grant date, provided the NEO continues in our employ through the applicable vesting date. The underlying shares may also vest on an accelerated basis in the event the NEO’s employment terminates under certain circumstances, as described in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”

(4)

These grants represent the maximum number of shares of our Common Stock that could be earned under PRSUs that were granted to the applicable executive officer in August 2017. The achievement of the performance-vesting component of these PRSUs will be determined following the completion of fiscal year 2020 based on the Company’s three-year Relative Free Cash Flow Margin over fiscal years 2018, 2019 and 2020 relative to our industry peer group. Fifty percent (50%) of the earned shares will vest on the three-year anniversary of the grant date, and the remaining fifty percent (50%) will vest on the four-year anniversary of the grant date, provided the NEO continues in our employ through the applicable vesting date. The underlying shares may also vest on an accelerated basis in the event the NEO’s employment terminates under certain circumstances, as described in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”

(5)

These grants represent the maximum number of shares of our Common Stock that could be earned under PRSUs that were granted to the applicable executive officer in August 2018. The achievement of the performance-vesting component of these PRSUs will be determined following the completion of fiscal year 2021 based on the Company’s three-year Relative Free Cash Flow Margin over fiscal years 2019, 2020 and 2021 relative to our industry peer group. Fifty percent (50%) of the earned shares will vest on the three-year anniversary of the grant date, and the remaining fifty percent (50%) will vest on the four-year anniversary of the grant date, provided the NEO continues in our employ through the applicable vesting date. The underlying shares may also vest on an accelerated basis in the event the NEO’s employment terminates under certain circumstances, as described in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”

(6)

These grants represent the maximum number of shares of our Common Stock that could be earned under TSR Awards that were granted to the applicable executive officer in 2019. The achievement of the performance-vesting component of these PRSUs will be determined during the five-year period ending March 20, 2024.One-third of the earned shares can vest no earlier than March 20, 2022 and the remainingone-third andone-third can vest no earlier than March 20, 2023 and 2024, respectively, provided the NEO continues in our employ through the applicable vesting date. The underlying shares may also vest on an accelerated basis in the event the NEO’s employment terminates under certain circumstances, as described in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”

(7)

These RSUs were granted with only service-based vesting criteria that vests over a four-year period of service with the Company measured from the award date. Each RSU represents the right to receive one share of our Common Stock upon the vesting of that unit. Other than for Messrs. Steimberg and Levy, 25% of the total number of shares underlying each of these awards vests and becomes issuable upon completion of one year of service measured from the grant date, and an additional 25% will vest on each of the second, third and fourth yearly anniversaries of the grant date, provided the NEO continues in our employ through the applicable vesting date. For Messrs. Steimberg and Levy, includes RSUs assumed in the Orbotech acquisition as well as the

additional RSU granted to each of them on February 20, 2019. The RSUs will vest on an accelerated basis in the event the officer’s employment terminates under certain circumstances, as described in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”

Name

  RSU Award
Date
  Total Number
of Shares
Subject to
Award
  Number of
Shares Vested
and Issued
Before July 1,
2019
 

 

Richard Wallace

  

 

 

 

8/2/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

27,589

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    8/3/2017   30,016   7,504 
    11/11/2016   33,454   16,728 
    8/4/2016   82,700   41,350 
    8/6/2015   52,950   39,713 
Bren Higgins   8/2/2018   11,495    
    8/3/2017   11,256   2,814 
    11/11/2016   30,109   15,055 
    8/4/2016   20,700   10,350 
    8/6/2015   13,250   9,938 
Ahmad Khan   8/2/2018   12,645    
    11/1/2017   7,029   1,758 
    8/3/2017   8,755   2,189 
    11/11/2016   20,073   10,037 
    8/4/2016   20,700   10,350 
    8/6/2015   13,250   9,938 
Brian Trafas   8/2/2018   9,196    
    11/1/2017   7,029   1,758 
    8/3/2017   5,003   1,251 
    2/1/2017   7,100   3,550 
    11/11/2016   5,353   2,677 
    8/4/2016   13,800   6,900 
    8/6/2015   8,800   6,600 
Amichai Steimberg   2/20/2019   34,470   2,787 
Asher Levy   2/20/2019   44,121   3,949 

(8)

These grants represent the maximum number of shares of our Common Stock that could be earned under PRSUs that were granted to the applicable executive officer in February 2019. The achievement of the performance-vesting component of these PRSUs will be determined following the completion of 2019 based on Orbotech’s achievement of Operating Margin Dollars for 2019 and balanced scorecard grade. The underlying shares may also vest on an accelerated basis in the event the NEO’s employment terminates under certain circumstances, as described in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”

 

Option Exercises 61

earned shares will vest on the three-year anniversary of the grant date, and the remaining fifty percent (50%) will vest on the four-year anniversary of the grant date, provided the NEO continues in our employ through the applicable vesting date. The underlying shares may also vest on an accelerated basis in the event the NEO’s employment terminates under certain circumstances, as described in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”

(6) Represents the maximum number of shares of our Common Stock Vestedthat could be earned under PRSUs that were granted to the applicable executive officer in August 2021. The achievement of the performance-vesting component of these PRSUs will be determined following the completion of fiscal year 2024 based on the Company’s three-year Relative Free Cash Flow Margin over fiscal years 2022, 2023 and 2024 relative to our industry peer group. Fifty percent (50%) of the earned shares will vest on the three-year anniversary of the grant date, and the remaining fifty percent (50%) will vest on the four-year anniversary of the grant date, provided the NEO continues in our employ through the applicable vesting date. The underlying shares may also vest on an accelerated basis in the event the NEO’s employment terminates under certain circumstances, as described in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”

(7) Reflects an award of RSUs that only has a service-vesting component tied to continued service beyond fiscal year 2022. One-third (1/3) of the original grant vests on each anniversary of the date of grant, provided that the NEO continues in our service through the applicable vesting date. The underlying shares may also vest on an accelerated basis in the event the NEO’s employment terminates under certain circumstances as described in the section of the Proxy Statement entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination of Change of Control.”

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED

The following table sets forth information with respect to shares of our Common Stock subject to RSUs or PRSUs held by the NEOs that vested during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019.2022. No stock appreciation rights or stock options were exercised by the NEOs during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019.2022.

 

   Stock Awards 

Name and Principal Position

 Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting (#) (1)
  Value Realized
on Vesting

($) (2)
 

 

Richard Wallace

 

 

 

 

119,349     

 

 

 

 

 

 

13,956,273     

 

 

  President & Chief Executive Officer   
Bren Higgins  34,683        3,938,618      
  Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer   
Ahmad Khan  33,307        3,791,686      
  President, Semiconductor Process Control   
Brian Trafas  23,365        2,686,076      
  Executive Vice President, Global Customer Organization   
Amichai Steimberg  2,787        339,234      
  CEO of Orbotech   
Asher Levy  3,950        480,672      
  Former CEO of Orbotech  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

    Stock Awards 

Name and Principal Position

  Number of Shares
Acquired on  Vesting
(#)(1)
     Value Realized
on Vesting ($)(2)
 

Richard Wallace

President & Chief Executive Officer

   122,728      42,155,887 
            

Bren Higgins

Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

   39,478      14,012,967 
            

Ahmad Khan

President, Semiconductor Process Control

   42,357      15,103,340 
            

Oreste Donzella

Executive Vice President, Electronics, Packaging & Components

   18,933      6,765,160 
            

Mary Beth Wilkinson

Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer & Corporate Secretary

   5,522      1,969,035 
            

(1)

(1) Our 2004 Equity Incentive Plan allows us to withhold shares issuable upon a vesting event to pay for the applicable withholding tax with respect to such vesting event. The gross number of shares acquired on vesting, which is set forth in the table above, was reduced by the withheld shares, (other than for Messrs. Steimberg and Levy), and the net remaining shares were issued to each officer. The following reflects the net number of shares that were issued to each officer, after giving effect to such withholding, during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019: Mr. Wallace: 60,174 shares; Mr. Higgins: 17,484 shares; Mr. Khan: 16,790 shares; and Mr. Trafas: 12,015 shares.

(2)

Based on the closing market price of the vested shares on the vesting date (or, if the vesting date occurred on a day on which the NASDAQ Stock Market was closed for trading, the closing market price of our Common Stock on the last completed trading day immediately prior to the vesting date). Does not include dividend equivalent rights on the vested shares.

Pay Ratio Disclosure

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensationnet remaining shares were issued to each NEO. The following reflects the net number of Mr. Wallace, our President and Chief Executive Officer. The pay ratio included in this information is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K.

As disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table,shares that were issued to each NEO, after giving effect to such withholding, during the fiscal 2019 annual total compensation as determined under Item 402 of RegulationS-K foryear ended June 30, 2022: Mr. Wallace was $20,512,367. The fiscal 2019 annual total compensation as determined under Item 402 of RegulationS-K for the median employee was $85,968.Wallace: 61,876 shares; Mr. Higgins: 19,902 shares; Mr. Khan: 21,352 shares; Mr. Donzella: 10,724 shares; Ms. Wilkinson: 3,505 shares.

(2) Based on the foregoing, our estimateclosing market price of the ratiovested shares on the vesting date (or, if the vesting date occurred on a day on which the NASDAQ Stock Market was closed for trading, the closing market price of Mr. Wallace’s annual total compensationour Common Stock on the last completed trading day immediately prior to the median employee’s annual total compensation for fiscal 2019 is 239 to 1. Givenvesting date). Does not include dividend equivalent rights on the different methodologies that various public companies will use to determine an estimate of their pay ratios, the estimated ratio reported above should not be used as a basis for comparison between companies.vested shares.

To identify the median of the annual total compensation of all employees, as well as to determine the annual total compensation of the “median employee,” the methodology and the material assumptions, adjustments, and estimates that were used were as follows:NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

We selected May 30, 2019, which is within the last three months of fiscal 2019, as the date upon which we would identify the “median employee”. On that date, we and our subsidiaries employed a total of 10,065 employees. We

identified the “median employee” based on total target compensation of each employee within our global workforce as set forth in our human resources databases, which included target salary, cash bonus, equity compensation and other long-term incentive compensation for fiscal 2019. For employees outside the United States, we converted their compensation to U.S. dollars using the exchange rate provided by our Finance organization, in effect as of May 1, 2019.

We calculated the total annual compensation for the “median employee” for fiscal 2019 in the same manner in which Mr. Wallace’s total annual compensation was calculated in the summary compensation table.

Pension Benefits

Orbotech contributes to a pension plan for its Israeli employees as mandated by Israeli law. Of the NEOs, only Messrs. Steimberg and Levy participated in the pension plan. Present value of accumulated benefit is based on foreign currency exchange rates in effect on June 28, 2019 (the last business day of the fiscal year).

Name

  Name of plan   Number of
years credited
service (#)
  Present value of
accumulated
benefit ($)
   Payments
during last
fiscal year
($)
 

Amichai Steimberg

 

   

 

Manager’s Insurance

 

 

 

  27

 

   

 

1,270,423

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

Asher Levy

 

   

 

Manager’s Insurance

 

 

 

  29

 

   

 

1,091,103

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

We have established the EDSP in order to provide our executive officers and other key employees with the opportunity to defer all or a portion of their cash compensation each year. Pursuant to the plan,EDSP, each participant can elect to defer between 5 to 100% of his or her salary, commissions and bonuses for the fiscal year. The deferred amount is credited to an account maintained in his or her name on our books. The portion of the account attributable to the participant’s deferral is fully vested at all times but is not matched with any Company funds. The account is periodically adjusted to reflect earnings (or losses) based on the participant’s investment elections among a select group of investment funds utilized to track the notional investment return on the account balance. As of June 30, 2019,2022, there were a total of 18 investment funds available for selection under the EDSP, and the participant may periodically change his or her investment elections. The participant may elect to receive his or her vested account balance upon termination of employment or at an earlier designated date. The distribution may, at the participant’s election, be made in a lump sum or in quarterly installments over a period ranging from five years to fifteen years, depending on the circumstances triggering the distribution event. A participant can receive

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

62  |Executive Compensation Tables

an early distribution of a portion of his or her vested account balance in the event of a financial hardship or in the event he or she agrees to forfeit a designated percentage of his or her remaining account balance. We maintain life insurance policies on EDSP participants as a funding vehicle for a portion of our obligations under the EDSP.

The following table shows the deferred compensation activity for each participating NEO during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 (Messrs. Higgins, Steimberg and Levy had no activity):2022:

 

Name and Principal Position

 Executive
Contributions in
Fiscal Year 2019

($)
  Company
Contributions in
Fiscal Year 2019

($)
  Aggregate
Earnings
in��Fiscal Year
2019

($)(1)(2)
  Aggregate
Withdrawals /
Distributions
($)
  Aggregate
Balance as of
June 30, 2019

($)
 

(a)

 (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)  (f) 
Richard Wallace        102,061      2,079,653 

  President & Chief Executive Officer

      
Ahmad Khan        92,684   33,461   1,510,495 

  President, Semiconductor Process Control

      
Brian Trafas        110,549      1,369,482 

  Executive Vice President,

      

  Global Customer Organization

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

Name and Principal

Position

  

Executive
Contributions
in Fiscal Year
2022

($)

   Company
Contributions
in Fiscal Year
2022 ($)
   

Aggregate
Earnings
in Fiscal
Year 2022

($)(1)(2)

  

Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions

($)

   

Aggregate
Balance
as of June 30,
2022

($)

 

(a)

  (b)   (c)   (d)  (e)   (f) 

Richard Wallace

President & Chief Executive Officer

           (830,958      2,512,726 

Bren Higgins

Executive Vice President
& Chief Financial Officer

   267,981        (51,988      316,032 

Ahmad Khan

President, Semiconductor
Process Control

           (27,702      180,610 

Oreste Donzella

Executive Vice President,
Electronics, Packaging & Components

   681,849        (269,295      1,786,362 

(1) The reported amount corresponds to a composite of the actual market earnings on a group of investment funds selected by the applicable executive officer for purposes of tracking the notional investment return on the officer’s account balance for fiscal year 2022. No portion of the reported amount was “above market” or “preferential.” Accordingly, amounts reported in this column (d) for each NEO are not reported in the Summary Compensation Table.

(1)

The reported amount corresponds to a composite of the actual market earnings on a group of investment funds selected by the applicable executive officer for purposes of tracking the notional investment return on the officer’s account balance for fiscal year 2019. No portion of the reported amount was “above market” or “preferential.” Accordingly, amounts reported in this column (d) for each NEO are not reported in the Summary Compensation Table.

(2)

The 18 investment funds named below were available for selection under the EDSP for some or all of fiscal year 2019. The rate of return for each such fund for fiscal year 2019(2) The 18 investment funds named below were available for selection under the EDSP for some or all of fiscal year 2022. The rate of return for each such fund for fiscal year 2022 was as follows:

 

Name of Fund

  % Rate of Return
Return for Fiscal Year
Year 20192022
 
American Funds IS Growth

Allspring Gov Money Market Institutional

   5.95%15% 
Deutsche

American Funds IS Growth

-24.25%

DFA VA US Targeted Value

-6.36%

DWS Small Cap Index VIP A Small Blend

   -3.54%-25.50% 
DFA VA US Targeted Value-7.77%

MFS VIT Global Equity Initial

   11.63%-17.42% 

PIMCO VIT Total Return Institutional

   7.58%-11.50% 

T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth

   10.37%-31.28% 

T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth

   15.91%-21.93% 
Templeton Foreign VIP-6.06%

Transamerica JP Morgan Mid Cap Value VP Initial

   4.44%-7.48% 

Vanguard VIF Balanced Equity

   10.28%-9.21% 

Vanguard VIF Equity Income

   8.95%0.15% 

Vanguard VIF Equity Index

   10.27%-10.75% 

Vanguard VIF High Yield Bond

   8.85%-11.44% 

Vanguard VIF International Foreign Large Growth

   -0.28%-35.96% 

Vanguard VIF REIT Index Real Estate

   12.08%-8.18% 

Vanguard VIF Small Company Growth

   1.38%-28.11% 

Vanguard VIF Total Bond Market Index

   7.77%-10.60% 
Wells Fargo Government Money

Vanguard VIF Total International Stock Market InstitutionalIndex

   2.12%-18.89% 

 

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of ControlLOGO

63

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE OF CONTROL

In January 2006, our Board adopted an Executivethe Original Severance Plan, (the “Original Severance Plan”).which was amended and restated on October 20, 2016. In November 2010, our Compensation and Talent Committee adopted athe 2010 Executive Severance Plan (the “2010 Severance Plan”).Plan. The 2010 Severance Plan exists in parallel with the Original Severance Plan, which remains in full force and effect for existing participants under that plan until terminated or modified in accordance with its terms. No participant under the 2010 Severance Plan is eligible to simultaneously participate under the Original Severance Plan, and no participant under the Original Severance Plan is eligible to simultaneously participate under the 2010 Severance Plan.

The Original Severance Plan and the 2010 Severance Plan each provide certain compensation and benefits if a participant’s employment with us terminates under certain defined circumstances. In exchange for receiving benefits under either plan, the participant must agree to a release of claims in favor of the Company and certainnon-solicitation restrictions for the period of timeco-terminous with the period for which he or she will receive continued compensation and benefits under the applicable plan. Each plan also contains a mitigation provision in which the benefits payable are subject to reduction to the extent the participant earns post-termination compensation from another source.Severance Plan. All of our NEOs (other than Messrs. Steimberg and Levy) participated in either the Original Severance Plan or the 2010 Severance Plan during fiscal year 2019,2022, as described in more detail below.

The terms of and benefits payable under our two severance plans are in many ways similar to one another. In October 2016, the Compensation Committee approved amendments to the Original Severance Plan to eliminate the taxgross-up provisions related to excise taxes that may be imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), as the result of a participant receiving a payment that would constitute a “parachute payment”

within the meaning of Code Section 280G upon or in connection with a change of control of the Company. Both severance plans contain a “best results” provision, which is described in more detail below. In addition, as part of a routine assessment of competitive market practices for executive severance benefits, our Board approved amendments to the Original Severance Plan and 2010 Severance Plan on September 21, 2015 (the “2015 Severance Plan Amendments”) to remove the mitigation andnon-compete provisions, and to provide that all cash benefits are payable under the applicable plan in a lump sum. The 2015 Severance Plan Amendments also revised the Original Severance Plan and 2010 Severance Plan to include the Executive Retiree Medical Benefits and make certain other clarifications. For additional information about this benefit, please refer to the “Executive Retiree Medical Program” description.

Original Severance Plan

Mr. Wallace currently participates in the Original Severance Plan.

IfUnder the terms of the Original Severance Plan, if Mr. Wallace is terminated other than for cause, or voluntarily resigns for good reason, prior to or more than two years after a change of control of our Company, then he will receive (i) salary continuation payments foran amount equal to two years of his base salary, payable in a lump sum, (ii) apro-rated annual incentive payment for the fiscal year of his termination or resignation (calculated based on his annual incentive bonus for the then-most recently completed calendar year and the proportion of the then-current fiscal year served through the date of termination or resignation),(iii) pro-rated vesting of all of his outstanding equity awards through the date of his termination or resignation (rounded up to the next whole month and disregarding any “cliff-vesting” provisions applicable to the award), and (iv) the extension of the post-termination exercise period of each stock option or stock appreciation right granted after January 1, 2006, so that the option or right will remain exercisable for twelve12 months following the date of termination or resignation, but in no event beyond the original term of the award. The calculation in clause (iii) of this paragraph with respect to any performance-based equity awards for which the achievement of the applicable performance criteria has not yet been determined as of the participant’s termination date will be delayed until the extent of the achievement of those criteria (and thus the maximum number of shares issuable under the applicable award) has been finally determined in accordance with the terms of the applicable award.

If Mr. Wallace is terminated other than for cause, or voluntarily resigns for good reason, within two years following a change of control of our Company, then he will receive (i) salary continuation payments foran amount equal to three years of his base salary payable in a lump sum, (ii) an amount equal to three times his average annual bonus for the preceding three completed years, payable in a lump sum, (iii) apro-rated annual incentive payment for the fiscal year of his termination or resignation (calculated as described in clause (ii) of the preceding paragraph), (iv) 100% vesting acceleration of all of his outstanding equity awards, (v) an additional $2,000 per month for the three-year severance period payable in a lump sum, and (vi) the extension of the post-termination exercise period of each stock option or stock appreciation right granted after January 1, 2006, so that the option or right will remain exercisable for twelve12 months following the date of termination or resignation, but in no event beyond the original term of the award. As of June 30, 2019,2021, the calculation in clause (iv) of this paragraph with respect to any performance-based equity awards for which the achievement of the applicable performance criteria had not yet been determined as of the participant’s termination date would have been calculated, pursuant to the terms of the applicable awards, based on a shortened performance period, which would have been deemed to have ended as of the most recent fiscal quarter end preceding the closing date of the change of control.

Mr. Wallace is also is eligible for the Executive Retiree Medical Benefits in accordance with the terms described above.

Certain of theThe RSUs, PRSUs and TSR Awards granted to Mr. Wallace were issued with dividend equivalent rights. These dividend equivalent rights entitle the recipientMr. Wallace to receive credits, payable in cash or additional shares of our Common Stock, equal to the cash dividends that would have been received on the shares of our Common Stock had the shares been issued and outstanding on the dividend record date. The dividend equivalents wouldwill only be paid to the recipientMr. Wallace upon vesting or settlement of the underlying award (including satisfaction of any performance-vesting criteria associated with any performance-based awards). In November 2014, our Board declared a special cash dividend of $16.50 per share on our outstanding Common Stock, which was substantially paid in December 2014. In connection with the special cash dividend, our Board and Compensation Committee approved an equitable and proportionate adjustment to then-outstanding equity awards (RSUs and PRSUs) under the 2004 Equity Plan, as required by the 2004 Equity Plan, which will be paid subject to the vesting requirements of the underlying awards. Accordingly, in connection with an acceleration of vesting of certain of the outstanding equity awards held by Mr. Wallace, as applicable, Mr. Wallacehe would be entitled to receive accrued dividend equivalents and the benefit of the equitable and proportionate adjustment of the special cash dividend attributable to such outstandinghis accelerated equity awards that accelerate.awards.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

64  |Executive Compensation Tables

The Original Severance Plan provides that, if a payment under the Original Severance Plan would (together with any other payments) constitute a “parachute payment” and would therefore be subject to Code Section 4999 excise tax, then the paymentsuch payments will be reduced to either (a) the largest portion of the payment that would result in no portion of the payment being subject to the excise tax, or (b) the largest portion, up to and including the total, of the payment, whichever amount, after taking into account all applicable federal, state and local employment taxes, income taxes and the excise tax (all computed at the highest applicable marginal rate), results in the participant’s receipt, on anafter-tax basis, of the greater amount of the payment, notwithstanding that all or some portion of the payment may be subject to the excise tax.

2010 Severance Plan

Messrs. Higgins, Khan and Trafas participateDonzella and Ms. Wilkinson participated in the 2010 Severance Plan, pursuant to which was amended by the 2015 Severance Plan Amendments in September 2015. Theythey each have the right to receive benefits under that plan solely in connection with a termination of their employment under certain circumstances within one year following a change of control of the Company.

IfUnder the 2010 Severance Plan, if Messrs. Higgins, Khan or TrafasDonzella or Ms. Wilkinson is terminated other than for cause, or voluntarily resigns for good reason, within one year following a change of control, then such officer will receive (i) salary continuation payments foran amount equal to 18 months of base salary payable in a lump sum, (ii) apro-rated annual incentive payment for the fiscal year of his or her termination or resignation (calculated based on such officer’s annual incentive bonus for the then-most recently completed year and the proportion of the then-current fiscal year served through the date of termination or resignation), (iii) 100% vesting acceleration of all of his or her outstanding equity awards, and (iv) the extension of the post-termination exercise period of each stock option or stock appreciation right granted after January 1, 2006, so that the option or right will remain exercisable for twelve12 months following the date of termination or resignation, but in no event beyond the original term of the award. As of June 30, 2019,2022, the calculation in clause (iii) of this paragraph with respect to any performance-based equity awards for which the achievement of the applicable performance criteria had not yet been determined as of the participant’s termination date would have been calculated, pursuant to the terms of the applicable awards, based on a shortened performance period, which would have been deemed to have ended as of the most recent fiscal quarter end preceding the closing date of the change of control.

Certain of theThe RSUs and PRSUs granted to Messrs. Higgins, Khan and Trafasor Donzella or Ms. Wilkinson were issued with dividend equivalent rights. These dividend equivalent rights entitle the recipient to receive credits, payable in cash or additional shares of our Common Stock, equal to the cash dividends that would have been received on the shares of our Common Stock had the shares been issued and outstanding on the dividend record date. The dividend equivalents wouldwill only be paid to the recipient upon vesting or settlement of the underlying award (including satisfaction of any performance-vesting criteria associated with any performance-based awards). In November 2014, our Board declared a special cash dividend of $16.50 per share on our outstanding Common Stock, which was substantially paid in December 2014. In connection with the special cash dividend, our Board and Compensation Committee approved an equitable and proportionate adjustment to outstanding equity awards (RSUs and PRSUs) under the 2004 Equity Plan, as required by the 2004 Equity Plan, which will be paid subject to the vesting requirements of the underlying awards. Accordingly, in connection with an acceleration of vesting of certain outstanding equity awards held by Messrs. Higgins, Khan or Trafas,Donzella, or Ms. Wilkinson, such officer would be entitled to receive accrued dividend equivalents and the benefit of the equitable and proportionate adjustment for the special cash dividend attributable to his or her accelerated equity awards.

The 2010 Severance Plan provides that, if a payment under the 2010 Severance Plan (together with any other payments) would constitute such a “parachute payment” and would therefore be subject to Code Section 4999 excise tax, then the payment will be reduced to either (a) the largest portion of the payment that would result in no portion of the payment being subject to the excise tax, or (b) the largest portion, up to and including the total, of the payment, whichever amount, after taking into account all applicable federal, state and local employment taxes, income taxes and the excise tax (all computed at the highest applicable marginal rate), results in the participant’s receipt, on anafter-tax basis, of the greater amount of the payment, notwithstanding that all or some portion of the payment may be subject to the excise tax.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


Orbotech Arrangements

Under the terms of the employment agreements we entered into upon the acquisition of Orbotech with each of Messrs. Steimberg and Levy, they are each entitled to receive the following upon termination of their service provider relationship (including upon death or disability) with Orbotech:

Benefit

Description

Advance Notice Payment

If the employee receives less than six months advance notice prior to termination without Cause (as defined below), employee shall receive the product of (i) the difference between six months and the period of time prior to termination in which the notice was given and (ii) the value of all benefits excluding equity and bonus-related benefits.

Vested Retirement    

Payment Benefits

A lump sum payment equal to the difference between (i) the product of 200% of monthly salary prior to transitioning to senior advisor status and 29 (in the case of Mr. Levy) and 27 (in the case of Mr. Steimberg) and (ii) contributions made by Orbotech to the Manager’s Insurance Policy or Pension Fund maintained by Orbotech for the period for November 1, 1990 through February 20, 2019 (in the case of Mr. Levy) and November 1, 1992 through February 20, 2019 (in the case of Mr. Steimberg).

Adjustment Period Benefits

A lump sum payment equal to six month’s salary based on the monthly salary in effect prior to transitioning to senior advisor status.

Retirement Payment Benefits

A lump sum payment equal to the difference between (i) the product of 200% of monthly salary prior to transitioning to senior advisor status and the number of years of service with Orbotech after the closing of the Orbotech acquisition by KLA and (ii) contributions made by Orbotech to the Manager’s Insurance Policy or Pension Fund maintained by Orbotech for the period from the acquisition of Orbotech by KLA on February 20, 2019 and the date of termination.

Accelerated Vesting of Assumed Awards

100% accelerated vesting of all equity awards held by employee that were assumed by KLA in the acquisition of Orbotech.

New Equity Awards

If the employee is terminated without Cause (as defined below), in lieu of 100% acceleration of outstanding RSUs and PRSUs held by employee that were not assumed awards, employee will receive a cash payment equal to the unvested portion of the award. If none of the awards had vested in part, the cash value for Mr. Steimberg and Levy of these awards would be $5,716,667 and $4,716,667, respectively.

For purposes of the employment agreements, “Cause” is defined as:

u

employee’s conviction of, or plea of no contest to, a felony;

u

the Employee’s gross misconduct;

u

any material act of personal dishonesty taken by the employee in connection with his responsibilities as an employee or service provider; or

u

the employee’s willful and continued failure to perform the duties and responsibilities of his position after there has been delivered to the employee a written demand for performance from Orbotech which describes the basis for the belief that the employee has not substantially performed his duties and provides the employee with 30 days to take corrective action.

LOGO

 

65

Table Reflecting Potential Termination and Change of Control Payments

The following table shows the estimated amounts that would have been payable to each of the NEOs upon the occurrence of each of the indicated events, had the applicable event occurred on June 30, 2019.2022. For such officers, the amount attributable to the accelerated vesting of PRSUs and RSUs is based upon the closing fair market value of our Common Stock on the last trading day of fiscal year 20192022 ($118.20319.08 per share). The actual compensation and benefits the officer would receive at any subsequent date would likely vary from the amounts set forth below as a result of certain factors, such as a change in the price of our Common Stock and any additional benefits the officer may have accrued as of that time under applicable benefit or compensation plans. The amounts that would have been payable to each of our NEOs upon the occurrence of the indicated event had the applicable event occurred on June 30, 20192022, are as follows:

Original Severance Plan

 

  Name and Principal Position

 

Event

 Salary / Bonus
  Continuation and  
Severance
Payments ($)
    Pro-rated  
Bonus ($)
  Accelerated
Vesting of
  Stock Awards  
($)(1)
  Payment of
Dividend
  Equivalents  
($)(2)
      Total ($)     

Richard Wallace

  President & Chief

  Executive Officer

 Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason(3)  1,800,000   2,305,260   24,321,541(4)   1,112,993   28,539,794 
  

Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason following a Change of Control (3)(5)

 

  9,366,550   2,305,260   46,874,101(6)   1,633,741   60,179,652 

Name and Principal

Position

  Event  Salary/Bonus
Continuation
and
Severance
Payments ($)
   Pro-rated
Bonus ($)
   Accelerated
Vesting of
Stock
Awards
($)(1)
  

Payment of
Dividend
Equivalents

($)(2)

   Total ($) 

Richard Wallace

President & Chief Executive Officer

  Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason (3)   2,000,000    2,953,846    46,205,337(4)   1,558,208    52,717,390 
   Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason following a Change of Control (3) (5)   11,459,416    2,953,846    93,219,222(6)   2,833,819    110,466,303 

2010 Severance Plan

 

  Name and Principal Position

 

Event

   Salary / Bonus  
Continuation

($)
    Pro-rated  
Bonus ($)
  Accelerated
Vesting of
  Stock Awards  

($)(1)
  Payment of
Dividend
  Equivalents  
($)(2)
      Total ($)     

Bren Higgins

  Executive Vice President &

  Chief Financial Officer

 

Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason following a Change of Control (3)(5)

 

  787,500   824,201   13,751,979(6)   456,826   15,820,506 

Ahmad Khan

  President,

  Semiconductor Process Control

 

Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason following a Change of Control (3)(5)

 

  787,500   847,875   13,799,259(6)   427,565   15,862,199 

Brian Trafas

  Executive Vice President,

  Global Customer Organization

 

Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason following a Change of Control (3)(5)

 

  750,000   680,023   9,571,718(6)   285,250   11,286,991 

Name and Principal

Position

  Event  Salary /
Bonus
Continuation
($)
  Pro-rated
Bonus ($)
  Accelerated
Vesting of
Stock Awards
($)(1)
  

Payment
of Dividend
Equivalents

($)(2)

  Total ($)

Bren Higgins

Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

  Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason following a Change of Control (3) (5)  900,000  1,138,462  31,063,076(6)  967,966  34,069,504

Ahmad Khan

President, Semiconductor Process Control

  Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason following a Change of Control (3) (5)  975,000  1,207,692  35,131,346(6)  1,093,665  38,407,703

Oreste Donzella

Executive Vice President,

Electronics, Packaging &

Components

  Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason following a Change of Control (3) (5)  690,000  716,308  14,143,221(6)  448,742  15,998,271

Mary Beth Wilkinson

Executive Vice President,

Chief Legal Officer &

Corporate Secretary 

  Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason following a Change of Control (3) (5)  787,500  806,154  8,351,600(6)  154,656  10,099,910

(1) As noted above, pursuant to the terms of the Original Severance Plan and the 2010 Severance Plan, the vesting acceleration of outstanding equity awards, when applied to any PRSUs for which the achievement of the applicable performance criteria has not yet been determined as of the participant’s termination date, is to be delayed until the extent of the achievement of those criteria (and thus the maximum number of shares issuable under the applicable award) has been finally determined in accordance with the terms of the applicable award, except that, under the Original Severance Plan and the 2010 Severance Plan, in a qualifying termination following a Change of Control, the vesting acceleration of performance-based equity awards for which the achievement of the applicable performance criteria has not yet been determined as of the participant’s termination date is based on a shortened performance period, which would have been deemed to have ended as of the most recent fiscal quarter end preceding the closing date of the Change of Control.

(1)

As noted above, pursuant to the terms of the Original Severance Plan and the 2010 Severance Plan, the vesting acceleration of outstanding equity awards, when applied to any PRSUs for which the achievement of the applicable performance criteria has not yet been determined as of the participant’s termination date, is to be delayed until the extent of the achievement of those criteria (and thus the maximum number of shares issuable under the applicable award) has been finally determined in accordance with the terms of the applicable award, except that, under the Original Severance Plan and the 2010 Severance Plan, in a qualifying termination following a Change of Control, the vesting acceleration of performance-based equity awards for which the achievement of the applicable performance criteria has not yet been determined as of the participant’s termination date is based on a shortened performance period, which would have been deemed to have ended as of the most recent fiscal quarter end preceding the closing date of the Change of Control.

The number of shares earnable under the fiscal year 2022 PRSUs is based on the Company’s achieved level of Relative Free Cash Flow Margin over the three-year period ending June 30, 2024. Under the terms of the fiscal year 2022 PRSUs, however, in the event of a Change of Control of the Company during the three-year performance period, the performance period will be shortened, so that it ends as of the most recent fiscal quarter end preceding the closing date of the Change of Control. Using that methodology, the fiscal year 2022 PRSUs have been included for purposes of this table at 150% of the target number of shares underlying the awards.

The number of shares earnable under the fiscal year 2019 TSR Awards is based on the level of total stockholder return (stock price appreciation over a 20 consecutive day trading period during the five years ended March 20, 2014 plus cash dividends distributed per share) in excess of $116.391 per share. We have assumed for purposes of this table that total stockholder return achievement was reached entitling the holder to vest in 100% of the target shares.

The number of shares earnable under the fiscal year 2019 PRSUs is based on the Company’s achieved level of Relative Free Cash Flow Margin over the three-year period ending June 30, 2021. Under the terms of the fiscal year 2019 PRSUs, however, in the event of a Change of Control of the Company during the three-year performance period, the performance period will be shortened, so that it ends as of the most recent fiscal quarter end preceding the closing date of the Change of Control. Using that methodology, the fiscal year 2019 PRSUs have been included for purposes of this table at 140%The number of shares earnable under the fiscal year 2021 PRSUs is based on the Company’s achieved level of Relative Free Cash Flow Margin over the three-year period ending June 30, 2023. Under the terms of the fiscal year 2021 PRSUs, however, in the event of a Change of Control of the Company during the three-year performance period, the performance period will be shortened, so that it ends as of the most recent fiscal quarter end preceding the closing date of the Change of Control. Using that methodology, the fiscal year 2021 PRSUs have been included for purposes of this table at 150% of the target number of shares underlying the awards.

The number of shares earnable under the fiscal year 2018 PRSUs is based on the Company’s achieved level of Relative Free Cash Flow Margin over the three-year period ending June 30, 2020. Under the terms of the fiscal

year 2018 PRSUs, however, in the event of a Change of Control of the Company during the three-year performance period, the performance period will be shortened, so that it ends as of the most recent fiscal quarter end preceding the closing date of the Change of Control. Using that methodology, the fiscal year 2018 PRSUs have been included for purposes of this table at 140% of the target number of shares underlying the awards.

The number of shares earnable under the fiscal year 2017 PRSUs is based on the Company’s achieved level of three-year Relative Free Cash Flow Margin over the three-year period ending September 30, 2019. Under the terms of the fiscal year 2017 PRSU awards, however, in the event of a Change of Control of the Company during the three-year performance period, the performance period will be shortened, so that it ends as of the most recent fiscal quarter end preceding the closing date of the Change of Control. Using that methodology, the fiscal year 2017 PRSUs have been included for purposes of this table at 115% of the target number of shares underlying the awards.

(2)

The RSUs and PRSUs granted to Messrs. Wallace, Higgins, Khan and Trafas in fiscal year 2019 were issued with dividend equivalent rights. These dividend equivalent rights entitle the recipient to receive credits, payable in cash or additional shares of our Common Stock, equal to the cash dividends that would have been received on the shares of our Common Stock had the shares been issued and outstanding on the dividend record date. The dividend equivalents would only be paid to the recipient upon vesting or settlement of the underlying award (including satisfaction of any performance-vesting criteria associated with any performance-based awards).

(3)

For purposes of the Original Severance Plan and the 2010 Severance Plan, “Cause” means (A) outside of the applicable period following a Change of Control (two years for the Original Severance Plan; one year for the 2010 Severance Plan), the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) the participant’s conviction of, or plea ofnolocontendre to, a felony; (ii) the participant’s gross misconduct; (iii) any material act of personal dishonesty taken by the participant in connection with his or her responsibilities as an employee of the Company, or (iv) the participant’s willful and continued failure to perform the duties and responsibilities of his or her position after there has been delivered to the participant a written demand for performance from the Board which describes the basis for the Board’s belief that the participant has not substantially performed his or her duties and provides the participant with thirty (30) days to take corrective action, and (B) within the applicable period following a Change of Control, the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) the participant’s conviction of, or plea ofnolo contendre to, a felony that the Board reasonably believes has had or will have a material detrimental effect on our reputation or business; (ii) the participant’s willful gross misconduct with regard to the Company that is materially injurious to us; (iii) any act of personal dishonesty taken by the participant in connection with his or her responsibilities as an employee of the Company with the intention or reasonable expectation that such action may result in substantial personal enrichment of the participant or (iv) the participant’s willful and continued failure to perform the duties and responsibilities of his or her position after there has been delivered to the participant a written demand for performance from the Board which describes the basis for the Board’s belief that the participant has not substantially performed his or her duties and provides the participant with thirty (30) days to take corrective action.

For purposes of the Original Severance Plan and the 2010 Severance Plan, “Good Reason” means the occurrence of any of the following events without the participant’s written consent: (i) a material change in the participant’s reporting requirements such that the participant is required to report to a person whose duties, responsibilities and authority are materially less than those of the person to whom the participant was reporting immediately prior to such change; (ii) a material reduction of the participant’s duties, authority or responsibilities; (iii) a material reduction in the participant’s base salary, other than a reduction that applies to other executives generally; (iv) a material reduction in the aggregate level of the participant’s overall compensation, other than a reduction that applies to other executives generally; or (v) a material relocation of the participant’s office, with a relocation of more than fifty (50) miles from its then present location to be deemed material, unless such relocated office is closer to the participant’s then principal residence;provided however, that in no event shall Good Reason exist unless (a) the participant provides us, within ninety (90) days after the occurrence of the event or transaction, written notice specifying in detail the grounds for a purported Good Reason resignation, (b) we fail to cure the purported grounds for the Good Reason within thirty (30) days following the receipt of such notice, and (c) the participant resigns within sixty (60) days after we fail to take such timely curative action, but in no event more than one hundred eighty (180) days after the occurrence of the event or transaction identified in the notice to us as the grounds for the Good Reason resignation.

(4)

The vesting schedules for the RSUs and PRSUs outstanding as of June 30, 2019 are listed in the footnotes to the table entitled “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End.” The amounts marked by this footnote (4) reflect thepro-rated vesting of the applicable officer’s outstanding equity awards through the date of his or her termination or resignation, without giving effect to the “cliff-vesting” provisions applicable to the awards and considering the maximum potential payout for the performance-based awards.

(5)

For purposes of the Original Severance Plan and the 2010 Severance Plan, a “Change of Control” means the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) any “person” (as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act) becoming the “beneficial owner” (as defined inRule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities representing 50% or more of the total voting power represented by our then outstanding voting securities; (ii) the sale or disposition by us of all or substantially all of our assets; (iii) the consummation of a merger or consolidation of the Company with any other corporation, other than a merger or consolidation which would result in our voting securities outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity) more than 50% of the total voting power represented by the voting securities of the Company or such surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation, or (iv) a change in the composition of our Board, as a result of which fewer than a majority of the directors are Incumbent Directors (where “Incumbent Directors” means directors who either (A) were directors of the Company as of a specified date (February 16, 2006 for the Original Severance Plan; November 3, 2010 for the 2010 Severance Plan), or (B) are elected, or nominated for election, to the Board with the affirmative votes of at least a majority of those directors whose election or nomination was not in connection with any transactions described in subsections (i), (ii) or (iii), or in connection with an actual or threatened proxy contest relating to the election of directors of the Company).

(6)

The amounts marked by this footnote (6) reflect both (a) thepro-rated vesting of the applicable officer’s outstanding equity awards through the date of his or her termination or resignation, without giving effect to the “cliff-vesting” provisions applicable to the awards, and (b) the accelerated vesting of the applicable officer’s outstanding equity awards for service periods after the date of his or her termination or resignation. The following table provides the breakdown for each such reported amount:

Name

  Value of Pro-
Rated Vesting
Through Date
  of Termination  
/ Resignation

($)
   Value of
Accelerated
Vesting for
  Service Period  
After Date of
Termination /
Resignation

($)
     Total Value  
Reported

($)
 
  
Richard Wallace   24,321,541    22,552,560    46,874,101 
  
Bren Higgins   6,743,901    7,008,078    13,751,979 
  
Ahmad Khan   6,446,037    7,353,222    13,799,259 
  
Brian Trafas   4,321,747    5,249,971    9,571,718 

 

Orbotech ArrangementsLOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

66  |Executive Compensation Tables

Certain values

The number of shares earnable under the fiscal year 2020 PRSUs is based on the Company’s achieved level of Relative Free Cash Flow Margin over the three-year period ending June 30, 2022. Under the terms of the fiscal year 2020 PRSUs, however, in the event of a Change of Control of the Company during the three-year performance period, the performance period will be shortened, so that it ends as of the most recent fiscal quarter end preceding the closing date of the Change of Control. Using that methodology, the fiscal year 2020 PRSUs have been included for purposes of this table below are basedat 134% of the target number of shares underlying the awards, which is the achievement percentage approved by the Compensation and Talent Committee and the Outside Directors in August 2022.

(2) The RSUs, PRSUs and TSR Awards granted to the NEOs were issued with dividend equivalent rights. These dividend equivalent rights entitle the recipient to receive credits, payable in cash or additional shares of our Common Stock, equal to the cash dividends that would have been received on foreign currency exchange ratesthe shares of our Common Stock had the shares been issued and outstanding on the dividend record date. The dividend equivalents would only be paid to the recipient upon vesting or settlement of the underlying award (including satisfaction of any performance-vesting criteria associated with any performance-based awards). Accordingly, this table includes the aggregate dividend equivalents payable in connection with the accelerated vesting of RSUs, PRSUs and TSR Awards that would apply in connection with the applicable NEO’s qualifying termination of employment.

(3) For purposes of the Original Severance Plan and the 2010 Severance Plan, “Cause” means (A) outside of the applicable period following a Change of Control (two years for the Original Severance Plan; one year for the 2010 Severance Plan), the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) the participant’s conviction of, or plea of nolo contendre to, a felony; (ii) the participant’s gross misconduct; (iii) any material act of personal dishonesty taken by the participant in connection with his or her responsibilities as an employee of the Company; or (iv) the participant’s willful and continued failure to perform the duties and responsibilities of his or her position after there has been delivered to the participant a written demand for performance from the Board which describes the basis for the Board’s belief that the participant has not substantially performed his or her duties and provides the participant with thirty (30) days to take corrective action, and (B) within the applicable period following a Change of Control, the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) the participant’s conviction of, or plea of nolo contendre to, a felony that the Board reasonably believes has had or will have a material detrimental effect on our reputation or business; (ii) the participant’s willful gross misconduct with regard to the Company that is materially injurious to us; (iii) any act of personal dishonesty taken by the participant in connection with his or her responsibilities as an employee of the Company with the intention or reasonable expectation that such action may result in substantial personal enrichment of the participant; or (iv) the participant’s willful and continued failure to perform the duties and responsibilities of his or her position after there has been delivered to the participant a written demand for performance from the Board which describes the basis for the Board’s belief that the participant has not substantially performed his or her duties and provides the participant with thirty (30) days to take corrective action.

For purposes of the Original Severance Plan and the 2010 Severance Plan, “Good Reason” means the occurrence of any of the following events without the participant’s written consent: (i) a material change in the participant’s reporting requirements such that the participant is required to report to a person whose duties, responsibilities and authority are materially less than those of the person to whom the participant was reporting immediately prior to such change; (ii) a material reduction of the participant’s duties, authority or responsibilities; (iii) a material reduction in the participant’s base salary, other than a reduction that applies to other executives generally; (iv) a material reduction in the aggregate level of the participant’s overall compensation, other than a reduction that applies to other executives generally; or (v) a material relocation of the participant’s office, with a relocation of more than fifty (50) miles from its then present location to be deemed material, unless such relocated office is closer to the participant’s then principal residence; provided however, that in no event shall Good Reason exist unless (a) the participant provides us, within ninety (90) days after the occurrence of the event or transaction, written notice specifying in detail the grounds for a purported Good Reason resignation; (b) we fail to cure the purported grounds for the Good Reason within thirty (30) days following the receipt of such notice; and (c) the participant resigns within sixty (60) days after we fail to take such timely curative action, but in no event more than one hundred eighty (180) days after the occurrence of the event or transaction identified in the notice to us as the grounds for the Good Reason resignation.

(4) The vesting schedules for the RSUs and PRSUs outstanding as of June 28, 2019 (the last business day30, 2022, are listed in the footnotes to the table entitled “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End.” The amounts marked by this footnote (4) reflect the pro-rated vesting of fiscal 2019)the applicable officer’s outstanding equity awards through the date of his or her termination or resignation, without giving effect to the “cliff-vesting” provisions applicable to the awards and considering the maximum potential payout for the performance-based awards.

(5) For purposes of the Original Severance Plan and the 2010 Severance Plan, a “Change of Control” means the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) any “person” (as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act) becoming the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities representing 50% or more of the total voting power represented by our then outstanding voting securities; (ii) the sale or disposition by us of all or substantially all of our assets; (iii) the consummation of a merger or consolidation of the Company with any other corporation, other than a merger or consolidation which would result in our voting securities outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity) more than 50% of the total voting power represented by the voting securities of the Company or such surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation; or (iv) a change in the composition of our Board, as a result of which fewer than a majority of the directors are Incumbent Directors (where “Incumbent Directors” means directors who either (A) were directors of the Company as of a specified date (February 16, 2006 for the Original Severance Plan; November 3, 2010 for the 2010 Severance Plan), or (B) are elected, or nominated for election, to the Board with the affirmative votes of at least a majority of those directors whose election or nomination was not in connection with any transactions described in subsections (i), (ii) or (iii), or in connection with an actual or threatened proxy contest relating to the election of directors of the Company).

(6) The amounts marked by this footnote (6) reflect both (a) the pro-rated vesting of the applicable officer’s outstanding equity awards through the date of his or her termination or resignation, without giving effect to the “cliff-vesting” provisions applicable to the awards, and (b) the accelerated vesting of the applicable officer’s outstanding equity awards for service periods after the date of his or her termination or resignation. The following table provides the breakdown for each such reported amount:

 

Benefit

  Amichai
Steimberg
($)
   Asher Levy
($)
 
  
Termination without Cause     
  
Vested retirement benefits   1,365,198    1,608,782 
  
Adjustment period benefits   264,789    294,211 
  
Retirement payment benefits   76,725    91,434 
  
Accelerated vesting of assumed awards   1,350,317    3,359,628 
  
Advance notice payment   27,770    30,033 
  
Cash in lieu of acceleration of new awards   5,716,667    4,716,667 
   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  
  Total   8,801,466    10,100,755 
  
Termination with Cause or by employee     
  
Vested retirement benefits   1,365,198    1,608,782 
  
Adjustment period benefits   264,789    294,211 
  
Retirement payment benefits   76,725    91,434 
  
Accelerated vesting of assumed awards   1,350,317    3,359,628 
   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  
  Total   3,057,029    5,354,055 

Name

  Value of Pro-Rated
Vesting
Through Date
of  Termination/
Resignation ($)
   

Value of Accelerated
Vesting for Service
Period After Date

of Termination/
Resignation ($)

   Total
Value
Reported
($)
 

Richard Wallace

   46,205,337    47,013,885    93,219,222 

Bren Higgins

   16,371,357    14,691,720    31,063,077 

Ahmad Khan

   18,540,462    16,590,884    35,131,346 

Oreste Donzella

   7,534,117    6,609,104    14,143,221 

Mary Beth Wilkinson

   2,170,701    6,180,899    8,351,600 

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

67

 

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONSPay Ratio Disclosure

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of Mr. Wallace, our President and Chief Executive Officer. The pay ratio included in this information is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K.

As disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table, the fiscal year 2022 annual total compensation as determined under Item 402 of Regulation S-K for Mr. Wallace (our Chief Executive Officer) was $20,568,625. The fiscal year 2022 annual total compensation as determined under Item 402 of Regulation S-K for the median employee was $105,278. Based on the foregoing, our estimate of the ratio of Mr. Wallace’s annual total compensation to the median employee’s annual total compensation for fiscal year 2022 is 195 to 1. Given the different methodologies that various public companies will use to determine an estimate of their pay ratios, the estimated ratio reported above should not be used as a basis for comparison between companies.

To identify the median of the annual total compensation of all employees, as well as to determine the annual total compensation of the “median employee,” the methodology and the material assumptions, adjustments, and estimates that were used were as follows:

We selected June 30, 2022 as the date upon which we would identify the “median employee.” On that date, we and our subsidiaries employed approximately 14,000 employees. We identified the “median employee” based on total target compensation of each employee within our global workforce as set forth in our human resources databases, which included target salary, cash bonus, equity compensation and other long-term incentive compensation for fiscal year 2022. For employees outside the United States, we converted their compensation to U.S. dollars using prevailing exchange rates on June 30, 2022.

Once the median employee was identified, we calculated our median employee’s total annual compensation for fiscal year 2022 in the same manner as Mr. Wallace’s total annual compensation was calculated for purposes of the Summary Compensation Table.

 

Review, Approval or Ratification ofLOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

68  |Certain Relationships and Related PartyTransactions

LOGO Certain Relationships and

    Related Transactions

REVIEW, APPROVAL OR RATIFICATION OF RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Our Standards of Business Conduct require that all employees and Directorsdirectors avoid conflicts of interests, including situations in which their personal interests interfere in any way, or appear to interfere, with the interests of KLA.

In addition, our Board has adopted a written policy and procedures for the review, approval or ratification of related party transactions. Under this policy, the Audit Committee reviews transactions, arrangements or relationships in which the Company (including any of its subsidiaries) is a participant, the amount involved exceeds $100,000 in any fiscal year, and one of our executive officers, Directors, Directordirectors, director nominees or 5% stockholders (or their immediate family members) has a direct or indirect material interest (other than solely as a result of being a director or beneficial owner of less than a specified percentage of shares of the other entity (5% for publicly traded entities and 10% for other entities)). As part of that review, the Audit Committee may consider such factors as it determines to be appropriate under the circumstances, which factors may include the position of the related party with the Company, the related party’s interest in the transaction, the materiality of the transaction, the business purpose for and reasonableness of the transaction, and comparable market terms for similar transactions that do not involve related parties.

Following that review, if the Audit Committee concludes that the terms of the related party transaction are acceptable and appropriate, the Audit Committee either approves or ratifies (as applicable) the transaction. No member of the Audit Committee participates in the review of a transaction for which he or she is the related party. The related party transaction policy created standingpre-approval for certain recurring related party transactions, including, among others, (i) executive officer or Directordirector compensation that has been approved by the Compensation and Talent Committee or the Board, and (ii) any contract, transaction or arrangement with any party who was not a related party at the time such contract, transaction or arrangement was entered into with the Company, and renewals or extensions thereof pursuant to contractual arrangements in effect and binding on the Company prior to the date that the party became a related party.

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

Transactions with Related Persons

During fiscal 2019,year 2022, we purchased products and/or services in the ordinary course in arms-length commercial transactions from the following companycompanies and/or one or more of its affiliated entities: NetApp, Inc. ($503,000); Citrix Systems, Inc. ($170,000);entities listed below. In addition, during fiscal year 2022, we sold products and Keysight Technologies, Inc. ($2,127,000). Mr. Wallace served onor services in the Boardordinary course in arms-length commercial transactions to the companies and/or one or more of Directors of NetApp;its affiliated entities listed below. Mr. Calderoni serves on the Board of Directors of Citrix Systems;Systems and Ansys; Ms. Myers is an executive officer of HP; Mr. Rango serves on the Board of Directors of Keysight Technologies.Technologies; and Mr. Peng was an executive officer of Xilinx and is an executive officer of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. None of the related persons has a material interest in any of the transactions referred to above.

Purchases

Sales

Ansys, Inc. ($525,000)

HP Inc. ($950,000)

Citrix Systems, Inc. ($272,000)

Keysight Technologies, Inc. ($1,359,000)

HP Inc. ($40,000)

Xilinx, Inc. ($1,000)

Keysight Technologies, Inc. ($240,000)

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. ($25,000)

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

 

69

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATIONLOGO Equity Compensation Plan

    Information

The following table provides information as of June 30, 20192022, with respect to shares of our Common Stock that may be issued under our existing equity compensation plans:

 

   Number of
Securities to be
Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and
Rights(1)

A
   Weighted-
Average Exercise
Price of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and
Rights(7)

B
   Number of
Securities
Remaining
Available for
Future Issuance
under Equity
Compensation
Plans (excluding
securities
reflected in
Column A)

C
 
  
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Stockholders(2)  2,436,467    $      —    13,453,227(3)(4)(5) 
  
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by
Stockholders(6)
  465,587    $54.00     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  

Total

  2,902,054    $54.00    13,453,227(3)(4)(5)(6) 

  (1)

Includes 2,902,054 sharesNumber of our Common Stock subject Securities
to RSUs that will entitle each holder to the issuancebe Issued Upon
Exercise of one share
Outstanding
Options, Warrants

and Rights(1)

Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of our Common Stock
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and
Rights(2)

Number of Securities
Remaining Available
for each unit that vests over the holder’s period of continued employment with the Company. Excludes purchase rights accruing Future Issuance
under our 1997 Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Purchase Plan”). Under the Purchase Plan, each eligible employee may purchase shares of Common Stock at each semi-annual purchase date (the last day of June and December each year), up to a maximum of $25,000 worth of stock (determined on the basis of the fair market value per share on the date the purchase right is granted) for each calendar year the purchase right remains outstanding. As of June 30, 2019, the date of the information set forthEquity
Compensation Plans
(excluding securities
reflected in the table above (and a date on which a purchase occurred under the Purchase Plan), the purchase price payable per share under the terms of the Purchase Plan was equal to eighty-five percent (85%) of the lower of (i) the closing selling price per share of our Common Stock on the first day of the

six-monthColumn A) offering period and (ii) the closing selling price per share of our Common Stock on the purchase date (or, if the purchase date is not a trading day, on the immediately preceding trading day).

  (2)ABC

Consists of our (a) 2004 Equity Plan and (b) Purchase Plan.Compensation Plans Approved by Stockholders(3)

1,572,586$—11,469,791(4)(5)(6)

Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Stockholders(6)

20,799$—

Total

1,593,385$—11,469,791(4)(5)(6)

(1) Includes 1,572,586 shares of our Common Stock subject to RSUs that will entitle each holder to the issuance of one share of our Common Stock for each unit that vests over the holder’s period of continued employment with the Company. Excludes purchase rights accruing under our 1997 Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Purchase Plan”). Under the Purchase Plan, each eligible employee may purchase shares of Common Stock at each semi-annual purchase date (the last day of June and December each year), up to a maximum of $25,000 worth of stock (determined on the basis of the fair market value per share on the date the purchase right is granted) for each calendar year the purchase right remains outstanding. As of June 30, 2022, the date of the information set forth in the table above (and a date on which a purchase occurred under the Purchase Plan), the purchase price payable per share under the terms of the Purchase Plan was equal to eighty-five percent (85%) of the lower of (i) the closing sales price per share of our Common Stock on the first day of the six-month offering period and (ii) the closing sales price per share of our Common Stock on the purchase date (or, if the purchase date is not a trading day, on the immediately preceding trading day).

(3)

Includes shares of our Common Stock available for future award as of June 30, 2019 under the 2004 Equity Plan (8,710,813 shares) and the Purchase Plan (1,840,360

(2) Consists of our (a) 2004 Equity Incentive Plan and (b) Purchase Plan.

(3) Includes shares of our Common Stock available for future grants of awards under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (9,242,005 shares) and the Purchase Plan (2,227,786 shares).

(4) As of June 30, 2022, 9,242,005 shares of our Common Stock were available for future award under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan. Shares reserved for award under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan may be issued pursuant to full value awards such as restricted stock awards or RSUs that vest upon the completion of designated service periods or performance units or PRSUs that vest upon the attainment of prescribed performance milestones (and the completion of designated service periods) and upon the exercise of stock options or stock appreciation rights. Shares issued pursuant to full value awards made under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (a) prior to November 6, 2014, reduce the share reserve available under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan by 1.8 shares for every one full value share issued; and (b) on or after November 6, 2014, reduce the share reserve available under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan by 2.0 shares for every one full value share issued.

(5) As of June 30, 2022 (after giving effect to the purchase of 280,594 shares of Common Stock under the Purchase Plan on or about that date), 2,227,786 shares of our Common Stock were reserved for issuance under the Purchase Plan. The Purchase Plan contains an annual automatic share renewal provision pursuant to which the number of shares of our Common Stock reserved for issuance under the Purchase Plan will automatically increase on the first day of each fiscal year by an amount equal to the lesser of 2,000,000 shares or the number of shares which we estimate will be required to be issued under the Purchase Plan during the forthcoming fiscal year.

(6) Includes shares subject to outstanding awards under the following three plans that the Company assumed in connection with its acquisition of Orbotech in February 2019: (i) Equity Remuneration Plan for Key Employees of Orbotech and its Affiliates and Subsidiaries (as Amended and Restated in 2005); (ii) 2010 Equity-Based Incentive Plan; and (iii) The Orbotech 2015 Equity-Based Incentive Plan (collectively, the “Orbotech Plans”). No future awards will be granted under these Orbotech Plans.

 

(4)

As of June 30, 2019, 11,612,867 shares of our Common Stock were available for future award under the 2004 Equity Plan. Shares reserved for award under the 2004 Equity Plan may be issued pursuant to full value awards such as restricted stock awards or RSUs that vest upon the completion of designated service periods or performance units or PRSUs that vest upon the attainment of prescribed performance milestones (and the completion of designated service periods) and upon the exercise of stock options or stock appreciation rights. Shares issued pursuant to full value awards made under the 2004 Equity Plan (a) prior to November 6, 2014 reduce the share reserve available under the 2004 Equity Plan by 1.8 shares for every one full value share issued; and (b) on or after November 6, 2014 reduce the share reserve available under the 2004 Equity Plan by 2.0 shares for every one full value share issued.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement

(5)

As of June 30, 2019 (after giving effect to the purchase under the Purchase Plan on or about that date), 1,840,360 shares of our Common Stock were reserved for issuance under the Purchase Plan. The Purchase Plan contains an annual automatic share renewal provision pursuant to which the number of shares of our Common Stock reserved for issuance under the Purchase Plan will automatically increase on the first day of each fiscal year by an amount equal to the lesser of 2,000,000 shares or the number of shares which we estimate will be required to be issued under the Purchase Plan during the forthcoming fiscal year.


(6)

Includes shares subject to outstanding awards as of June 30, 2019 under the following three plans assumed in connection with the acquisition of Orbotech in February 2019: (i) Equity Remuneration Plan for Key Employees of Orbotech and its Affiliates and Subsidiaries; (ii) 2010 Equity-Based Incentive Plan; and (iii) 2015 Equity-Based Incentive Plan (collectively, the “Orbotech Plans”). No future awards may be granted under these plans.

LOGO

(7)

Represents the weighted average exercise price per share for the 14,558 options to purchase our Common Stock assumed under the Orbotech Plans.

 

70  |Report of the Audit Committee

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEELOGO Report of the Audit Committee

KLA’s Audit Committee is comprised of Outside Directors, each of whom meets current standards of independence and the financial experience requirements of the NASDAQ Stock Market. Each of Messrs. Calderoni Dickson and Patel has served on the Audit Committee from the beginning of fiscal year 2019 through the date of this Proxy Statement, with Mr. Calderoni serving as the Chairman of the Audit Committee. David WangMessrs. Kennedy and Msses. HigashiRango and Pinczuk alsoMs. Myers have served on the Audit Committee for a portion ofsince fiscal year 2019.2020.

The Board has determined that each of Messrs. Calderoni, DicksonKennedy and Patel and Ms. Myers is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC. The Board has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee that details the responsibilities of the Audit Committee. This report relates to the activities undertaken by the Audit Committee in fulfilling such responsibilities. The charter is reviewed at least annually for changes, as appropriate, and is posted on KLA’s website athttp://ir.KLA.com in the Corporate Governance section.

KLA’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of internal controls and the financial reporting process. The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the Company’s auditing, accounting and financial reporting processes, system of internal controls, and legal and ethical compliance. This report relates to the activities undertaken by the Audit Committee in fulfilling such responsibilities. During fiscal year 20192022 and subsequent to the completion of the fiscal year, the Audit Committee reviewed, discussed and provided input to management on the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019.2022. The Audit Committee also met routinely with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, with and without members of the Company’s management team present, to evaluate and approve the Company’s internal controls and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting. The Audit Committee also met with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer to discuss and act, as necessary, on accounting issues and risks facing the Company.

The Audit Committee also discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 1301.the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”) and the SEC.

The Audit Committee received from the independent registered public accounting firm the written disclosures and the letter required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence. In addition, on a quarterly basis, the members of the Audit Committee discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm their independence, and the independent registered public accounting firm reaffirmed the independence of the Audit Committee members.its own independence. After reviewing such information, the Audit Committee determined that the independent registered public accounting firm is independent from management and KLA. The Audit Committee also concluded that the provision of services covered by fees paid to the independent registered public accounting firm was compatible with maintaining their independence.

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board approved, the inclusion of the audited financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019,2022, filed with the SEC on August 16, 2019.5, 2022.

MEMBERS OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

Robert Calderoni, Chairman

John DicksonKevin Kennedy

Marie Myers

Kiran Patel

Ana PinczukRobert Rango

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

71

LOGO Proposal Four: Stockholder

    Proposal for a Report on

    Net Zero Targets and

    Climate Transition Planning

A stockholder has informed us that they intend to present the proposal set forth below at our Annual Meeting. The name and address of the stockholder and the number of the Company’s securities that the stockholder owns will be provided to stockholders promptly upon request.

In accordance with SEC rules, we have set forth below the stockholder proposal, along with the supporting statement of the stockholder proponent, for which we and our Board accept no responsibility. The stockholder proposal is required to be voted upon at our Annual Meeting only if properly presented at our Annual Meeting. As explained below, our Board recommends that you vote “AGAINST” the stockholder proposal.

NET ZERO TARGETS AND CLIMATE TRANSITION PLANNING

WHEREAS: The increasing rate and number of climate related disasters affecting society is causing alarms to be raised globally, making the corporate sector’s contribution to climate mitigation a significant policy issue.

In addition to environmental and social harms, climate change is creating systemic risks to the economy. The latest IPCC publication states that the window for limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees, and thereby avoiding the most catastrophic impacts of climate change, is quickly narrowing and that immediate, sharp emissions reduction is required of all market sectors and industries.1

Shareholders are increasingly concerned about the growing material climate risk to their companies and to their portfolios. In response, the Climate Action 100+ initiative, a coalition of more than 700 investors with over $68 trillion in assets, issued a Net Zero Benchmark (Benchmark) outlining metrics that create climate accountability for companies and transparency for shareholders. Indicators 1 through 5 of the Benchmark seek reporting on companies’ net zero emissions ambition; short, medium and long term greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions goals; and strategic actions planned to achieve decarbonization targets.2

KLA Corporation is a leading provider of technological systems for the semiconductor and nanoelectronics industries. Our company discloses its GHG emissions and has committed to achieve 100% renewable electricity for its operations.3 It is undertaking certain other energy initiatives, such as using efficient lighting and resource efficient manufacturing processes. While these are important first steps, more than 99% of KLA emissions is related to its supply chain, which the company’s renewable electricity goals and other initiatives do not address.

Further, KLA Corporation has not set GHG reduction targets. By setting 1.5 degree, Paris-aligned GHG reduction targets for its Scope 1-3 emissions, disclosing a net zero climate transition plan, and demonstrating progress toward achieving these goals, KLA can provide investors with assurance that management is reducing its climate contribution and addressing the risks and opportunities associated with climate change.

1 https://report.ipcc.ch/ar6wg3/pdf/IPCC_AR6_WGIII_FinalDraft_FullReport.pdf

2https://www.climateaction100.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Climate-Action-100-Benchmark-Indicators-FINAL-3.12.pdf

3 https://www.kla.com/documents/2021/KLA_2019-2020 Global Impact Report_Final.pdf

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

 

72  |Proposal Four: Stockholder Proposal for a Report on Net Zero Targets and Climate Transition Planning

RESOLVED: Shareholders request the Board issue a report, at reasonable expense and excluding confidential information, disclosing how the Company intends to reduce its GHG emissions in alignment with the Paris Agreement’s 1.5 degree goal requiring net zero emissions by 2050.

SUPPORTING STATEMENT: Proponents suggest, at Board and Company discretion, that KLA Corporation report:

    LOGO   A timeline for setting a net zero GHG reduction target, and 1.5 degree aligned interim goals;

    LOGO   An enterprise-wide climate transition plan to achieve net zero emissions;

    LOGO   Annual progress towards meeting its emissions reduction goals;

    LOGO   Other information the Board deems appropriate.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION TO PROPOSAL FOUR

After careful consideration, the Board recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal, as we believe that its prescriptive approach is not in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders at this time, particularly in light of the actions KLA is already taking to address climate change and sustainability.

KLA is guided by certain core values, including our “drive to be better” and our commitment to being “honest, forthright, and consistent.” We recognize the importance of addressing climate change, and we have taken a number of steps on our journey towards creating a more sustainable future for our company. However, we believe that we should approach addressing the challenges posed to our business by climate change in a responsible way, rooted in data and realistic expectations.

Over the past several years, KLA has taken several actions to improve our understanding and management of climate-related matters, as well as our commitment to addressing them. In 2020, we expanded our greenhouse gas emissions inventory across Scope 1, 2, and 3 GHG emissions, and we have continued to refine our methodologies and expand our datasets to improve its accuracy. In 2021, we announced a goal to use 100% renewable electricity across our global operations by 2030. And in 2022, we announced a goal of achieving net zero Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 2050 (with an interim target of a 50% reduction in Scope 1 and 2 emissions from our 2021 baseline by 2030) and secured a sustainability-linked credit facility related to our renewable energy and GHG emissions reduction initiatives.

We recognize that the work to create a more sustainable future is ongoing. That is why we conduct research on more efficient production methods and have introduced several new products aimed at supporting the production of advanced electronics for the energy transition, such as the automotive semiconductors needed for electric vehicles. We are also assessing opportunities to work with KLA’s suppliers and to improve the energy efficiency of various products to help inform our approach to the Scope 3 portion of our GHG emissions. Such engagements and assessments take time, and we currently plan to provide an update on this process by the end of 2023.

While we are committed to furthering our sustainability efforts, our core values guide how we approach fulfilling that commitment. As such, we believe it would be irresponsible to commit to the proponent’s requested actions before completing the necessary foundational steps, many of which were underway before we received the proponent’s proposal. As such, we do not believe it is in the Company’s or our stockholders’ best interests to commit to the actions in the proposal at this time, and we recommend a vote against the proposal.

VOTE REQUIRED AND RECOMMENDATION

If a quorum is present, the affirmative vote of the majority of votes cast is needed to approve Proposal Four.

LOGO

For the reasons detailed above, the Board unanimously believes that this proposal is not in the best interests of KLA or our stockholders and recommends that you vote “AGAINST” Proposal Four.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

73

INFORMATION FORLOGO Questions and Answers

PROXY MATERIALS

1. Why Am I Receiving Copies of These Materials?

The Board of KLA ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERSis providing these proxy materials to you in connection with KLA’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Wednesday, November 2, 2022, at 12:00 p.m. PDT (the “Annual Meeting”). As a stockholder, you are invited to attend the Annual Meeting, which will be held in the Plus Building of our Milpitas headquarters, located at One Technology Drive, Milpitas, California 95035. The purposes of the Annual Meeting are set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and this Proxy Statement.

These proxy solicitation materials, together with our Annual Report for fiscal year 2022, were first made available electronically and mailed to those stockholders requesting hard copies on or about September 22, 2022 to all stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Our principal executive offices are located at One Technology Drive, Milpitas, California 95035, and our telephone number is (408) 875-3000.

2. How May I Obtain KLA’s Annual Report on Form 10-K?

NOVEMBER 5, 2019A copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2022 is available free of charge on the Internet from the website of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) at http://www.sec.gov, as well as on our website at http://ir.KLA.com.

3. Why Did I Receive a Notice in the Mail Regarding the Internet Availability of the Proxy Materials Instead of a Paper Copy of the Proxy Materials?

We are again mailing to our stockholders a notice regarding the Internet availability of the proxy materials instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials. All stockholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials over the Internet and request to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request a paper copy may be found in the notice. In addition, the notice contains instructions on how you may request access to proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically on an ongoing basis.

4. How Can I Access the Proxy Materials Over the Internet?

Your notice regarding the Internet availability of the proxy materials, proxy card or voting instruction card will contain instructions on how to:

    LOGO   Access and view our proxy materials for the Annual Meeting on the Internet; and

    LOGO   Instruct us to send our future proxy materials to you electronically by e-mail.

Our proxy materials are also available on our website at the following address: http://ir.kla.com/financial-information/annual-reports.

Your notice regarding the Internet availability of the proxy materials, proxy card or voting instruction card will contain instructions on how you may request access to proxy materials electronically on an ongoing basis. Choosing to access your future proxy materials electronically will help us conserve natural resources and reduce the costs of printing and distributing our proxy materials. If you choose to access future proxy materials electronically, you will receive an e-mail with instructions containing a link to the website where those materials are available and a link to the proxy voting website. Your election to access proxy materials by e-mail will remain in effect until you terminate it.

5. How May I Obtain a Paper Copy of the Proxy Materials?

Stockholders receiving a notice regarding the Internet availability of the proxy materials will find instructions in that notice about how to obtain a paper copy of the proxy materials free of charge. Stockholders who have previously submitted a standing request to receive paper copies of our proxy materials will receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement

12:00


LOGO

74  |Questions and Answers

6. I Received One Copy of These Materials. May I Get Additional Copies?

Certain stockholders who share an address are being delivered only one copy of our annual report, proxy statement, or notice of Internet availability, as applicable. You may receive additional copies of our annual report, proxy statement, or notice of Internet availability without charge by sending a written request to KLA Corporation, Attention: Investor Relations, One Technology Drive, Milpitas, California 95035. Requests may also be made by calling our Investor Relations department at (408) 875-3000.

7. How Can Stockholders Sharing an Address Request That Only a Single Copy of the Proxy Materials Be Delivered?

Stockholders sharing an address may request delivery of a single copy of our future proxy statements, annual reports or notices regarding the Internet availability of the proxy materials, as applicable, by writing to the address provided in the answer to Question 6 above or by calling our Investor Relations department at the telephone number below. Stockholders may also request electronic delivery of future proxy statements by writing to the address above, by calling our Investor Relations department at (408) 875-3000 or via our website at http://ir.KLA.com.

THE ANNUAL MEETING

8. Who May Vote at the Annual Meeting?

You may vote at the Annual Meeting if our records showed that you owned shares of KLA Common Stock as of the close of business on the Record Date. At the close of business on the Record Date, we had a total of 141,807,816 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding, which were held of record by approximately 404 stockholders. As of the Record Date, we had no shares of Preferred Stock outstanding. You are entitled to one vote for each share that you own.

The Annual Meeting will be held if a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote is represented at the Annual Meeting. If you have returned valid proxy instructions or attend the Annual Meeting in person, your shares of Common Stock will be counted for the purpose of determining whether there is a quorum, even if you wish to abstain from voting on some or all matters at the Annual Meeting.

9. What Proposals are Being Voted on at the Annual Meeting?

In addition to such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof, the following four proposals are expected to be presented at the Annual Meeting:

    LOGO   Election of ten candidates nominated by our Board to serve as directors for one-year terms;
    LOGO   Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023;
    LOGO   Non-binding, advisory approval of our named executive officer compensation; and
    LOGO   Consideration of a stockholder proposal requesting our Board to issue a report regarding net zero targets and climate transition planning, if properly presented at the meeting.

PROXY SOLICITATION AND VOTING

10. How Can I Vote if I Own Shares Registered Directly in My Name?

Most stockholders do not own shares registered directly in their name, but rather are “beneficial holders” of shares held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee (that is, shares held “in street name”). Those stockholders should refer to Question 11 below for instructions regarding how to vote their shares.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

75

If, however, your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, you are considered, with respect to those shares, the stockholder of record. You may vote in the following ways:

    LOGO   By Telephone: Votes may be cast by telephone prior to 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on November 1, 2022. To vote by telephone, you will need the control number that appears on your notice regarding the Internet availability of the proxy materials (whether you received that notice by mail or e-mail) or your proxy card;
    LOGO   By Internet: Votes may be cast through the Internet voting site prior to 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on November 1, 2022. To vote through the Internet, please follow the instructions for Internet voting contained in your notice regarding the Internet availability of the proxy materials (whether you received that notice by mail or e-mail) or your proxy card;
    LOGO   By Mail: Stockholders who have received a paper copy of a proxy card by mail may also vote by mail, as long as the proxy card is timely delivered. To vote by mail, you must complete, sign and date your proxy card and mail it in the accompanying pre-addressed envelope, and it must be delivered prior to 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on November 1, 2022; or
    LOGO   In Person: Attend the Annual Meeting and vote your shares in person.

The shares represented by properly returned proxies will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions of the stockholder. However, if no specific instructions are given, the shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of our Board and as the proxy holders may determine in their discretion with respect to any other matters that properly come before the Annual Meeting.

11. How May I Vote if My Shares are Held in a Stock Brokerage Account, or by a Bank or Other Nominee?

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held “in street name,” and your broker, bank or other nominee is considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares. Your broker, bank or other nominee should be forwarding these proxy materials to you. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote, and you are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting. However, since you are not the stockholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee. If a broker, bank or other nominee holds your shares, you will receive instructions from them that you must follow to have your shares voted.

12. Can I Revoke or Change My Vote?

You may revoke or change your vote at any time prior to the vote at the Annual Meeting. To revoke or change your proxy instructions if you are a stockholder of record, you must:

    LOGO   Advise our Corporate Secretary in writing at our principal executive offices, before the proxy holders vote your shares, that you wish to revoke your proxy instructions; or
    LOGO   Deliver proxy instructions dated after your earlier proxy instructions, in any of the voting methods described in the response to Question 10 above.

If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, you should contact the broker, bank or other nominee that holds your shares for instructions regarding how to revoke or change your vote.

13. Who Will Bear the Cost of This Proxy Solicitation?

KLA is making this proxy solicitation, and we will pay the entire cost of this solicitation, including preparing, assembling, printing, mailing and distributing the notices and these proxy materials and soliciting votes. We have retained the services of D.F. King & Co., local timeInc. to aid in the solicitation of proxies from brokers, banks or other nominees and other institutional owners. We estimate that we will pay D.F. King fees of approximately $6,000 (plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses) for the solicitation activities, forwarding solicitation material to beneficial and registered stockholders and processing the results. Certain of our directors, officers and regular employees, without additional compensation, may solicit proxies personally or by telephone.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

76  |Questions and Answers

14. Can My Broker Vote My Shares if I Do Not Instruct Him or Her How I Would Like My Shares Voted?

Yes, but only on limited types of proposals. If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the “beneficial” owner of shares held “in street name,” and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your broker, bank or other nominee along with a voting instruction card. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote your shares, and your broker, bank or other nominee is required to vote your shares in accordance with your instructions.

A broker, bank or other nominee is entitled to vote shares held for a beneficial owner on routine matters, such as the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, without instructions from the beneficial owner of those shares. However, brokers, banks or other nominees do not have discretion to vote your shares on Proposal One, Proposal Three or Proposal Four, in each case in the absence of specific instructions from you (the beneficial owner). Therefore, if you do not give instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee, the broker, bank or other nominee will only be entitled to vote your shares in its discretion on Proposal Two. Broker non-votes occur when shares held in “street name” for a beneficial owner are voted on at least one proposal at a meeting but are not voted with respect to other proposals because the broker, bank or other nominee (1) has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner and (2) lacks discretionary voting power to vote those shares.

15. Are Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes Counted?

Shares that are voted “FOR,” “AGAINST,” or “ABSTAIN” are treated as being present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum, and broker non-votes also count for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present.

Proposals One through Four each require a majority of the votes cast to be approved.

For each proposal, you may vote your shares “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN.” Shares that are voted without giving specific voting instructions will be voted as described in the answer to Question 10. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered votes cast and will have no effect on the outcome of Proposals One through Four.

Proposals Two through Four are non-binding advisory votes, for which our Board and its committees will give careful consideration to the voting results.

16. How Does the Board Recommend That I Vote?

The Board recommends that stockholders vote as follows:

    LOGO   “FOR” the election of the ten candidates nominated by the Board to serve as directors: Robert Calderoni, Jeneanne Hanley, Emiko Higashi, Kevin Kennedy, Gary Moore, Marie Myers, Kiran Patel, Victor Peng, Robert Rango and Richard Wallace;
    LOGO   “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023;
    LOGO   “FOR” the approval of our named executive officer compensation; and
    LOGO   “AGAINST”the stockholder proposal requesting our Board to issue a report regarding net zero targets and climate transition planning, if properly presented at the meeting.

17. Will Any Other Business Be Transacted at the Annual Meeting?

We are not aware of any matters to be presented other than those described in this Proxy Statement. In the unlikely event that any matters not described in this Proxy Statement are properly presented at the Annual Meeting, the proxy holders will use their own judgment to determine how to vote.

18. What Happens if the Annual Meeting is Adjourned or Postponed?

If the Annual Meeting is adjourned or postponed, the proxy holders can vote your shares on the new meeting date as well, unless you have properly revoked your proxy instructions.

19. Where Can I Find the Voting Results of the Annual Meeting?

We intend to announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and publish final results in a Current Report on Form 8-K to be filed with the SEC within four business days following the Annual Meeting.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

77

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS, DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS BY STOCKHOLDERS AND RELATED BYLAW PROVISIONS

20. Can I Present Other Business to Be Transacted from the Floor at the Annual Meeting?

A stockholder may only present a matter from the floor of a meeting of stockholders for consideration at that meeting if certain procedures set forth in our bylaws are followed, including delivery of advance notice by such stockholder to us. We have not received any timely notice with respect to the Annual Meeting regarding the presentation by a stockholder of business from the floor of the meeting, other than the business set forth in Proposal Four. Accordingly, we do not expect to acknowledge any other business presented from the floor at the Annual Meeting.

21. What is the Deadline to Propose Actions for Consideration at Next Year’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders?

You may submit proposals for consideration at future stockholder meetings. For a stockholder proposal to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement for next year’s annual meeting of stockholders, our Corporate Secretary must receive the written proposal at our principal executive offices no later than May 25, 2023. Such proposals also must comply with SEC regulations under Rule 14a-8 regarding the inclusion of stockholder proposals in company-sponsored proxy materials. Proposals should be addressed to:

Corporate Secretary

KLA Milpitas FacilityCorporation

Building Three

ThreeOne Technology Drive

Milpitas, California 95035

Fax: (408) 875-4266

For a stockholder proposal that is not intended to be included in our proxy statement under Rule 14a-8, the stockholder must provide the information required by our bylaws and give timely notice to our Corporate Secretary in accordance with our bylaws, which, in general, require that the notice be received by our Corporate Secretary:

    LOGO   No earlier than the close of business on July 5, 2023, and

    LOGO   No later than the close of business on August 4, 2023.

If the date of the stockholders’ meeting is moved more than 30 days before or 60 days after November 2, 2023, then notice of a stockholder proposal that is not intended to be included in our proxy statement under Rule 14a-8 must be received no earlier than the close of business 120 days prior to the meeting and no later than the close of business on the later of the following two dates:

    LOGO   90 days prior to the meeting; and

    LOGO   10 days after public announcement of the meeting date.

In addition to satisfying the requirements under our bylaws, to comply with the universal proxy rules, stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees must provide notice to the Company that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act no later than September 3, 2023.

22. How May I Recommend or Nominate Individuals to Serve as Directors?

You may propose director candidates for consideration by the Board’s Nominating and Governance Committee. Any such recommendations should include the nominee’s name and qualifications for Board membership and should be directed to our Corporate Secretary at the address of our principal executive offices set forth in Question 21 above.

In addition, our bylaws permit stockholders to nominate directors for election at an annual meeting of stockholders. To nominate a director, the stockholder must deliver the information required by our bylaws and a statement by the nominee acknowledging that he or she will owe a fiduciary obligation to KLA and its stockholders.

23. What is the Deadline to Propose or Nominate Individuals to Serve as Directors?

A stockholder may send a proposed director candidate’s name and information to the Board at any time. Generally, such proposed candidates are considered at the first or second Nominating and Governance Committee meeting prior to the annual meeting of stockholders.

 

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

78  |Questions and Answers

To nominate an individual for election at an annual meeting of stockholders, the stockholder must give timely notice to our Corporate Secretary in accordance with our bylaws which, for next year’s annual meeting of stockholders, will generally require that the notice be received by our Corporate Secretary between the close of business on July 5, 2023, and the close of business on August 4, 2023, unless the annual meeting is moved by more than 30 days before or 60 days after November 2, 2023, in which case the deadline will be as described in the last paragraph of Question 21 above.

24. How May I Obtain a Copy of KLA’s Bylaws?

For a free copy of our bylaws, please contact our Investor Relations department at (408) 875-3000. A copy of our bylaws is also available free of charge on the Internet on our website at http://ir.KLA.com and on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.

LOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO

79

LOGO Information for KLA Annual

    Meeting of Stockholders on

    November 2, 2022, 12:00 p.m.     PDT

KLA Milpitas Headquarters

Plus Building

One Technology Drive

Milpitas, California 95035

Directions to KLA’s Milpitas Facility

Headquarters

From Highway 237 Heading East:

Exit at McCarthy Boulevard. At the stop light, turn right onto McCarthy Boulevard. At the next intersection, turn right onto Technology Drive. KLA is on the right side.

From Highway 237 Heading West:

Exit at McCarthy Boulevard. At the stop light, turn left onto McCarthy Boulevard (this will take you back over the freeway). At the next intersection, turn right onto Technology Drive. KLA is on the right side.

 

LOGOLOGO  | 2022 Proxy Statement


LOGO        LOGO

 

Your vote matters – here’s how to vote!
You may vote online or by phone instead of mailing this card.
LOGO

Votes submitted electronically must be

received by 11:59 PM, Eastern Time, on

November 1, 2022.

Online
Go to www.envisionreports.com/klac
or scan the QR code — login details are
located in the shaded bar below.
LOGO

Phone

Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within

the USA, US territories and Canada

LOGO

Save paper, time and money!

Sign up for electronic delivery at

www.envisionreports.com/klac

Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example.

Please do not write outside the designated areas.

LOGO

01—Edward Barnholt 04—Emiko Higashi 07—Kiran Patel 02—Robert Calderoni 05—Kevin Kennedy 08—Victor Peng 03—Jeneanne Hanley 06—Gary Moore 09—Robert Rango For Against Abstain For Against Abstain For Against Abstain 1 U P X 10—Richard Wallace Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. 034F1C + + Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each of the Director Nominees (Proposal A 1) and a vote FOR Proposals 2 and 3. 2. Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2020. 3. Approval on anon-binding, advisory basis of our named executive officer compensation. 1. To elect as Directors the ten candidates nominated by the Company’s Board of Directors to each serve for aone-year term, until his or her successor is duly elected. For Against Abstain qIF

LOGO

LOGO  IF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.q Annual Meeting Proxy Card For Against Abstain ENVELOPE.LOGO

 A 

ProposalsThe Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each of the Director Nominees (Proposal 1), a vote FOR Proposals 2 and 3 and a vote AGAINST Proposal 4.+

1.

To elect the ten candidates nominated by our Board of Directors to serve as directors for one-year terms, each until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified.

ForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstain

01 – Robert Calderoni

02 – Jeneanne Hanley03 – Emiko Higashi

04 – Kevin Kennedy

05 – Gary Moore06 – Marie Myers

07 – Kiran Patel

08 – Victor Peng09 – Robert Rango

10 – Richard Wallace

ForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstain

2. To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023.

3. To approve on a non-binding, advisory basis our named executive officer compensation.

4. To consider a stockholder proposal requesting our Board to issue a report regarding net zero targets and climate transition planning, if properly presented at the meeting.

In their discretion, the proxy holders are authorized to vote on all such matters as may properly come before the meeting or at any adjournment thereof.

 B Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to count. Please date and sign below.

Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. B Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to count. Please date and sign below. In their discretion, the proxy holders are authorized to vote on all such matters as may properly come before the meeting or at any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below.

Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box.

Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.

//

    1 U P X+
030U2D


LOGOKLA Corporation’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held on

November 2, 2022, 12:00 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time, in the Plus Building of our Milpitas headquarters, located at

One Technology Drive, Milpitas, California 95035.

 

LOGO

Small steps make an impact.

LOGO

Help the environment by consenting to receive electronic

delivery, sign up at www.envisionreports.com/klac

LOGO  IF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.LOGO

 Proxy — KLA CORPORATION+

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders Three Technology Drive Milpitas, CA 95035

Proxy Solicited by Board of Directors for Annual Meeting — November 5, 2019 2, 2022

To the Stockholders:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of KLA Corporation (the “Company”), a Delaware corporation, will be held on Tuesday,Wednesday, November 5, 20192, 2022 at 12:00 p.m., local time, in Building Three of the Company’s Milpitas facility, located at Three Technology Drive, Milpitas, CA 95035, for the purposes stated on the reverse side. Pacific Daylight Time.

The undersigned hereby appoints Mary Beth Wilkinson and Bren D. Higgins, and Teri A. Little, or either of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint hisher or herhis substitute, and hereby authorizes them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side, all of the shares of Common Stock of the Company that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders or at any adjournment or postponement thereof.

THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED BY THE UNDERSIGNED STOCKHOLDER. IF NO SUCH DIRECTIONS ARE MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES LISTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, AND FOR PROPOSALS 2 AND 3. 3, AND AGAINST PROPOSAL 4.

PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED REPLY ENVELOPE.

CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON THE REVERSE SIDE Proxy

 C Non-Voting Items

Change of AddressKLA CORPORATION qIF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.qPlease print new address below.

IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A - C ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD.